again another false assumption.wow the classic and totally false paranoid rambling..Hey, you know what Daws? You got me! I'll admit it, I DO have a cognitive bias!I don't fucking trust the establishment. Why should I? I know it lies. My grandfather was a thirty-second degree Freemason, my father always told me, don't trust them all, any of them might be lying, you must ALWAYS follow the money. I KNOW president Clinton lied, don't you? I KNOW president BUSH lied, don't you? How can you be so tuned out to not know the establishment is constantly deceiving us in so many ways. You must not just take what they tell you at face value. Does that mean you should take what others read at face value? No. We must SEE the results of these things in reality, and not seek to deny what we see.
I have had over seven years of Political Science at University. I have been well trained in interest groups, revolving door politics, and Iron triangles. My skepticism if VERY high. I KNOW what the elites think the masses are there for. Sure, my cognitive bias is there, and it is extremely skeptical. If you bothered to watch that piece, you would KNOW it isn't a hit piece on vaccines, it is a middle of the road skepticism piece that acknowledges the great wonder and benefit that vaccines have played in our society. And I am willing to bet, that even Eots would say, there was a time when vaccines were a boon to our civilization.
But you know, have you ever heard the saying, "Too much of a good thing?" Isn't it just possible that drug companies have seen something that can be used for the masses as a way to make millions, perhaps billions, and have cut manufacturing processes using cheap ingredients to save costs, have skipped safety trials, and have pushed unnecessary vaccines for diseases that aren't truly a threat to public safety, all in the search of the almighty profit? Did you know that drug companies control the FDA and the CDC? If you don't see or believe that, you aren't a skeptic, you aren't reserving judgement, and you are letting them corrupt something that is probably hugely beneficial for society, only to let it have become deadly dangerous. In my parents day, and my day, vaccines weren't causing the epidemic of health problems that they are causing today. They used to save lives. Now? I'm not sure the cost is worth the gain. That is all I am trying to put forward.
Why don't you ever want to think for yourself?
always has the same ending too !:"Why don't you ever want to think for yourself?" that's ironic since everything you asshats post is a rehash of every other conspiracy theorist's
paranoid rambling..the antistasis of thinking for yourself...
O.K. I tried being logical, rational, and reasonable with you. But I know you well enough to know that is not possible. You don't like to read and take seriously what I have to say, because it causes you serious difficulties. I know what your problem is. . .
again another false assumption.
O.K. I tried being logical, rational, and reasonable with you. But I know you well enough to know that is not possible. You don't like to read and take seriously what I have to say, because it causes you serious difficulties. I know what your problem is. . .
nothing you post is logical, rational or reasonable.
anyone who believes fluoridated water is a hypnotic that makes you watch TV, is several neurons short of a properly functioning brain.
what you call serious difficulties. are in actuality brilliant but unintended comedy..
again another false assumption.O.K. I tried being logical, rational, and reasonable with you. But I know you well enough to know that is not possible. You don't like to read and take seriously what I have to say, because it causes you serious difficulties. I know what your problem is. . .
nothing you post is logical, rational or reasonable.
anyone who believes fluoridated water is a hypnotic that makes you watch TV, is several neurons short of a properly functioning brain.
what you call serious difficulties. are in actuality brilliant but unintended comedy..
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 October;
Review
Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
esults: The standardized weighted mean difference in IQ score between exposed and reference populations was –0.45 (95% confidence interval: –0.56, –0.35) using a random-effects model. Thus, children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses also indicated inverse associations, although the substantial heterogeneity did not appear to decrease.
Conclusions: The results support the possibility of an adverse effect of high fluoride exposure on childrenÂ’s neurodevelopment. Future research should include detailed individual-level information on prenatal exposure, neurobehavioral performance, and covariates for adjustment.
Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
someone farted in here.
