The Worst President America Ever Had

Cock Breath? You projecting again?

The last place you were seen was in the john of a naval base in Mexico giving BJs for nickels so you could get some cheap beer.

And I saw the episode.

Hannity the faggot said he would get water boarded. He never did it. Plus, he ripped off the public that thought their money was going to vets.

And I'd give you a nickle...but I don't let fags give me BJs.

Stick to the fags in the bathroom looking for your services.

Sallow, you repeatedly call people you don't agree with and wish to insult, "faggots".

Is that how Democrats/liberals REALLY think about gays?

YOu really don't get it, do you EDGE?

SALLOW is NOT a DEM. Sallow complains about OBAMA as much (and far more logically) than the most rabid obama deraged idiots on this board.

Sallow, you see, is PAYING ATTENTION TO THE FACTS

I know, to you that's impossible.

One DOES NOT NEED TO KNOW ANYTHING, one is either a Republican or a Democrat because that's the ONLY choice one has.

This blind loyalty to party is how the MASTERS make you tools dance to their tunes.

You're dancing this nation into the dustbin of history.

wrong, sallow NEVER complains about Obama unless it's that he's not being thuggish enough with Republicans in Congress
and he damn sure never complains about anything Democrats do, just Republicans..he even lies for the proven liar Obama
 
Last edited:
The Worst President America Ever Had
Nixon, no Raygun, no Shrub daddy, no Shrub Jr.......Cons are such assholes it's hard to pick just one.

what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Those two guys respresent two of the most corrupt administrations in our history. If one judges corruption by the numbers of people in an administration that get indicted, convicted, and pardoned, Reagan wins the prize. Both Nixon and Reagan administrations waged secret wars after being forbidden to do so by Congress.
Nixon opened trade to China. You see the results today.
Reagan instituted policies that destroyed the middle class.
Reagan gave birth to modern day terrorist. He broke the policy of not only Carter, but of international response to terrorism by negociating with terrorist. He made terrorism against Americans profitable with the sale of weapons to Iran for the exchange of hostages taken by Hezbollah in Lebanon. His weak or non-existent response to consistent and regular acts of terrorism against American citizens, military and diplomats made American citizens open targets for terrorist.
His over the top support for Jihahdist in Afghanistan helped to empower Bin Ladin and create Al Qaeda. The Soviets would have been defeated in Afghanistan without the creation of powerful Jihadist group(s) like the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
 
Nixon, no Raygun, no Shrub daddy, no Shrub Jr.......Cons are such assholes it's hard to pick just one.

what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Those two guys respresent two of the most corrupt administrations in our history. If one judges corruption by the numbers of people in an administration that get indicted, convicted, and pardoned, Reagan wins the prize. Both Nixon and Reagan administrations waged secret wars after being forbidden to do so by Congress.
Nixon opened trade to China. You see the results today.
Reagan instituted policies that destroyed the middle class.
Reagan gave birth to modern day terrorist. He broke the policy of not only Carter, but of international response to terrorism by negociating with terrorist. He made terrorism against Americans profitable with the sale of weapons to Iran for the exchange of hostages taken by Hezbollah in Lebanon. His weak or non-existent response to consistent and regular acts of terrorism against American citizens, military and diplomats made American citizens open targets for terrorist.
His over the top support for Jihahdist in Afghanistan helped to empower Bin Ladin and create Al Qaeda. The Soviets would have been defeated in Afghanistan without the creation of powerful Jihadist group(s) like the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

nixon opened up trade to china which shited manufacturing from Japan to china. Made in Japan became made in china. but remember it was clinton who eliminated the import quotas which is what really opened up the flood gates to imported goods.

so now do me a favor, put aside all your litttle bullshit liberal talking points and tell me the specific legislation these corrupt republicans are responsible for that have created all these issues and then tell me what the democrats have done to reverse them. here's 't your turn to be a hero instead of another gum flapping liberal puppet. Bet you cant do it.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Those two guys respresent two of the most corrupt administrations in our history. If one judges corruption by the numbers of people in an administration that get indicted, convicted, and pardoned, Reagan wins the prize. Both Nixon and Reagan administrations waged secret wars after being forbidden to do so by Congress.
Nixon opened trade to China. You see the results today.
Reagan instituted policies that destroyed the middle class.
Reagan gave birth to modern day terrorist. He broke the policy of not only Carter, but of international response to terrorism by negociating with terrorist. He made terrorism against Americans profitable with the sale of weapons to Iran for the exchange of hostages taken by Hezbollah in Lebanon. His weak or non-existent response to consistent and regular acts of terrorism against American citizens, military and diplomats made American citizens open targets for terrorist.
His over the top support for Jihahdist in Afghanistan helped to empower Bin Ladin and create Al Qaeda. The Soviets would have been defeated in Afghanistan without the creation of powerful Jihadist group(s) like the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

nixon opened up trade to china which shited manufacturing from Japan to china. Made in Japan became made in china. but remember it was clinton who eliminated the import quotas which is what really opened up the flood gates to imported goods.

so now do me a favor, put aside all your litttle bullshit liberal talking points and tell me the specific legislation these corrupt republicans are responsible for that have created all these issues and then tell me what the democrats have done to reverse them. here's 't your turn to be a hero instead of another gum flapping liberal puppet. Bet you cant do it.

You are the gum flapper that believes a President is good or bad, great or horrible because of political ideology, economic policies, legislation. None of what I posted are talking points. What I posted are indisputable facts. A talking point would be your comment about shifting trade from Japan to China as if that is irrelevant and of no great or meaningful consequence. They are both Asian countries so what difference does it make? Brainwashed ideologs fall for that nonsense.
Some are less influenced by ideology and "politics"and view a Presidency by the long lasting legacy. Nixon brought us long lasting trade with China that eventually has led to the destruction of American maunufacturing. Reagan led us directly into an age of dealing with terrorism and terrorist. You don't have to be a liberal, conservative, communist, socialist of cartoonist to understand these things. If your head isn't stuck up your ass you should be able to see reality.
 
Last edited:
Sallow, you repeatedly call people you don't agree with and wish to insult, "faggots".

Is that how Democrats/liberals REALLY think about gays?

YOu really don't get it, do you EDGE?

SALLOW is NOT a DEM. Sallow complains about OBAMA as much (and far more logically) than the most rabid obama deraged idiots on this board.

Sallow, you see, is PAYING ATTENTION TO THE FACTS

I know, to you that's impossible.

One DOES NOT NEED TO KNOW ANYTHING, one is either a Republican or a Democrat because that's the ONLY choice one has.

This blind loyalty to party is how the MASTERS make you tools dance to their tunes.

You're dancing this nation into the dustbin of history.

wrong, sallow NEVER complains about Obama unless it's that he's not being thuggish enough with Republicans in Congress

Possible there's merit in that. I didn't read Sallow for a long time.

and he damn sure never complains about anything Democrats do, just Republicans..he even lies for the proven liar Obama

That's just point blank not true, lad.


Sallow's complaints about the hypocricy of the O-Man often mirror my own, in fact.

I know it must hard for somebody like you to understand but some of us here art USMB actually do think for ourselves and are NOT partisan tools.

I suspect Sallow is one of those thorny ornorey thinkers who will not be stampeded by the propagandists of either party.

Leastwise that's been my impression of his posts for the last few months.
 
Last edited:
Nixon, no Raygun, no Shrub daddy, no Shrub Jr.......Cons are such assholes it's hard to pick just one.

what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

You would win that bet since it is traditional that the incoming President reverses the outgoing Presidents EO's. They all did it!

I remember two and there are many more. The use of stem cells for research, a slap in the face of the pro-life folks and the closing of Gitmo within a year. LOL
 
what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

You would win that bet since it is traditional that the incoming President reverses the outgoing Presidents EO's. They all did it!

I remember two and there are many more. The use of stem cells for research, a slap in the face of the pro-life folks and the closing of Gitmo within a year. LOL

Exactly. Embryonic Stem Cell research was not banned. The use of federal funds for such research was. Is it a slap in the face to the pro life folks when fertility clinics destroy unused embryos? Congress legislated that Gitmo remain open.
 
Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

You would win that bet since it is traditional that the incoming President reverses the outgoing Presidents EO's. They all did it!

I remember two and there are many more. The use of stem cells for research, a slap in the face of the pro-life folks and the closing of Gitmo within a year. LOL

Exactly. Embryonic Stem Cell research was not banned. The use of federal funds for such research was. Is it a slap in the face to the pro life folks when fertility clinics destroy unused embryos? Congress legislated that Gitmo remain open.

I am not familiar with the pro life position on fertility clinics destroying unused embryos so you will have to ask someone that is a member of that group. The restoration of federal funds for research was exactly what I described.

Congress certainly did stop Obama from closing Gitmo. We didn't need to open Gitmo north in an Illinois prison. I always considered that an Obama kickback for the people in Illinois who helped his campaign.

We also didn't need to have a bunch of high priced lawyers get these terrorists off in an American court so they could go back to killing Americans. Middle East oil money would have financed the show trials with unlimited money for lawyers quite willing to take it.
 
Those two guys respresent two of the most corrupt administrations in our history. If one judges corruption by the numbers of people in an administration that get indicted, convicted, and pardoned, Reagan wins the prize. Both Nixon and Reagan administrations waged secret wars after being forbidden to do so by Congress.
Nixon opened trade to China. You see the results today.
Reagan instituted policies that destroyed the middle class.
Reagan gave birth to modern day terrorist. He broke the policy of not only Carter, but of international response to terrorism by negociating with terrorist. He made terrorism against Americans profitable with the sale of weapons to Iran for the exchange of hostages taken by Hezbollah in Lebanon. His weak or non-existent response to consistent and regular acts of terrorism against American citizens, military and diplomats made American citizens open targets for terrorist.
His over the top support for Jihahdist in Afghanistan helped to empower Bin Ladin and create Al Qaeda. The Soviets would have been defeated in Afghanistan without the creation of powerful Jihadist group(s) like the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

nixon opened up trade to china which shited manufacturing from Japan to china. Made in Japan became made in china. but remember it was clinton who eliminated the import quotas which is what really opened up the flood gates to imported goods.

so now do me a favor, put aside all your litttle bullshit liberal talking points and tell me the specific legislation these corrupt republicans are responsible for that have created all these issues and then tell me what the democrats have done to reverse them. here's 't your turn to be a hero instead of another gum flapping liberal puppet. Bet you cant do it.

You are the gum flapper that believes a President is good or bad, great or horrible because of political ideology, economic policies, legislation. None of what I posted are talking points. What I posted are indisputable facts. A talking point would be your comment about shifting trade from Japan to China as if that is irrelevant and of no great or meaningful consequence. They are both Asian countries so what difference does it make? Brainwashed ideologs fall for that nonsense.
Some are less influenced by ideology and "politics"and view a Presidency by the long lasting legacy. Nixon brought us long lasting trade with China that eventually has led to the destruction of American maunufacturing. Reagan led us directly into an age of dealing with terrorism and terrorist. You don't have to be a liberal, conservative, communist, socialist of cartoonist to understand these things. If your head isn't stuck up your ass you should be able to see reality.

see, I was right. you can't answer the question. but then again, when i ask this question of a liberal, i always end up being right
 
Nixon, no Raygun, no Shrub daddy, no Shrub Jr.......Cons are such assholes it's hard to pick just one.

what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

beyond stem cell research and funding abortions in other countries name one that overturned any bush era economic policies. Name any laws the democratic congress put in place and what bush era policies they overturned. or are you just a gum flapper too?
 
what i find interesting is since reagan no democratic president has ever overturned any legislation you claim these eveil republicans have enacted that are destroying the country. Why is that?

Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

beyond stem cell research and funding abortions in other countries name one that overturned any bush era economic policies. Name any laws the democratic congress put in place and what bush era policies they overturned. or are you just a gum flapper too?

Like I said Presidents do not pass legislation. However....

"While often controversial, the reversal of past president’s executive orders is hardly new and has been used by members of both parties.

Early in his first term, President George W. Bush took a similar approach to executive orders issued by Bill Clinton, including one that would forbid companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking workers."

Obama Joins Tradition of Overturning Predecessor?s Executive Orders
 
nixon opened up trade to china which shited manufacturing from Japan to china. Made in Japan became made in china. but remember it was clinton who eliminated the import quotas which is what really opened up the flood gates to imported goods.

so now do me a favor, put aside all your litttle bullshit liberal talking points and tell me the specific legislation these corrupt republicans are responsible for that have created all these issues and then tell me what the democrats have done to reverse them. here's 't your turn to be a hero instead of another gum flapping liberal puppet. Bet you cant do it.

You are the gum flapper that believes a President is good or bad, great or horrible because of political ideology, economic policies, legislation. None of what I posted are talking points. What I posted are indisputable facts. A talking point would be your comment about shifting trade from Japan to China as if that is irrelevant and of no great or meaningful consequence. They are both Asian countries so what difference does it make? Brainwashed ideologs fall for that nonsense.
Some are less influenced by ideology and "politics"and view a Presidency by the long lasting legacy. Nixon brought us long lasting trade with China that eventully has led to the destruction of American maunufacturing. Reagan led us directly into an age of dealing with terrorism and terrorist. You don't have to be a liberal, conservative, communist, socialist of cartoonist to understand these things. If your head isn't stuck up your ass you should be able to see reality.

see, I was right. you can't answer the question. but then again, when i ask this question of a liberal, i always end up being right

:clap2:Yes, you are right, none of the thousands of laws passed since the late 60s and early 70's under Nixon or the thousands passed since the 80's under Reagan have in any way changed the policies or legislation adapted or passed under either President. :clap2:
 
In general Obama sucks as president.

Most President's in general suck. Some do some good along with the damage they cause. Some do so much damage the little bit of good they do is hardly worth it. Some do so much damage and long lasting bad shit that any good stuff they may have accomplished just becomes an asterik in history and ignored by future generations.
 
Presidents do not pass legislation. They do sign EO's and I'll bet a dollar to a donut that many of President Bushes EO's were overturned or reversed by President Obama.

beyond stem cell research and funding abortions in other countries name one that overturned any bush era economic policies. Name any laws the democratic congress put in place and what bush era policies they overturned. or are you just a gum flapper too?

Like I said Presidents do not pass legislation. However....

"While often controversial, the reversal of past president’s executive orders is hardly new and has been used by members of both parties.

Early in his first term, President George W. Bush took a similar approach to executive orders issued by Bill Clinton, including one that would forbid companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking workers."

Obama Joins Tradition of Overturning Predecessor?s Executive Orders

so like i said, the EO initiatives obama took were to overturn bush on stem cell research and funding abortions in third world nations. he did nothing to take action against any economic policies, trade policies, labor policies or anything impacting jobs and the economy. The same holds true for Clinton on any bush Sr or Reagan era policies.
 
Do liberals still believe Bush lied about wmds in order to get a war with Iraq? They cannot be that stupid, considering how we have proven that he did not lie?

I mean are they really that stupid?
 
Do liberals still believe Bush lied about wmds in order to get a war with Iraq? They cannot be that stupid, considering how we have proven that he did not lie?

I mean are they really that stupid?

Are you calling Bush a liberal or are you saying he is just that stupid?
Pay particular attention at the 25 second mark.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSN-Kku_rFE]bush admits there were no WMDs in IRAQ - YouTube[/ame]
 
Do liberals still believe Bush lied about wmds in order to get a war with Iraq? They cannot be that stupid, considering how we have proven that he did not lie?

I mean are they really that stupid?

Are you calling Bush a liberal or are you saying he is just that stupid?
Pay particular attention at the 25 second mark.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSN-Kku_rFE]bush admits there were no WMDs in IRAQ - YouTube[/ame]

That was good. Now, find the youtube video of these two prominent Democrats making the same admission that they were wrong.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
 
Do liberals still believe Bush lied about wmds in order to get a war with Iraq? They cannot be that stupid, considering how we have proven that he did not lie?

I mean are they really that stupid?

Yes, they are really that stupid.
 
Bush had good speech writers and his "talking points" were crafted in such a way that he could always deny he lied. Now other members of his administration did lie.

When testifying about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction before the House Armed Services Committee Sept. 18, 2002, Rumsfeld said Saddam "has amassed large clandestine stocks of biological weapons." including anthrax and botulism toxin and possibly smallpox. His regime has amassed large clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons, including VX and sarin and mustard gas."

Saddam "has at this moment stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons," he later added, repeating the charges the next day before the Senate Armed Services Committee.


"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

Rumsfeld Retreats, Disclaims Earlier Rhetoric
 

Forum List

Back
Top