“This administration has it exactly backward,”

So, where would we get electricity to replace the coal plant you want to shut down? Even if the windmill were to be built, it makes sense to wait until it is up and running before shutting down a producing plant.

Or . . . do you want a shortage, so that electricity bills go up and you can blame Trump?
What would make sense

Is NOT shutting down an energy source that is nearly completed
 
So, where would we get electricity to replace the coal plant you want to shut down? Even if the windmill were to be built, it makes sense to wait until it is up and running before shutting down a producing plant.

Or . . . do you want a shortage, so that electricity bills go up and you can blame Trump?
Energy production in the US is not in perfect balance. Maybe you need to sit in a corner and consider fully the ramifications of that reality.

While you are contemplating that, answer this. Are you in favor of this policy?

Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects​

 
What would make sense

Is NOT shutting down an energy source that is nearly completed
It's not the only one.

Two weeks ago, the administration said it was reversing a Biden administration decision to approve the Lava Ridge Wind Project, a giant wind farm planned for southern Idaho. The administration said it had discovered “legal deficiencies” in the original approval but did not provide details.
 
1756041569477.webp
 
Do you mine coal or work on an oil rig?

Rare earth mineral extraction is extremely dangerous and toxic to the workers and the environment. Comparing them against conventionals proves how extremely toxic green/clean energy is. Ive seen coal production and have been to several oil rigs. Go to africa, china, south america and you'll see how deadly clean energy is,.
 
So, where would we get electricity to replace the coal plant you want to shut down? Even if the windmill were to be built, it makes sense to wait until it is up and running before shutting down a producing plant.

Or . . . do you want a shortage, so that electricity bills go up and you can blame Trump?

They have no clue. They fart out what they think are great ideas with no clue of how to get there other than to destroy everything in the process and then they're off to the next horrible idea. It truly is amazing watching such absurdity.
 
The priority of the government should be ensuring that society has enough energy.

Energy = Economic growth.



There are realistically, only two ways to accomplish this.

First, to regulate and control the building of both crypto mining and data centers, the two largest users of energy, which are both growing industries.

The other way is to encourage the rapid building of both nuclear and coal plants, which China, our nearest competitor is doing, leaving us in its wake.


It is a simple equation any university educated student in social sciences used to learn, the more energy a society makes use of, the higher its living standards and economic output are.

a3zwf1.jpg

a3zwh9.jpg

a3zwj2.jpg



Wind and solar are a waste of time and money at this point. The government has no business subsidizing either.
 

Trump Administration Orders Work Halted on Wind Farm That Is Nearly Built​

At the same time as it thwarts the wind industry, the Trump administration has taken several steps to boost oil and gas as well as coal, the dirtiest and most expensive fossil fuel when it comes to burning it for electricity.

The Energy Department on Thursday extended an emergency order compelling a Michigan coal-burning power plant to stay open past its retirement date. The department has issued several orders to keep coal plants running past their planned closure dates, even in cases where the operators never sought an extension and ratepayers would shoulder the costs of complying.

“This administration has it exactly backward,” said Kit Kennedy, managing director for power at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group. “It’s trying to prop up clunky, polluting coal plants while doing all it can to halt the fastest-growing energy sources of the future — solar and wind power.”


The thread title applies to the trump government in many ways, but it's especially true when it comes to energy policy. It's one thing not to support progress and quite another to get in its way.

It’s also the case that, though the Trump administration is working to stymie the clean power business and some environmental groups are struggling, the economics of the energy transition have a momentum of their own.

This year, roughly half of all new generating capacity in the United States, some 33 gigawatts, is expected to come from solar energy. And while the growth of clean energy is slowing, it is still poised to be up 7 percent in the U.S. this year.

That growth is driven by the fact that, on balance, it is now cheaper and faster to build clean energy in the United States than it is to build new fossil fuel capacity, such as gas plants.


Economic reality has a way of transcending politics, and stupidity. However, if there are ways to shift the cost of building polluting fossil fuel plants in their favor I have no doubt the Energy Dept. will try to find it. Because it appears trump wants the regression of clean energy projects to be part of his already disastrous legacy.
I’m sure kit Kennedy is upset he’s not getting as much tax dollars to fund his projects that can’t make it in the market
 
AI Overview

While a precise, real-time "number of coal plants" is elusive, in mid-2023, China had over 300 new coal power plants in various stages of construction or planning, adding 17.1 GW to its grid in the first half of that year. Since 2022, the country has significantly increased the permitting of new coal capacity, with approvals in 2023 alone reaching 106 GW.
 
15th post
Has the OP ever started a thread whining about India’s coal plants?


AI Overview

Mapped: The world's coal power plants in 2020

India has approximately 285 to 300 operating coal-fired power plants as of early 2025, ranking as the second-highest in the world after China. This number reflects the significant portion of the country's electricity generation that still relies on coal.
 
Hey berg80 , do you still use any of these products?

Hypocrite.


SolventsDiesel fuelMotor OilBearing Grease
InkFloor WaxBallpoint PensFootball Cleats
UpholsterySweaters (that explains the itchy sweater I have at home)BoatsInsecticides
Bicycle TiresSports Car BodiesNail PolishFishing lures
DressesTiresGolf BagsPerfumes
CassettesDishwasher partsTool BoxesShoe Polish
Motorcycle HelmetCaulkingPetroleum JellyTransparent Tape
CD Player (do people still have these?)Faucet WashersAntisepticsClothesline
CurtainsFood PreservativesBasketballsSoap (that explains why soap doesn’t clean oil off your hands)
Vitamin CapsulesAntihistaminesPursesShoes
DashboardsCortisoneDeodorantFootballs
PuttyDyesPanty HoseRefrigerant
PercolatorsLife JacketsRubbing AlcoholLinings
SkisTV CabinetsShag RugsElectrician’s Tape
Tool RacksCar Battery CasesEpoxyPaint
MopsSlacksInsect RepellentOil Filters
UmbrellasYarnFertilizersHair Coloring
RoofingToilet SeatsFishing RodsLipstick
Denture AdhesiveLinoleumIce Cube TraysSynthetic Rubber
SpeakersPlastic WoodElectric BlanketsGlycerin
Tennis RacketsRubber CementFishing BootsDice
Nylon RopeCandlesTrash BagsHouse Paint
Water PipesHand LotionRoller SkatesSurf Boards
ShampooWheelsPaint RollersShower Curtains
Guitar StringsLuggageAspirinSafety Glasses
AntifreezeFootball HelmetsAwningsEyeglasses (I thought they were made from glass)
ClothesToothbrushesIce ChestsFootballs
CombsCD’s & DVD’sPaint BrushesDetergents
VaporizersBalloonsSun GlassesTents
Heart ValvesCrayonsParachutesTelephones
EnamelPillowsDishesCameras
AnestheticsArtificial TurfArtificial limbsBandages
DenturesModel CarsFolding DoorsHair Curlers
Cold creamMovie filmSoft Contact lensesDrinking Cups
Fan BeltsCar EnamelShaving CreamAmmonia
RefrigeratorsGolf BallsToothpaste (Yuck)Gasoline
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom