Do you have a point? Other than proving the ones I've made?
Haven't seen you make a single point that addresses anything I have posted, so whatever you have proven in the dark corners of your imagination I will leave up to your dark corners to argue with. Civilization is not collapsing because people are not getting vaccines. This is a back-door anti-immigration, elitist, and xenophobic red herring that brings the bigots from the right and the left together. Immunize yours if you so desire, and let others live or die by their own decisions. That is what freedom is.
I would say your point is well taken except that when you don't immunize your child, you put others at risk such as kids that aren't eligible for immunization, kids in other countries where the vaccination isn't available, and of course kids with stupid parents.
People are at risk whenever they go out into public for things far worse than mumps for which we don't vaccinate/don't have a vax. People owe no duty to protect other people's kids from getting sick, and it is doubtful some kid in Sri Lanka is going to get measles because a Christian Scientist/granola eater in Minneapolis decided not to give their child the MMR vax.
Kids in Sri Lanka already die from mumps in droves.
Nobody is arguing that people in the US getting mumps are going to infect people in Sri Lanka (who already are getting the mumps). You're presenting a completely false dilemma, as you have been all through the thread.
The DANGER with not vaccinating isn't that society will fall...society is going to fall ultimately anyway.
It's that it's fucking RETARDED to reject a health policy that so painlessly and effectively has halted serious, deadly diseases in their tracks.
It's like saying "Well when I wash my hands I don't get shit in my mouth and contract ecoli...so obviously, I don't need to wash my hands! After all, I haven't been sick!"