- Thread starter
- #21
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Those Counterfeit Democrat Justices
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #22
9. WHAT???????????
A President who keeps his promises?????????????
No wonder the Democrats had to get rid of him.
I must admit that I never anticipated Roe being overturned when Trump promised it......
I should have seen the result of his promise to immediately move our embassy to Jerusalem....a constant promise from other Presidents.
Remember all the hand-wringing about how war would break out all over the Middle East????
Instead, he got five Nobel Peace Prize nominations.
Now this.......
It's a Trump Supreme Court......and American one.
A President who keeps his promises?????????????
No wonder the Democrats had to get rid of him.
I must admit that I never anticipated Roe being overturned when Trump promised it......
I should have seen the result of his promise to immediately move our embassy to Jerusalem....a constant promise from other Presidents.
Remember all the hand-wringing about how war would break out all over the Middle East????
Instead, he got five Nobel Peace Prize nominations.
Now this.......
It's a Trump Supreme Court......and American one.
1. Of course, we must begin with an understanding of the role of a Supreme Court Justice, and move on to the contumely due the Democrat Party for what it has done to the Court.
For a clear explanation of the role, here is Justice par excellence, Justice Wm.Rehnquist:
"...[Liberal judicial activism] seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own, quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems. Once we have abandoned the idea that the authority of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional is somehow tied to the language of the Constitution that the people adopted, a judiciary exercising the power of judicial review appears in a quite different light.
Judges then are no longer the keepers of the covenant; instead they are a small group of fortunately situated people with a roving commission to second-guess Congress, state legislatures, and state and federal administrative officers concerning what is best for the country.
Surely there is no justification for a third legislative branch in the federal government, and there is even less justification for a federal legislative branch’s reviewing on a policy basis the laws enacted by the legislatures of the fifty states."
THE NOTION OF A LIVING CONSTITUTION*
WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No2_Rehnquist.pdf
2. That bears restating: the only role for a Justice is to know the Constitution and apply.....it is written in English.....it to any problem that comes before the court.
Nothing else.
3. Democrats do not nominate judges for the court based either on knowledge, or the role stated above, merely to count on their vote no matter the issue.
And now, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:
“Judge Jackson’s record of reversals by the left-leaning D.C. Circuit is troubling for anyone concerned about the rule of law,” Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
Democrats have saddled the court with Kagan, an opponent of free speech and Sotomayor, a dunce who has claimed that different ethnic groups can read the Constitution differently.
4.This week the Court has taken a giant step toward reviving the America that the Founders believed they created, not an administrative state run by bureaucrats, technocrats and unelected judges.
In a major 6-3 ruling, for the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, limits the EPA's ability to set regulations on the energy sector a decision that poses massive implications on the Biden administration's goals to fight climate change.
The Court correctly decided that regulations of the sort the EPA claimed to have power over, are only constitutional when elected officials, the Congress, or legislatures offer them.
5. Now back to the befuddled imbecile, Democrat Kagan, who, like the majority of Democrat voters, is clueless as to the role of a Justice:
Kagan wrote:
".....a decision that poses massive implications for the Biden Administrations to fight climate change....."
"....this Court does not have a clue about how to address climate change...."
WHAT???????????
The Court's role is singular: to make certain that the only document the people have agreed to be governed by....the Constitution is adhered to.
This gormless idiot, and that applies to any Justice who voted against the EPA rebuke, is the reason that Democrats have one goal and one goal only......
....to destroy America.
That's not what the current court is doing. This court is just overturning things the Federalist Society wants gone, and setting up religious rights like the country has never seen.
Administrative Tryanny is what the Supreme Court is currently setting up.
Giving out religious rights that the Constitution was clear should not be given. No mixing of church and state.
The Supreme Court simply is NOT qualified to rule on medical matters.
- Thread starter
- #25
That's not what the current court is doing. This court is just overturning things the Federalist Society wants gone, and setting up religious rights like the country has never seen.
What a vapid post.
Just to prove you're as stupid as I say you are......let's give you a second opportunity to put your foot in your mouth:
Let's see you defend the imbecile Kagan:
3. Democrats do not nominate judges for the court based either on knowledge, or the role stated above, merely to count on their vote no matter the issue.
And now, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:
“Judge Jackson’s record of reversals by the left-leaning D.C. Circuit is troubling for anyone concerned about the rule of law,” Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
Democrats have saddled the court with Kagan, an opponent of free speech and Sotomayor, a dunce who has claimed that different ethnic groups can read the Constitution differently.
4.This week the Court has taken a giant step toward reviving the America that the Founders believed they created, not an administrative state run by bureaucrats, technocrats and unelected judges.
In a major 6-3 ruling, for the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, limits the EPA's ability to set regulations on the energy sector a decision that poses massive implications on the Biden administration's goals to fight climate change.
The Court correctly decided that regulations of the sort the EPA claimed to have power over, are only constitutional when elected officials, the Congress, or legislatures offer them.
5. Now back to the befuddled imbecile, Democrat Kagan, who, like the majority of Democrat voters, is clueless as to the role of a Justice:
Kagan wrote:
".....a decision that poses massive implications for the Biden Administrations to fight climate change....."
"....this Court does not have a clue about how to address climate change...."
WHAT???????????
The Court's role is singular: to make certain that the only document the people have agreed to be governed by....the Constitution is adhered to.
This gormless idiot, and that applies to any Justice who voted against the EPA rebuke, is the reason that Democrats have one goal and one goal only......
....to destroy America.
- Thread starter
- #26
Administrative Tryanny is what the Supreme Court is currently setting up.
Giving out religious rights that the Constitution was clear should not be given. No mixing of church and state.
The Supreme Court simply is NOT qualified to rule on medical matters.
All of Western Civilization is based on "religion."
America was founded on "religion."
It all began with Genesis 1:26
You Nazis claim the opposite.....your need to kill any human being that don't bend neck and knee to government.
Here......let me make you feel right at home:
So it is OK that the recent SC nominees lied about respecting the Roe precedent just to get on the bench? Seems rather sleazy to me.1. Of course, we must begin with an understanding of the role of a Supreme Court Justice, and move on to the contumely due the Democrat Party for what it has done to the Court.
For a clear explanation of the role, here is Justice par excellence, Justice Wm.Rehnquist:
"...[Liberal judicial activism] seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own, quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems. Once we have abandoned the idea that the authority of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional is somehow tied to the language of the Constitution that the people adopted, a judiciary exercising the power of judicial review appears in a quite different light.
Judges then are no longer the keepers of the covenant; instead they are a small group of fortunately situated people with a roving commission to second-guess Congress, state legislatures, and state and federal administrative officers concerning what is best for the country.
Surely there is no justification for a third legislative branch in the federal government, and there is even less justification for a federal legislative branch’s reviewing on a policy basis the laws enacted by the legislatures of the fifty states."
THE NOTION OF A LIVING CONSTITUTION*
WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No2_Rehnquist.pdf
2. That bears restating: the only role for a Justice is to know the Constitution and apply.....it is written in English.....it to any problem that comes before the court.
Nothing else.
3. Democrats do not nominate judges for the court based either on knowledge, or the role stated above, merely to count on their vote no matter the issue.
And now, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:
“Judge Jackson’s record of reversals by the left-leaning D.C. Circuit is troubling for anyone concerned about the rule of law,” Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
Democrats have saddled the court with Kagan, an opponent of free speech and Sotomayor, a dunce who has claimed that different ethnic groups can read the Constitution differently.
4.This week the Court has taken a giant step toward reviving the America that the Founders believed they created, not an administrative state run by bureaucrats, technocrats and unelected judges.
In a major 6-3 ruling, for the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, limits the EPA's ability to set regulations on the energy sector a decision that poses massive implications on the Biden administration's goals to fight climate change.
The Court correctly decided that regulations of the sort the EPA claimed to have power over, are only constitutional when elected officials, the Congress, or legislatures offer them.
5. Now back to the befuddled imbecile, Democrat Kagan, who, like the majority of Democrat voters, is clueless as to the role of a Justice:
Kagan wrote:
".....a decision that poses massive implications for the Biden Administrations to fight climate change....."
"....this Court does not have a clue about how to address climate change...."
WHAT???????????
The Court's role is singular: to make certain that the only document the people have agreed to be governed by....the Constitution is adhered to.
This gormless idiot, and that applies to any Justice who voted against the EPA rebuke, is the reason that Democrats have one goal and one goal only......
....to destroy America.
- Thread starter
- #28
10. For the life of me, I cannot understand how anyone who claims to be a Democrat cannot be anything but embarrassed by this lamebrained appointee to the Court, who clearly has no idea what the role of the judiciary is in our system of government.
She demonstrates that she is nothing but a Left-wing activist who sees her role on the Court as nothing more than a party representative, and does not understand that she is there to do noting other than read and apply the words and language of the Constitution.
The Democrat Party has an agenda, and that is what Elena Kagan is there to enforce!!!!
Compare this moron to the conservative Justices who have gone to law school, read the Constitution, understand the separation of powers, understand what their job is.........and do it.
Every voter should have learned long ago that an understanding of law is not a requirement to be a Democrat Supreme Court nominee.
She demonstrates that she is nothing but a Left-wing activist who sees her role on the Court as nothing more than a party representative, and does not understand that she is there to do noting other than read and apply the words and language of the Constitution.
The Democrat Party has an agenda, and that is what Elena Kagan is there to enforce!!!!
Compare this moron to the conservative Justices who have gone to law school, read the Constitution, understand the separation of powers, understand what their job is.........and do it.
Every voter should have learned long ago that an understanding of law is not a requirement to be a Democrat Supreme Court nominee.
All of Western Civilization is based on "religion."
America was founded on "religion."
It all began with Genesis 1:26
You Nazis claim the opposite.....your need to kill any human being that don't bend neck and knee to government.
Here......let me make you feel right at home:
View attachment 665272
Every day you come here and put your ignorance and stupidity on display for all to see.
We ELECTED Trudeau - last fall. That stupid Karen from the Free-Dumb Convoy appointed herself, and decided she didn't want Trudeau as PM. Then she disobeyed the court orders, and got herself arrested.
After bitching like crazy, she got her bail reduced, and she refused to abide by her bail conditions. She can go fuck herself, and since she's back in jail, fundraising off her arrest, I hope the new bank account get seized as well. Nobody elected this woman to piss on our national monuments and demand she get her own way.
That conservative clown from the "People's Party" who was marching with her? He didn't get elected either. He got 5% of the vote. Nobody wanted his racists ass either.
Trudeau got us through the pandemic with 80% fully vaxxed, and 1/3 of the disease and death of the USA. No shortages of tests or PPE, and he didn't crash our economy. Best County in the World, multiple years running.
The USA wants gun control and the Supreme Court gave you the Wild Wild West, because they want killing, crime and chaos. It' helps their agenda. Americans want to be MORE like Canada, but if people were happy with their lives, Republicans could never get their votes.
Magnus
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 10,903
- 8,259
- 2,138
Back for another beating?????
You didn’t really imagine (I almost said ‘think’) I’d let you change the subject, did you, you dolt???
You voluntarily subscribe to the thread because of how deeply it injured you….and I continued to do so in two subsequent posts. And….the beat goes on.
I love when your sort posts and help in proving that Democrats have no ability when it comes to either thinking or having integrity.
LOL Poor retard. Cannot explain why she started her thread quoting a racist! One more time...
Blah blah blah. Same response, retard. When you address why you chose a racist to throw shade on liberal policy, we can have a dialogue.
Till then, no amount of verbal diarrhea can change that.
- Thread starter
- #31
11. The only function a Supreme Court Justice has is to be the arbiter of how laws conform to the Constitution.
Nothing else....and certainly not the support a political agenda.
Yet the Democrats put a birdbrain like Kagan on the Court to derail its functioning.
Here, the moron goes on about "climate science," as though her "expertise" in the area has any....ANY......bearing on the constituionality of unelected bureaucrats to dictate policy.
"If the current rate of emissions continues, children born this year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard swallowed by the ocean," Kagan wrote in her dissent.
Kagan said the dangers of rising temperatures and, as a result, devastating environmental effects, including, "Rising waters, scorching heat, and other severe weather conditions [that] could force ‘mass migration events[,] political crises, civil unrest,’ and even state failure.'"
Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kagan's dissent in the 6-3 case. "
www.foxbusiness.com
It doesn't have any bearing on the constituionality issue whether she is right or wrong about climate.......
Three stoodges......none of whom should be on the Supreme Court.
Nothing else....and certainly not the support a political agenda.
Yet the Democrats put a birdbrain like Kagan on the Court to derail its functioning.
Here, the moron goes on about "climate science," as though her "expertise" in the area has any....ANY......bearing on the constituionality of unelected bureaucrats to dictate policy.
"If the current rate of emissions continues, children born this year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard swallowed by the ocean," Kagan wrote in her dissent.
Kagan said the dangers of rising temperatures and, as a result, devastating environmental effects, including, "Rising waters, scorching heat, and other severe weather conditions [that] could force ‘mass migration events[,] political crises, civil unrest,’ and even state failure.'"
Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kagan's dissent in the 6-3 case. "
Justice Kagan warns parts of East Coast could be 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent in EPA case
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned of the dangers of climate change in her dissenting opinion issued in the case West Virginia v. EPA.
www.foxbusiness.com
It doesn't have any bearing on the constituionality issue whether she is right or wrong about climate.......
Three stoodges......none of whom should be on the Supreme Court.
- Thread starter
- #32
LOL Poor retard. Cannot explain why she started her thread quoting a racist! One more time...
Blah blah blah. Same response, retard. When you address why you chose a racist to throw shade on liberal policy, we can have a dialogue.
Till then, no amount of verbal diarrhea can change that.
Still can't find a single thing you can dispute???
Figures.
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 14,135
- 11,547
- 2,140
No, you can go fuck yourself you lying little Nazi lover. Your blatant worship of a dictator wannabe like Turdeau makes you unqualified to speak on anything. Nobody wants to be more like Canada dummy. Freezing bank accounts because people don’t agree with you. That’s YOUR pathetic little boy. Now STFU about a country you know nothing about.Every day you come here and put your ignorance and stupidity on display for all to see.
We ELECTED Trudeau - last fall. That stupid Karen from the Free-Dumb Convoy appointed herself, and decided she didn't want Trudeau as PM. Then she disobeyed the court orders, and got herself arrested.
After bitching like crazy, she got her bail reduced, and she refused to abide by her bail conditions. She can go fuck herself, and since she's back in jail, fundraising off her arrest, I hope the new bank account get seized as well. Nobody elected this woman to piss on our national monuments and demand she get her own way.
That conservative clown from the "People's Party" who was marching with her? He didn't get elected either. He got 5% of the vote. Nobody wanted his racists ass either.
Trudeau got us through the pandemic with 80% fully vaxxed, and 1/3 of the disease and death of the USA. No shortages of tests or PPE, and he didn't crash our economy. Best County in the World, multiple years running.
The USA wants gun control and the Supreme Court gave you the Wild Wild West, because they want killing, crime and chaos. It' helps their agenda. Americans want to be MORE like Canada, but if people were happy with their lives, Republicans could never get their votes.
Magnus
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 10,903
- 8,259
- 2,138
LOL Poor retard. Cannot explain why she started her thread quoting a racist! One more time...Still can't find a single thing you can dispute???
Figures.
Blah blah blah. Same response, retard. When you address why you chose a racist to throw shade on liberal policy, we can have a dialogue.
Till then, no amount of verbal diarrhea can change that.
Magnus
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 10,903
- 8,259
- 2,138
All of Western Civilization is based on "religion."
America was founded on "religion."
It all began with Genesis 1:26
You Nazis claim the opposite.....your need to kill any human being that don't bend neck and knee to government.
Here......let me make you feel right at home:
View attachment 665272
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
No it isn't. SCOTUS is correctly ruling that law MUST be made by the legislatures of the federal government and the "several states"' not by unelected judges. That's what our constitution says. If any or all state legislatures say abortion right up to delivery is legal, it is, that's the way the system is designed to work. Same thing with environmental laws, unelected bureaucrats can't legally make laws, the legislatures have to do that.That's not what the current court is doing. This court is just overturning things the Federalist Society wants gone, and setting up religious rights like the country has never seen.
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
They didn't lie, previous court decisions are settled law until they are overturned. If that wasn't the case segregated schools would still be legal.So it is OK that the recent SC nominees lied about respecting the Roe precedent just to get on the bench? Seems rather sleazy to me.
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
The majority of people in the USA DON'T want gun control. The ones that do are a loud minority. If the majority wanted gun control, the legislatures wouldn't have any problems passing gun control laws.Every day you come here and put your ignorance and stupidity on display for all to see.
We ELECTED Trudeau - last fall. That stupid Karen from the Free-Dumb Convoy appointed herself, and decided she didn't want Trudeau as PM. Then she disobeyed the court orders, and got herself arrested.
After bitching like crazy, she got her bail reduced, and she refused to abide by her bail conditions. She can go fuck herself, and since she's back in jail, fundraising off her arrest, I hope the new bank account get seized as well. Nobody elected this woman to piss on our national monuments and demand she get her own way.
That conservative clown from the "People's Party" who was marching with her? He didn't get elected either. He got 5% of the vote. Nobody wanted his racists ass either.
Trudeau got us through the pandemic with 80% fully vaxxed, and 1/3 of the disease and death of the USA. No shortages of tests or PPE, and he didn't crash our economy. Best County in the World, multiple years running.
The USA wants gun control and the Supreme Court gave you the Wild Wild West, because they want killing, crime and chaos. It' helps their agenda. Americans want to be MORE like Canada, but if people were happy with their lives, Republicans could never get their votes.
- Thread starter
- #39
LOL Poor retard. Cannot explain why she started her thread quoting a racist! One more time...
Blah blah blah. Same response, retard. When you address why you chose a racist to throw shade on liberal policy, we can have a dialogue.
Till then, no amount of verbal diarrhea can change that.
How can you Democrats be oblivious to what your party has done to America????
We both know how deeply wounded you are by my exposing Democrats on the high Court.....yet you are trying your best to change the subject with the usual Democrat lies.......
- Thread starter
- #40
How can you Democrats be oblivious to what your party has done to America????
We both know how deeply wounded you are by my exposing Democrats on the high Court.....yet you are trying your best to change the subject with the usual Democrat lies.......
Speak up......how can you ignore what has been done to the Supreme Court?????
Similar threads
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 195
- Replies
- 201
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 42
- Views
- 861
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2
- Replies
- 78
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 26
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8043
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-