This is a thread for those on the LEFT to unequivocally condemn those celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

[Cougarbear]

Well, we're 35 posts in.

Not one leftist taking the opportunity to "lower the temperature".

When someone like George Floyd dies, the Left take to the streets and burn down their own communities. When Kirk dies, the Right hold vigils and pray for his family. No protests. No violence.

 

[Old Rocks]

With no "both-sides-ism", no "what about-isms", no asides or footnotes.

Just a place to condemn the assassination of Charlie Kirk and anyone celebrating his murder.

THOSE ON THE LEFT ONLY PLEASE.

Why? Because it will have meaning coming from those that share an ideology... that people they perhaps respect are condemning their actions.

Of course we condemn that type of political violence. Even when it is done by a "Conservative" to another "Conservative" That kind of violence has no place in a civilized society, and all should condemn it. No calling for a Civil War over policy differences, no call for violence against anyone expressing their 1st Amendment right.

 

[IM2]

Hillary Clinton came from a Republican family.

Is it so hard to condemn those celebrating a political assassination?

Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with this.

*****, those like you have celebrated and goated about the deaths of blacks. So you can take your demand and shove it. Charlie Kirk celebrated the deaths of blacks. So again, you don't get to demand something from others you guys don't do.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Democrats here posted a list a things Kirk said that they believe justified shooting him.

If you say/post similar remarks, Democrats will justify shooting you.

Democrats = terrorists

All terrorists need to be DEPORTED

now.

The Trump administration will never make America Great Again

with them here.

 

[candycorn]

I'm not a leftie, but I know many of you think I am, so ...

People celebrating Kirk's assassination are sick and sickening. Unequivocally. They don't want debate. They want violent conflict.

Agreed. Quite sick.

 

[dblack]

This assassination has been condemned plenty and so we do not have to spend every day for the rest of our lives condemning this ...

Fair enough. How about now? Just this once?

 

[dblack]

Agreed. Quite sick.

+1

 

[forkintheroad7]

Of course we condemn that type of political violence. Even when it is done by a "Conservative" to another "Conservative" That kind of violence has no place in a civilized society, and all should condemn it. No calling for a Civil War over policy differences, no call for violence against anyone expressing their 1st Amendment right.

Oh, look

an "unequivocal condemnation"

right after I commented that there were no

"unequivocal condemnations"

(from the left, that is)

 

[dudmuck]

Democrats here posted a list a things Kirk said that they believe justified shooting him.

If you say/post similar remarks, Democrats will justify shooting you.

Democrats = terrorists

the shooter's family is all maga, but the terrorists are democrats?

 

[dblack]

I don't see any "unequivocal condemnations"

Hmmmm...

can't say I'm shocked

candycorn got one in there.

 

[dblack]

Of course we condemn that type of political violence. Even when it is done by a "Conservative" to another "Conservative" That kind of violence has no place in a civilized society, and all should condemn it. No calling for a Civil War over policy differences, no call for violence against anyone expressing their 1st Amendment right.

Fail

 

[Dante]

With no "both-sides-ism", no "what about-isms", no asides or footnotes.

Just a place to condemn the assassination of Charlie Kirk and anyone celebrating his murder.

THOSE ON THE LEFT ONLY PLEASE.

Why? Because it will have meaning coming from those that share an ideology... that people they perhaps respect are condemning their actions.

Screw you.

Loyalty Tests may be okay in your America, but...

screw you

 

[Old Rocks]

When someone like George Floyd dies, the Left take to the streets and burn down their own communities. When Kirk dies, the Right hold vigils and pray for his family. No protests. No violence.

Why should we take to the streets over a "Conservative" murdering a "Conservative"? That kind of violence is not at all right in any civilized society. You are really talking apples and oranges here. Floyd was murdered by a policeman is a way that represents the systemic violence against people of color. Just like Elijah McCain's death;

Judge frees Colorado paramedic convicted in death of Elijah McClain from prison

A judge is freeing from prison a Colorado paramedic convicted in the death of Elijah McClain, a Black man whose name became part of the rallying cries for social justice that swept the U.S. in 2020.

apnews.com

 

[Dante]

Of course we condemn that type of political violence. Even when it is done by a "Conservative" to another "Conservative" That kind of violence has no place in a civilized society, and all should condemn it. No calling for a Civil War over policy differences, no call for violence against anyone expressing their 1st Amendment right.

Why play along with these hateful loons?

 

[IM2]

When someone like George Floyd dies, the Left take to the streets and burn down their own communities. When Kirk dies, the Right hold vigils and pray for his family. No protests. No violence.

And here we have another lie. There were vigils and prayers every day during those protests. The only problem came from the right.

Four Extremist Groups Suspected of Involvement in Protest Violence

Attorney General William Barr warns that violence committed by antifa and other similar groups is "domestic terrorism" and will be treated as such

www.voanews.com

Warrant: White supremacist instigated looting at George Floyd protest

The “Umbrella Man,” as police describe him, is allegedly a member of the Hell’s Angels and associate of the prison gang Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist organization.

www.mprnews.org

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110775/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf

AP finds most arrested in protests aren't leftist radicals

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump portrays the hundreds of people arrested nationwide in protests against racial injustice as violent urban left-wing radicals.

apnews.com

And there are many more examples.

These Are the kind of lies people liKe Kirk trafficked.

 

[White 6]

Interesting that you would post this instead of a condemnation.

It's not hard to do. Go ahead, you can do it.

What is it you want condemned. Have you tried, your city council?

 

[dblack]

Screw you! Screw yo! Screw you!

Nobody owes you anything. You are a self-anointed A-hole with this thread

You owe it to yourself.

 

[Missourian]

Of course we condemn that type of political violence. Even when it is done by a "Conservative" to another "Conservative" That kind of violence has no place in a civilized society, and all should condemn it. No calling for a Civil War over policy differences, no call for violence against anyone expressing their 1st Amendment right.

That's a great start. Thank you.

But can you do it without the "both-sides"?

Just flat out condemn anyone celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination.

I'd really appreciate that. To get one person on the left to unequivocally renounce the hatred.

 

[forkintheroad7]

candycorn got one in there.

I can't find it

seriously, I can't... Oh well, one out of 100,000 is insignificant

 

[dblack]

I can't find it

seriously, I can't...

Post #45