Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ole mitch has no business being in the Senate, period.
You really are uninformed, or a hack of the highest order.
Literally nothing you posted has any relationship to reality. Nothing.
You talk shit, but you don't prove shit.
You talk shit, but you don't prove shit.
Incompetent rebuttal.
Comments which do not rise above 'you're wrong" without elaboration or substantiation are not arguments or counter arguments.
But, to put it more bluntly; you talk shit but you don't prove shit.
He did some good things while Trump was in, then tucked tail and turned on Trump vacillating at best the minute it took loyalty and backbone and personal risk to stand beside his president. McConnell put his own career and safety ahead of the nation even knowing that the result of it all would be putting a person like Biden in the WH.
Perhaps Dershowitz and Turkey have a desire to protect our Constitution from democrats who want to use it and especially its Bill of Rights as toilet paper. After all the dems want to live in a Marxist socialist workers paradise. That obsolete form of government proven time and time again to be a failure doesn’t like freedom one bit.Ahh, Alan 'I wore my underpants' Dershowitz. Well, ever since he declared:
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
He has been in the legal doghouse, The quote was widely criticized by legal scholars and commentators from across the political spectrum, who saw it as an overly broad interpretation of executive power that could potentially provide a legal justification for a wide range of misconduct. Critics contended that this line of reasoning could undermine the system of checks and balances by rendering athe president immune to impeachment for virtually any action taken with the rationale of self-interest tied to perceived public interest.
AS for Turley, the man who is the self appointed man of the moderate viewpoint, whose criticism of liberals is often and criticism of deserved criticism of conservatives is scant and thus borders on sycophancy, Turley is worthy of criticism, himself: To Wit:
What Happened to Jonathan Turley, Really?
Turley’s midterm quandary—how to boost the poor performance by the party he has loyally served as academically-credentialed propagandist—is unenviable.slate.com
I'll pass on both of them.
If they found nothing why was he willing to plea guilty to crimes?They found absolutely nothing on Hunter at all (besides simple mis-demeanors).
US Attorney Weiss had authority to investigate anything he wanted relating to Hunter, and he found nothing .
This new "Special Council" designation does nothing and changes nothing with regard to the powers of US Attorney Weiss, the investigation, and the facts of the investigation. If Hunter was dirty, Weiss would have found it.
I welcome the Special council as it will fully clear Joe and Hunter from this GOP Witch Hunt of lies.
Republicans Wanted a Special Counsel Investigation of Hunter Biden. Now Many Oppose It.
Although some G.O.P. lawmakers see the appointment of David C. Weiss as a vindication of their strategy, others criticize the now-scuttled plea deal he struck with Mr. Biden.www.nytimes.com
They found absolutely nothing on Hunter at all (besides simple mis-demeanors).
US Attorney Weiss had authority to investigate anything he wanted relating to Hunter, and he found nothing .
This new "Special Council" designation does nothing and changes nothing with regard to the powers of US Attorney Weiss, the investigation, and the facts of the investigation. If Hunter was dirty, Weiss would have found it.
I welcome the Special council as it will fully clear Joe and Hunter from this GOP Witch Hunt of lies.
Republicans Wanted a Special Counsel Investigation of Hunter Biden. Now Many Oppose It.
Although some G.O.P. lawmakers see the appointment of David C. Weiss as a vindication of their strategy, others criticize the now-scuttled plea deal he struck with Mr. Biden.
Stop lying,it’s well documented Joe Biden’s bribes he has taken all the way back to his days as senator and very credible whistleblowers have come forward on his call girls on the laptop.opinion my ass.Just like the rest of you, am only hearing opinions based on what political party you prefer.
Really we have very little proven information in either direction.
With the exception of, we all know Hunter has some bad problems with behavior & drugs.
Try documented facts.That’s the world the wanker and rumpass live in.
Perhaps the Democratic Party and its recent actions show both Dershowitz and Turley that it is not really interested in preserving the rights and liberties granted by our Constitution and the Bill of Rights to citizens.Ahh, Alan 'I wore my underpants' Dershowitz. Well, ever since he declared:
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
He has been in the legal doghouse, The quote was widely criticized by legal scholars and commentators from across the political spectrum, who saw it as an overly broad interpretation of executive power that could potentially provide a legal justification for a wide range of misconduct. Critics contended that this line of reasoning could undermine the system of checks and balances by rendering the president immune to impeachment for virtually any action taken with the rationale of self-interest tied to perceived public interest.
AS for Turley, the man who is the self appointed man of the moderate viewpoint, whose criticism of liberals is often and criticism of deserved criticism of conservatives is scant and thus borders on sycophancy, Turley is worthy of criticism, himself: To Wit:
What Happened to Jonathan Turley, Really?
Turley’s midterm quandary—how to boost the poor performance by the party he has loyally served as academically-credentialed propagandist—is unenviable.
I'll pass on both of them.
Perhaps the Democratic Party and its recent actions show both Dershowitz and Turley that it is not really interested in preserving the rights and liberties granted by our Constitution and the Bill of Rights to citizens.
Perhaps they have enough integrity and honesty to voice their opinion on why the Democratic Party which does seem to want to make our nation a banana republic is wrong. In passing I heard Dershowitz state that while he will defend Trumps he will not vote for him in 2024.
I admire such men. They have more interest in preserving our nation than advancing the goals of just one Party. If this nation is to survive with any resemblance of what it was imagined to be, we need more men like Dershowitz and Turley and fewer like Joe Biden who sold his influence to buy mansions and gain wealth.
If Biden gets away with it and I predict he will, my grandchildren will live in a nation much more like the Soviet Union then the USA that I grew up in. A nation that has nothing worth fighting for as it is a one party dictatorship ruled by the corruption and greed of its political leaders.
Rumpass totally got owned.
thehill.com
This is a good piece of rational thinking:They found absolutely nothing on Hunter at all (besides simple mis-demeanors).
US Attorney Weiss had authority to investigate anything he wanted relating to Hunter, and he found nothing .
This new "Special Council" designation does nothing and changes nothing with regard to the powers of US Attorney Weiss, the investigation, and the facts of the investigation. If Hunter was dirty, Weiss would have found it.
I welcome the Special council as it will fully clear Joe and Hunter from this GOP Witch Hunt of lies.
Republicans Wanted a Special Counsel Investigation of Hunter Biden. Now Many Oppose It.
Although some G.O.P. lawmakers see the appointment of David C. Weiss as a vindication of their strategy, others criticize the now-scuttled plea deal he struck with Mr. Biden.
There’s a “perfect storm” brewing in the House in the coming weeks, and it could pose a threat to Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s speakership, Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) said Sunday.
“On the one hand, we've got to pass a continuing resolution," Buck said during an interview on MSNBC’s “Inside with Jen Psaki.” "We also have the impeachment issue. And we also have members of the House, led by my good friend, Chip Roy, who are concerned about policy issues. They want riders in the appropriations bills, amendments in the appropriations bills that guarantee some type of security on our Southern border.
“So you take those things put together, and Kevin McCarthy, the speaker, has made promises on each of those issues to different groups. And now it is all coming due at the same time,” Buck said.
Can you admit Trump lost the election and is lying about election fraud that never happened??Still a fake thread title but that is what is sought at Unfounded Statements Moron Broadcasts
