The sun is constant yet ocean temperatures increase and decrease. Why?

That's a pretty lame spin. The official line is that when land moves to within 600 miles of an Earth pole, it enters an ICE AGE, which, while very slow, begin to change the climate by accumulating ice and trapping gas in the process. As more ice is accumulated, that cools Earth both air and water. When land in ice age leaves the 600 miles to the pole, as NA recently did, the ice melts, gas is released, oceans rise, and Earth warms.


And you and the Co2 FRAUD cannot refute one word of that...


Are these currents bullshit too?
1729902302398.png


Arctic region currents | U.S. Geological Survey

 
So now you are arguing that ice doesn't grow on land near the pole?


You are a sick liar, undoubtedly a cocksucker. You are arguing that WATER too warm to FREEZE causes ICE TO FREEZE ON LAND, and that is absolutely fucking laughable. A junior high science class would laugh at it...

and the maps clearly show Greenland's ice is centered, not by the coasts.


EMH's explanation for ICE AGE perfectly explains EARTH ICE today and in the past.

 



That is a snapshot of ocean currents in 2017. So what.

Hilariously enough, your map has a cold current by Alaska. So why isn't Alaska "glaciating?"

LOL!!!!


 
That is a snapshot of ocean currents in 2017. So what.

Hilariously enough, your map has a cold current by Alaska. So why isn't Alaska "glaciating?"

LOL!!!!


Do you think the heat circulation shown there is bullshit?
 
You are a sick liar, undoubtedly a cocksucker. You are arguing that WATER too warm to FREEZE causes ICE TO FREEZE ON LAND, and that is absolutely fucking laughable. A junior high science class would laugh at it...

and the maps clearly show Greenland's ice is centered, not by the coasts.


EMH's explanation for ICE AGE perfectly explains EARTH ICE today and in the past.

Do you believe that if heat circulation to the Arctic stopped that ice would start growing on the lands?
 
Do you believe that if heat circulation to the Arctic stopped that ice would start growing on the lands?



This is even more hilarious that first perceived.

This is the plot for "Day After Tomorrow." Dennis Quaid claimed "global warming" can "cause an ice age" by... altering ocean currents...

and 3 days later the United States was buried under an ice age.... LOL!!!


"heat circulation" by ocean currents has happened on Earth since Earth acquired oceans. Your problem is that ocean WATER is WATER and you are claiming WATER CAUSES ICE and that is beyond pathetic.

You have NO DATA.

McBullshit is easily refuted.

Your side has absolutely NOTHING REAL to even attempt to argue this...
 
Do you think the heat circulation shown there is bullshit?


No reason to question it, and you have no reason not to explain the fact that the map shows cold currents by Alaska, but Alaska is not "glaciating" and hence REFUTES COMPLETELY THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE PUSHING...
 
This is even more hilarious that first perceived.

This is the plot for "Day After Tomorrow." Dennis Quaid claimed "global warming" can "cause an ice age" by... altering ocean currents...

and 3 days later the United States was buried under an ice age.... LOL!!!


"heat circulation" by ocean currents has happened on Earth since Earth acquired oceans. Your problem is that ocean WATER is WATER and you are claiming WATER CAUSES ICE and that is beyond pathetic.

You have NO DATA.

McBullshit is easily refuted.

Your side has absolutely NOTHING REAL to even attempt to argue this...
So ice doesn't grow on lands near the poles when temperatures drop? You've been arguing that it does.

When these currents of warm water stop circulating in the Arctic the surrounding lands in the Arctic will glaciate.
1729906139222.webp
 
No reason to question it, and you have no reason not to explain the fact that the map shows cold currents by Alaska, but Alaska is not "glaciating" and hence REFUTES COMPLETELY THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE PUSHING...
When those currents which are circulating warm water from the Atlantic stop the Arctic will freeze.
 
So ice doesn't grow on lands near the poles when temperatures drop?



More precisely, the closer you are to a pole, the colder it is on planet Earth. In Buffalo it snows like 10 feet every year, but it all melts during the summer. When land gets to 600 miles to a pole, the Sun fails to melt the snow from winter fully, and then it starts to stack. Greenland has stacked for 1+ million years, and Antarctica has stacked for 40+ million years. And they have both continuously stacked during your completely discredited "interglacials" and periodic changes in ocean currents.
 
More precisely, the closer you are to a pole, the colder it is on planet Earth. In Buffalo it snows like 10 feet every year, but it all melts during the summer. When land gets to 600 miles to a pole, the Sun fails to melt the snow from winter fully, and then it starts to stack. Greenland has stacked for 1+ million years, and Antarctica has stacked for 40+ million years. And they have both continuously stacked during your completely discredited "interglacials" and periodic changes in ocean currents.
No. The more thermally isolated the pole the more sensitive it is to lower temperatures triggering glacial events when ocean currents (as shown below) stop circulating warm water from the Atlantic to the Arctic.

1729906653306.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom