And that accounts for everyone laughing at you.
Too funny;
The earth has a "use of money" rate you fail to understand.... CO2 is not like a bank account where it just piles up. There is a half life of just 3 years meaning that half of the co2 we create is absorbed within 3 years of its creation, whether it be from natural or man made sources.
The only person being laughed at is you... A 7% decrease in money in, coupled with the flow out, causes massive changes rapidly in our atmosphere.
Give it up. You do not have a clue...
I gotta tell you, Bob, I never said I was a climate expert, my forte is more in the electrical field but I worked in an electronic R&D lab years ago developing stuff for communications and I have to say that in my life's experience, I've just never seen an engine where you can cut back on the fuel you are feeding into it yet it still keeps building more energy out of it picking up speed as the climate alarmers keep telling me!
That would seem to violate the basic laws of the universe.
It means we are getting energy from nothing. I guess CO2 is the gift that just keeps giving and giving and giving.
Speaking of ICE motors, I've built a hot rod or two in my youth and did you know that even just a little roughness along the surface of the insides of the intake manifold can affect the horsepower produced? That's why pro race drivers polish surfaces such as these.
But Earth's atmosphere shares no such sensitivity-- -- you can chop the greatest reduction in CO2 since WWII and still it just keeps growing and growing, getting worse all the time!
I actually just did a little research in the matter and according to one study, this year's Covid cutback has put us back to where we were 30 years ago as far what we are dumping into the air.
20 years before that, they were telling us we were heading for another ice age.
Another article said that the last time CO2 was at 410ppm, was 3-5 million years ago! That was back before the Stone Age when the Woolly Mammoth and Mastodon were first appearing.
Now why would the Earth create such cold-weather creatures when it was hell on earth and not even any air conditioning?
BTW, we are at 7% reduction right now. Another study said that the 2015 Paris Climate Treaty called for a reduction of 2C, but the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) subsequently determined that 1.5C is a far safer temperature guardrail.
They determined that if we just go a little higher (to 7.6% reduction) and stay there a few years, we can hit that recommended ideal 1.5C mark that will save the world.
Yet we are being told to forget about seeing any benefit from 2020's 7% drop.
Color me cornfused.
Meantime, another report put methane in the same category as CO2 as far as GHGs are concerned! Well, THAT'S JUST NOT TRUE. The two cannot even be compared.
The one thing I concluded in this reading is that if the climate alarmists have their way, ALL HUMAN ACTIVITY is harmful to the Earth! Just our being here is bad. Everything we do produces carbon. I'm a logical man and there is just no way that man can live and have a ZERO CARBON footprint! Can't be done. Nothing on this planet has a zero carbon footprint.
The Earth is made of carbon and created us with carbon intending us to need, want and use carbon because we ARE carbon and you can't do anything, not even fart or scratch your balls, without affecting carbon. Apparently the Earth created man with carbon as the first result of biological growth whose inevitability is to destroy the Earth just for being. That makes humanity Earth's single bad mistake.
Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are set to drop by up to seven percent in 2020 because of the coronavirus pandemic, but even this dramatic decline—the sharpest since WWII—would barely dent longterm global warming, researchers reported Tuesday.
phys.org
Carbon dioxide emissions, which are the leading cause of global warming, fell by 7% in 2020, according to the report from the Global Carbon Project.
www.usatoday.com
A record 7 per cent drop in global carbon emissions this year will make no difference to long-term climate change, say researchers
www.newscientist.com
