SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,820
- 365
Ok. I am a little uncertain about the sequence of events. But I am going to tell you what I think happened. Think mind you. I could be wrong. And if anyone has more information I’ll be happy to get it.
It appears as though a high school football game ended. Two thugs from rival gangs got into an argument and then began shooting at each other.
Ok. Fairly common event so far. Then three police officers rushed to the scene and opened fire on the suspects and cars trying to flee.
This included a reported five shots that struck the car carrying a family and wounded one girl and killed eight year old Fanta Bility.
The five shots apparently came from police.
I can’t find anything that shows the family or the car was involved in anyway with the gang dispute or altercation.
I’ve read three variations of the same article. And the three sources all intimate that the car and other bystanders injured by police fire were uninvolved.
Now. As I said above. I could be wrong in my understanding of the events.
Originally the DA was going to charge the two gang bangers for the death of the little girl. The old argument that the original actions led to the death. That has been the standard for as long as I can find information on. Pretty much forever.
After pressure from the public the DA dropped the murder charges. One of the gang bangers already plead guilty and was sentenced to 2 1/2 years to 5 years for aggravated Assault with a weapon. The second one is awaiting trial.
The DA went to the Grand Jury and got the three officers charged with Manslaughter.
Now. In my effort to be fair and honest. I’m a little surprised by this indictment. How many times have we excused the police shooting bystanders or the wrong person? The police can and do say they were acting on the best information they had where a split second is the difference between life and death. I always admit there is truth in that.
However most of the situations wouldn’t happen if the police would take a moment to assess if shooting is needed. Not just authorized.
I’m sure you can think of the events I am thinking of. I don’t want to derail this thread with examples where shooting was or was not justified.
I am honestly not sure how I feel about this charge. It is really surprising. Is the charge justified? I honestly do not know. I don’t know enough about the situation to say. Is it unusual? Absolutely.
For a couple decades I’ve warned that if police don’t get to the forefront of reform and address some of the glaring issues facing them, eventually reform would swamp them and make their jobs far more dangerous in reality instead of propaganda fiction.
I think this case proves I am right. Reform is crashing over them. And by resisting all calls for decades the cops won’t be listened to now.
I am sure that things will never go back to how they were before. I just wonder where they will end up.
It appears as though a high school football game ended. Two thugs from rival gangs got into an argument and then began shooting at each other.
Ok. Fairly common event so far. Then three police officers rushed to the scene and opened fire on the suspects and cars trying to flee.
This included a reported five shots that struck the car carrying a family and wounded one girl and killed eight year old Fanta Bility.
The five shots apparently came from police.
I can’t find anything that shows the family or the car was involved in anyway with the gang dispute or altercation.
Town votes to fire 3 officers involved in the shooting death of an 8-year-old girl
The three officers, who fired their weapons at a car amid crowds of people, face manslaughter charges in the killing of Fanta Bility.
www.npr.org
I’ve read three variations of the same article. And the three sources all intimate that the car and other bystanders injured by police fire were uninvolved.
Now. As I said above. I could be wrong in my understanding of the events.
Originally the DA was going to charge the two gang bangers for the death of the little girl. The old argument that the original actions led to the death. That has been the standard for as long as I can find information on. Pretty much forever.
After pressure from the public the DA dropped the murder charges. One of the gang bangers already plead guilty and was sentenced to 2 1/2 years to 5 years for aggravated Assault with a weapon. The second one is awaiting trial.
The DA went to the Grand Jury and got the three officers charged with Manslaughter.
Now. In my effort to be fair and honest. I’m a little surprised by this indictment. How many times have we excused the police shooting bystanders or the wrong person? The police can and do say they were acting on the best information they had where a split second is the difference between life and death. I always admit there is truth in that.
However most of the situations wouldn’t happen if the police would take a moment to assess if shooting is needed. Not just authorized.
I’m sure you can think of the events I am thinking of. I don’t want to derail this thread with examples where shooting was or was not justified.
I am honestly not sure how I feel about this charge. It is really surprising. Is the charge justified? I honestly do not know. I don’t know enough about the situation to say. Is it unusual? Absolutely.
For a couple decades I’ve warned that if police don’t get to the forefront of reform and address some of the glaring issues facing them, eventually reform would swamp them and make their jobs far more dangerous in reality instead of propaganda fiction.
I think this case proves I am right. Reform is crashing over them. And by resisting all calls for decades the cops won’t be listened to now.
I am sure that things will never go back to how they were before. I just wonder where they will end up.