shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 45,385
- 44,498
- 3,605
The Creepy Ones want more power and they do not care how they obtain it or who they upset.
Will Americans care that their nation to the north is adopting CCP-like powers that MANY U.S corporations will risk being compromised or undermined?
nationalpost.com
OTTAWA — The majority Liberal government is pulling out the “guillotine” for one of its most contentious pieces of legislation, moving to give MPs until Friday to pass its controversial bill facilitating police and intelligence agencies’ ability to intercept and collect personal information.
Late Monday, Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon tabled a sweeping motion that would effectively put an end to clause-by-clause debate of Bill C-22 at committee by Thursday night and put an end to the second reading stage. The motion then gives the government the ability to limit third reading debate to a single MP from each party.
Article content
That means that, if the motion is passed in the House of Commons, the Liberals can push through their embattled Bill C-22 by the end of the week when MPs go home for the summer recess. The motion is particularly aggressive in that it aims to curb debate on multiple debate stages of the bill.
Such time allocation and closure motions are colloquially referred to as a “guillotine” because they cut off debate after a certain amount of time.
Bill C-22 proposes a new lawful access regime which would make it easier for police and intelligence agencies to intercept private communications or personal data as part of their investigations.
Lawful access is one of the most intrusive powers afforded to police and intelligence agencies. Creating such a regime for the digital age in Canada has been the subject of fierce debate for decades.
The bill is strongly supported by police services across Canada and CSIS, who argue that their investigations into serious crimes like extortion, terrorism or child sex abuse material are significantly hampered because of Canada’s lack of a modern-day lawful access regime.
But there has been a recent groundswell of opposition against the bill by civil liberties advocates and tech companies like Apple, Meta and Google who argue that the bill goes too far and could significantly undermine Canadians’ right to privacy.
Will Americans care that their nation to the north is adopting CCP-like powers that MANY U.S corporations will risk being compromised or undermined?
Liberals pull out 'guillotine' motion to shut down debate on police search powers bill
The majority Liberal government is pulling out the "guillotine" for one of its most contentious pieces of legislation.
nationalpost.com
OTTAWA — The majority Liberal government is pulling out the “guillotine” for one of its most contentious pieces of legislation, moving to give MPs until Friday to pass its controversial bill facilitating police and intelligence agencies’ ability to intercept and collect personal information.
Late Monday, Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon tabled a sweeping motion that would effectively put an end to clause-by-clause debate of Bill C-22 at committee by Thursday night and put an end to the second reading stage. The motion then gives the government the ability to limit third reading debate to a single MP from each party.
Article content
That means that, if the motion is passed in the House of Commons, the Liberals can push through their embattled Bill C-22 by the end of the week when MPs go home for the summer recess. The motion is particularly aggressive in that it aims to curb debate on multiple debate stages of the bill.
Such time allocation and closure motions are colloquially referred to as a “guillotine” because they cut off debate after a certain amount of time.
Bill C-22 proposes a new lawful access regime which would make it easier for police and intelligence agencies to intercept private communications or personal data as part of their investigations.
Lawful access is one of the most intrusive powers afforded to police and intelligence agencies. Creating such a regime for the digital age in Canada has been the subject of fierce debate for decades.
The bill is strongly supported by police services across Canada and CSIS, who argue that their investigations into serious crimes like extortion, terrorism or child sex abuse material are significantly hampered because of Canada’s lack of a modern-day lawful access regime.
But there has been a recent groundswell of opposition against the bill by civil liberties advocates and tech companies like Apple, Meta and Google who argue that the bill goes too far and could significantly undermine Canadians’ right to privacy.
