This is a thread for those on the LEFT to unequivocally condemn those celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

[Cougarbear]

Why should we take to the streets over a "Conservative" murdering a "Conservative"? That kind of violence is not at all right in any civilized society. You are really talking apples and oranges here. Floyd was murdered by a policeman is a way that represents the systemic violence against people of color. Just like Elijah McCain's death;

Judge frees Colorado paramedic convicted in death of Elijah McClain from prison

A judge is freeing from prison a Colorado paramedic convicted in the death of Elijah McClain, a Black man whose name became part of the rallying cries for social justice that swept the U.S. in 2020.

apnews.com

Robinson isn't a conservative. He was radicalized according to family and friends. He was changed to a Leftist antifa follower. Reminds me of a young 17 year old I once knew who stabbed another girl at school. Fortunately, the girl did not die. But, as soon as it happened, she jumped into a car where her brother was and had witnessed the stabbing. The brother said "Why did you do that?" He said it was like the evil spirit just left her and she was there left holding the bag (knive). She said, "I don't know why. I'm sorry?" Fortunately, because the girl did not die, she was rehabilitated and has gone on to have a good life free from violence. Sounds like when Robinson's father talked with him, the same thing happened. The evil spirit left him and his response was that he wanted to kill himself. Kirk was attempting to stop the radical brainwashing of the communists that run our education system. There is no apples an oranges. Nice try but you failed. t’s been more than 48 hours since Charlie’s murder & no cities have been set ablaze & no stores have been looted, we’re not the same.

 

[Darkwind]

Of course I condemn it, no strings attached.

Since everyone on the left condemns such things every time, what's the point of this wildly dishonest propaganda thread? That is, why do 100% of righties lie about the left being violent, instead of themselves?

Oh, that's right. The cult told them to bleat that lie, and not one of them has the brains or balls necessary to tell their cult that they won't lie for them.

Plus, all the righties want excuses to back violence themselves, and telling that lie is how they justify it. Yes, it is that obvious. We've seen it before in history. The old Nazis also made up stories about how the violence of the jews/liberals justified their own constant brownshirt tactics.

This isn't a debate. The right is much more violent. Since 1990, political shootings have been about 85% right / 15% left, and that trend has remained fairly constant.

Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society

By Celinet Duran. Using data from the U.S. Extremist Crime Database, this exploratory study examines the differences between far-left and far-right ideologically motivated fatal violence between 1990 and 2020.

ccjls.scholasticahq.com

Anyways, since this shooter was a hardcore Trump supporter -- as every non-kook expected, given the violent nature of the right -- we should now ask every Trump supporter if they condemn the nonstop violent rhetoric coming from their side that results in so many radicalized Trump supporters shooting people.

You're right. It isn't debatable. The left has been actively violent since Bush II.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Robinson isn't a conservative. He was radicalized according to family and friends. He was changed to a Leftist antifa follower. Reminds me of a young 17 year old I once knew who stabbed another girl at school. Fortunately, the girl did not die. But, as soon as it happened, she jumped into a car where her brother was and had witnessed the stabbing. The brother said "Why did you do that?" He said it was like the evil spirit just left her and she was there left holding the bag (knive). She said, "I don't know why. I'm sorry?" Fortunately, because the girl did not die, she was rehabilitated and has gone on to have a good life free from violence. Sounds like when Robinson's father talked with him, the same thing happened. The evil spirit left him and his response was that he wanted to kill himself. Kirk was attempting to stop the radical brainwashing of the communists that run our education system. There is no apples an oranges. Nice try but you failed. t’s been more than 48 hours since Charlie’s murder & no cities have been set ablaze & no stores have been looted, we’re not the same.

Erm isn't this rather off topic considering what's written in the OP?

 

[Cougarbear]

And here we have another lie. There were vigils and prayers every day during those protests. The only problem came from the right.

Four Extremist Groups Suspected of Involvement in Protest Violence

Attorney General William Barr warns that violence committed by antifa and other similar groups is "domestic terrorism" and will be treated as such

www.voanews.com

Warrant: White supremacist instigated looting at George Floyd protest

The “Umbrella Man,” as police describe him, is allegedly a member of the Hell’s Angels and associate of the prison gang Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist organization.

www.mprnews.org

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110775/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf

AP finds most arrested in protests aren't leftist radicals

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump portrays the hundreds of people arrested nationwide in protests against racial injustice as violent urban left-wing radicals.

apnews.com

And there are many more examples.

These Are the kind of lies people liKe Kirk trafficked.

Nice try. But, 48 hours and no violence at night either. Yes, there were some who acted appropriately. But, they did nothing to stop the violence at night. In fact, the Left encouraged it. And, yes, it also happened during the day too. t’s been more than 24 hours since Charlie’s murder & no cities have been set ablaze & no stores have been looted, we’re not the same.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Very, very close.

"His murder was completely unacceptable, and no one should be celebrating it."

Well, are there any murders that are acceptable? people should celebrate? not condemn?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Everybody.

 

[dblack]

Nah, I'm doing fine, and just what the thread deserves. Haven't read the thread, except for your op post and somebody's response that addressed me. Are you getting any good trolling in?

Why do you see it as trolling? Why is it so hard to simply condemn the ass hats celebrating this? What this thread really points out is how party loyalty is pushing you to abandon your humanity, pushing you into a corner were you can't make a simple, obvious condemnation of heinous behavior. It's not a trick question.

 

[Zincwarrior]

When someone like George Floyd dies, the Left take to the streets and burn down their own communities. When Kirk dies, the Right hold vigils and pray for his family. No protests. No violence.

And put in bomb threats to black colleges.

 

[Missourian]

Well, are there any murders that are acceptable? people should celebrate? not condemn?

I Don't want to derail the thread. Ask me in the Clean Debate zone.

 

[Zincwarrior]

There were not riots when Dem politicians were assassinated

And put in bomb threats to black colleges.

Either.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I Don't want to derail the thread. Ask me in the Clean Debate zone.

I would have thought a simple "no" would suffice.

See? you cannot do the very thing you are asking others to do.

 

[Missourian]

I would have thought a simple "no" would suffice.

See, you cannot do the very thing you are asking others to do.

Ask me in the clean debate zone if you want to know. Or start your own thread. I promise I'll answer.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Ask me in the clean debate zone if you want to know.

Ha, I already know.

 

[Missourian]

Ha, I already know.

...how to attempt to derail a thread.

 

[Moonglow]

I have seen no one in a jubilant mood over the assassination; the majority never spoke a word about it.

 

[Missourian]

Ha, I already know.

Then why bother asking?

 

[Moonglow]

How did you get he considered himself a leftist out of that?

He's not a leftist.

Because the OP asked fer lefties only, derpa.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Then why bother asking?

Because I didn't know (your answer to my question) until you refused to answer it, now I do know so we can let the matter rest.

 

[Missourian]

I have seen no one in a jubilant mood over the assassination; the majority never spoke a word about it.

If I showed you an example, would you unequivocally condemn it?

 

[Moonglow]

If I showed you an example, would you unequivocally condemn it?

Do I need to for you to exist?