The Trump Impeachment Video Horror Show...

Most bipartisan impeachment in U.S. history for a reason.

The man is a piece of shit and the blood is on his hands.

The way he conducts himself is exactly what brought a record-breaking number of voters to get his ass out of there.
 
Most bipartisan impeachment in U.S. history for a reason.

The man is a piece of shit and the blood is on his hands.

The way he conducts himself is exactly what brought a record-breaking number of voters to get his ass out of there.
Most bipartisan impeachment in U.S. history for a reason.

The man is a piece of shit and the blood is on his hands.

The way he conducts himself is exactly what brought a record-breaking number of voters to get his ass out of there.
What do you think of a President that says "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun".
 
What do you think of a President that says "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun".

I think it's a terrible attempt at "Bu-bu-bu-but Obama!"

Taken out of context and no violent incident that it lead to. Just terrible.

You asked.
 
The video the Dems presented as evidence of Trump's total guilt. It is really, really, really bad for Trump. What Trump did was abhorent, and it was all based on fabricated lies.

No republican has offered any defense or rebuttal for Trump's actions, their only defense is Trump is no longer in office? They have no defense at all for Trump's actions. Trump's actions that day were worse than anything any president has ever done, including the failed GWB and criminal Nixon.

Trump is 100% guilty of inciting an insurrection.


Republicans have offered plenty of rebuttal, its just that we are so divided that if someone were to take the truth and tape it to your forehead, you'd say you don't see it nor bilelieve it.

Don't get angry because I'm not just picking in you...the right has the same problem. The real criminal in this whole thing is the media and their partisan spin on every story they produce, and its only getting worse.

Huh?? I haven't seen one person make a legitimate rebuttal argument that Trump didn't incite an insurrection, everybody has just said impeachment is unconstitutional.
It's pretty freakin obvious what Trump said, AND it was all based on lies. Which Mitch McConnell actually said as well...
No impartial nonpartisan person can say Trump didn't incite an insurrection at the capitol.

All of this was over a lie... that's the worst part. A big fabricated BS lie. "We won in a landslide"

You can't prove the incitement. All you can do is piece together things he has said at different times, and through the power of partisan media, they will show you exactly what you want to see.

He specifically said "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard". He never once uttered the words "storm the capitol", or "break in to the capitol, or "cause harm to people at the capitol". You want to believe that because that is what media is telling you, and you hate the Republican party so much that you will believe it without even considering any alternate viewpoint.

AHAHAHAHAHA!!!! :auiqs.jpg:

So because Trump said "peacefully" onetime after firing up the mob to the level of sheer anger displayed in the video, that means he didn't incite that insurrection??? What are you fuckin stupid? Like full blown chromosome deficient retard stupid.

He said go to the Capitol, I'm coming with you, after he totally fired them up to a rage, telling them to "fight", and telling them "when there's fraud you can use other means" Those wackos were full blown insane, and that was because Trump fed them lies about election fraud that never happened.

You people always to play the corrupt media card whenever Trump gets caught red handed in some new scandal, you've been doing it for 5 years. You always have some pathetic excuse.

It is clear as day on the tape what he did and what he said. Nobody has provided a legitimate rebuttal that Trump didn't incite an insurrection. Even Trump's lawyers today couldn't do that today, they didn't even try, because it is all documented on tape.

He said "go to the capitol and, peacefully and patriotically, make your voices heard". He held a rally, people tend to get energized at rallies, but there is no evidence that trump intended for his words to incite violence.

People use the word "fight" in all sorts.of ways, often figuratively, but not always in the context of physical fighting.

Trumps lawyers didn't present a defense today. Today was about the constitutionality of putting a private citizen on trial. His lawyers clearly said they have a rebuttal for everything the house managers stated. Now, I have no illusion that what they say will make any difference. Like last time, this trial has already been decided. There is not a single senator in there who hasn't already made up their mind how they will vote. This trial is merely for public consumption, likely to create even more division.

Please you're so gullible.
Basically your mind was made up 5 years ago. "Trump could shoot somebody in the head on 5th avenue and he won't lose any supporters"
You will make some pathetic excuse for anything Trump does.

Trump said be peaceful 1 time, then he said about 10 other things that were completely contrary and highly inciteful, and in a separate statement he told his follows to march on the capitol and he was coming with, and they ran to the Capitol in a rage and destroyed it.

So what argument can you make? The Trumpers ran to the Capitol and rioted after Trump told them lies about election fraud that didn't happen and made 10 other highly inciteful statements all shown in the video.
The rioters said things like "Trump sent us"

Nope, I'm going to say that trump didn't send them to riot. Sure, they can say that, but, again, the riot started before trump finished his speech. Trump never once instructed anyone to become violent. Show me where trump has said his intentions were to create a violent mob. You can't blame him for someone reacting to something he says, unless he specifically intended for that to be the route.

OK, how about this. Let's say someone watches natural born killers, then goes out and commits a murder spree. Do you blame the movie company and the actors? Of course not, it was never their intent to have someone mimic their actions in the movie. Same here. If trump makes statements and some people go act on them, you don't blame trump unless you can prove he intended to make them do that.

And for the record, you're wrong about me. I don't particularly like trump. I've made that known back when he was elected. I'd rather it had been one of the other Republicans elected, but, unfortunately, before Hillary or Biden, I would take trump. I defend him because the left had a vendetta against him from before he even took office, and, the left are so bent on hurting trump that they will do anything to accomplish that goal, even if it means convicting him without any ACTUAL PROOF. What the left is doing is putting trump on trial based on circumstantial evidence, but lack any actual evidence.

Terrible analogy, a movie about killing is not the same as a Trump rally where Trump feeds his supporters lies and they then go down to the capitol, and riot.
You are such a cliche, the typical Trump supporter that defends Trump's every criminal move, then claims he doesn't like Trump...
So you are saying Mitch McConnell is wrong when he said the riot was incited by Trump fueled with lies...
 
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
Trump knew exactly what he was doing. He said he was going to the Capitol with them, but didn't go. And when the terrorists got there, they said fight for Trump, because Trump told them to fight like hell. And they are the reason seven people are dead. Trump planted the seeds and he knew it.
Protesting corrupt pols is not a new concept--------fighting back against corrupt pols is not a new thing. Trump encouraged his people to protest our corrupt pols at the capital...Unfortunately pelosie and the other cockroacks had plenty of warning so they could scurry away or call in the national guard. Meanwhile, the cockroaches' puppet masters could arrange with their brown shirts and the fbi/cia could get their people like the viking prepared to try to use the attack on the capital as political theater as our cia is known to do all over the world by instigating riots. This time they used their agents hidden in the crowd and antifa/blm embedded int he crowd to lead the protestors around breaking doors and windows and trying to get the conservative crowd to be more violent for which they failed given how the 4 that died HAD DIED that day.

Still think the viking actor is a cia or fbi operative which explains his income...........
 
Last edited:
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
Which actions were those again? The ones where Trump said to peacefully protest?
The little piece of shit always says both sides of every point he throws out , and only the smallest minds come back with the part he doesn't mean but these hate party members are to fucking stupid to see that. They are at the same sub level of humanity that trump is the king and top God of.
 
.
.
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

You always make the dumbest arguments I have ever heard, they are pathetic. You never make any valid points. Why don't you go tell Trump's defense lawyers to make that arguments, see what they say...

Nobody has made a legitimate argument to defend Trump's acitons. The only argument Trump's lawyers have made is "its unconstitutional" when most scholars say it is fine.

Trump's actions are indefensible and that is why Trump has no real argument to make in his defense besides "its unconstitutional"...

Trump is 100% guilty

So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

Which words did he say that make him guilty?
hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

Why didn't Trump's lawyers make your terrible argument? If you think that would work, then that shows how truly stupid you are...

This is my standard exchange with you: you say something incredibly stupid and meritless. I destroy your stupid argument. Then instead of ending it you double down on stupid, looking even worse.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty, that is just a terribly bad argument and it makes you look totally clueless...

hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

You can't post the relevant part? The actual words?

This is my standard exchange with you:

You make a stupid claim, I ask for clarification or evidence, you run away whining and crying.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty

If your argument is that Trump said something that proves he is guilty....post it.
Too long to post everything, says it all right here:

Did you notice in the video they posted, they conveniently left off the "peacefully and patriotically" part of his speech...almost as if they were deliberately trying to mislead people.

Look, the truth is, this is just a show trial. Those senators already know how they are going to vote. All this is, is just drama played out for public consumption. I've actually heard it said that ALL debates on the senate and house floor are for the TV cameras only. All legislation gets done behind closed doors and everything is worked out ahead of time and when you see congress giving speeches on the floor, its for the tv only.

Are you aware that he never said that in his speech like some Qultists like to claim? Here's the full transcript:


See if you can find it.
 
.
.
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

You always make the dumbest arguments I have ever heard, they are pathetic. You never make any valid points. Why don't you go tell Trump's defense lawyers to make that arguments, see what they say...

Nobody has made a legitimate argument to defend Trump's acitons. The only argument Trump's lawyers have made is "its unconstitutional" when most scholars say it is fine.

Trump's actions are indefensible and that is why Trump has no real argument to make in his defense besides "its unconstitutional"...

Trump is 100% guilty

So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

Which words did he say that make him guilty?
hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

Why didn't Trump's lawyers make your terrible argument? If you think that would work, then that shows how truly stupid you are...

This is my standard exchange with you: you say something incredibly stupid and meritless. I destroy your stupid argument. Then instead of ending it you double down on stupid, looking even worse.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty, that is just a terribly bad argument and it makes you look totally clueless...

hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

You can't post the relevant part? The actual words?

This is my standard exchange with you:

You make a stupid claim, I ask for clarification or evidence, you run away whining and crying.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty

If your argument is that Trump said something that proves he is guilty....post it.
Too long to post everything, says it all right here:


Too long to post everything, says it all right here:

He said something impeachable....quote it.
Or run away whining and crying. Like you usually do.

Inciting a white supremacist riot is cool?

Lol....now its a "white supremacist" riot. Man, that goal post moves fast. What part of this riot turned it into a white supremacist riot?

Yep...white supremacists....I did not stutter.
 
The video the Dems presented as evidence of Trump's total guilt. It is really, really, really bad for Trump. What Trump did was abhorent, and it was all based on fabricated lies.

No republican has offered any defense or rebuttal for Trump's actions, their only defense is Trump is no longer in office? They have no defense at all for Trump's actions. Trump's actions that day were worse than anything any president has ever done, including the failed GWB and criminal Nixon.

Trump is 100% guilty of inciting an insurrection.


Republicans have offered plenty of rebuttal, its just that we are so divided that if someone were to take the truth and tape it to your forehead, you'd say you don't see it nor bilelieve it.

Don't get angry because I'm not just picking in you...the right has the same problem. The real criminal in this whole thing is the media and their partisan spin on every story they produce, and its only getting worse.

Huh?? I haven't seen one person make a legitimate rebuttal argument that Trump didn't incite an insurrection, everybody has just said impeachment is unconstitutional.
It's pretty freakin obvious what Trump said, AND it was all based on lies. Which Mitch McConnell actually said as well...
No impartial nonpartisan person can say Trump didn't incite an insurrection at the capitol.

All of this was over a lie... that's the worst part. A big fabricated BS lie. "We won in a landslide"

You can't prove the incitement. All you can do is piece together things he has said at different times, and through the power of partisan media, they will show you exactly what you want to see.

He specifically said "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard". He never once uttered the words "storm the capitol", or "break in to the capitol, or "cause harm to people at the capitol". You want to believe that because that is what media is telling you, and you hate the Republican party so much that you will believe it without even considering any alternate viewpoint.

AHAHAHAHAHA!!!! :auiqs.jpg:

So because Trump said "peacefully" onetime after firing up the mob to the level of sheer anger displayed in the video, that means he didn't incite that insurrection??? What are you fuckin stupid? Like full blown chromosome deficient retard stupid.

He said go to the Capitol, I'm coming with you, after he totally fired them up to a rage, telling them to "fight", and telling them "when there's fraud you can use other means" Those wackos were full blown insane, and that was because Trump fed them lies about election fraud that never happened.

You people always to play the corrupt media card whenever Trump gets caught red handed in some new scandal, you've been doing it for 5 years. You always have some pathetic excuse.

It is clear as day on the tape what he did and what he said. Nobody has provided a legitimate rebuttal that Trump didn't incite an insurrection. Even Trump's lawyers today couldn't do that today, they didn't even try, because it is all documented on tape.

He said "go to the capitol and, peacefully and patriotically, make your voices heard". He held a rally, people tend to get energized at rallies, but there is no evidence that trump intended for his words to incite violence.

People use the word "fight" in all sorts.of ways, often figuratively, but not always in the context of physical fighting.

Trumps lawyers didn't present a defense today. Today was about the constitutionality of putting a private citizen on trial. His lawyers clearly said they have a rebuttal for everything the house managers stated. Now, I have no illusion that what they say will make any difference. Like last time, this trial has already been decided. There is not a single senator in there who hasn't already made up their mind how they will vote. This trial is merely for public consumption, likely to create even more division.

Please you're so gullible.
Basically your mind was made up 5 years ago. "Trump could shoot somebody in the head on 5th avenue and he won't lose any supporters"
You will make some pathetic excuse for anything Trump does.

Trump said be peaceful 1 time, then he said about 10 other things that were completely contrary and highly inciteful, and in a separate statement he told his follows to march on the capitol and he was coming with, and they ran to the Capitol in a rage and destroyed it.

So what argument can you make? The Trumpers ran to the Capitol and rioted after Trump told them lies about election fraud that didn't happen and made 10 other highly inciteful statements all shown in the video.
The rioters said things like "Trump sent us"

Nope, I'm going to say that trump didn't send them to riot. Sure, they can say that, but, again, the riot started before trump finished his speech. Trump never once instructed anyone to become violent. Show me where trump has said his intentions were to create a violent mob. You can't blame him for someone reacting to something he says, unless he specifically intended for that to be the route.

OK, how about this. Let's say someone watches natural born killers, then goes out and commits a murder spree. Do you blame the movie company and the actors? Of course not, it was never their intent to have someone mimic their actions in the movie. Same here. If trump makes statements and some people go act on them, you don't blame trump unless you can prove he intended to make them do that.

And for the record, you're wrong about me. I don't particularly like trump. I've made that known back when he was elected. I'd rather it had been one of the other Republicans elected, but, unfortunately, before Hillary or Biden, I would take trump. I defend him because the left had a vendetta against him from before he even took office, and, the left are so bent on hurting trump that they will do anything to accomplish that goal, even if it means convicting him without any ACTUAL PROOF. What the left is doing is putting trump on trial based on circumstantial evidence, but lack any actual evidence.

Terrible analogy, a movie about killing is not the same as a Trump rally where Trump feeds his supporters lies and they then go down to the capitol, and riot.
You are such a cliche, the typical Trump supporter that defends Trump's every criminal move, then claims he doesn't like Trump...
So you are saying Mitch McConnell is wrong when he said the riot was incited by Trump fueled with lies...

The movie analogy was spot on. The point being, you can't simply say "he said this, they did that, so he is guilty of making them do that". They need to show that trump went into this with the intent of causing a riot.

I don't defend his every criminal move, its just that, in both cases, the left has failed to show PROOF that he committed what they alleged.

If you know anything about politics, then you know the name of the game is CYA. McConnell was probably just doing whatever It took to keep himself out of hot water with the next administration. It doesn't mean he is right. In fact, the fact that he made his judgment before the trial shows just how much he was wrong.
 
Just a possible scenario...

President Trump gets acquitted again...

You filthy fucking animals are left with another ruined orgasm.... and more night terrors of being smothered by a 30 foot orange nutsack with nobody there to hear your screams....

DJT wins again.... and you... well, you know what you are.
Ah....you must be a trump Qultist....I can tell by your snappy reparte'
 
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
Trump knew exactly what he was doing. He said he was going to the Capitol with them, but didn't go. And when the terrorists got there, they said fight for Trump, because Trump told them to fight like hell. And they are the reason seven people are dead. Trump planted the seeds and he knew it.

Trump knew exactly what he was doing.


Scary!!

What words were "inciting"?
 
.
.
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

You always make the dumbest arguments I have ever heard, they are pathetic. You never make any valid points. Why don't you go tell Trump's defense lawyers to make that arguments, see what they say...

Nobody has made a legitimate argument to defend Trump's acitons. The only argument Trump's lawyers have made is "its unconstitutional" when most scholars say it is fine.

Trump's actions are indefensible and that is why Trump has no real argument to make in his defense besides "its unconstitutional"...

Trump is 100% guilty

So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

Which words did he say that make him guilty?
hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

Why didn't Trump's lawyers make your terrible argument? If you think that would work, then that shows how truly stupid you are...

This is my standard exchange with you: you say something incredibly stupid and meritless. I destroy your stupid argument. Then instead of ending it you double down on stupid, looking even worse.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty, that is just a terribly bad argument and it makes you look totally clueless...

hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

You can't post the relevant part? The actual words?

This is my standard exchange with you:

You make a stupid claim, I ask for clarification or evidence, you run away whining and crying.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty

If your argument is that Trump said something that proves he is guilty....post it.
Too long to post everything, says it all right here:

Did you notice in the video they posted, they conveniently left off the "peacefully and patriotically" part of his speech...almost as if they were deliberately trying to mislead people.

Look, the truth is, this is just a show trial. Those senators already know how they are going to vote. All this is, is just drama played out for public consumption. I've actually heard it said that ALL debates on the senate and house floor are for the TV cameras only. All legislation gets done behind closed doors and everything is worked out ahead of time and when you see congress giving speeches on the floor, its for the tv only.

Are you aware that he never said that in his speech like some Qultists like to claim? Here's the full transcript:


See if you can find it.

Don't need to read the transcript, we have video.





Also note, he actually does give instructions to the people. He says "we are going to walk to the capitol and were going to CHEER ON our senators..." then later he says peacefully and patriotically...so, right there he is clearly stating that they are going to use their voices to cheer them on, peacefully and patriotically.
 
.
.
You think that because Trumps mentions "peaceful protest" one time that it somehow negates him repeatedly inciting an insurrection based on lies.

How many times did he say "insurrection" or "storm the building"?
So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

You always make the dumbest arguments I have ever heard, they are pathetic. You never make any valid points. Why don't you go tell Trump's defense lawyers to make that arguments, see what they say...

Nobody has made a legitimate argument to defend Trump's acitons. The only argument Trump's lawyers have made is "its unconstitutional" when most scholars say it is fine.

Trump's actions are indefensible and that is why Trump has no real argument to make in his defense besides "its unconstitutional"...

Trump is 100% guilty

So because he didn't say those 2 words you are saying he is not guilty?

Which words did he say that make him guilty?
hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

Why didn't Trump's lawyers make your terrible argument? If you think that would work, then that shows how truly stupid you are...

This is my standard exchange with you: you say something incredibly stupid and meritless. I destroy your stupid argument. Then instead of ending it you double down on stupid, looking even worse.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty, that is just a terribly bad argument and it makes you look totally clueless...

hello watch the video, the evidence is pretty overwhelming.

You can't post the relevant part? The actual words?

This is my standard exchange with you:

You make a stupid claim, I ask for clarification or evidence, you run away whining and crying.

If your argument is that Trump didn't say insurrection or storm the capital so he is not guilty

If your argument is that Trump said something that proves he is guilty....post it.
Too long to post everything, says it all right here:


Too long to post everything, says it all right here:

He said something impeachable....quote it.
Or run away whining and crying. Like you usually do.

Inciting a white supremacist riot is cool?

Lol....now its a "white supremacist" riot. Man, that goal post moves fast. What part of this riot turned it into a white supremacist riot?

Yep...white supremacists....I did not stutter.

Ah ok, so, where in that rally was there anything that would suggest that it was about white supremacy?
 
What do you think of a President that says "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun".

I think it's a terrible attempt at "Bu-bu-bu-but Obama!"

Taken out of context and no violent incident to say it lead up to. Just terrible.
Oh yeah, the old "taken out of context". You twits are exactly like a religious cult.

I believe that context can be difficult for uneducated retards.
Go fuck yourself. You lying cocksucker.
 
Just a possible scenario...

President Trump gets acquitted again...

You filthy fucking animals are left with another ruined orgasm.... and more night terrors of being smothered by a 30 foot orange nutsack with nobody there to hear your screams....

DJT wins again.... and you... well, you know what you are.
Ah....you must be a trump Qultist....I can tell by your snappy reparte'
Pitiful creature.
 

Forum List

Back
Top