White mother, son ordered to pay Black neighbor for violating Illinois Hate Crime Act!!!

[TNHarley]

The difference has to do with generalized vs specific.

I dont understand man. So if it someone is using their free speech against a particular, it doesn't count?

 

[Mack The Finger]

Bill Maher has built his whole career on calling white people crackers and the press cheers that.

Us JOOOs are all alike !

 

[TheInfiniteSadness]

When the leftists were marching around calling for “Death to Jews!,” it was ruled free speech.

You got a video of that or are you just making it up as usual

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

DEI, affirmative action, Black Lives Matter, etc., all bigoted racist initiatives. But they don’t justify this obvious act of racist hate. They’re all a bunch of racist tripe.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

The difference has to do with generalized vs specific.

HAHAHAHA. More wooly-brained liberal gibberish.

 

[Mac-7]

Targeted harrassment???? HAHAHA WTF does that mean?

It means a biden voter wants some walking around money

 

[ThisIsMe]

This is free speech absolutely.!!! The left supports this judgement and then calls the right fascist!!!

MSN

How did they arrive at a charge? Hate crimes cannot be charged and convicted independently. The hate crime has to be attached to an underlying crime. In other words, you can’t just charge someone for hate.

And before you all ask:

A person cannot be charged with a hate crime alone; it must be
attached to an underlying criminal act, such as assault, vandalism, or murder. Hate itself is not a crime in the U.S. and is protected by the First Amendment

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47060#:~:text=Hate%2C%20in%20and%20of,an%20added%20element%20of%20bias.%22

 

[ThisIsMe]

And this is why one of your people ended up with a $90,000 civil judgement against them because they obviously, like you, don't know what "targeted harassment" means.

It should be appealed and overturned since there was no crime for the hate crime to be attached to.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

You got a video of that or are you just making it up as usual

Educate yourself.

Global Antisemitic Incidents In the Wake of Hamas' War on Israel

www.adl.org

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It should be appealed and overturned since there was no crime for the hate crime to be attached to.

This case sounds like an actual threat of harm is involved so that would be the crime.
If hateful attitude alone could be considered a crime then over 90% of blacks would be in jail.

 

[ThisIsMe]

This case sounds like an actual threat of harm is involved so that would be the crime.
If hateful attitude alone could be considered a crime then over 90% of blacks would be in jail.

I didn’t see any threat of harm. They displayed some racist shit outside their home, but it doesn’t say any threat was given, unless they are saying the noose and effigy were a “threat”, but that would be hard to prove. No crime was committed that I can see so the hate crime should have never been brought. They would have to show some kind of intent I believe.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

This case sounds like an actual threat of harm is involved so that would be the crime.

HUH? what threat of harm?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I didn’t see any threat of harm. They displayed some racist shit outside their home, but it doesn’t say any threat was given, unless they are saying the noose and effigy were a “threat”, but that would be hard to prove. No crime was committed that I can see so the hate crime should have never been brought. They would have to show some kind of intent I believe.

I’d say the inference of a noose is a threat.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

HUH? what threat of harm?

Noose

 

[Lisa558]

This case sounds like an actual threat of harm is involved so that would be the crime.
If hateful attitude alone could be considered a crime then over 90% of blacks would be in jail.

Then why aren’t the chants of “Death to Jews!!” at leftist college campuses considered an actual threat of harm? Those antisemites are calling for people to murder Jews.

It can’t be OK when it’s against Jews (which the Harvard president said it was, in context), and then a hate crime when it’s against blacks.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Then why aren’t the chants of “Death to Jews!!” at leftist college campuses considered an actual threat of harm? Those antisemites are calling for people to murder Jews.

It can’t be OK when it’s against Jews (which the Harvard president said it was, in context), and then a hate crime when it’s against blacks.

I didn’t say it was OK to threaten Jews. Those anti-Semitic creeps should be charged, too.

 

[Lisa558]

I didn’t say it was OK to threaten Jews. Those anti-Semitic creeps should be charged, too.

No, I didn’t mean that YOU said it was OK.

I’m pointing out the double standards of leftists. The (black DEI) president of Harvard said it was OK to threaten to murder Jews on her campus, and leftists defended the Hitler rhetoric as “free speech.” But when vile threats are made against blacks, then they are opposed.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I’d say the inference of a noose is a threat.

I understand that, but you can’t be charged with a hate crime unless you are also charged with an underlying crime.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

I’d say the inference of a noose is a threat.

HAHAHAHA. A rope with a knot in it??? You are insane.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

When the leftists were marching around calling for “Death to Jews!,” it was ruled free speech.

What were those whites in Charlottesville chanting, "Jews won't replace us"?