There is something seriously warped about this Duggar statement

[bodecea]

I didn't follow what started the Sandusky case, but didn't one or more his victims sue him? Sandusky was not a minor so sealing his records is absurd.

Nor was Duggar when the investigation started.

Duggar was not arrested, charged with a crime or sued by anyone. The statute of limitations has expired and all you bigots are doing is hurting several innocent victims for no other reason than you hate Christians.

We aren't doing anything but discussing this on a public forum. Your concern for the victims is shallow. If you were really concerned for the victims, you'd be wondering why his parents swept this under the rug, and never got Josh any professional help from a licensed therapist. And stop with your whiny victim BS.

He's not fooling anyone. Neither him nor his fellow radical reactionary rightwing choir members.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Spoken like a pretend Christian.

^ Indeed.

 

[bodecea]

Duggar was not arrested, charged with a crime or sued by anyone. The statute of limitations has expired and all you bigots are doing is hurting several innocent victims for no other reason than you hate Christians.

We aren't doing anything but discussing this on a public forum. Your concern for the victims is shallow. If you were really concerned for the victims, you'd be wondering why his parents swept this under the rug, and never got Josh any professional help from a licensed therapist. And stop with your whiny victim BS.

Only a jerk would want to sensationalize what happened to 5 year old girls 12 years ago. The only one being harmed are the victims who are now teenagers and subjected to scrutiny and humiliation by assholes like you. In case you didn't notice, the Duggars have been widely discussed in the media.

Of course they're under scrutiny, you idiot, they are on a reality show preaching family values. They turned their own lives over to the media. This wouldn't have come back to bite them on the ass if they had been honest about it to begin with, and if they had dealt with it in an appropriate manner.

If they had dealt with it appropriately they would never have earned so much money as media whores. They sold their children out for money.

They did deal with it appropriately. Jealous of their money? LOL. Are all children on TV shows media whores, or just Christian children. Bigotry and jealousy are not very good arguments.

Well now...this is a new excuse for Josh.......people are jealous of the family's money............that's why we are calling them out on their hypocrisy and Josh being a pervert. Got to admit you are creative in your excuse making.

 

[bodecea]

Ever,

Jesus has forgiven him. the Duggars say that they know this, and presumably, Josh has a note from Jesus to that effect. Accordingly, unlike unforgiven child molesters, who are sent up the river for 10 to 20, Josh has been assigned to community service, where his job is to demonize gays.

Why isn't he a registered sex offender? Teens caught sexting have to be registered.

 

[TooTall]

We aren't doing anything but discussing this on a public forum. Your concern for the victims is shallow. If you were really concerned for the victims, you'd be wondering why his parents swept this under the rug, and never got Josh any professional help from a licensed therapist. And stop with your whiny victim BS.

Only a jerk would want to sensationalize what happened to 5 year old girls 12 years ago. The only one being harmed are the victims who are now teenagers and subjected to scrutiny and humiliation by assholes like you. In case you didn't notice, the Duggars have been widely discussed in the media.

Of course they're under scrutiny, you idiot, they are on a reality show preaching family values. They turned their own lives over to the media. This wouldn't have come back to bite them on the ass if they had been honest about it to begin with, and if they had dealt with it in an appropriate manner.

If they had dealt with it appropriately they would never have earned so much money as media whores. They sold their children out for money.

They did deal with it appropriately. Jealous of their money? LOL. Are all children on TV shows media whores, or just Christian children. Bigotry and jealousy are not very good arguments.

Well now...this is a new excuse for Josh.......people are jealous of the family's money............that's why we are calling them out on their hypocrisy and Josh being a pervert. Got to admit you are creative in your excuse making.

Josh doesn't need any excuses but bigots do.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Ever,

Jesus has forgiven him. the Duggars say that they know this, and presumably, Josh has a note from Jesus to that effect. Accordingly, unlike unforgiven child molesters, who are sent up the river for 10 to 20, Josh has been assigned to community service, where his job is to demonize gays.

Why isn't he a registered sex offender? Teens caught sexting have to be registered.

Why, because Jesus has forgiven him!

 

[bodecea]

Statistically, sex offenders continue to re-offend. That is why sex offenders are registered and face penalties for failing to do so. Josh has not been convicted, but his admission to having committed sex offenses as a youth is a strong indication that he may suffer and be subject to the same kind of illness other sex offenders have. The only way to insure he does not is by professional evaluation. Hence the only way to insure the safety of children around Josh is to make an evaluation so as to know what protective, if any, steps have to be taken. His unwillingness to be evaluated is suspicious, selfish and unreasonable. He himself has admitted to having experienced a problem that experts agree may be controlled, but in many cases, not cured. He needs to show that he is cured or that his illness can be controlled by professional assistance.

Show me the statistics of teenagers that are non-violent sex offenders that re-offend since I believe it is a very low percentage. It seems after 12 years, a marriage and three children, if Josh was a repeat sex offender he would have been, at the very least, been accused of something. He has shown that he is cured by his actions.

Sir, what was your stance for that Anthony Weiner incident?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Anthony Weiner is an adult, not a teenager, and should have known better. What was your opinion?

It is disturbing that folks like the Duggar's and many of their followers and fans compare things like what Anthony Weiner did and same sex marriage with a teenage molesting five year old little girls. Normal people don't put those things in the same category. That is part of the driving force behind this scandal. The Duggar's and their fans are attempting to minimize the molestation of little girls. They compare it to consenting adults deciding on sexuality or an adult sending pictures of himself to other adults. If we listen to them we will treat molesting little girls as some kind of miner offense that need not be taken seriously. Oh well, it is the families business is not good enough for most people. Oh well, how about if we be serious about teenagers molesting little kids.

.

I didn't follow the Anthony Weiner incident. Was he arrested? Did he ask for forgiveness for his apparently indecent actions? Did he seek professional help? I really would like to know before I could make a comparison. I have three gay couples as neighbors, two couples are women and one couple is male, and we get along extremely well and consider each other friends. They don't need to get married to live together and most legal problems they may have can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom.com.

"Some of my best friends are..................." gambit.

You don't need to get married either to live together....most of your legal problems can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom. com. Why aren't you doing that?0

 

[EverCurious]

The reason you bigots are insisting on humiliating the Duggars is because they are opposed to same sex marriage. That is beyond disgusting. Do you accept only the words in the Bible that you agree with?

The only reason bible thumpers are fighting SSM is because "gay sex is icky." Disgusting is relative isn't it...

The Dugger's have made millions, taking advantage of true believers, all the while covering this shit up so they could make more money. /THAT/ is disgusting.


And yes, I do pretty much only accept the words written in the bible that I happen to agree with. Unless some major shit went down and everyone in the country missed it, I am not required to "accept" jack shit that is written in the bible.

The bible is the word of men, written specifically to control other men. Thing is that book's message doesn't work on me, to me God is nothing more than a bio-electric impulse effect of the brain; there's some researchers who can hook you up so you can meet him if you'd like...

I don't mind ya'll getting together and believing in whatever the **** you want, hell I don't even really care if you assholes don't want to serve gays at your businesses, but I draw the line when you start trying to people they can't legally do something simply because of a few lines in your stupid book. So like I said, if you bible thumpers can't get in line with the rest of the world as far as SSM, then you really shouldn't be in this /free/ country, it's not your style clearly.

~ Someone else's religion should never be used to dictate how one lives in America, period.

No point in any further discussion with an anti-religious bigot. bye!

And there you have it. Merely accepting that they believe as /they/ wish is not enough, we are expected to believe exactly as they do or they write us off as bigots. The nutshell of extremism that drives my lack of sympathy for their "harassment" plights.


This is exactly what I was talking about that fired off his rant too, most American's have no patience for this kind of ridiculousness. These are the types who will end up driving Christianity ranks lower in the US. I just hope those who have need to believe in a higher power are not harmed in the process.

 

[bodecea]

Only a jerk would want to sensationalize what happened to 5 year old girls 12 years ago. The only one being harmed are the victims who are now teenagers and subjected to scrutiny and humiliation by assholes like you. In case you didn't notice, the Duggars have been widely discussed in the media.

Of course they're under scrutiny, you idiot, they are on a reality show preaching family values. They turned their own lives over to the media. This wouldn't have come back to bite them on the ass if they had been honest about it to begin with, and if they had dealt with it in an appropriate manner.

If they had dealt with it appropriately they would never have earned so much money as media whores. They sold their children out for money.

They did deal with it appropriately. Jealous of their money? LOL. Are all children on TV shows media whores, or just Christian children. Bigotry and jealousy are not very good arguments.

Well now...this is a new excuse for Josh.......people are jealous of the family's money............that's why we are calling them out on their hypocrisy and Josh being a pervert. Got to admit you are creative in your excuse making.

Josh doesn't need any excuses but bigots do.

So that's why people like you have been laying out all those excuses. Gotcha!

 

[Camp]

Statistically, sex offenders continue to re-offend. That is why sex offenders are registered and face penalties for failing to do so. Josh has not been convicted, but his admission to having committed sex offenses as a youth is a strong indication that he may suffer and be subject to the same kind of illness other sex offenders have. The only way to insure he does not is by professional evaluation. Hence the only way to insure the safety of children around Josh is to make an evaluation so as to know what protective, if any, steps have to be taken. His unwillingness to be evaluated is suspicious, selfish and unreasonable. He himself has admitted to having experienced a problem that experts agree may be controlled, but in many cases, not cured. He needs to show that he is cured or that his illness can be controlled by professional assistance.

Show me the statistics of teenagers that are non-violent sex offenders that re-offend since I believe it is a very low percentage. It seems after 12 years, a marriage and three children, if Josh was a repeat sex offender he would have been, at the very least, been accused of something. He has shown that he is cured by his actions.

Sir, what was your stance for that Anthony Weiner incident?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Anthony Weiner is an adult, not a teenager, and should have known better. What was your opinion?

It is disturbing that folks like the Duggar's and many of their followers and fans compare things like what Anthony Weiner did and same sex marriage with a teenage molesting five year old little girls. Normal people don't put those things in the same category. That is part of the driving force behind this scandal. The Duggar's and their fans are attempting to minimize the molestation of little girls. They compare it to consenting adults deciding on sexuality or an adult sending pictures of himself to other adults. If we listen to them we will treat molesting little girls as some kind of miner offense that need not be taken seriously. Oh well, it is the families business is not good enough for most people. Oh well, how about if we be serious about teenagers molesting little kids.

.

I didn't follow the Anthony Weiner incident. Was he arrested? Did he ask for forgiveness for his apparently indecent actions? Did he seek professional help? I really would like to know before I could make a comparison. I have three gay couples as neighbors, two couples are women and one couple is male, and we get along extremely well and consider each other friends. They don't need to get married to live together and most legal problems they may have can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom.com.

You offered an opinion on the guy and now you are saying you don't really know anything about the case. Maybe you should find out about these things before you try to discuss them. I know very little, nor do I care. I just know sending pictures of himself to adult females does not equate to Josh diddling his 5 year old kid sister and little girl visiting his home.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Show me the statistics of teenagers that are non-violent sex offenders that re-offend since I believe it is a very low percentage. It seems after 12 years, a marriage and three children, if Josh was a repeat sex offender he would have been, at the very least, been accused of something. He has shown that he is cured by his actions.

Sir, what was your stance for that Anthony Weiner incident?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Anthony Weiner is an adult, not a teenager, and should have known better. What was your opinion?

It is disturbing that folks like the Duggar's and many of their followers and fans compare things like what Anthony Weiner did and same sex marriage with a teenage molesting five year old little girls. Normal people don't put those things in the same category. That is part of the driving force behind this scandal. The Duggar's and their fans are attempting to minimize the molestation of little girls. They compare it to consenting adults deciding on sexuality or an adult sending pictures of himself to other adults. If we listen to them we will treat molesting little girls as some kind of miner offense that need not be taken seriously. Oh well, it is the families business is not good enough for most people. Oh well, how about if we be serious about teenagers molesting little kids.

.

I didn't follow the Anthony Weiner incident. Was he arrested? Did he ask for forgiveness for his apparently indecent actions? Did he seek professional help? I really would like to know before I could make a comparison. I have three gay couples as neighbors, two couples are women and one couple is male, and we get along extremely well and consider each other friends. They don't need to get married to live together and most legal problems they may have can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom.com.

You offered an opinion on the guy and now you are saying you don't really know anything about the case. Maybe you should find out about these things before you try to discuss them. I know very little, nor do I care. I just know sending pictures to himself to adult females does not equate to Josh diddling his 5 year old kid sister and little girl visiting his home.

15 times, no less......

 

[LittleNipper]

Homosexuality today is all about glamorizing sexual enjoyment/fulfillment... Dugger's problem seems to have been straightened out and not dwelled on, accepted, or normalized. I am sure he would be the first one to admit he had a problem. Not many homosexuals are willing today to admit they are hooked or have an issue. The only reason Duggar was "outed" was to discredit his family which is a thorn in the side of today's "new normal." Fortunately, Duggar isn't what he was at 14 or 15 ---- Unfortunately, most 'gays' may never grow up.

Just out of curiosity when were you homosexual and when did you "grow out of it"? Since you know what it's "all about"...

It is a matter of choice. One can grow into being a lush if one refuses to curb the desire to get drunk. Babies do not start off wanting to be sexual objects. They grow up, and along the way they decide how they are going to live. Are they going to live for themselves, someone else, or for God? This is the basic choice of life. A man can use his sexuality to further his own pleasure, or decide that sex is not all there is to life. In fact, it should be among the least important things for a Christian. To the homosexual, sex seems to be the major defining characteristic. I believe that such a desire is learned and nurtured.

An interesting theory, though not based on personal experience, and a bit hypocritical if you ask me. Do you also claim that heterosexual relationships are "improperly sparked" by the existence of sexual attraction between the couple?

I can agree that the choice of partner should not be a "sexual" decision alone, but your imagination that sex is /all/ there is in an LGBT relationship is both unfounded and patently wrong. You likely merely choose to only hear about LGBT sex because you discount the mentioned feelings that LGBT's have for each other as "invalid" - aka you know better than they do what they are feeling and thinking about each other. However, it should be noted that your "outside" perception does not in fact define the /true/ depth, nor shallowness, of anyone's LGBT relationship any more than you could define the depth or shallowness of a heterosexual's relationship from the "outside."

To paraphrase a wall-of-text I recently posted in another thread; LGBT relationships are not as shallow as you folks want to believe; in fact one could likely argue that there is more depth in an LGBT relationship than in a typical heterosexual relationship due to the shared empathy of many things that heterosexuals can't fully understand, the more upfront "truth" that LGBT's have with their partners as far as their life expectations, and a "kinship" that members of the opposite sex would typically not be capable of. To be clear, I'm not saying that LGBT relationships are necessarily better than heterosexual relationships or anything, merely that either type of relationship is almost always about more than just sex. Boiling down an LGBT relationship to "icky sex" is a wholly dishonest argument, in even the best light possible.

My adopted sister has been with her now wife for at least 20 years, two decades of commitment to each other is more than /mere/ sex by any standard of measurement. Similarly a close friend of the families son has been with is boyfriend for over a decade. I admit I do have other LGBT buddies who's relationships are more short lived and frequent, but I could say exactly the same of my heterosexual friends. Both sides split up over very similar issues as well; money handling, fidelity, and the vague "it just didn't work out" are the most common from either camp.

There is a lot to be said regarding the old song, "I want a girl, just like the girl that married dear old dad." I believe that a "Christian" male would be looking for someone who would be a great mother for any children they might have together. I'm not suggesting that pretty, beautiful, or knockout doesn't come into play. However, the reality is that the pretty little thing one marries today will not look the same in 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years. In fact I feel this is Bruce Jenner's problem. He's now old and he imagines that a sex change will provide "additional" time with a new lease on life.

A gay person I know once said, that he could never imagine having sex with an 80 year old. Well, the fact is that he will one day be 70 or 80 if he lives long enough ----- and who would wish to fulfill his "needs" then? And why is the divorce rate so high? Perhaps people today have unreasonable expectations for THEMSELVES!

The guy who marries with the hope of having children may at least have grandkids to look forward to. However, the person who needs sex for sex sake will likely lead a shallow life unless he matures. I mean the George Cloonies and Favios of yesterday are starting to look tied and worn-out.

 

[EverCurious]

So you blame all of societies marital woes upon gays, who can't even legally marry in most places? That's interesting.

I've never had /anyone/ tell me that they couldn't imagine having sex with an 80 year old, so idk what to say about your gay friend there. However, only like one, maybe two, of the LGBT's I know are looking for sex, the heterosexuals are far more inclined to that "fulfillment." Most of the LGBT's I know are looking for their "soul mates" and flowery romanticized shit like that (which, yea, I don't believe in.)

While I can agree with the "expectation" thing being a major cause for marriage failures (or any relationship failure) I again point out that this is not exclusive to LGBT relationships, heterosexuals have the same difficulties with unrealistic expectations of how their relationship is going to be, and yes, even how "marriage" is going to be - in fact many people on both sides (typically women) seem to have this stupid idea that if they get married things will change for the better; and I strongly advise both my straight and LGBT friends when I believe that they may be falling into that trap.

As far as aging, testosterone is a fickle thing as once ages. The desire for sex oft does wear off, but again you ignore that there is /more/ to the LGBT relationship than sex alone. Your one friend may in deed suffer from a "lack of fulfillment" or "satisfaction" but that isn't the case for every gay out there, not is it in any way exclusive to LGBT relationships. As far a Jenner, maybe he is looking for some more spot-light time, I really do not know, but he does not define all LGBT relationships, or even all Transgenders; Jenner is, like your gay friend, merely one individuals story.

Everything you've described as a "flaw" is both accepted and considered "normal" in heterosexual relationships, why then point it out as a "problem" for LGBTs? It's not a problem for LGBT's, it's a problem for all couples.

 

[LittleNipper]

So you blame all of societies marital woes upon gays, who can't even legally marry in most places? That's interesting.

I've never had /anyone/ tell me that they couldn't imagine having sex with an 80 year old, so idk what to say about your gay friend there. However, only like one, maybe two, of the LGBT's I know are looking for sex, the heterosexuals are far more inclined to that "fulfillment." Most of the LGBT's I know are looking for their "soul mates" and flowery romanticized shit like that (which, yea, I don't believe in.)

While I can agree with the "expectation" thing being a major cause for marriage failures (or any relationship failure) I again point out that this is not exclusive to LGBT relationships, heterosexuals have the same difficulties with unrealistic expectations of how their relationship is going to be, and yes, even how "marriage" is going to be - in fact many people on both sides (typically women) seem to have this stupid idea that if they get married things will change for the better; and I strongly advise both my straight and LGBT friends when I believe that they may be falling into that trap.

As far as aging, testosterone is a fickle thing as once ages. The desire for sex oft does wear off, but again you ignore that there is /more/ to the LGBT relationship than sex alone. Your one friend may in deed suffer from a "lack of fulfillment" or "satisfaction" but that isn't the case for every gay out there, not is it in any way exclusive to LGBT relationships. As far a Jenner, maybe he is looking for some more spot-light time, I really do not know, but he does not define all LGBT relationships, or even all Transgenders; Jenner is, like your gay friend, merely one individuals story.

Everything you've described as a "flaw" is both accepted and considered "normal" in heterosexual relationships, why then point it out as a "problem" for LGBTs? It's not a problem for LGBT's, it's a problem for all couples.

I don't blame gays ---- but I certainly don't want to add them to the ever increasing pile of societal woes. I feel society is better promoting the ideal and not settling for whatever and encouraging it for future generations as "normal." Marriage is an ideal. Homosexuality is just another rung down the ladder

 

[Ravi]

Duggar was not arrested, charged with a crime or sued by anyone. The statute of limitations has expired and all you bigots are doing is hurting several innocent victims for no other reason than you hate Christians.

We aren't doing anything but discussing this on a public forum. Your concern for the victims is shallow. If you were really concerned for the victims, you'd be wondering why his parents swept this under the rug, and never got Josh any professional help from a licensed therapist. And stop with your whiny victim BS.

Only a jerk would want to sensationalize what happened to 5 year old girls 12 years ago. The only one being harmed are the victims who are now teenagers and subjected to scrutiny and humiliation by assholes like you. In case you didn't notice, the Duggars have been widely discussed in the media.

Of course they're under scrutiny, you idiot, they are on a reality show preaching family values. They turned their own lives over to the media. This wouldn't have come back to bite them on the ass if they had been honest about it to begin with, and if they had dealt with it in an appropriate manner.

If they had dealt with it appropriately they would never have earned so much money as media whores. They sold their children out for money.

They did deal with it appropriately. Jealous of their money? LOL. Are all children on TV shows media whores, or just Christian children. Bigotry and jealousy are not very good arguments.

It can't be dealt with appropriately as the three of them escaped justice by covering it up past the point time the statute of limitations expired.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Duggars is sooooooo yesterday.

 

[Esmeralda]

So you blame all of societies marital woes upon gays, who can't even legally marry in most places? That's interesting.

I've never had /anyone/ tell me that they couldn't imagine having sex with an 80 year old, so idk what to say about your gay friend there. However, only like one, maybe two, of the LGBT's I know are looking for sex, the heterosexuals are far more inclined to that "fulfillment." Most of the LGBT's I know are looking for their "soul mates" and flowery romanticized shit like that (which, yea, I don't believe in.)

While I can agree with the "expectation" thing being a major cause for marriage failures (or any relationship failure) I again point out that this is not exclusive to LGBT relationships, heterosexuals have the same difficulties with unrealistic expectations of how their relationship is going to be, and yes, even how "marriage" is going to be - in fact many people on both sides (typically women) seem to have this stupid idea that if they get married things will change for the better; and I strongly advise both my straight and LGBT friends when I believe that they may be falling into that trap.

As far as aging, testosterone is a fickle thing as once ages. The desire for sex oft does wear off, but again you ignore that there is /more/ to the LGBT relationship than sex alone. Your one friend may in deed suffer from a "lack of fulfillment" or "satisfaction" but that isn't the case for every gay out there, not is it in any way exclusive to LGBT relationships. As far a Jenner, maybe he is looking for some more spot-light time, I really do not know, but he does not define all LGBT relationships, or even all Transgenders; Jenner is, like your gay friend, merely one individuals story.

Everything you've described as a "flaw" is both accepted and considered "normal" in heterosexual relationships, why then point it out as a "problem" for LGBTs? It's not a problem for LGBT's, it's a problem for all couples.

I don't blame gays ---- but I certainly don't want to add them to the ever increasing pile of societal woes. I feel society is better promoting the ideal and not settling for whatever and encouraging it for future generations as "normal." Marriage is an ideal. Homosexuality is just another rung down the ladder

With a 50% divorce rate, it isn't very ideal.

 

[TooTall]

Ever,

Jesus has forgiven him. the Duggars say that they know this, and presumably, Josh has a note from Jesus to that effect. Accordingly, unlike unforgiven child molesters, who are sent up the river for 10 to 20, Josh has been assigned to community service, where his job is to demonize gays.

Why isn't he a registered sex offender? Teens caught sexting have to be registered.

Why don't you ask whoever was the Chief of Police 12 years ago?

 

[TooTall]

Of course they're under scrutiny, you idiot, they are on a reality show preaching family values. They turned their own lives over to the media. This wouldn't have come back to bite them on the ass if they had been honest about it to begin with, and if they had dealt with it in an appropriate manner.

If they had dealt with it appropriately they would never have earned so much money as media whores. They sold their children out for money.

They did deal with it appropriately. Jealous of their money? LOL. Are all children on TV shows media whores, or just Christian children. Bigotry and jealousy are not very good arguments.

Well now...this is a new excuse for Josh.......people are jealous of the family's money............that's why we are calling them out on their hypocrisy and Josh being a pervert. Got to admit you are creative in your excuse making.

Josh doesn't need any excuses but bigots do.

So that's why people like you have been laying out all those excuses. Gotcha!

You are the dipshit that called someones jealousy of the money the Duggars make an excuse, not me.

 

[TooTall]

Show me the statistics of teenagers that are non-violent sex offenders that re-offend since I believe it is a very low percentage. It seems after 12 years, a marriage and three children, if Josh was a repeat sex offender he would have been, at the very least, been accused of something. He has shown that he is cured by his actions.

Sir, what was your stance for that Anthony Weiner incident?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Anthony Weiner is an adult, not a teenager, and should have known better. What was your opinion?

It is disturbing that folks like the Duggar's and many of their followers and fans compare things like what Anthony Weiner did and same sex marriage with a teenage molesting five year old little girls. Normal people don't put those things in the same category. That is part of the driving force behind this scandal. The Duggar's and their fans are attempting to minimize the molestation of little girls. They compare it to consenting adults deciding on sexuality or an adult sending pictures of himself to other adults. If we listen to them we will treat molesting little girls as some kind of miner offense that need not be taken seriously. Oh well, it is the families business is not good enough for most people. Oh well, how about if we be serious about teenagers molesting little kids.

.

I didn't follow the Anthony Weiner incident. Was he arrested? Did he ask for forgiveness for his apparently indecent actions? Did he seek professional help? I really would like to know before I could make a comparison. I have three gay couples as neighbors, two couples are women and one couple is male, and we get along extremely well and consider each other friends. They don't need to get married to live together and most legal problems they may have can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom.com.

You offered an opinion on the guy and now you are saying you don't really know anything about the case. Maybe you should find out about these things before you try to discuss them. I know very little, nor do I care. I just know sending pictures of himself to adult females does not equate to Josh diddling his 5 year old kid sister and little girl visiting his home.

For starters, I only offered my opinion on the difference between an adult and a teenager. And, you seem to be the only one who claims that Josh 'diddled' little girls. Are you sure about that or did you just grab that out of you ass.

 

[Camp]

Sir, what was your stance for that Anthony Weiner incident?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Anthony Weiner is an adult, not a teenager, and should have known better. What was your opinion?

It is disturbing that folks like the Duggar's and many of their followers and fans compare things like what Anthony Weiner did and same sex marriage with a teenage molesting five year old little girls. Normal people don't put those things in the same category. That is part of the driving force behind this scandal. The Duggar's and their fans are attempting to minimize the molestation of little girls. They compare it to consenting adults deciding on sexuality or an adult sending pictures of himself to other adults. If we listen to them we will treat molesting little girls as some kind of miner offense that need not be taken seriously. Oh well, it is the families business is not good enough for most people. Oh well, how about if we be serious about teenagers molesting little kids.

.

I didn't follow the Anthony Weiner incident. Was he arrested? Did he ask for forgiveness for his apparently indecent actions? Did he seek professional help? I really would like to know before I could make a comparison. I have three gay couples as neighbors, two couples are women and one couple is male, and we get along extremely well and consider each other friends. They don't need to get married to live together and most legal problems they may have can be solved by a power of attorney from legalzoom.com.

You offered an opinion on the guy and now you are saying you don't really know anything about the case. Maybe you should find out about these things before you try to discuss them. I know very little, nor do I care. I just know sending pictures of himself to adult females does not equate to Josh diddling his 5 year old kid sister and little girl visiting his home.

For starters, I only offered my opinion on the difference between an adult and a teenager. And, you seem to be the only one who claims that Josh 'diddled' little girls. Are you sure about that or did you just grab that out of you ass.

Perhaps we have different definitions of diddle. I thought it meant a kind of fondling of private parts. That is how I meant it to be interpreted.