H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
I've never watched one with any gay characters in it, dumbass.
You have never watched a movie or TV show with a single gay character?
Really?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've never watched one with any gay characters in it, dumbass.
The census doesn't count the number of gay people, moron.I will go with the census thank you very much.....
The census doesn't count the number of gay people, moron.
I've seen some TV gi with some obviously gay characters in it, and they pretty much monopolize the show.You have never watched a movie or TV show with a single gay character?
Really?
I've seen some TV gi with some obviously gay characters in it, and they pretty much monopolize the show.
Did I tell you lately that you are a pure ignoramus? Politically and culturally of course.The census doesn't count the number of gay people, moron.
It gives them the option. That means it's not scientifically valid.Did I tell you lately that you are a pure ignoramus?
Census Bureau Survey Explores Sexual Orientation and Gender …
WebThe 2021 American Community Survey estimated there were 1.2M same-sex couple households in the U.S., and of them, 59% (711,129) were married couples. Advancing …2020 Census: LGBTQ+
Web// Census.gov / Newsroom / Press Kits / 2020 Census: LGBTQ+ 2020 Census: LGBTQ+ February 27, 2020 Every 10 years, the U.S. Census Bureau will attempt to count everyone …![]()
2020 Census: LGBTQ+
The 2020 Census will give people the option to identify a relationship as same-sex.www.census.gov
So you know their numbers are undoubtedly higher than they admit....It gives them the option. That means it's not scientifically valid.
There are plenty of other polls and surveys that say the same damn thing, give it up.It gives them the option. That means it's not scientifically valid.
It gives them the option. That means it's not scientifically valid.
We don't know what methodology they used. Nowhere in the article does it even state what that percentage of the population was.So you know their numbers are undoubtedly higher than they admit....
ROFL! You just proved that you don't know the meaning of "scientifically valid."You should not use words you do not know the meaning of
ROFL! You just proved that you don't know the meaning of "scientifically valid."