Correct, he got the information negligance of the IRS.The contractor's employee got the information from the access the government gave to the contractor. The Contractor gave access to Littlejohn.
Government employees were not involved.
Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct, he got the information negligance of the IRS.The contractor's employee got the information from the access the government gave to the contractor. The Contractor gave access to Littlejohn.
Government employees were not involved.
Don't they have newspapers where you live.That's more oversight then they have now, the current Settlement Fund, only the DOJ, ultimately the AG, makes the decision.
That's your opinion, but the others say it starts from when the IRS discloused it to Trump.....in 2024That's not what the statute says. The date Trump filed, was two years from when Littlejohn was sencenced
Jan 29, 2024 — A former IRS contractor was sentenced today to five years in prison for disclosing thousands of tax returns without authorization
Trump knew, or should have known when the conviction was announced.
Littlejohn pleaded guilty in October 2023 to unauthorized disclosure of tax returns and return information.
The 2 year SOL ran from when the culprit was found guilty.
hopefully? why are you ok with people's rights being violated by the Govt? or anyone for that matter?Hopefully, the judge will vacate the settlement for being made in bad faith and then dismiss the case based on the statute of limitations being past.
That's not when Trump was notified by the IRSLittlejohn was convicted in October 2023. That's when Trump had absolutely proof of who and how his tax returns were released.
That's the absolute latest to start the SOL clock.
They settled a lawsuit that was about to be thrown out of court, for multiple reasons. Standing, statute of limitations, wrong plaintiff. The case had so many flaws, and jailhouse lawyer could get it thrown out.no, they settled out of Court, like what happens in the VAST majority of all civil cases...only about 1-3 percent of all civil cases actually go to trial in the United States.
Why would this case be the rare exception?
They do.Don't they have newspapers where you live.
The illegal settlement Blanche made said there would be a six member board. He would personally pick 5 of them, and congress could pick number six.
So the guy who made the deal, gave himself 80% representation.
there is zero evidence it was about to be thrown out of court, in fact the Court granted the Plantiffs more time to respond and was aware there was settlement discussionThey settled a lawsuit that was about to be thrown out of court, for multiple reasons. Standing, statute of limitations, wrong plaintiff. The case had so many flaws, and jailhouse lawyer could get it thrown out.
Trump is such a bad President.Correct, he got the information negligance of the IRS.
Thanks
The cases that don't go to trial go through DISCOVERY, which is when a settlement might be offered.no, they settled out of Court, like what happens in the VAST majority of all civil cases...only about 1-3 percent of all civil cases actually go to trial in the United States.
Why would this case be the rare exception?
It's not negligence to give government contractors access to government information in order to fulfil the contract.Correct, he got the information negligance of the IRS.
Thanks
He was notified by the federal courts.That's not when Trump was notified by the IRS
He's flip-flopped on that and continues to seek paying off Trump's Traitors for abandoning them the week after January 6th.![]()
Trump to abandon $1.776 billion compensation fund amid bipartisan backlash, source says
The president was left with a choice: Keep fighting an uphill battle or back down from a fight he was likely to lose. He apparently went with the latter.www.ms.now
Too much heat from his own party, so he ran away.
The judge was 2 days away from throwing out the case, when the case was withdrawn.there is zero evidence it was about to be thrown out of court, in fact the Court granted the Plantiffs more time to respond and was aware there was settlement discussion
why do you lie?
Are you suggesting the parties didn't share information? Any link to that?The cases that don't go to trial go through DISCOVERY, which is when a settlement might be offered.
It's like a poker game where both sides ante up $100. And before a single card is delt, one side settles by just giving the other side $20
link to the judge saying that....i'll waitThe judge was 2 days away from throwing out the case, when the case was withdrawn.
He wasn't party to the case, so why would the Federal Court give him notice? Stop lyingHe was notified by the federal courts.
it is when you give it to someone who's entire purpose in getting them is to leak them, illegallyIt's not negligence to give government contractors access to government information in order to fulfil the contract.
The negligence was on the part of the contractor, who is responsible for the employees they assigned to the IRS.
And the DOJ's illegal call, was like my analogy of a poker game, where the DOJ gave up before a single card was delt.Currently, under US Law, the Settlement Fund, the larger one that exist and has since the 50s, only the DOJ makes the call on what to settle, when, and how much
Any victim of govt abuse can still file suit, and get a settlement from the Settlement fund that has been in existance since the 1950s.He's flip-flopped on that and continues to seek paying off Trump's Traitors for abandoning them the week after January 6th.
The idea of paying Capitol riot defendants long predates last month’s announcement that the Department of Justice was setting up a $1.8 billion slush fund largely for that purpose. And the push for payback continues.![]()
Dropping The 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' Doesn't Mean Trump Admin Won't Pay Rioters
Jan. 6 defendants were already seeking payments before the fund was created.www.yahoo.com
“Mark my words: We will be compensated for the way we were treated and the injustices we dealt with,” Thomas Smith, who spent two years in prison after being convicted of assaulting police and other charges, told HuffPost.
Smith is one of hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants who filed administrative claims for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Already, the Trump administration agreed to pay the family of rioter Ashli Babbitt nearly $5 million over her killing by a Capitol Police officer as she breached an inner door inside the Capitol.