Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
Words are not violence. Thats a snowflake argument.wrong---that's because I respect the right of people NOT TO BE ATTACKED BY LYNCH MOBS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Words are not violence. Thats a snowflake argument.wrong---that's because I respect the right of people NOT TO BE ATTACKED BY LYNCH MOBS
was the word INCITE on your fourth grade vocabularyWords are not violence. Thats a snowflake argument.
I will say again. Words are not violence. To be criminally liable related to mob activity it has to be immediate, against a specific target, and actionable.was the word INCITE on your fourth grade vocabulary
list?
“Courts around the country have held that individuals cannot be sued for calling out the views of others as racist, fascist, homophobic, radical, or sexist. As we and the Center for Constitutional Rights explained in a friend-of-the-court brief we submitted last week in support of SPLC, such statements of opinion criticizing hateful or bigoted views lie at the core of First Amendment protection. They enable us to express ourselves (including our disgust), they animate our political discussion, and they offer us a tool to persuade others. For debate on political issues to flourish, we must be able to express our views about the prejudices of others without fearing that a defamation lawsuit could arise from our words.”
Americans are at liberty to state the fact that Musk is a fascist and racist, free from threats of lawsuits.
And yet it is only you guys writing swastikas and firebombing“Courts around the country have held that individuals cannot be sued for calling out the views of others as racist, fascist, homophobic, radical, or sexist. As we and the Center for Constitutional Rights explained in a friend-of-the-court brief we submitted last week in support of SPLC, such statements of opinion criticizing hateful or bigoted views lie at the core of First Amendment protection. They enable us to express ourselves (including our disgust), they animate our political discussion, and they offer us a tool to persuade others. For debate on political issues to flourish, we must be able to express our views about the prejudices of others without fearing that a defamation lawsuit could arise from our words.”
Americans are at liberty to state the fact that Musk is a fascist and racist, free from threats of lawsuits.
BS^^I will say again. Words are not violence. To be criminally liable related to mob activity it has to be immediate, against a specific target, and actionable.
Didn’t say he was starving, that’s not an element of the offenseit harmed his businesses? the poor guy is starving?
ok----good point----but as a public figure who HIMSELFDidn’t say he was starving, that’s not an element of the offense
Words are not violence. Thats a snowflake argument.
I do an even lower bar-----BLOCKING TRAFFICWhat about painting swastikas on peoples' cars and firebombing immigrant-owned businesses, like you guys are doing right now?
A legal target? What does that mean?? You can’t defame people, even public figuresok----good point----but as a public figure who HIMSELF
is a CONTROL FREAK ( <<<I am now liable?) he is, IMO,
a legal target
DEFAME? nope---accusing him of RAPE --is defamation--A legal target? What does that mean?? You can’t defame people, even public figures
Yes defame calling someone a racist or Nazi is offensive, just like falsely accusing someone of rape is offensiveDEFAME? nope---accusing him of RAPE --is defamation--
characterizing his politics is----politics
I did not attempt to characterize his politics---I amYes defame calling someone a racist or Nazi is offensive, just like falsely accusing someone of rape is offensive
You aren’t characterizing his polltics, he is not a national socialist, far from it, he in fact wants smaller govt not larger centralized govt. you are lying about him simply to damage his reputation…it’s textbook defamation
You should research your statement before revealing your ignorance.BS^^
No you aren’t, because nothing about just politics is remotely like the national socialist. You are using the term to damage his reputation just like when you call him a racist with zero evidenceI did not attempt to characterize his politics---I am
considering the issue on theory. The term "racist"
is a lot more subjective than "guilty of rape" ---as
is the term "nazi
That's not fact; it's opinion. You really need a windbag explanation to understand this?Americans are at liberty to state the fact that Musk is a fascist and racist, free from threats of lawsuits.
Well MAGAs love to call nonMAGAs Nazis too, so it protects them as well.Lefties want to put you in jail for using the wrong pronoun but they fight for the right to call you a Nazi. Go figure.
When Kim Kardashian is a Nazi everyone is a Nazi. Then too, Nazis are better than democrats. But then, everyone BUT democrats are better than democrats.You are very correct Nazi