The whole story about the death of Pretti

[Concerned American]

No you didn't, you lying piece of shit. You simply obfuscated more gas light bullshit regarding supporting the narrative of the administration, like a trolling moron, when all, I say again ALL video records and operant laws state and federal do not support the bullshit you are putting out. Nobody is buying it but MAGA TROLLS, in other words IDIOTS.

Great mod behavior there six.

 

[OldFlame]

I am a guy with a gun, and totally innocent of any possibly wrongdoing, if it is retained in the holster, while I take pictures or video, as I am have done, in state and national parks. There simply is not law or rule forbidding you to carry your legally owned, carrier permitted firearm. I remember when MAGA used to support the 2nd Amendment as the law of the land, before they went Anti-American, espousing only terrorists carry weapons, carrier permitted under state and federal law or not. The guy never touched, drew or brandished any weapon, clearly seen in every video with nothing by a cellphone camera. You do not kill people for brandishing a camera. You sound like those idiots Noem and Bovino (now former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-at-Large), but video proves you are attempting to gaslight America. But, nobody with two eyes and any knowledge of law is buying that bullshit.

You must be as blind as a ******* bat and with a lower IQ, where do you think your lies are going to get you? He was NOT just standing there taking video and pictures, your entire premise that he was only doing that is a ******* LIE.

 

[OldFlame]

That is the charge he was arrested with, like it or not.

Another LIE, that was ONE of the charges, moron.

 

[OldFlame]

Great mod behavior there six.

He should not be a mod.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It amazes me how easy it has been for the mainstream media to convince leftists that violent gangbangers are their heroes and those attempting to protect them from such are their enemy.

 

[White 6]

Great mod behavior there six.

Of course, I am not moderating this thread, and have no tolerate a lying troll, accusing me of lying.
All Vid, (in other words, reality) support my position on the Petti killing, at the hands of ICE. He did not deserve to die. The FEDS acted maliciously, on impulse with a lack of control, far beyond what should be tolerated of any branch of supposedly law enforcement. That troll should not try to piss down my back and tell me, it raining.

 

[Robert W]

I am a guy with a gun, and totally innocent of any possibly wrongdoing, if it is retained in the holster, while I take pictures or video, as I am have done, in state and national parks. There simply is not law or rule forbidding you to carry your legally owned, carrier permitted firearm. I remember when MAGA used to support the 2nd Amendment as the law of the land, before they went Anti-American, espousing only terrorists carry weapons, carrier permitted under state and federal law or not. The guy never touched, drew or brandished any weapon, clearly seen in every video with nothing by a cellphone camera. You do not kill people for brandishing a camera. You sound like those idiots Noem and Bovino (now former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-at-Large), but video proves you are attempting to gaslight America. But, nobody with two eyes and any knowledge of law is buying that bullshit.

To the entire forum. Some of his claims, can to a degree be verified on the videos. Some of his claims are guesses. Such as his claim the dead man was lawfully carrying. We have read claims, but so far, seen no proof. Here us what is known since it is in official reports. He appeared at a troubled spot and was well armed. He and the police got into a scuffle. The man was shot a number of times, resulting in his immediate death. In any investigation, a good many facts come out that have not been disclosed to us all as of now.

 

[Concerned American]

That troll should not try to piss down my back and tell me, it raining.

You might practice what you preach.

 

[OldFlame]

View attachment 1211844
Of course, I am not moderating this thread, and have no tolerate a lying troll, accusing me of lying.
All Vid, (in other words, reality) support my position on the Petti killing, at the hands of ICE. He did not deserve to die. The FEDS acted maliciously, on impulse with a lack of control, far beyond what should be tolerated of any branch of supposedly law enforcement. That troll should not try to piss down my back and tell me, it raining.

It's about your BIAS. The video does not support your position at all, you do nothing but lie.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

View attachment 1211844
Of course, I am not moderating this thread, and have no tolerate a lying troll, accusing me of lying.
All Vid, (in other words, reality) support my position on the Petti killing, at the hands of ICE. He did not deserve to die. The FEDS acted maliciously, on impulse with a lack of control, far beyond what should be tolerated of any branch of supposedly law enforcement. That troll should not try to piss down my back and tell me, it raining.

He was not trolling.

To troll is to say something intentionally inflammatory in such a way as to cast a wide net hoping to outrage large numbers people.

If you actually opposed trolling, there are quite a few leftists whose every O.P. should be moved to the basement.

 

[Edgetho]

FYI: Another lawless dimocrap piece of ******* shit 'Judge' *****-slapped

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Overrules Lawless Lowly District Judicial Insurrectionist, Removing Bullshit Restrictions on How ICE Can Handle Violent "Protesters"​

—Ace​

Who knows, it's possible that this judge's lawless diktat that "protesters" should be allowed to be violent and ICE is barred from responding with non-lethal munitions like tear gas and pepper spray actually led to the death of the violent protesters.


MXM News:

A federal appeals court on Monday stepped in to stop what the Trump administration argued was an extraordinary act of judicial overreach, blocking a Minnesota order that effectively handcuffed federal immigration agents during enforcement operations.
The three-judge panel on the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Trump administration and issued a full stay of a January injunction that had restricted how officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement could respond while facing aggressive anti-ICE protests.

That lower-court order barred agents from making arrests, detaining individuals, or using pepper spray during confrontations unless heightened legal thresholds were met--rules critics warned would put officers at risk as agitators pressed into enforcement scenes.

The lowly district court judge and insurrectionist had claimed, in the face of all evidence, that the "protesters" were all uniformly peaceful and therefore ICE was barred from using any non-lethal force against them.

Reviewing the same video evidence cited by the district court, the appeals panel flatly rejected the idea that the encounters were uniformly peaceful, writing that the footage showed "a wide range of conduct, some of it peaceful but much of it not," with agents responding to rapidly changing situations.

...

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez had accepted [violent "protesters'"] claims on January 16, finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on First and Fourth Amendment grounds and issuing a sweeping injunction against the Department of Homeland Security and ICE.

Her ruling cited alleged instances in which agents used pepper spray, pointed weapons, made arrests, and conducted traffic stops against individuals she characterized as peacefully observing or protesting enforcement activity.

The appeals court was unmoved, emphasizing that the encounters varied widely--different officers, different protesters, different behavior, different locations--making a blanket prohibition not only unworkable but dangerous.

Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed the decision as a decisive stand for law enforcement.

"Liberal judges tried to handcuff our federal law enforcement officers, restrict their actions, and put their safety at risk when responding to violent agitators," Bondi wrote on X, noting that the Justice Department first secured a temporary pause and has now won a full stay.

In the meanwhile, Kash Patel says he's following the money and the FBI is investigating who is funding these violent revolutionary groups.

Continue reading

 

[Doc7505]

This woman is a very experienced attorney. She is nonbiased. She creates truthful content. She picks apart the entire case to get the truth told. I enjoy her site a lot since she details her findings in easy-to-understand format. She is not out to go against the innocent and will honestly inform us all. See her case unfold. Tell us what you think after seeing her comments.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Good objective reporting by Jordan.
Thanks for the heads up...

 

[White 6]

To the entire forum. Some of his claims, can to a degree be verified on the videos. Some of his claims are guesses. Such as his claim the dead man was lawfully carrying. We have read claims, but so far, seen no proof. Here us what is known since it is in official reports. He appeared at a troubled spot and was well armed. He and the police got into a scuffle. The man was shot a number of times, resulting in his immediate death. In any investigation, a good many facts come out that have not been disclosed to us all as of now.

Just how many articles and statements by Minnesota officials, do you need to know, the he had a permit in that state. The federal Government has not disputed he was permitted carrier. Who are you trying to gaslight, now?

 

[Lisa558]

Cop stalks Ashli Babbitt, kills her, your verdict?

Cop gets promotion!

 

[Robert W]

Just how many articles and statements by Minnesota officials, do you need to know, the he had a permit in that state. The federal Government has not disputed he was permitted carrier. Who are you trying to gaslight, now?

The officials of Minnesota have serious legal problems, and it is my opinion this operation by them is to distract from the Mayor and Governors legal problems.
Have you seen the photo of his permit to carry?

 

[Care4all]

The federal agents in Minneapolis are trained as a warrant squad, not to put down an insurrection led by the Governor and Mayor. They are doing an excellent job of serving these warrants with very little violence. It will take more than ICE to reestablish the rule of law in Minneapolis.

Non lethal methods of crowd control are used to keep crowds away from law enforcement so that harsher methods do not have to be used to protect the officers and their mission. Apparently, in the judgement of the officer the woman presented a impending threat. If he was wrong, that's a matter for the courts, but when Pretti directly interfered with the officer, that was a crime, and when he violently resisted arrest, that was another crime.

These mobs have been sent to impede and obstruct federal officers from doing their duty, sending a clear message that in Minneapolis obeying federal law is considered optional.

How did he directly impede the officer from doing his legal job or mission, what was his JOB that he was impeded by Alex?

I don't think any of what your claiming was going on, makes a lick of sense when watching the videos.

 

[Lisa558]

Just how many articles and statements by Minnesota officials, do you need to know, the he had a permit in that state. The federal Government has not disputed he was permitted carrier. Who are you trying to gaslight, now?

Just because he had a permit doesn’t mean he can carry a loaded gun to a riot to interfere with a law enforcement operation, and then fight with cops.

 

[Lisa558]

How did he directly impede the officer from doing his legal job or mission, what was his JOB that he was impeded by Alex?

I don't think any of what your claiming was going on, makes a lick of sense when watching the videos.

He was fighting with the officers.

 

[Robert W]

How did he directly impede the officer from doing his legal job or mission, what was his JOB that he was impeded by Alex?

I don't think any of what your claiming was going on, makes a lick of sense when watching the videos.

Have you defended the murder of Ashli Babbitt? Your questions apply also to her murder.

 

[White 6]

Just because he had a permit doesn’t mean he can carry a loaded gun to a riot to interfere with a law enforcement operation, and then fight with cops.

Show me the law against it. It does not exist in most states, and definitely does not exist in Minnesota.
In Minnesota, individuals with a concealed carry permit are allowed to carry firearms at public protests, as the state permits gun owners to be armed in public. However, there are restrictions on carrying firearms in certain locations, such as state capitols and K-12 schools. protectmn.org Arizona PBS