The Troops are concerned about gays serving openly.

Okay Spoonie m'man.......tell us........exactly how many years have you served in the U.S. Military, and what branch?

Either put up or shut up you penis puffing tea bagging colon jouster from hell. If you don't serve, or haven't served, what possible qualifications do you have to speak on this subject?
 
Okay Spoonie m'man.......tell us........exactly how many years have you served in the U.S. Military, and what branch?

Either put up or shut up you penis puffing tea bagging colon jouster from hell. If you don't serve, or haven't served, what possible qualifications do you have to speak on this subject?

Dude, you are the one who has me confused with someone else. So, where's my post challenging your service and saying I was a sailor?

Remove head from ass and get to looking
 
Okay Spoonie m'man.......tell us........exactly how many years have you served in the U.S. Military, and what branch?

Either put up or shut up you penis puffing tea bagging colon jouster from hell. If you don't serve, or haven't served, what possible qualifications do you have to speak on this subject?

Dude, you are the one who has me confused with someone else. So, where's my post challenging your service and saying I was a sailor?

Remove head from ass and get to looking

You seem to be in favor of keeping DADT. Now, what do you base this assessment on? Have you ever served on active duty in the US Military?

If not, shut the **** up, you have nothing to contribute that would be considered factual. Many others on this thread are telling you that from their EXPERIENCE of serving, they (like myself, who is a 20 year vet), think that based on their EXPERIENCES of serving with gays and seeing how they were treated by their fellow soldiers and sailors, they do not think there would be any impact on readiness.

What is your evidence that you can present? I'm guessing nothing other than rhetoric.
 
Okay Spoonie m'man.......tell us........exactly how many years have you served in the U.S. Military, and what branch?

Either put up or shut up you penis puffing tea bagging colon jouster from hell. If you don't serve, or haven't served, what possible qualifications do you have to speak on this subject?

Dude, you are the one who has me confused with someone else. So, where's my post challenging your service and saying I was a sailor?

Remove head from ass and get to looking

You seem to be in favor of keeping DADT. Now, what do you base this assessment on? Have you ever served on active duty in the US Military?

If not, shut the **** up, you have nothing to contribute that would be considered factual. Many others on this thread are telling you that from their EXPERIENCE of serving, they (like myself, who is a 20 year vet), think that based on their EXPERIENCES of serving with gays and seeing how they were treated by their fellow soldiers and sailors, they do not think there would be any impact on readiness.

What is your evidence that you can present? I'm guessing nothing other than rhetoric.

But wait. I'm sailor right? Or are you saying as usual you got your facts all screwed up? :eusa_whistle:
 
I already told ya once you sperm drooling cock monkey.......I was a PN.

BT's, HT's, MM's and other engineers are who hangs out in the bowels of a ship.

Apparently, as a (supposed) sailor, you don't know that. Shocking......really.......

Where do you get I was a supposed sailor? Making shit up again?

There was another thread where you questioned my service, and volunteered that you'd been a former sailor as well.

Like I said you colon jousting retard, it's the ENGINEERS who hang out in the bowels of the ship.

The titless Waves (like I was) are usually placed on the main deck or above.
isn't a wave a chick? :lol: You know they did away with PN's don't you?
 
Okay Spoonie m'man.......tell us........exactly how many years have you served in the U.S. Military, and what branch?

Either put up or shut up you penis puffing tea bagging colon jouster from hell. If you don't serve, or haven't served, what possible qualifications do you have to speak on this subject?

Dude, you are the one who has me confused with someone else. So, where's my post challenging your service and saying I was a sailor?

Remove head from ass and get to looking

You seem to be in favor of keeping DADT. Now, what do you base this assessment on? Have you ever served on active duty in the US Military?

If not, shut the **** up, you have nothing to contribute that would be considered factual. Many others on this thread are telling you that from their EXPERIENCE of serving, they (like myself, who is a 20 year vet), think that based on their EXPERIENCES of serving with gays and seeing how they were treated by their fellow soldiers and sailors, they do not think there would be any impact on readiness.

What is your evidence that you can present? I'm guessing nothing other than rhetoric.

I seem to remember others saying that in other threads about this subject.... Seems your side told them they were wrong That being military wasn't the only qualification to make a judgement on this....... But i could be remembering that wrong, it happens on occasion.....
 
IDK. I still believe the reason you go into the military is to serve you country. Not to further a personal cause.

The former high school soft ball star down the road is in Afghanistan as I post. She is gay and is an interpreter. Known her and her folks for 20 years.
They would throw her out if known she is gay.
And that is fucked up and anyone with a brain knows it.
Is her service a "personal cause"?
Where is this person that is gay and is serving for their "personal cause"?
What is their name?
Gomer Pyle was gay
 
Dude, you are the one who has me confused with someone else. So, where's my post challenging your service and saying I was a sailor?

Remove head from ass and get to looking

You seem to be in favor of keeping DADT. Now, what do you base this assessment on? Have you ever served on active duty in the US Military?

If not, shut the **** up, you have nothing to contribute that would be considered factual. Many others on this thread are telling you that from their EXPERIENCE of serving, they (like myself, who is a 20 year vet), think that based on their EXPERIENCES of serving with gays and seeing how they were treated by their fellow soldiers and sailors, they do not think there would be any impact on readiness.

What is your evidence that you can present? I'm guessing nothing other than rhetoric.

I seem to remember others saying that in other threads about this subject.... Seems your side told them they were wrong That being military wasn't the only qualification to make a judgement on this....... But i could be remembering that wrong, it happens on occasion.....

the commander and chief has the only ward that counts ,you can whine all you please or just shut up and serve .
just like integration in the military .
 
You seem to be in favor of keeping DADT. Now, what do you base this assessment on? Have you ever served on active duty in the US Military?

If not, shut the **** up, you have nothing to contribute that would be considered factual. Many others on this thread are telling you that from their EXPERIENCE of serving, they (like myself, who is a 20 year vet), think that based on their EXPERIENCES of serving with gays and seeing how they were treated by their fellow soldiers and sailors, they do not think there would be any impact on readiness.

What is your evidence that you can present? I'm guessing nothing other than rhetoric.

I seem to remember others saying that in other threads about this subject.... Seems your side told them they were wrong That being military wasn't the only qualification to make a judgement on this....... But i could be remembering that wrong, it happens on occasion.....

the commander and chief has the only ward that counts ,you can whine all you please or just shut up and serve .
just like integration in the military .

OK, you proved that you know nothing about the military. Did you maybe mean Commander in Chief?
 
Where do you get I was a supposed sailor? Making shit up again?

There was another thread where you questioned my service, and volunteered that you'd been a former sailor as well.

Like I said you colon jousting retard, it's the ENGINEERS who hang out in the bowels of the ship.

The titless Waves (like I was) are usually placed on the main deck or above.
isn't a wave a chick? :lol: You know they did away with PN's don't you?

Very good ya drooling idiot........Waves ARE girls, which is why when males were working in an administrative type billet, they were called "titless Waves" based on the fact that they were doing what was considered "womans work", thus the name.

And yes........PN was converted by combining them with DK's, resulting in the current rate of PK. They phased out PN about a year after I retired in 2002.

Yes. I keep up with things.
 
There was another thread where you questioned my service, and volunteered that you'd been a former sailor as well.

Like I said you colon jousting retard, it's the ENGINEERS who hang out in the bowels of the ship.

The titless Waves (like I was) are usually placed on the main deck or above.
isn't a wave a chick? :lol: You know they did away with PN's don't you?

Very good ya drooling idiot........Waves ARE girls, which is why when males were working in an administrative type billet, they were called "titless Waves" based on the fact that they were doing what was considered "womans work", thus the name.

And yes........PN was converted by combining them with DK's, resulting in the current rate of PK. They phased out PN about a year after I retired in 2002.

Yes. I keep up with things.

So you did womens work :lol:

Actually I thought it was changed to PS but.........
 
IDK. I still believe the reason you go into the military is to serve you country. Not to further a personal cause.

The former high school soft ball star down the road is in Afghanistan as I post. She is gay and is an interpreter. Known her and her folks for 20 years.
They would throw her out if known she is gay.
And that is fucked up and anyone with a brain knows it.
Is her service a "personal cause"?
Where is this person that is gay and is serving for their "personal cause"?
What is their name?
Gomer Pyle was gay

Was he any good?
 
The former high school soft ball star down the road is in Afghanistan as I post. She is gay and is an interpreter. Known her and her folks for 20 years.
They would throw her out if known she is gay.
And that is fucked up and anyone with a brain knows it.
Is her service a "personal cause"?
Where is this person that is gay and is serving for their "personal cause"?
What is their name?
Gomer Pyle was gay

Was he any good?

idk, ask sgt carter
 
isn't a wave a chick? :lol: You know they did away with PN's don't you?

Very good ya drooling idiot........Waves ARE girls, which is why when males were working in an administrative type billet, they were called "titless Waves" based on the fact that they were doing what was considered "womans work", thus the name.

And yes........PN was converted by combining them with DK's, resulting in the current rate of PK. They phased out PN about a year after I retired in 2002.

Yes. I keep up with things.

So you did womens work :lol:

Actually I thought it was changed to PS but.........

Tell ya what ya retarded little troll..........based on the many **** ups you've posted around here, I'd be willing to bet your knowledge of the military is only what you can get from Google.

And yeah........FWIW, many people considered secretary work (which means admin work), is a chicks job. Only thing is........people still gotta get paid and service records still gotta have entries, as well as the EPAD needs to be kept up to date, and women used to not be allowed on combat vessels until around 1985 or so. They still can't go on subs either.

PS? I stand corrected. The reservist I was talking to at the station here out in Amarillo called 'em PK's, I guess because he saw they'd combined PN and DK and thought that's what it was.

You on the other hand are still totally screwed about your views on military readiness being impacted by repeal of DADT.
 
Very good ya drooling idiot........Waves ARE girls, which is why when males were working in an administrative type billet, they were called "titless Waves" based on the fact that they were doing what was considered "womans work", thus the name.

And yes........PN was converted by combining them with DK's, resulting in the current rate of PK. They phased out PN about a year after I retired in 2002.

Yes. I keep up with things.

So you did womens work :lol:

Actually I thought it was changed to PS but.........

Tell ya what ya retarded little troll..........based on the many **** ups you've posted around here, I'd be willing to bet your knowledge of the military is only what you can get from Google.

And yeah........FWIW, many people considered secretary work (which means admin work), is a chicks job. Only thing is........people still gotta get paid and service records still gotta have entries, as well as the EPAD needs to be kept up to date, and women used to not be allowed on combat vessels until around 1985 or so. They still can't go on subs either.

PS? I stand corrected. The reservist I was talking to at the station here out in Amarillo called 'em PK's, I guess because he saw they'd combined PN and DK and thought that's what it was.

You on the other hand are still totally screwed about your views on military readiness being impacted by repeal of DADT.

What were you saying about my many **** ups around here? based on your criteriea, you are the troll.

they could have always let the gay guys do the womens jobs :eusa_whistle::lol:
 
So you did womens work :lol:

Actually I thought it was changed to PS but.........

Tell ya what ya retarded little troll..........based on the many **** ups you've posted around here, I'd be willing to bet your knowledge of the military is only what you can get from Google.

And yeah........FWIW, many people considered secretary work (which means admin work), is a chicks job. Only thing is........people still gotta get paid and service records still gotta have entries, as well as the EPAD needs to be kept up to date, and women used to not be allowed on combat vessels until around 1985 or so. They still can't go on subs either.

PS? I stand corrected. The reservist I was talking to at the station here out in Amarillo called 'em PK's, I guess because he saw they'd combined PN and DK and thought that's what it was.

You on the other hand are still totally screwed about your views on military readiness being impacted by repeal of DADT.

What were you saying about my many **** ups around here? based on your criteriea, you are the troll.

they could have always let the gay guys do the womens jobs :eusa_whistle::lol:

After I retired in 2002, I didn't see the inside of anything Navy until around 2008. Why? Because I didn't need to go to the base. I finally got to talk to someone when I had to take care of some stuff and used the Reservist station to make my phone calls.

Like I said, they changed it over in 2003 after I left. You don't make mistakes? You sure as **** have all over these boards.

Hey Spoonertard.......**** off ya goddamn pedant, go please purists.
 
15th post
Tell ya what ya retarded little troll..........based on the many **** ups you've posted around here, I'd be willing to bet your knowledge of the military is only what you can get from Google.

And yeah........FWIW, many people considered secretary work (which means admin work), is a chicks job. Only thing is........people still gotta get paid and service records still gotta have entries, as well as the EPAD needs to be kept up to date, and women used to not be allowed on combat vessels until around 1985 or so. They still can't go on subs either.

PS? I stand corrected. The reservist I was talking to at the station here out in Amarillo called 'em PK's, I guess because he saw they'd combined PN and DK and thought that's what it was.

You on the other hand are still totally screwed about your views on military readiness being impacted by repeal of DADT.

What were you saying about my many **** ups around here? based on your criteriea, you are the troll.

they could have always let the gay guys do the womens jobs :eusa_whistle::lol:

After I retired in 2002, I didn't see the inside of anything Navy until around 2008. Why? Because I didn't need to go to the base. I finally got to talk to someone when I had to take care of some stuff and used the Reservist station to make my phone calls.

Like I said, they changed it over in 2003 after I left. You don't make mistakes? You sure as **** have all over these boards.

Hey Spoonertard.......**** off ya goddamn pedant, go please purists.

mmmmm care to point out some of my mistakes?

Well that's what happens when you spend your career in the bowls of a ship.
 
I seem to remember others saying that in other threads about this subject.... Seems your side told them they were wrong That being military wasn't the only qualification to make a judgement on this....... But i could be remembering that wrong, it happens on occasion.....

the commander and chief has the only ward that counts ,you can whine all you please or just shut up and serve .
just like integration in the military .

OK, you proved that you know nothing about the military. Did you maybe mean Commander in Chief?

oh **** you, you know who I meant ,
and your right its been a long time since I served , but it seems to me you so called professionals are vary whiny .

maybe now you have rights , but it wasn't always so , you did what you were told served alongside who you were told ,

we had a better attitude .
 
Back
Top Bottom