The U.S. Grid can not support its Climate Pledges:

[Devils_Advocate]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

 

[Votto]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

You assume the US won't have a sharp decline in population

The leaders in DC I think are thinking otherwise.

It's the only conclusion I can make from it.

How about you?

 

[there4eyeM]

A decline in population is not necessary, merely a reduction in wasteful use.

 

[fncceo]

A decline in population is not necessary, merely a reduction in wasteful use.

Who gets to determine what is wasteful?

 

[JGalt]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

Ending fossil fuels and magically converting everything to "green energy" is a fool's folly. It will never be accomplished. The country was built on cheap., reliable fossil fuel energy, it runs on cheap, reliable fossil fuel energy, and without that the entire country would grind to a halt. We're about to see how that happens in California.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Ending fossil fuels and magically converting everything to "green energy" is a fool's folly. It will never be accomplished. The country was built on cheap., reliable fossil fuel energy, it runs on cheap, reliable fossil fuel energy, and without that the entire country would grind to a halt. We're about to see how that happens in California.

It can be done and before the usage of fossil fuel like oil what did the world do before?

Even coal was limited and how humans would heat their homes back in the day was different in today time.

Fossil Fuels like Coal and Oil can be reduced to almost nothing with the combination of Nuclear and Green Energy but both sides will argue against one or the other.

Who gets to determine what is wasteful?

I am wondering that also.

 

[MarathonMike]

Why is hyrdrogen never part of the "Green Conversation"? What could be more green than a fuel whose exhaust is water?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Why is hyrdrogen never part of the "Green Conversation"? What could be more green than a fuel whose exhaust is water?

I agree.

 

[JGalt]

It can be done and before the usage of fossil fuel like oil what did the world do before?

Even coal was limited and how humans would heat their homes back in the day was different in today time.

Fossil Fuels like Coal and Oil can be reduced to almost nothing with the combination of Nuclear and Green Energy but both sides will argue against one or the other.


I am wondering that also.

Before gas, oil, and coal, the world sat in their cold dark huts and didn't go anywhere, except by horseback. They denuded the entire countryside of trees, because they needed not only lumber, but wood to heat their homes and to cook with.

The hills around the little town I live near, are covered with trees. You can look at pictures of those same hills that were taken through the 1800's, and there wasn't a single tree on them.

Supporting this large of a country, its economy, and its people, just couldn't happen without cheap, abundant fossil fuel energy. It's how we got here. It's what caused the industrial revolution, won wars, and made this country what it is today.

 

[Likkmee]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

<<<<< Move up to second world status. Yeah It's expensive for electric

Costa Rica Used 100% Renewable Energy for 299 Days

Costa Rica is pioneering the future of running on renewable energy.

thecostaricanews.com

 

[Likkmee]

11 countries leading the charge on renewable energy | Climate Council

Here are the top eleven countries using renewables—wind, electricity, geothermals—to lead the way to a low-carbon, zero emissions future.

www.climatecouncil.org.au

 

[JGalt]

<<<<< Move up to second world status. Yeah It's expensive for electric

Costa Rica Used 100% Renewable Energy for 299 Days

Costa Rica is pioneering the future of running on renewable energy.

thecostaricanews.com

That would be a step down for the US, not a step up.

 

[Dekster]

Even if we could generate enough extra "green" electricity in Florida to transmit to Chicago efficiently, it does not change that the sun goes down in both places around the same time. We really need to work on the lowest hanging fruit first and accept the reality that we are going to have to have a lot of dirty standby capacity. We can offset that some by looking at other ways to reduce carbon in other sectors. Changing the ingredients in concrete might be a practical one worth exploring. Another low hanging fruit would be to require skylights and solar tube lighting in all new construction so homes and businesses would have less of a need for artificial lighting during the day.

 

[Votto]

A decline in population is not necessary, merely a reduction in wasteful use.

The powers that be have long focused on population control.

If they did not create the climate change fear to gain support for their agendas, it would have been something else. In fact, in the 1970's they said the world was going into an ice age.

Going back as far as the 1950's these people had a plan all along.



Or look at this

Georgia Guidestones - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What strikes you about these two sources focused on population levels?

1. Highly educated

2. Very rich.

In fact, the Guide stones in Georgia that told us we needed to keep population levels around 500 million cost a fortune, but money is of no concern to those in power.

We now see the UN telling us that about a billion people will die of starvation in the coming year, while governments around the world are restricting farmers from using fertilizer to grow crops.

We also see government around the world pushing such things as abortion and gender reassignment. We see the US do nothing about rampant crime and life expectancy around the US has declined over the last 2 years of Biden. We see about 200 people a day die of drug overdoses from drugs flowing across an unsecured border with virtually no mention of it in the media.

Why? To reduce population levels.

 

[2aguy]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

That is the point and the goal......leftists, democrats.....believe that there are too many people on the planet......they want to reduce the number of people ....... by limiting energy access.....making it extremely expensive, unreliable, and limited.......they force future people to choose having no or smaller families.....that is the goal...

If you doubt this......try explaining their policies if you think their goal is cheap, reliable, plentiful energy....

Then, when that fails to explain the situation, refer to the first paragraph.....you will see I am right.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Before gas, oil, and coal, the world sat in their cold dark huts and didn't go anywhere, except by horseback. They denuded the entire countryside of trees, because they needed not only lumber, but wood to heat their homes and to cook with.

The hills around the little town I live near, are covered with trees. You can look at pictures of those same hills that were taken through the 1800's, and there wasn't a single tree on them.

Supporting this large of a country, its economy, and its people, just couldn't happen without cheap, abundant fossil fuel energy. It's how we got here. It's what caused the industrial revolution, won wars, and made this country what it is today.

They cooked with dried cow shit.

 

[JGalt]

They cooked with dried cow shit.

True. But now they just have contests to see who can fling it the farthest. Our politicians hold most of the records.

 

[Toro]

The U.S. Power Grid Can’t Support Its Climate Pledges | OilPrice.com

America’s aging power grid has some major problems, and if it is not upgraded, the country’s climate pledges could be in risk

oilprice.com

As been told many times if the U.S. plans to go green we must invest into better infrastructure and yet we are not and why?

Don’t point your fingers at the opposition and it is time for Local, State and Federal Governments to remove their heads from their asses and combine Green and Nuclear together while getting us off the Fossil Fuels like Oil and Coal.

Buy

• Oil stocks
• Copper
• Other metals stocks like those that mine Lithium.

Ignore liberals who claim they want EVs and hate mining. They're idiots.

 

[elektra]

Green renewable energy does not exist.

To make fossil fuels smell better, we should do what green renewable energy had done and call fossil fuels, ROSES

Problem solved, just call something what it is not. Just like green energy.