200 illegal acts that Trump has committed in 2025

The only thing that can be done to a president is to impeach him and with the Republicans controlling Congress, that is not going to happen

Your list is really pathetic.

All these actions are perfectly legal. Implementing election integrity is the opposite of “undermining elections”. Undermining elections are what Democrats do, by fighting any attempt to implement common sense measures like voter ID.

Dems know they can’t win without cheating.

The Alien Enemies Act certainly gives him the power to ban immigrants of his choosing, as does another law:
View attachment 1189734
One problem with your post is that 59 federal judges, as well as the Supreme Court, found no evidence that the election was stolen (as Trump claimed), meaning that Trump trying to fix something that is NOT broken, is not only a waste of time but totally unnecessary.

He was not trying to fix anything, in fact the opposite, he was trying to fix the election to HIS liking, which is ILLEGAL.
 
Oh. . . so now you're a lawyer?

iu


:auiqs.jpg:
No , not at all , but you seem to believe you are.
 
Apparently the more members of Congress know about the law , the more they know how to bend it.
Is it illegal to “bend” laws?
GTFO with that shit, clown.
 
So it is yoar claim, that the lawyer whose soap boxing you posted, knows more about the law than the GOP members in congress who are also lawyers, AND managed to get themselves elected?

"140 Members of the House (31.7% of the House) and 47 Senators (47% of the Senate) hold law degrees;"

Why should the opinion of some rando lawyer mean more than the folks in Congress who also know that law?
Well then, why haven't they proven him to be wrong.............legally.

Oh, and by the way, the law says it clearly (the parameters for firing Inspector Generals) and it has been proven that Trump did not follow the law in most instances, making your post not addressing the statement
 
Well then, why haven't they proven him to be wrong.............legally.


Why would they waste time on a TDS social media shit talker, who uses his career as an appeal to authority fallacy .. . . to imply his arguments are even worth addressing?

That's as insane as actually bleeving that AOC knows shit about economics simply b/c she has a degree in it.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
law says it clearly (the parameters for firing Inspector Generals) and it has been proven that Trump did not follow the law
If congress passes a law to increase their power and the power of the establishment, does that mean the law is necessarily constitutional?



1764695972976.webp
 
Why would they waste time on a TDS social media shit talker, who uses his career as an appeal to authority fallacy .. . . to imply his arguments are even worth addressing?

That's as insane as actually bleeving that AOC knows shit about economics simply b/c she has a degree in it.

:auiqs.jpg:
You just undermined the claim you made in post #57. Fool !
 
Why would they waste time on a TDS social media shit talker, who uses his career as an appeal to authority fallacy .. . . to imply his arguments are even worth addressing?

That's as insane as actually bleeving that AOC knows shit about economics simply b/c she has a degree in it.

:auiqs.jpg:
It isn't just the "social media shit talker" saying it. An official Lawsuit against Trump has been filed stating that he broke this law, and he lost that lawsuit and is now up at the Supreme Court to validate the unlawfulness of that.

AI Overview

One lawsuit was filed by a group of eight inspectors general (IGs) who were fired by Donald Trump in January 2025. A federal judge later ruled that the Trump administration had unlawfully fired the IGs but declined to reinstate them, pending a related Supreme Court case.
 
It isn't just the "social media shit talker" saying it. An official Lawsuit against Trump has been filed stating that he broke this law, and he lost that lawsuit and is now up at the Supreme Court to validate the unlawfulness of that.

AI Overview

One lawsuit was filed by a group of eight inspectors general (IGs) who were fired by Donald Trump in January 2025. A federal judge later ruled that the Trump administration had unlawfully fired the IGs but declined to reinstate them, pending a related Supreme Court case.
So wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in. . . . are you even an American? Or do you feel some deep need to . . . .

iu
 
So wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in. . . . are you even an American? Or do you feel some deep need to . . . .

iu
The Supreme Court is there to confirm or not the ruling. Nonetheless, an official Federal Judge has already ruled against Trump. Why should I wait for the Supreme Court to rule? Do I have any reason to doubt the Federal Judge knowing the law? The law says it is illegal and that has already been RULED ON!
 
Trump is a conman, a liar, and someone that is in it for himself
You could list every crime and every lie, and they'd summarily deny and dismiss each and every last one of them.

The Faithful are far too emotionally invested in this to give an inch now. This is about far more than politics for them.
 
Why are Trump supporters supporting things done illegally by Trump? Aren't we all FOR our country being ruled by laws and the Constitution?
 
15th post
One problem with your post is that 59 federal judges, as well as the Supreme Court, found no evidence that the election was stolen (as Trump claimed), meaning that Trump trying to fix something that is NOT broken, is not only a waste of time but totally unnecessary.

He was not trying to fix anything, in fact the opposite, he was trying to fix the election to HIS liking, which is ILLEGAL.
Nope, none of them looked at evidence or ruled that “it wasn’t stolen”. They ruled on the grounds of procedures and precedent.
The numbers don’t lie, neither does the 2024 election which saw all these actions Biden votes evaporate.

If Biden won with “81 million votes” then 2024 would had been a cakewalk. Biden lost 17 of 18 bell weather counties. The numbers don’t lie, Biden cheated in 2020.

Regardless, how can voter ID laws hinder elections in any way?

Feel free to explain that one instead of deflecting about court cases.
 
You are looking everywhere (and finding nothing) to support your biased theory, aren't you?

The word you are ignoring is "ADVANCE-TO-THE-FIRING" notice. That is BEFORE they are fired!!!!!!!!!!

There is absolutely no "Hawk" in you. You are more like an "Emu", who is considered the dumbest bird in the world. Why don't you change your nick and be honest (rather than deceitful) about who you are. A dumb person that is biased to boot!
Likewise there is no "luckyone" in you. Right from your start here you have been lying, starting with a claim of being objective and non-partisan when you have consistently been a Leftwing hack spewing pravda.
You should change your nick(username) to "Lyingone" !
 
You could list every crime and every lie, and they'd summarily deny and dismiss each and every last one of them.

The Faithful are far too emotionally invested in this to give an inch now. This is about far more than politics for them.
Sounds more like what would apply to you Leftwingnut losers and traitors and idols/heroes Obama and Biden ... :rolleyes:
 
Why are Trump supporters supporting things done illegally by Trump? Aren't we all FOR our country being ruled by laws and the Constitution?
They're at war with evil. With Satan. It appears they really do think that.

So all bets are off. They'll get back to the laws and Constitution (wink wink) when they're "won".
 
Back
Top Bottom