Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship bestowed on illegals offspring

[1srelluc]

What will SCOTUS be ruling on that will effect the 14th amendment?

If it was just meant for slaves or not.

 

[Unkotare]

Birthright citizenship was clearly intended to insure the rights of slave offspring, not illegal aliens. Trump MUST END this madness.

Not gonna happen.

 

[g5000]

.
Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE

And, as expressed under existing statutory law see: A. General Requirements for Acquisition of Citizenship at Birth
In general, a person born outside of the United States may acquire citizenship at birth if all of the following requirements are met at the time of the person’s birth:

The person is a child[2] of a U.S. citizen parent(s);

The U.S. citizen parent meets certain residence or physical presence requirements in the United States or an outlying possession before the person’s birth in accordance with the applicable provision;[3] and

The person meets all other applicable requirements under either INA 301 or INA 309.

.
Considering the current recognition of birthright citizenship granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national is nothing more than unwritten “policy”, President Trump has a number of options to put an end to birthright citizenship being recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship…

YES! Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

The authors of the 14th Amendment made it very clear what they meant by birthright citizenship. We've gone over this dozens of times. You're late to the game.

You lose.

 

[Unkotare]

Anchor premature babies often cost much more than $200K in medical care.

There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

 

[d0gbreath]

If it was just meant for slaves or not.

Oh OK. It's a pretty simple couple of sentences.

 

[1srelluc]

Oh OK. It's a pretty simple couple of sentences.

Yeah, but some people have a lot of trouble with "shall not be infringed" too.

 

[lafayette]

What will SCOTUS be ruling on that will effect the 14th amendment?

Nothing. There is no standing by anybody to challenge the amendment.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Birthright citizenship was clearly intended to insure the rights of slave offspring, not illegal aliens. Trump MUST END this madness.

The people who wrote and voted for this abomination knew exactly what they were unleashing upon America. The only way to fix this mess is by constitutional amendment.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Birthright citizenship was clearly intended to insure the rights of slave offspring, not illegal aliens. Trump MUST END this madness.

Based on what?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It wasn't the intent of the amendment. People are using it as a loophole. We're gonna close that loophole

What was the intent of the amendment?

 

[Unkotare]

The people who wrote and voted for this abomination knew exactly what they were unleashing upon America. The only way to fix this mess is by constitutional amendment.

Good luck with that.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The authors of the 14th Amendment made it very clear what they meant by birthright citizenship. We've gone over this dozens of times. You're late to the game.

You lose.

Apply that same statement to the authors of the second amendment.

 

[para bellum]

What was the intent of the amendment?

Section 1?

To set aside the Dred Scott decision and confer citizenship on freed slaves.

 

[MarathonMike]

Based on what?

Based on Constitutional INTENT. The INTENT of the 14th Amendment is obvious to any 5th grader with a basic knowledge of American history.

 

[Mac-7]

There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

Why, because it offends your sensitive ears?

The scam is that an illegal alien has a child that automatically becomes a US citizen

Then libs raise a fuss against deporting the illegal alien mother of the child

That sounds like an anchor baby to me

 

[Unkotare]

Why, because it offends your sensitive ears?
...

Because there is no "anchoring" taking place.

 

[Unkotare]

...

The scam is that an illegal alien has a child that automatically becomes a US citizen

...

There is no "becomes." Anyone born in the US IS a US citizen from the get-go.

 

[Unkotare]

...

Then libs raise a fuss against deporting the illegal alien mother of the child

...

Who cares? "A fuss" doesn't change anyone's immigration status.

 

[Moonglow]

.
Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE

And, as expressed under existing statutory law see: A. General Requirements for Acquisition of Citizenship at Birth
In general, a person born outside of the United States may acquire citizenship at birth if all of the following requirements are met at the time of the person’s birth:

The person is a child[2] of a U.S. citizen parent(s);

The U.S. citizen parent meets certain residence or physical presence requirements in the United States or an outlying possession before the person’s birth in accordance with the applicable provision;[3] and

The person meets all other applicable requirements under either INA 301 or INA 309.

.
Considering the current recognition of birthright citizenship granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national is nothing more than unwritten “policy”, President Trump has a number of options to put an end to birthright citizenship being recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship…

YES! Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

You can't name any of the ways.

 

[Moonglow]

Watching Donald amend The Constitution all by himself should be a h00t!

He'll use his Sharpie.