Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Truth is objective, beauty is not. What is a beautiful woman to one person is hideous to another. Bats are beautiful to some people and revolting to others. The OP's original statement is saying that the "beholder" decides what truth is, which is patently false.Beauty is objective and is universally so even in the undeveloped world.
I've accounted for that, in Christiandom, we go on the evidence provided in the Bible.
The evidence (of God) has proven to be true.
There are major limits to what we've been able to observe of other star/planet systems and much of that is inferred.We live in a solar system that is not at all typical of the ones we've observed to date, the rocky inner planet with gas Giants in the outer orbits are less than 1%; we have a Moon that is the identical same apparent size as the Sun and causes lunar and solar eclipses, that occurs nowhere else in our solar system with 9 planets and hundreds of Moons - that's only on Earth
My truth, is, the truth! I think, therefore, I am!Truth is in the eye of the beholder.
For many "Truth" is based on religion, watching TV, or discussions in back alley forums.
What is the basis of your "Truth?"
Isn't God's creation wonderful!?!?We live in a solar system that is not at all typical of the ones we've observed to date, the rocky inner planet with gas Giants in the outer orbits are less than 1%; we have a Moon that is the identical same apparent size as the Sun and causes lunar and solar eclipses, that occurs nowhere else in our solar system with 9 planets and hundreds of Moons - that's only on Earth
The major hypocrisy here is the subjective false truth (fake news) of this included item from "The Subversive Lens", which, BTW is the first clue your OP is anything but the "Truth", other than a display of your own version of "eye of the beholder" (presenter). The last paragraph of what is in that insert is true in application to you it would seem.Truth is in the eye of the beholder.
For many "Truth" is based on religion, watching TV, or discussions in back alley forums.
What is the basis of your "Truth?"
Isn't the Kreator's Creation wonderful !?!?Isn't God's creation wonderful!?!?
Observation.From where do you derive the difference between your truth and what you say is not true?
The universe contains much circumstantial evidence for the existence of a higher power and/or intelligence behind it all. But that is not PROOF that God exists, and therefore not a self-evident TRUTH.Isn't God's creation wonderful!?!?
A truth does not mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged. - Brian Weiner
You know, I can’t say with certitude. - Anthony Weiner
Your truth is your truth.My truth, is, the truth! I think, therefore, I am!
The "truth" 500 years ago was what the Church said it was.The major hypocrisy here is the subjective false truth (fake news) of this included item from "The Subversive Lens", which, BTW is the first clue your OP is anything but the "Truth", other than a display of your own version of "eye of the beholder" (presenter). The last paragraph of what is in that insert is true in application to you it would seem.
Go back a few pages of history and notice that at the time Galileo with his Solar centric cosmos versus the Earth centric common majority view was "in the margins", but has since been proven as Truth.
To be blunt, your "insert" is just more blatant propaganda masking as 'truth' when it's largely misinformation when not outright lies.
500 years ago that applied to the Western Civ.(European) World.The "truth" 500 years ago was what the Church said it was.
It ignored the reality in which it existed.
Obviously you are one who needs his "truths" to support his bias.
Thus, when you see a truth that opposes your bias, it becomes fake news.
Perhaps you should try to separate your "truth" from the reality around you and understand why you need to believe what disagrees with your "truth" as "fake news."
The difference?500 years ago that applied to the Western Civ.(European) World.
But same could be said for the rest, in Asia, Africa, the Americas, etc. whom had different ideas of "truth" or "fake news" than that in Europe/Western Civilization.
Technically, we ALL have certain "truths" we use to support our bias and beliefs. Something you seem to overlook or fail to grasp.
If you read my profile, you'll see I present credentials that support my objective, scientific, technical, and practical background, and view on topics. Also, I'd wager I have greater historical perspective and grasp than you do. For that matter, you seem to lack the integrity, honesty, guts, or whatever to share anything of your qualifications other than your age. In my book, and my "truth", that makes you little more than a troll, phony, or;
I doubt that!The difference?
I look past my bias.
You include yours.
Truly quite that simple.
AND
Your image is you. you can be anything you want on the interwebs W.
OKI doubt that!
But present any lies, delusions, and misinformation you like.
You just further disqualified your credibility.