”The West” has backed itself into a corner over Ukraine

Talking out of your hat as per usual.
Exactly the opposite is true .
The US , let alone Kyiv, cannot believe how inventive the Russians are in this area .
Then why is Russia using Soviet era tanks?
Why has their Navy been driven out of the Black Sea?
 
Yeah, and 80% after almost three years isn't the sort of pressure needed to make Ukraine come to the negotiating table. The rate of Russian advance isn't fast enough, and their gains aren't big enough to put the squeeze on Kiev to negotiate. That's why it matters that the front hasn't collapsed. Unless the front collapses, Kiev is unlikely to negotiate.

It's currently similar to the position that Germany was in in 1917. It was losing, but it still had a lot of land, and a lot of troops. Germany could have kept fighting, but Kaiser Wilhelm II gave a shit, so he agreed to the peace terms.

Finally, those goals are the only sensible goals. If Ukraine still exists after the war, what will prevent it from remilitarizing, joining NATO, and just going to war again? And why would Russia trust Ukraine to adhere to any sort of peace agreement after Minsk II?
You really do have no idea what you are talking about. Who wants to make Ukraine come to the negotiating table? You've been lied to. Putin gave Zoolinsky a chance to negotiate (the Minsk Agreement) and Zooky agreed but the Yankees and Brits put the kibash on it so the agreement was off. Putin is making them pay for it and now he doesn't want any negotiation. Any peace now will be on Putin's terms - no bartering.
 

Russia Surprised Kiev With New Attacks​

November 15, 2024



Surprising alliance of Donald Trump, Viktor Orban and Pope Francis that could derail support for Ukraine​

Exclusive: The Pope has shown backing for Hungary’s so-called ‘peace deal’ between Kyiv and Moscow – while Trump’s election puts US aid at risk

 
I disagree. Look how much land Ukraine still controls. And again, the front hasn't collapsed anywhere yet. While it's possible the Ukrainians may try to negotiate, we are getting closer and closer to the point where there's little incentive for Russia to negotiate instead of just "going all the way and finishing the job."

There's a lot of dead Russians..... I'd say Russia is pretty pissed off right now.
 
1731850754247.png

Ukraine: Over 6 Million Refugees Spread Across Europe​


I don't think peace will be achieved unless the west recognizes the wishes of those who live/lived in the Donbas & Russia's security concerns. Our elites have admitted that this is a proxy war, so it is clear they don't give two craps about the people of Ukraine.

How the United States Drove Russia to Invade Ukraine and the Potential Consequences​

August 2, 2024

". . . Nuland is married to Robert Kagan, a close associate of Paul Wolfowitz. We have come full circle.

What followed in Ukraine was the outlawing of both the Russian language and any political parties not partial to the new regime in Kyiv. Then in May 2014 a peaceful protest in Odessa was broken up by a mob and 30-40 Russian speakers were burned to death in a trade union building. An eight-year civil war ensued in the Donbass, leaving 15,000-18,000 dead, primarily in the Donbass. . . . "

<snip>

". . . Sun Tzu was a Chinese military general, strategist and philosopher who lived approximately 2,500 years ago. He was the author of “The Art of War,”[30] a highly respected text that is taught at West Point and Sandhurst. One of Sun Tzu’s more famous observations was that:

  1. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles
  2. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat
  3. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle
A painting of a person with a beardDescription automatically generated
Sun Tzu [Source: china385.fr]

The United States has placed itself firmly in the third category by refusing to accept Russia’s legitimate security concerns, as well as operating as if the United States has the power to dictate the affairs of other nations.

It would have been better to have heeded Sun Tzu’s recommendation, which would be to “Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across.”
 
View attachment 1042956

Ukraine: Over 6 Million Refugees Spread Across Europe​


I don't think peace will be achieved unless the west recognizes the wishes of those who live/lived in the Donbas & Russia's security concerns. Our elites have admitted that this is a proxy war, so it is clear they don't give two craps about the people of Ukraine.

How the United States Drove Russia to Invade Ukraine and the Potential Consequences​

August 2, 2024

". . . Nuland is married to Robert Kagan, a close associate of Paul Wolfowitz. We have come full circle.

What followed in Ukraine was the outlawing of both the Russian language and any political parties not partial to the new regime in Kyiv. Then in May 2014 a peaceful protest in Odessa was broken up by a mob and 30-40 Russian speakers were burned to death in a trade union building. An eight-year civil war ensued in the Donbass, leaving 15,000-18,000 dead, primarily in the Donbass. . . . "

<snip>

". . . Sun Tzu was a Chinese military general, strategist and philosopher who lived approximately 2,500 years ago. He was the author of “The Art of War,”[30] a highly respected text that is taught at West Point and Sandhurst. One of Sun Tzu’s more famous observations was that:

  1. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles
  2. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat
  3. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle
A painting of a person with a beardDescription automatically generated
Sun Tzu [Source: china385.fr]

The United States has placed itself firmly in the third category by refusing to accept Russia’s legitimate security concerns, as well as operating as if the United States has the power to dictate the affairs of other nations.

It would have been better to have heeded Sun Tzu’s recommendation, which would be to “Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across.”
Seems Ukraine was a done deal 2500 yrs ago Mr B ~S~
 
Seems Ukraine was a done deal 2500 yrs ago Mr B ~S~

The Russian-U.S. Relationship Goes Way Back to John Quincy Adams

Before he became president, Adams was the nascent country’s first ambassador to Russia


“The Sovereign,” he wrote to his mother Abigail, “is Absolute, in all the extent of the word. . . .And the nobility have the same power over the people, that the Sovereign has over them. The Nation is wholly composed of Nobles and Serfs, or in other words, of Masters and Slaves.” The system, he wrote, is disadvantageous even to the ruler, for the nobles continually rebel against absolute power. Young though he was, Adams was very much a republican in the land of absolutism. .. ."

<snip>

". . . Adams was deeply impressed by Russian piety, noting that even the gentry fasted for the 40 days of Lent—and then gorged themselves on the stupendous feats of Easter. Everything was strange and outsized. Men wagered on which day the ice on the Neva would break; and when, in mid-May, it finally it did so, the governor of St. Petersburg brought the Czar an ice-cold glass of river water, and the Czar rewarded him with a hundred ducats. The Russian palaces were vast, the furnishings dazzling. At Catherine's Winter Palace, the magnificent decorations were decaying from wanton neglect. But Adams found the gravestones of three imperial greyhounds—"Sir Tom Anderson, Duchesse, and Zemire"—with inscriptions written in impeccable French verse.

Adams never lost his fascination with Russia; nor did Czar Alexander's fondness for the United States flag. But the bond between the two nations, the one the defender of autocratic orthodoxy, the other of republican liberty, was not a natural one. After Russia defeated Napoleon and humbled France, the Czar placed himself at the head of the Holy Alliance, a league of princes dedicated to stamping out all traces of republican thought in Europe. In 1817, Adams became Secretary of State in the administration of President James Monroe. He was the chief intellectual force behind the 1823 Monroe Doctrine, which stipulated that since "the political system of the allied powers"—the Holy Alliance—was "essentially different" from that of the United States, the U.S. would "consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety." The New World, that is, would be republican, and the U.S. would be its guarantor. The ideological struggle that would come to define U.S. relations with the Soviet Union in the 20th century was thus prefigured by the friction between republican America and autocratic Russia. . . "
 
There's a lot of dead Russians..... I'd say Russia is pretty pissed off right now.
Potentially.

The Russian-U.S. Relationship Goes Way Back to John Quincy Adams

Before he became president, Adams was the nascent country’s first ambassador to Russia


“The Sovereign,” he wrote to his mother Abigail, “is Absolute, in all the extent of the word. . . .And the nobility have the same power over the people, that the Sovereign has over them. The Nation is wholly composed of Nobles and Serfs, or in other words, of Masters and Slaves.” The system, he wrote, is disadvantageous even to the ruler, for the nobles continually rebel against absolute power. Young though he was, Adams was very much a republican in the land of absolutism. .. ."

<snip>

". . . Adams was deeply impressed by Russian piety, noting that even the gentry fasted for the 40 days of Lent—and then gorged themselves on the stupendous feats of Easter. Everything was strange and outsized. Men wagered on which day the ice on the Neva would break; and when, in mid-May, it finally it did so, the governor of St. Petersburg brought the Czar an ice-cold glass of river water, and the Czar rewarded him with a hundred ducats. The Russian palaces were vast, the furnishings dazzling. At Catherine's Winter Palace, the magnificent decorations were decaying from wanton neglect. But Adams found the gravestones of three imperial greyhounds—"Sir Tom Anderson, Duchesse, and Zemire"—with inscriptions written in impeccable French verse.

Adams never lost his fascination with Russia; nor did Czar Alexander's fondness for the United States flag. But the bond between the two nations, the one the defender of autocratic orthodoxy, the other of republican liberty, was not a natural one. After Russia defeated Napoleon and humbled France, the Czar placed himself at the head of the Holy Alliance, a league of princes dedicated to stamping out all traces of republican thought in Europe. In 1817, Adams became Secretary of State in the administration of President James Monroe. He was the chief intellectual force behind the 1823 Monroe Doctrine, which stipulated that since "the political system of the allied powers"—the Holy Alliance—was "essentially different" from that of the United States, the U.S. would "consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety." The New World, that is, would be republican, and the U.S. would be its guarantor. The ideological struggle that would come to define U.S. relations with the Soviet Union in the 20th century was thus prefigured by the friction between republican America and autocratic Russia. . . "
Something that people don't know about is that the Russians helped the Union in a huge way during the Civil War. France and Britain were fixing to get involved with more than just providing the South with material support. The Russians, in polite terms, told them not to do that.
 
Potentially.


Something that people don't know about is that the Russians helped the Union in a huge way during the Civil War. France and Britain were fixing to get involved with more than just providing the South with material support. The Russians, in polite terms, told them not to do that.

Yep that is correct.... At the time France had a lot to gain by trading directly with the Southern States..... And Britain of course would have jumped at any chance screw up the new country that they just lost control of. To put this in perspective had both of those countries gotten involved there's no possible way the North would have been able to pull off a victory. France had a very well equipped and very well organized field force and the British Navy at that time was probably superior to the American Navy.
 
Well there ya go.... The constant cry that nobody was trying to genocide the Russian nationals in that province is complete baloney.

Jo
Well, I coulda told you that the genocide was real and ongoing. If you look through history, this isn't the first time the Ukrainians have carried out a campaign of ethnic cleansing against other groups in lands they believe are theirs. It's actually the reason much of Eastern Europe isn't super enthusiastic about helping them. Why help the people who less than 100 years ago were cutting unborn children out of pregnant women before killing them and burning the villages?
 
Well, I coulda told you that the genocide was real and ongoing. If you look through history, this isn't the first time the Ukrainians have carried out a campaign of ethnic cleansing against other groups in lands they believe are theirs. It's actually the reason much of Eastern Europe isn't super enthusiastic about helping them. Why help the people who less than 100 years ago were cutting unborn children out of pregnant women before killing them and burning the villages?

Geezus.... Makes you wonder if Vlad the impaler was a Ukrainian refugee!
.
 
There's a lot of dead Russians..... I'd say Russia is pretty pissed off right now.
Best estimate , Russia 100-150 000
Ukraine , minimum 750 000 . Possibly significantly more .

FIO Dear Uncle P was born in a village in Siberia but he and Mum moved to Georgia when Dad did a runner . Volodya was about 9 when he moved to St P .
That's the real bio . The official one is BS .
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom