Contumacious
Radical Freedom
There is NO LawI don't see any law that confirms his decision. So I'm asking you which one? you see, Trump can because of this one little phrase in the amendment
"Subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
They are referring to CASE LAW pursuant to
The SCOTUS case known as United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
In the Wong Kim Ark case , Justices Fuller and Harlan dissented . 169 US 705.
Their dissent clearly shows that birthright citizenship has no Constitutional basis and SCOTUS should overturn the precedent/