See.............this is where you all get confused.................Russia didn't hack the voting machines, nor did they hack specific states. Why? It's impossible to do because ALL machines would have to be hacked in order to change the vote.
What IS being said is that Russia hacked into the DNC, and then used the information they got out of them to INFLUENCE the election by releasing all those Podesta emails and other documents that made her look bad.
Or.......to put it in simple terms, the Russians hacked the DNC and used the unfavorable information they found there by leaking it to the public and making her look bad. They influenced the election by influencing how people viewed her.
It was INFLUENCE, not hack.
In the real world, only Hillary, and Hillary herself influenced how people saw her. The average American voter is challenged by where and when to vote. Do you actually believe that most took the time to research Podesta's and DNC e-mails?
That's the problem. People AREN'T going to go and do the research themselves, they are content to just sit there and listen to whatever their friends and news sources tell them. And, with the way the emails and information from the DNC was leaked, it DID have an influence on how people viewed her.
People tend to believe the bad before they believe the good in others. It's a survival response, because they don't want to take chances on something bad happening to them.
How come no one ever brings this up when arguing/discussing "The Russians"?, you see, According to Jill Einstein, The Russians already knew 2 months before the election that Trump was going to win(or just barely) Wisconsin,Pennsylvania and Michigan. Right? is that what Jill was getting at? The Russians only wanted to hack those states, but didn't hack the other 54 States?
