Thursday Night Football

[Alex.]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree and that had been my position from jump street. The lower court exceeded it authority by addressing the investigation even though the lawyers for the NFL chose to introduce the facts which made up the decision to that court.

The lower court examined the validity of the NFL's case against Brady and the judge (even though it was in a venue chosen by the NFL not the Players Union!) scolded the NFL for the lack of proof they had.

All the higher court ruling established was that Roger Goodell had the legal right to impose whatever penalties he chose whether guilt had been proven or not!

So please stop with your nonsense about how Tom Brady was found guilty...because that never happened! The fact of the matter is that when a court of law examined the facts...he was found to be not guilty.

Scolded ......you are a complete moron. I have tolerated your nonsense throughout the pendancy of the Brady issue. You have responded with your body measurements, your very personal relations with men and remarks about my mother.

Get lost loser.

Remarks about your mother? Right...

Telling me to "get lost" I assume is your way of admitting that you really don't have a response to the fact that lower court DIDN'T find the NFL proved it's case against Tom Brady?

It was beyond the lower court's authority to "find the NFL proved its case against Tom Brady". Yep you cried until someone came to your rescue when I called you on it.

as I said earlier before and I never thought about this till this weekend,Isnt it funny how kraft is has had only TWO coachs since be became owner,pete the cheat and BeliCHEAT? Kraft obviously is only attracted to criminals which these two both are. I cant believe i just thought of that how the only two coachs he has ever had both very much lack character and are criminals.lol

 

[Alex.]

I agree and that had been my position from jump street. The lower court exceeded it authority by addressing the investigation even though the lawyers for the NFL chose to introduce the facts which made up the decision to that court.

The lower court examined the validity of the NFL's case against Brady and the judge (even though it was in a venue chosen by the NFL not the Players Union!) scolded the NFL for the lack of proof they had.

All the higher court ruling established was that Roger Goodell had the legal right to impose whatever penalties he chose whether guilt had been proven or not!

So please stop with your nonsense about how Tom Brady was found guilty...because that never happened! The fact of the matter is that when a court of law examined the facts...he was found to be not guilty.

Scolded ......you are a complete moron. I have tolerated your nonsense throughout the pendancy of the Brady issue. You have responded with your body measurements, your very personal relations with men and remarks about my mother.

Get lost loser.

Remarks about your mother? Right...

Telling me to "get lost" I assume is your way of admitting that you really don't have a response to the fact that lower court DIDN'T find the NFL proved it's case against Tom Brady?

It was beyond the lower court's authority to "find the NFL proved its case against Tom Brady". Yep you cried until someone came to your rescue when I called you on it.

as I said earlier before and I never thought about this till this weekend,Isnt it funny how kraft is has had only TWO coachs sicne be became owner,pete the cheat and BeliCHEAT? Kraft obviously is only attracted to criminals which these two both are. I cant believe i just thought of that how the only two coachs he has ever had both very much lack character and are criminals who do very fishy stuff.

Karft is a crooked bastard, his wife was sick, then dies and the next thing you know Krapt has some bimbo hanging on his arm.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The lower court examined the validity of the NFL's case against Brady and the judge (even though it was in a venue chosen by the NFL not the Players Union!) scolded the NFL for the lack of proof they had.

All the higher court ruling established was that Roger Goodell had the legal right to impose whatever penalties he chose whether guilt had been proven or not!

So please stop with your nonsense about how Tom Brady was found guilty...because that never happened! The fact of the matter is that when a court of law examined the facts...he was found to be not guilty.

Scolded ......you are a complete moron. I have tolerated your nonsense throughout the pendancy of the Brady issue. You have responded with your body measurements, your very personal relations with men and remarks about my mother.

Get lost loser.

Remarks about your mother? Right...

Telling me to "get lost" I assume is your way of admitting that you really don't have a response to the fact that lower court DIDN'T find the NFL proved it's case against Tom Brady?

It was beyond the lower court's authority to "find the NFL proved its case against Tom Brady". Yep you cried until someone came to your rescue when I called you on it.

as I said earlier before and I never thought about this till this weekend,Isnt it funny how kraft is has had only TWO coachs sicne be became owner,pete the cheat and BeliCHEAT? Kraft obviously is only attracted to criminals which these two both are. I cant believe i just thought of that how the only two coachs he has ever had both very much lack character and are criminals who do very fishy stuff.

Karft is a crooked bastard, his wife was sick, then dies and the next thing you know Krapt has some bimbo hanging on his arm.

Yeah he is as much a criminal as that evil ***** georgia frontiere who had her husband murdered so she could move the Rams to st louis. Kraft will someday be lined up next to her burning in hell. she is burning in it right now as we speak,just waiting for him to come join her some day in the future.

 

[Papageorgio]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

 

[Alex.]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

 

[Papageorgio]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

The contract gives him a very board range. It has to be what is the best interest of football. The Well's report, said probably, however Belichick didn't have knowledge. My big issue is the NFL and Goodell are not consistent in the rule regarding tampering with equipment and the punishment.

That all said, the Pats look like they have reaped the benefits of the punishment. Which really ticks me off.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.^

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

you are making way too much sense for old fart style or pooper to comprehend.

 

[Alex.]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

The contract gives him a very board range. It has to be what is the best interest of football. The Well's report, said probably, however Belichick didn't have knowledge. My big issue is the NFL and Goodell are not consistent in the rule regarding tampering with equipment and the punishment.

That all said, the Pats look like they have reaped the benefits of the punishment. Which really ticks me off.

The NFL has been investigated, digested and regurgitated regarding this issue. The judiciary ruled in their favor. The Patriots are still out 1 million dollars and a 1st and 4th round draft pick. Brady has been out 4 games.

That is more than enough they once again have shown themselves to be cheaters.

Now is the time for a new beginning

Those who crow at the success of this franchise without taking their cheating into account miss the entire point of fair competition. They can have as many Ws as they can garner it is meaningless for true fans of the sport.

 

[Unkotare]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

The contract gives him a very board range. It has to be what is the best interest of football. The Well's report, said probably, however Belichick didn't have knowledge. My big issue is the NFL and Goodell are not consistent in the rule regarding tampering with equipment and the punishment.

That all said, the Pats look like they have reaped the benefits of the punishment. Which really ticks me off.

The NFL has been investigated, digested and regurgitated regarding this issue. The judiciary ruled in their favor. The Patriots are still out 1 million dollars and a 1st and 4th round draft pick. Brady has been out 4 games.

That is more than enough they once again have shown themselves to be cheaters.

Now is the time for a new beginning

Those who crow at the success of this franchise without taking their cheating into account miss the entire point of fair competition. They can have as many Ws as they can garner it is meaningless for true fans of the sport.

 

[Alex.]

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

The contract gives him a very board range. It has to be what is the best interest of football. The Well's report, said probably, however Belichick didn't have knowledge. My big issue is the NFL and Goodell are not consistent in the rule regarding tampering with equipment and the punishment.

That all said, the Pats look like they have reaped the benefits of the punishment. Which really ticks me off.

The NFL has been investigated, digested and regurgitated regarding this issue. The judiciary ruled in their favor. The Patriots are still out 1 million dollars and a 1st and 4th round draft pick. Brady has been out 4 games.

That is more than enough they once again have shown themselves to be cheaters.

Now is the time for a new beginning

Those who crow at the success of this franchise without taking their cheating into account miss the entire point of fair competition. They can have as many Ws as they can garner it is meaningless for true fans of the sport.

Unkotare



"translated as dripping poop. This word is used to describe a pornographic genre commonly known as Scat."


Back at you Scat.

 

[Unkotare]

....

That is more than enough they once again have shown themselves to be cheaters.

Now is the time for a new beginning

Those who crow at the success of this franchise without taking their cheating into account miss the entire point of fair competition. They can have as many Ws as they can garner it is meaningless for true fans of the sport.

 

[Alex.]

....

That is more than enough they once again have shown themselves to be cheaters.

Now is the time for a new beginning

Those who crow at the success of this franchise without taking their cheating into account miss the entire point of fair competition. They can have as many Ws as they can garner it is meaningless for true fans of the sport.

^^^^^^

 

[Oldstyle]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

The truth of the matter is that even in the court venue that the NFL chose to hear the case against Tom Brady...a court that the NFL felt would be sympathetic to their case against Brady...THAT judge listened to the "evidence" that the NFL had gathered against Brady and asked incredulously..."Is that all you've got?" Quite obviously the NFL didn't meet their burden of proof!

 

[Oldstyle]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

They didn't have to meet any burden. Goodell is judge, jury and executioner. Goodell wanted to do what he wanted and let all the players know he has the power, he does.

Of course they had to meet their burden, the court examined whether Goodell abused or acted outside the scope of the authority granted by the terms of the contract.

You're not a very intelligent fellow, Phallics! You can't seem to get it through your head that there is a difference between a court finding insufficient evidence against Tom Brady to warrant a suspension...which the lower court did...and a court finding that the Commissioner of the NFL by virtue of the CBA can apply any punishment he feels like to a player without having to "prove" anything! Papa grasps that concept...why is it so hard for you to?

 

[Oldstyle]

The lower court examined the validity of the NFL's case against Brady and the judge (even though it was in a venue chosen by the NFL not the Players Union!) scolded the NFL for the lack of proof they had.

All the higher court ruling established was that Roger Goodell had the legal right to impose whatever penalties he chose whether guilt had been proven or not!

So please stop with your nonsense about how Tom Brady was found guilty...because that never happened! The fact of the matter is that when a court of law examined the facts...he was found to be not guilty.

Scolded ......you are a complete moron. I have tolerated your nonsense throughout the pendancy of the Brady issue. You have responded with your body measurements, your very personal relations with men and remarks about my mother.

Get lost loser.

Remarks about your mother? Right...

Telling me to "get lost" I assume is your way of admitting that you really don't have a response to the fact that lower court DIDN'T find the NFL proved it's case against Tom Brady?

It was beyond the lower court's authority to "find the NFL proved its case against Tom Brady". Yep you cried until someone came to your rescue when I called you on it.

as I said earlier before and I never thought about this till this weekend,Isnt it funny how kraft is has had only TWO coachs sicne be became owner,pete the cheat and BeliCHEAT? Kraft obviously is only attracted to criminals which these two both are. I cant believe i just thought of that how the only two coachs he has ever had both very much lack character and are criminals who do very fishy stuff.

Karft is a crooked bastard, his wife was sick, then dies and the next thing you know Krapt has some bimbo hanging on his arm.

Because as we all know...it's illegal to be married to a woman that you love dearly for 48 years...have her tragically pass away from cancer...and then a year later meet and fall in love with someone new! You take obsession to a whole new level!

 

[Alex.]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

The truth of the matter is that even in the court venue that the NFL chose to hear the case against Tom Brady...a court that the NFL felt would be sympathetic to their case against Brady...THAT judge listened to the "evidence" that the NFL had gathered against Brady and asked incredulously..."Is that all you've got?" Quite obviously the NFL didn't meet their burden of proof!

The "court" could ask anything they want, however, they are guided by the rules and could not make any determination on those facts as we saw when they were reversed.

You level of butthurt and crying cannot change what has occurred....Brady is still suspended and will always be known as a super bowl winner who needed to lie and cheat and have someone take care of his balls in order to gain an unfair advantage.

There is a rule where I coach and that is no talk of the Patriots or Brady during practice and games. Too much of a negative role model and too much of a distraction, that is what the parents wanted.

 

[Alex.]

Scolded ......you are a complete moron. I have tolerated your nonsense throughout the pendancy of the Brady issue. You have responded with your body measurements, your very personal relations with men and remarks about my mother.

Get lost loser.

Remarks about your mother? Right...

Telling me to "get lost" I assume is your way of admitting that you really don't have a response to the fact that lower court DIDN'T find the NFL proved it's case against Tom Brady?

It was beyond the lower court's authority to "find the NFL proved its case against Tom Brady". Yep you cried until someone came to your rescue when I called you on it.

as I said earlier before and I never thought about this till this weekend,Isnt it funny how kraft is has had only TWO coachs sicne be became owner,pete the cheat and BeliCHEAT? Kraft obviously is only attracted to criminals which these two both are. I cant believe i just thought of that how the only two coachs he has ever had both very much lack character and are criminals who do very fishy stuff.

Karft is a crooked bastard, his wife was sick, then dies and the next thing you know Krapt has some bimbo hanging on his arm.

Because as we all know...it's illegal to be married to a woman that you love dearly for 48 years...have her tragically pass away from cancer...and then a year later meet and fall in love with someone new! You take obsession to a whole new level!

Now you are in the head of Krapt.

 

[Oldstyle]

The court decision was about Goodell's right to suspend, not whether Brady was guilty. The Wells report did not have the evidence to say anything for positive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The standard is Preponderance of the Evidence nothing more stringent like Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt, clearly the NFL met their burden.

The truth of the matter is that even in the court venue that the NFL chose to hear the case against Tom Brady...a court that the NFL felt would be sympathetic to their case against Brady...THAT judge listened to the "evidence" that the NFL had gathered against Brady and asked incredulously..."Is that all you've got?" Quite obviously the NFL didn't meet their burden of proof!

The "court" could ask anything they want, however, they are guided by the rules and could not make any determination on those facts as we saw when they were reversed.

You level of butthurt and crying cannot change what has occurred....Brady is still suspended and will always be known as a super bowl winner who needed to lie and cheat and have someone take care of his balls in order to gain an unfair advantage.

There is a rule where I coach and that is no talk of the Patriots or Brady during practice and games. Too much of a negative role model and too much of a distraction, that is what the parents wanted.

Yeah, only to the whiny little losers like yourself who's teams couldn't beat Brady on the field!

I'm SURE the parents of your kid's don't want any talk about the Patriots...a team that is literally the role model for how you SHOULD run a franchise in the NFL...or about Tom Brady...a player who IS the poster child for what you can achieve through hard work and determination no matter what round of the draft you're selected in! I'm guessing they don't bring up the Patriots or Tom Brady because it makes you foam at the mouth and start babbling about men's genitals!