Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 27,391
- 10,186
- 465
Yep, a complete dickhead. I get itYes yes very much so
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, a complete dickhead. I get itYes yes very much so
That is literally just a blog of delusions a TDS leftist has. Same kind of things we have heard a thousand times over in the past ten years.‘Just before Christmas, Donald Trump and his sidekick Elon Musk were so eager for Trump to start acting like an ineffective lame duck president that they blundered into a debacle over a temporary spending bill, thereby positioning Democrats to exploit GOP plans to cut essential government programs.
The failed Trump and Musk show of “power” had no material impact on government spending and “succeeded” only in cutting funding for pediatric cancer research and nixing efforts to cut back on junk fees. (The cancer research spending was later revived by the Senate.) But the fiasco revealed the mendaciousness of Republicans’ supposed goal of increasing government “efficiency,” while confirming Trump/Musk’s actual plan to remake the federal government — not to make it spend less, but to make it provide less to those with less, and more to those with a lot.
The show of non-force began on the morning of December 18 with Musk, clearly unilaterally, unleashing a wave of uninformed tweets attacking a continuing budget resolution bill that it was wholly in Trump’s interest to pass without much fanfare.
The bill’s primary purpose was to continue government funding at current levels until March, when the GOP will have majorities in both houses of Congress and Trump will be in the White House (or on the golf course, as the case may be). But for calendar-related reasons, the spending bill also had to include aid both for large farmers (a key GOP constituency) and disaster assistance. And so Democrats and Republicans also negotiated the inclusion of some fiscally insignificant additional items, such as funding for childhood cancer research.
Musk had apparently glanced at some entirely predictable far right social media sniping about the bill, which he was inclined to repeat and amplify, particularly the false and misleading parts. He had self-interested reasons for making a stink. His business interests are tightly aligned with the Communist Party of China, given Tesla’s massive investments in that country, so he had cause to object to provisions intended to limit the transfer of technology to China.’
![]()
‘Businessmen’ are incapable of sound, responsible governance – Trump and Musk are proof of that.
Don’t be so hard on yourselfYep, a complete dickhead. I get it
Trump has 2 years until he loses the house and probably the senate. he will spend most of that time dealing with the Mike Johnson debacle.'Side Kick.' You are so cute. Boy how Trump must be grinding your coffee!
It is going to be so L-O-N-G a four years for you.
Trump won, you lost, Bozo.
Even if that is true, Trump is the president for 4-years, and the democrat brand is a disaster.Trump has 2 years until he loses the house and probably the senate. he will spend most of that time dealing with the Mike Johnson debacle.
DC is only about "spin" and gaining political power, not about governing, just ask Joe Manchin.Scary to see people preferring the gov being run on party hate,
as opposed to demanding an honest effort towards some measure of balance & unity.