‘Unconstitutional conspiracy’: Judge slams Trump administration over targeted deportations

[Rogue AI]

What do you think this has to do with the case at hand?

The defendant hasn’t said anything about overthrowing the US government.

Supporting Hamas and the whole 'death to America' thing rather dispute your claims.

 

[BackAgain]

Ohhhhh

So a guy is only old if he’s the opposition

For it

No, you retarded assclown. But you drew a false analogy. One can, like Biden, be old and clearly demented. Or one can be even older and yet unaffected by senility or any form of dementia.

Assholes like you point to the fact that the judge was a nominee of President Reagan. But you only apply age and related (possible) concerns to your own opponents, you hypocritical hack.

 

[Marener]

Supporting Hamas and the whole 'death to America' thing rather dispute your claims.

Where did the defendant do that?

 

[Lesh]

No, you regarded assclown. But you drew a false analogy. One can, like Biden, be old and clearly demented. Or one can be even older and yet unaffected by senility or any form of dementia.

Assholes like you point to the fact that the judge was a nominee of President Reagan. But you only apply age and related (possible) concerns to your own opponents, you hypocritical hack.

Bwahahahaha

Spinning like a top

And that’s “highly regarded”assclown…

 

[BackAgain]

Bwahahahaha

Spinning like a top

And that’s “highly regarded”assclown…

That’s a very effective way of pointing out my unedited typo. I’ve corrected it, now. Thanks for your always mature assistance.

In fact, you’re still retarded and held in very low regard.

 

[Rogue AI]

Where did the defendant do that?

Allegedly she led violent pro-Hamas protests at Tufts. It sufficient grounds under the cited case.

 

[berg80]

Blue slip appointment. Don't be an ignorant rube.

Young's rebuke and implied future ruling in no way violates the SC decision you cited. Don't be an obtuse hack.

The judge found the president and his aides targeted the members of the group for their First Amendment-protected views and speech, guided by an anonymously run private website targeting Palestinian students in the United States.

“I’ve asked myself why — how did this happen? How could our own government, the highest officials in our government, seek to infringe the rights of people lawfully here in the United States? And I’ve come to believe that there’s a concept of freedom here that I don’t understand,” the judge continued. “The record in this case convinces me that these high officials, and I include the president of the United States, have a fearful view of freedom.”

 

[Marener]

Allegedly she led violent pro-Hamas protests at Tufts. It sufficient grounds under the cited case.

She co-authored an opinion piece criticizing Israel.

You’re making things up.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

She co-authored an opinion piece criticizing Israel.

You’re making things up.

She should continue to do that back in her home country.

 

[Marener]

She should continue to do that back in her home country.

Pretty crazy that you big strong patriots are so afraid of a young woman.

You’re so threatened by her speech? Maybe your ideas aren’t very good.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Pretty crazy that you big strong patriots are so afraid of a young woman.

You’re so threatened by her speech? Maybe your ideas aren’t very good.

I wish her the best of luck, using her free speech rights back in her home country.

 

[Rogue AI]

She co-authored an opinion piece criticizing Israel.

You’re making things up.

She was accused of leading a violent protest. Do your liberal sources gloss over that? As to her op-ed, it was contrary to US foreign policy and intended to undermine decades of American diplomatic efforts.

 

[Marener]

She was accused of leading a violent protest. Do your liberal sources gloss over that? As to her op-ed, it was contrary to US foreign policy and intended to undermine decades of American diplomatic efforts.

Being contrary to US foreign policy is hardly the same as advocating to overthrow the government.

You’re moving the goalposts.

 

[Marener]

I wish her the best of luck, using her free speech rights back in her home country.

Lord knows we don’t have them here anymore.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lord knows we don’t have them here anymore.

It's awful!
Maybe you should move with her?

 

[Rogue AI]

Being contrary to US foreign policy is hardly the same as advocating to overthrow the government.

You’re moving the goalposts.

In fact not, the case did not specify the standards which had to be met, only that the law itself had broad limits and was constitutional.

 

[Captain Creeper]

You can say anything to a reporter, but the truth is the courts.

They're telling you that this administration is violating the Constitution. But Trump will claim the judges are rogues who say such things because they have TDS, and people will actually believe the lie and try to argue using it.

‘Unconstitutional conspiracy’: Judge slams Trump administration over targeted deportations​

A federal judge handling a lawsuit over the deportation of pro-Palestinian activists excoriated top administration officials, including President Donald Trump, for trampling on the First Amendment and for what the judge described as a fearful approach to freedom.

“There was no policy here,” said U.S. District Judge William Young, an 85-year-old Reagan appointee who has been on the federal bench in Boston for 40 years. “What happened here is an unconstitutional conspiracy to pick off certain people.”

During a hearing on the suit Thursday, Young tore into Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for pursuing a targeted deportation campaign that Young said was at odds with the country’s core values.

“I find it breathtaking that I have been compelled on the evidence to find the conduct of such high-level officers of our government — cabinet secretaries — conspired to infringe the First Amendment rights of people with such rights here in the United States,” Young said. “These cabinet secretaries have failed in their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/unconstitutional-conspiracy-judge-slams-trump-administration-over-targeted-deportations-00733070

I guess in you tiny brain the appellate courts who overturn the District Courts are not the truth. Moron.

 

[Darlo kittu]

When did become standard operating procedure for a political party to ignore existing immigration laws?

A judges to allow it?

 

[Marener]

In fact not, the case did not specify the standards which had to be met, only that the law itself had broad limits and was constitutional.

The precedent you included said the law required them to be advocating for the overthrow of the government.

That’s hardly broad, and it also doesn’t seem to apply here.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You can say anything to a reporter, but the truth is the courts.

They're telling you that this administration is violating the Constitution. But Trump will claim the judges are rogues who say such things because they have TDS, and people will actually believe the lie and try to argue using it.

‘Unconstitutional conspiracy’: Judge slams Trump administration over targeted deportations​

A federal judge handling a lawsuit over the deportation of pro-Palestinian activists excoriated top administration officials, including President Donald Trump, for trampling on the First Amendment and for what the judge described as a fearful approach to freedom.

“There was no policy here,” said U.S. District Judge William Young, an 85-year-old Reagan appointee who has been on the federal bench in Boston for 40 years. “What happened here is an unconstitutional conspiracy to pick off certain people.”

During a hearing on the suit Thursday, Young tore into Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for pursuing a targeted deportation campaign that Young said was at odds with the country’s core values.

“I find it breathtaking that I have been compelled on the evidence to find the conduct of such high-level officers of our government — cabinet secretaries — conspired to infringe the First Amendment rights of people with such rights here in the United States,” Young said. “These cabinet secretaries have failed in their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/15/unconstitutional-conspiracy-judge-slams-trump-administration-over-targeted-deportations-00733070

Trump should appoint himself as a district Judge