The year is 1775,would Obama, Clintons & Hollywood be British Loyalists?

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
44,382
Reaction score
43,436
Points
3,605
I believe they would. George Washington would have had a fight on his hands as these Loyalists worked hard to place their new Queen on the throne in the U.S Monarchy they founded...
 
Last edited:
I believe they would. George Washington would have had a fight on his hands as these Loyalists worked hard to place their new Queen on the throne in the new U.S Monarchy they founded...

Well, Barry would be ... ummm ... "working" for Bill.
 
The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.
 
This has no business being in politics..

Sorry, I had just woken up, it was 7 am here. Why you need to take such an approach?

The question still stands, would they fight for American Independence, or be British Loyalists?!
 
The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.
The British bought the slaves and ruled them in America. It wasn't till 70 years after American indepedence that the slaves were freed. For 150 yearrs blacks were slaves of the Crown.
 
The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

You should read U.S. History before commenting.

No one like your country, food nor your women ( well usually on the women )
 
The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.
This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

I dunno. It's early yet. :laugh:
iknowiknow, and SR is posting.

but seriously, Britain had shit to do with America at that point.

basically this moron is claiming the English invaded the South

seriously, that's clearly manic
 
15th post
The op has it backwards. Russia has infiltrated the American voting process and Trump and the GOP have turned a blind eye. Putin loves him some stupid Americans
 
Back
Top Bottom