This is why MAGA is an unyeilding force.

[justoffal]

attempting to imprison the leading candidate against your party is the very definition of tyranny .

They keep rationalizing that if Trump wasn't guilty he wouldn't be in this position and yet most legal experts agree that Alvin Bragg overstretched the limits of the connections between the events that he pieced together to make this schizophrenic jigsaw puzzle into one piece, with the help of a jury tampering judge.

 

[justoffal]

Ok policy position
Trump's policies benefited America
Biden's benefited others

Others including Biden's bank account. But then again every president that's been in office has benefited financially from it in some way.

 

[justoffal]

MAGA IS MORE THAN TRUMP.

It is not going anywhere when he leaves politics.

Be scared shitlibs.

That's probably true.

 

[Chillicothe]

"...attempting to imprison the leading candidate against your party is the very definition of tyranny ."

--------------------------------------------------------


'the very definition of tyranny'*

* Unless, of course, that leading candidate committed felonies, was arrested for them, underwent American jurisprudence of arraignment, grand juries, vetted trial juries sifted via competent voir dire by the defendant's own hired attorneys, and then that jury-of-his-peers unanimously found that 'leading candidate' guilty as charged.

34 times.

So there is that, not unimportant qualifier to poor poster Yidnar's incomplete suggestion.

 

[justoffal]

--------------------------------------------------------


'the very definition of tyranny'*

* Unless, of course, that leading candidate committed felonies, was arrested for them, underwent American jurisprudence of arraignment, grand juries, vetted trial juries sifted via competent voir dire by the defendant's own hired attorneys, and then that jury-of-his-peers unanimously found that 'leading candidate' guilty as charged.

34 times.

So there is that, not unimportant qualifier to poor poster Yidnar's incomplete suggestion.

Yeah the only problem is nobody's buying it except for the people who bought it before the trial. The entire proceeding was extremely unconvincing, reeked of jury tampering, and has been laughed at by many legal experts as a chewing gum and string case pieced together in desperation overseen by a biased judge.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

--------------------------------------------------------


'the very definition of tyranny'*

* Unless, of course, that leading candidate committed felonies, was arrested for them, underwent American jurisprudence of arraignment, grand juries, vetted trial juries sifted via competent voir dire by the defendant's own hired attorneys, and then that jury-of-his-peers unanimously found that 'leading candidate' guilty as charged.

34 times.

So there is that, not unimportant qualifier to poor poster Yidnar's incomplete suggestion.

Those indictments will be over turned

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yeah the only problem is nobody's buying it except for the people who bought it before the trial. The entire proceeding was extremely unconvincing, reeked of jury tampering, and has been laughed at by many legal experts as a chewing gum and string case pieced together in desperation overseen by a biased judge.

This is why it's going to be overtirnedb

 

[Billiejeens]

opting to support or vote for a convicted felon who will only be a dictator on day one...says a lot about trump morons

Idiotic response.

 

[Billiejeens]

You can retire the overused "convicted felon" line....it doesn't hold any water. Honestly man, how childish and stupid can you be? Do you think Trump is suddenly now a different person after the verdict? A tag name inserted by a kangaroo court will have no consequence.

Dictator? Oh please....so on day one all democratic political machinery will mysteriously cease to exist?

No, sadly.

 

[justoffal]

Idiotic response.

It's a talking points response being passed out from liberal Central that's all. They've all been told to make sure they continue to use the two words convicted felon in all of their speech.
It will have the same effect as the good economy verbiage on the listening public.

 

[Billiejeens]

no doubt you are very slow learners and you feel very aggrieved.

"**** ypur feelings."

try the violence again and we'll put you on a reservation

Sure *****

 

[Billiejeens]

It's a talking points response being passed out from liberal Central that's all. They've all been told to make sure they continue to use the two words convicted felon in all of their speech.
It will have the same effect as the good economy verbiage on the listening public.

Half of those brain dead ***** believe all of it.

 

[BluesLegend]

You can retire the overused "convicted felon" line...

That Dem talking point fizzled out quick. Poor Dems all of their get Trump schemes have failed.

 

[citygator]

And yet you still refuse to put your money where your mouth is.

Puss.

I’m not a cultist like MAGAts nor can I predict the future. I just know if every single election since 2016 has gone against MAGAts so….

 

[JGalt]

Others including Biden's bank account. But then again every president that's been in office has benefited financially from it in some way.

Not every President. Trump lost about one-third of his net worth during the time he was in office.

Donald Trump's Net Worth Fell by a Third During His Presidency, Forbes Says

 

[justoffal]

Half of those brain dead ***** believe all of it.

They did before the trial and before the tag name "convicted felon." Nothing has changed. If anything, people who are in the middle wondering whether or not the left was waging political lawfare on Trump, are now no longer wondering.

 

[MagicMike]

Another that didn't watch the video

I did watch the video you dolt.
It isn't worth a shit. That is why I commented on it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I did watch the video you dolt.
It isn't worth a shit. That is why I commented on it.

Sure you did
Of course you did