This is a thread for those on the RIGHT to unequivocally condemn the racism, white supremacy, fascism, antisemitism, and bigotry of Charlie Kirk.

He didn't want to be a good person. He didn't encourage good. He worked to divide.

No he didn't. He would BEG people with different views to take the mic and debate him. He changed hundreds of thousands of minds this way. He would INTENTIONALLY go into the belly of the beast, college campuses, bastions of liberalism, to debate the students. The fact that the students didn't stand a chance against him and he used knowledge, not insults, to let them see how stupid they sounded, made him an INCREDIBLE person.
 
I use the term to describe a specific behavior that you and others

No you don't....you breath it like oxygen and exhale it like halitosis. Your promiscuous over usage of the term does a disservice to all real cases of actual racism. You have lost all sensible reference points to gauge the actual and legitimate connotation and have been reduced to a cackling echo of near meaninglessness.
Your opinion means nothing. I know what I am doing, and I know you have white fragility and can't take criticism of whites while you think you can criticize blacks with impunity. What's being overused is the racism coming from whites like you. But the entitlement mentality that comes from being a white racist has you believing that you have the right to make racist comments and hld rcist eliefs and nt be challenged, criticized, or questioned. The fact that you could not see the racism in the things Kirk said shows you are a racist, and thats not overuse of a term, it's called an accurate description of your belief and behavior.
 
And here we see an example of the flawed racist thinking about this policy. Affirmative Action allowed qualified blacks to get jobs that formerly unqualified whites were hired to do . Furthermore, the main recipients of this policy were white women. So every time a comment is made, such as the quote, it is evidence of that person's racism.

Now I find it funny that someone such as Charlie Kirk ran his mouth about people's qualifications because he dropped out of Junior college. The only way he was able to accumulate wealth was by peddling white grievance. His skill and education meant that he should have been working at a drive-thru window or washing dishes. Instead, he sold his soul to Satan, and that ended badly for him.

"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
Affirmative action allowed the formation of black admission cut-offs and white admission cut-offs. Grades and scores that allowed in 80% of blacks to med school allowed in less than 30% of whites.

IOW, blacks with a specific MCAT/GPA were almost 3x as likely to get accepted to med school than whites with those metrics. In fact, most blacks with mediocre still got accepted, whereas only 6% of Asians and 8% of whites got in.

Affirmative action has always been a racist policy. Opposing racist policies like AA does not make one a racist. To the contrary, supporting it does.

IMG_2781.webp
 
No, he went to coeg campuses trying t ully
No he didn't. He would BEG people with different views to take the mic and debate him. He changed hundreds of thousands of minds this way. He would INTENTIONALLY go into the belly of the beast, college campuses, bastions of liberalism, to debate the students. The fact that the students didn't stand a chance against him and he used knowledge, not insults, to let them see how stupid they sounded, made him an INCREDIBLE person.
Campuses aren't bastions of liberalism; this is a lie you right-wingers have created. Utah is hardly a state full of liberals. Kirk got chewed up at Oxford. Kirk went to college campuses to bully young kids. When did he debate older, more educated "liberals"? He made millions of young people hate him. The guy who killed him was 22, a member of the age group of young people Kirk consistently tried to bully.
 
Last edited:
I'll condemn fascism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism any day of the week.

I also condemn you for falsely ascribing those qualities to Charlie Kirk.
 
I'll condemn fascism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism any day of the week.

I also condemn you for falsely ascribing those qualities to Charlie Kirk.
And the young man, robbed of his entire life as a result of leftist hate and lies, isn’t even in the ground yet - and IM2 is doubling down on what got him murdered.
 
And the young man, robbed of his entire life as a result of leftist hate and lies, isn’t even in the ground yet - and IM2 is doubling down on what got him murdered.
Yes, he is. What a worthless piece of internet slime.
 
I'll condemn fascism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism any day of the week.

I also condemn you for falsely ascribing those qualities to Charlie Kirk.
These things wre not falsely ascribed to Kirk. Condemn yourself for your racism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. And the fact you agree with tht racist b---- Lisa is even more proof of what you are. You two and the rest of the MAGATS are the slime.
 
These things wre not falsely ascribed to Kirk. Condemn yourself for your racism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. And the fact you agree with tht racist b---- Lisa is even more proof of what you are. You two and the rest of the MAGATS are the slime.
^^^ and he’s now tripling down. What a piece of work.
 
So what is your point? None of those things is reason to go shoot someone. It bothers me more that he was a propagandist for Starvation and genocide in Gaza, denying Starvation when his own hero Trump said "THERE IS REAL STARVATION IN GAZA." That comes close to a crime against humanity.

 
These things wre not falsely ascribed to Kirk. Condemn yourself for your racism, bigotry, white supremacy, and anti-semitism. And the fact you agree with tht racist b---- Lisa is even more proof of what you are. You two and the rest of the MAGATS are the slime.
IM2 can you list three or four of your accomplishments in life? Doesn't have to be anything Earth shaking, curing cancer or whatnot.

Just things like your education, jobs you've been proud of, achievements at those jobs, etc. I'm curious if you would list your, um, work on the internet as your main achievement?
 
So what is your point? None of those things is reason to go shoot someone. It bothers me more that he was a propagandist for Starvation and genocide in Gaza, denying Starvation when his own hero Trump said "THERE IS REAL STARVATION IN GAZA." That comes close to a crime against humanity.


The point is that the right needs to take responsibility for what the rhetoric they spew can create.
 
The point is that the right needs to take responsibility for what the rhetoric they spew can create.
Is taking responsibility the same as taking a bullet in your world view?
 
The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Don't like it? Change the channel, change the station. if it 's a politician, vote against them.

kill your electronic device, not the messenger you disagree with.

that's the action of a barbarian.
IM2, I challenge you to watch ALL of the information behind all of those accusations, not just sound bites and segments. Once you have proper context, and can prove he was being racist, ill condemn him.
 
15th post
If you can't see that every word he said was wrong, then you're part of the problem.
Oh, I’m part of the problem.

What are you going to do about it?
 
Oh, I’m part of the problem.

What are you going to do about it?
I don't have to do anything. But I am fully confident that you will get what you deserve.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom