Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Chuz. Is that pronounced the way it is spells?
Rhymes with because?
Rhymes with because?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Roe died. Can't have the dead litigating." Is Bad Better Or Worse Than Not Good In Continuing Resolutions "
* Standardization Of Good Versus Not Good Public Protection *
The roe v wade ruled that in second trimester states could regulate abortion to ensure that the procedures were safe .
The diagnosis of second trimester developmental anomalies in fetus are available through ultrasound at 13 weeks , through amniocentesis at 15 - 20 , through microvilli at 13 weeks , assuming services are available , with miscarriage risks for the latter .
The roe v wade ruled that in third trimester states could proscribe abortion , as an ability of a fetus to survive an imminent live birth - at natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement for legitimate interests of a federate or state to provide equal protection with a citizen .
The roe v wade ruled that first trimester abortions were between doctor and patient and did not represent a significant public safety risk , even as d&c was more frequent then modern medical abortion .
To establish independence of the individual through equal protection of negative liberties , as per us 9th amendment , and to institute legitimate interests of a state for ensuring public safety and security , there is not a constitutional reason for states not to have roe v wade laws .
Any us citizen has legal standing to contest that federal or state proscription of abortion violates the enumerated rite to equal protection clause of us 14th amendment .Roe died. Can't have the dead litigating.
She is dead. The dead are not living citizens." Witless Protection Programs "
* Every Living Us Citizen Is Entitled To Legal Standing Against Dumbfounded Sedition And Malfeasance Of Dobbs *
Any us citizen has legal standing to contest that federal or state proscription of abortion violates the enumerated rite to equal protection clause of us 14th amendment .
The constitutional basis for the ruling of roe v wade has not changed from a live birth requirement for equal protection with a us citizen , though the cabal of traitors among jurisprudence , political parties and pundits of the fee press of a us republic , who pander and support the dumbfounded sedition and malfeasance of the dobbs decision , refuse to acknowledge it .She is dead. The dead are not living citizens.
Norma Leah Nelson McCorvey (née Nelson; September 22, 1947 – February 18, 2017), also known by the pseudonym Jane Roe, was the plaintiff in the landmark 1973 American legal case Roe v. Wade in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that individual state laws banning abortion were unconstitutional.<a href="Norma McCorvey - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>
Who among us has the right to bargain with and make compromises with the basic human rights of others?Um, okay. Now, how do you enforce it?
I promise you, every OB/GYN will just declare every fetus they aborted was at 11 weeks or less.
This is why SCOTUS passed Roe in 1973. They knew the laws were unworkable and not being followed, but the legislatures simply didn't have the political courage to take them off the books.
Way back when personalized plates were first allowed in my State, I tried to register "Choose Life" but too many characters. So, I tried to shorten it to ChuzLife and was told that was already pre-registered by Planned Parenthood. True story.Chuz. Is that pronounced the way it is spells?
Rhymes with because?
The basics of hue mammon rites conform with a universal scale of exploitation , else a macrocosm of magnanimous primordial ego is more inclined to adversely punish the arrogance of hue mammon .Who among us has the right to bargain with and make compromises with the basic human rights of others?
Who among us has the right to bargain with and make compromises with the basic human rights of others?
Who among us has the right to tell a woman what she can do with her body?
This is where you anti-choice fanatics always fall.
You assume that because you declare your principles, everyone is just going to go along with them.
This is the same mistake the people who promoted Prohibition thought. After they tricked dumb people into thinking banning alcohol would help beat the Kaiser or something, people promptly went about finding ways to flaunt the law. Police didn't care to enforce the laws (they needed to get drunk, too!)
Women had no problems getting an abortion before Roe, when all but five states restricted it in some way. OB/GYN's would perform the abortion, write something else down on the chart, insurance would happily pay for it, and everyone went home happy. (Except little Globby, he ended up in a medical waste container.)
I've explained this to you multiple times.
That statement fails to include assertions by anti-choice that any other entity also exists , which anti-choice assert is entitled to representation by proxy .Who among us has the right to tell a woman what she can do with her body?
A natural law theorist presumes that the means to the ends justifies its deontology , by expecting a logical fallacy for bandwagon abdication to nomian authority of its goad .This is where you anti-choice fanatics always fall.
You assume that because you declare your principles, everyone is just going to go along with them.
...This is the same mistake the people who promoted Prohibition thought. After they tricked dumb people into thinking banning alcohol would help beat the Kaiser or something, people promptly went about finding ways to flaunt the law. Police didn't care to enforce the laws (they needed to get drunk, too!)
The illicit unregulated markets often work well for civil liberties , however as the quality of products or services are not regulated , compliance with public safety and security standards is not determined .Women had no problems getting an abortion before Roe, when all but five states restricted it in some way. OB/GYN's would perform the abortion, write something else down on the chart, insurance would happily pay for it, and everyone went home happy. (Except little Globby, he ended up in a medical waste container.)
I've explained this to you multiple times.
Her Body, her choice.
Now, I have no respect for a woman who has an abortion because she didn't use birth control, or her plan to get her boyfriend to marry her didn't work, so the fetus becomes expendable.
All that said, it's not my decision, and it's not your decision, either.
Learn to cope.
When did I say I was a defender of human rights?
The lithograph depicts a little girl in a car seat as the victim of basic hue mammon rites , as is typical of abortion anti choice its depictions render a poster child icon at idealistic stages of development , when with cause abortion is optioned for developmental anomalies .When did I say I was a defender of human rights?
Fetuese aren't viable, and as long as they require another person to keep them alive, that person's buy in is required.
When did I say I was a defender of human rights?
Fetuese aren't viable, and as long as they require another person to keep them alive, that person's buy in is required.