'This is not a do-over': Trump jurors told sexual abuse is undeniable in Carroll case

This is not re-litigable, Trumpers.

1705887923745.png
 
‘Former President Donald Trump's liability for sexual abuse in the E. Jean Carroll case cannot be revisited or relitigated, a state judge instructed a jury today, reported ABC News on Tuesday.

"Judge Lewis Kaplan told the nine jurors that they must accept as true that Trump forcibly sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll and defamed her when he denied it," said the report. "'Ms. Carroll did not make up her claim of forcible sexual abuse,' Judge Kaplan told the panel. 'His false statements tended to disparage Ms. Carroll or tended to expose her to hatred or to induce an unsavory opinion of her.' The judge made it clear the jury was only determining damages related to two defamatory statements Trump made in June 2019 when he denied Carroll's rape allegation."

Ultimately, Kaplan instructed the jury, "This trial is not a do-over of the previous trial which determined those facts."’


And a majority of Republicans in Iowa want to put Trump in the WH – someone who forcibly sexually assaulted a woman.

Like Trump, Republicans have no shame.
Apparently, the judge in this case is a mentor of the prosecutor. And hints at biases. Like perhaps explains why they just ignored they had no proof Trump did anything in this case. Plus how this could be seen as political oppression or intimidation. This case isn't over.
 
‘Former President Donald Trump's liability for sexual abuse in the E. Jean Carroll case cannot be revisited or relitigated, a state judge instructed a jury today, reported ABC News on Tuesday.

"Judge Lewis Kaplan told the nine jurors that they must accept as true that Trump forcibly sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll and defamed her when he denied it," said the report. "'Ms. Carroll did not make up her claim of forcible sexual abuse,' Judge Kaplan told the panel. 'His false statements tended to disparage Ms. Carroll or tended to expose her to hatred or to induce an unsavory opinion of her.' The judge made it clear the jury was only determining damages related to two defamatory statements Trump made in June 2019 when he denied Carroll's rape allegation."

Ultimately, Kaplan instructed the jury, "This trial is not a do-over of the previous trial which determined those facts."’


And a majority of Republicans in Iowa want to put Trump in the WH – someone who forcibly sexually assaulted a woman.

Like Trump, Republicans have no shame.
Trump never raped the woman he did not even ever encounter. The trial is a true sham.
 
Overruled, Magats, and sit down. You are all losers yet again.

He won't appeal.

And, yes, she grabbed him by the wallet.
 
Last edited:
Kaplan is a leftwing activist appointed by Clinton. This is purely another partisan witch hunt. The idea that Trump would go after an old hag then in her 50s, now in her 80s, several years older than him is absurd when he could get women in their 20s.

If you notice, every leftwing media photo of Carroll shows her with her new facelift and new do. All with the intention of trying to make it plausible Trump would be interested.
maga respect fpr women.
 
Ridiculous judicial misconduct.
There is no evidence of any rape at all.
Nor should a 30 year old case even been allowed.
Calling Jean Carroll a liar is a protected right.

The simple facts are she volunteered to get naked in front of Trump to model lingerie.
So the whole case is ridiculous.
 
Kaplan is a leftwing activist appointed by Clinton. This is purely another partisan witch hunt. The idea that Trump would go after an old hag then in her 50s, now in her 80s, several years older than him is absurd when he could get women in their 20s.

If you notice, every leftwing media photo of Carroll shows her with her new facelift and new do. All with the intention of trying to make it plausible Trump would be interested.

Why would Trump be interested? He's a fat slob with a pendulous belly.. even his wife is repulsed by him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top