The worst terrorist threat in the U.S. today is the Southern Poverty Law Center

[P@triot]

A conservative think tank can come up with is 1620.

Those are actual cases where someone was found guilty, pumpkin. The fact that you intentionally keeping leaving that out to make everyone thing that is an “estimate” from the Heritage Foundation is testament to the fact that you know you’ve been thoroughly defeated.

They didn’t “come up” with that number. It’s a database of actual cases where someone was successfully prosecuted.

You don’t have an honest bone in your body because you’ve been so thoroughly defeated.

 

[P@triot]

So, every drunk driver is arrested, huh?

Sounds like you’re endorsing drunk driving....Not sure why you keep bringing it up.

Because it perfectly illustrates the stupidity of your claim that there are “only” () 1,600+ cases of voter fraud (as if that number is low).

Which means…

1. You’re so shockingly low-IQ that you need something insanely obvious explained to you

or

2. You’re being an immature, disingenuous prick because you know you’re so thoroughly defeated

So which is it? There can’t be a third. Are you really that low-IQ (it would explain why you vote Dumbocrat and support failure) or are you being disingenuous because you know you’ve been thoroughly defeated here?

 

[P@triot]

Every drunk driver is arrested, right?

Poor CC has been painted into a corner by logic & reason. Nowhere for her to go

 

[Nostra]

Poor CC has been painted into a corner by logic & reason. Nowhere for her to go

A spec of logic baffles that dingbat.

 

[candycorn]

Those are actual cases where someone was found guilty, pumpkin. The fact that you intentionally keeping leaving that out to make everyone thing that is an “estimate” from the Heritage Foundation is testament to the fact that you know you’ve been thoroughly defeated.

They didn’t “come up” with that number. It’s a database of actual cases where someone was successfully prosecuted.

You don’t have an honest bone in your body because you’ve been so thoroughly defeated.

Nice fantasy. In the real world, when someone says they have “a receipt” (as you did), that is documentation. Don’t blame me dickless that your receipt doesn’t back up your claim. Also be a good little boy and don’t say you have proof then try to distance yourself from what you produce.

But let’s play it your way. Tell us what the real number of voter fraud is since 1982–the year your “receipt” was dated.

 

[candycorn]

Your game is weak, Short Bys.

Tell us again how every illegal voter is caught.

Then explain how some do it for years and years over several elections.

Hmmmmmm…..

Not willing to pick a number I see. Oh well.

 

[P@triot]

Nice fantasy. In the real world, when someone says they have “a receipt” (as you did), that is documentation.

I posted the “receipt”. A database of actual convictions for voter fraud

Imagine trying to claim that “isn’t” the most indisputable receipt ever.

But let’s play it your way. Tell us what the real number of voter fraud is since 1982–the year your “receipt” was dated.

How could we know how many instances that weren’t prosecuted as well as the instances where they were never caught?

The point is, the entire world (including you) knows two things:

1. 1,600+ convictions is a ton of voter fraud. Over 44 years, that’s 22 elections (there aren’t elections every year, sweetie) which comes out to approximately 72 cases of fraud each election where someone was actually caught and prosecuted. Each one of those cases represents dozens to thousands of fraudulent votes.

2. The actual number is even higher since these are just the instances of cases where people were found guilty in a court of law.

 

[P@triot]

Not willing to pick a number I see. Oh well.

Not willing to admit that every case isn’t caught and/or prosecuted, I see. Oh well. The inability to have an honest discussion is what the entire world has come to expect from the low-IQ left.

 

[P@triot]

Also be a good little boy and don’t say you have proof then try to distance yourself from what you produce.

“Distance myself”? 1,600+ instances of successfully prosecuted cases of voter fraud over 22 elections is staggering.

The fact that you even attempt to dismiss 1,600+ cases just like it was 4 total instances just shows how disingenuous you are.

It also illustrates that you know Democrats cannot win clean & fair elections.

“1,600+ cases? Ahhh….pay no mind! It’s only voter fraud. We the People shouldn’t get to decide our own representatives!” - CC

 

[candycorn]

I posted the “receipt”. A database of actual convictions for voter fraud

But you want to claim things not on the receipt.

So no sale.

When you get some proof c’mon back.

The point is, the entire world (including you) knows two things:

1. 1,600+ convictions is a ton of voter fraud. Over 44 years, that’s 22 elections (there aren’t elections every year, sweetie) which comes out to approximately 72 cases of fraud each election where someone was actually caught and prosecuted. Each one of those cases represents dozens to thousands of fraudulent votes.

72 cases out of a hundreds of millions of votes?

Dozens to thousands? Another lie.

Some of YOUR LINK has cases in 1983. Neither a general or midterm election was held in 1983.

2. The actual number is even higher since these are just the instances of cases where people were found guilty in a court of law.

Prove it. But in the mean time… Tell us the number you suspect of the widely debunked imaginary “rampant” voter fraud.

C’mon little boy..time for another spanking

 

[ColonelAngus]

Massive props to Patriot.

Nailed TF out of this one!

 

[Nostra]

Nice fantasy. In the real world, when someone says they have “a receipt” (as you did), that is documentation. Don’t blame me dickless that your receipt doesn’t back up your claim. Also be a good little boy and don’t say you have proof then try to distance yourself from what you produce.

But let’s play it your way. Tell us what the real number of voter fraud is since 1982–the year your “receipt” was dated.

This idiot thinks all voter fraud is caught.
‘Yes folks, that’s how stupid this one is.

 

[Nostra]

Not willing to pick a number I see. Oh well.

Here is a number: 2.

It is your IQ.

 

[Hafar1014]

Better than we were during the Jim Crow, you want to return us to.

The problem is that whites like you exist, and many of them are in positions of responsibility.

Considering the crime poor schools ghettos largest group on welfare most arrets and put in prison all created by democrats how is that better. It was better in the 1950s before the welfare state put you back in slavery

 

[P@triot]

Some of YOUR LINK has cases in 1983. Neither a general or midterm election was held in 1983.

View attachment 1248553
View attachment 1248554

Oh sweetie…that was the year of the conviction…

From your screenshot….

 

[candycorn]

Oh sweetie…that was the year of the conviction…

False news.

 

[P@triot]

False news.

I get why you’re lying here - I’m genuinely embarrassed for you. That is a seriously humiliating gaffe illustrating your inability to read or even engage in logic and reason.

 

[P@triot]

Serious question, candycorn - do you ever get tired of being wrong? Why don’t you just ask me? I’ll happily guide you to facts and apply the logic & reason for you.

 

[candycorn]

Oh sweetie…that was the year of the conviction…

From your screenshot….

View attachment 1248602

The instances cited by YOUR SOURCE were from local elections as well this meaning far more than just 22 elections. So the % of fraud grows smaller still.

 

[Nostra]

Serious question, candycorn - do you ever get tired of being wrong? Why don’t you just ask me? I’ll happily guide you to facts and apply the logic & reason for you.

Obviously she never gets tired of it since she is wrong in every post.