The Stupid Lie called The Theory of Evolution

[sealybobo]

Unless God plopped down two adult humans giraffe cats bears wolves pigs alligators snakes deer mice fish shark spiders ants mosquitoes Beatle dolphin dinosaurs and they all procreated from there. That is the only possible thing they could be suggesting as a counter argument to evolution.

No one has to come up with another explanation, dipshit.... how many times do I have to say that? The lack of another credible theory does not make your theory valid... there is absolutely NOTHING in Science that says such a thing... it's absolutely ludicrous.

Make your case for YOUR theory on IT'S merit!

It is not a theory, it is a reality

Simple creatures have evolved into more complex creatures. Man did not frolic with the trilobites

No. After trilobites this "spirit said let there be dinosaurs then later said let there be humans.

 

[Boss]

Simple creatures have evolved into more complex creatures.

If that's what you believe, you have to prove that with Science. You haven't. Sorry.

 

[sealybobo]

Macroevolution is a scientific fact.

Nope... It's STILL not... and you can say it over and over again if you like... it still won't be a scientific fact.

You can believe I can walk ten blocks but you can't believe I can walk 100. That's the difference between micro and macro.

Sorry, it's not the same thing and that isn't the scientific method. The SM doesn't state that you can create clever analogies and those prove your theories. It requires that you test, observe and evaluate your hypothesis.... doesn't have a thing in there about poo-pooing religion or creating straw men.

Problem is, when scientists conducted nearly 100 years of fruit fly experiments, they couldn't find evidence to support your hypothesis. The fruit flies refused to become anything other than fruit flies. The reason they chose fruit flies is because they regenerate a new generation every 11 days, a fraction of the time humans take... so it's like being able to look at the process on a macro level. They tried everything they could think of to encourage the fruit flies to "evolve" and after billions of generations, not one new enzyme or amino acid was produced. They had mutation, but the mutations did not result in producing new enzymes or amino acids and in order to successfully have transition from one genera to another it would require at a minimum, 27 amino acids and 14 enzymes. Again... billions of generations, NONE were produced.

Now, you can keep on posting links and propaganda from those on a mission to promote their faith-based beliefs as science... I can't stop you. You and them can explain what's wrong with everybody that they don't jump on your faith-based bandwagon and ridicule them while pointing to this "scientific community" as if somehow, that replaces science and the scientific method.... again, I can't stop you. What you cannot do, apparently, is provide us with the actual scientific data to support your 1859 theory. And until you CAN do that, I am not going to believe in your fairy tale. Sorry!

I'm afraid all the screeching you do to promote your gods is a poor substitute for facts.

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

But boss said we've produced no evidence. Surely there must be a mistake. Maybe he missed your post

 

[Boss]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

 

[sealybobo]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

No. You believe because we can't reproduce it in the lab that that proves macro evolution is wrong. You're wrong. Even if macro isn't true, you don't have a better theory. Macro is the theory that makes the most sense. Explaining it to you over and over would be an exercise in futility

 

[ChrisL]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Sorry, but they have actually come close to be to reproduce this chemical reaction. And look! It's a Fox News link.

Scientists Create World's First 'Mini Big Bang' | Fox News

 

[ChrisL]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Yes. Why don't you do some research about it and read up on it. It makes a HELL of a lot more sense than any theory that you've put forth thus far.

 

[sealybobo]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Even if I believed in your God I would assume it planted one seed that turned into all life. Yes that is mind boggling but your spirit put adult humans here makes absolute zero sense. But it's proof how gullible igorant and brainwashed humans are. We will believe anything

 

[sealybobo]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Yes. Why don't you do some research about it and read up on it. It makes a HELL of a lot more sense than any theory that you've put forth thus far.

He admits he has no theory he just doesn't like sciences theory. He doesn't know how we got here but knows neither do we. And he finds it hard to believe we share a common ancestor with all life.

Next time you're in Florida hug your cousin the alligator

 

[ChrisL]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Yes. Why don't you do some research about it and read up on it. It makes a HELL of a lot more sense than any theory that you've put forth thus far.

He admits he has no theory he just doesn't like sciences theory. He doesn't know how we got here but knows neither do we. And he finds it hard to believe we share a common ancestor with all life.

Next time you're in Florida hug your cousin the alligator

No thanks. Lol. You can though.

 

[Boss]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

No. You believe because we can't reproduce it in the lab that that proves macro evolution is wrong. You're wrong. Even if macro isn't true, you don't have a better theory. Macro is the theory that makes the most sense. Explaining it to you over and over would be an exercise in futility

It made the most sense that the Earth was flat.... It made the most sense that the universe revolved around the Earth... It made the most sense that the universe was comprised mostly of atoms... What makes the most sense is not always what is true. That's where Science comes in.... it doesn't care what makes the most sense, it's about questioning these things, testing and evaluating evidence.

You simply can't declare me wrong because that's your opinion. That's what closed-minded bigots do. Closed-minded bigots who believe their opinions are always right regardless of whether they can back their opinions up with evidence, have no business in Science. Your mindset is precisely what Science was invented to defeat.

 

[Boss]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Sorry, but they have actually come close to be to reproduce this chemical reaction. And look! It's a Fox News link.

Scientists Create World's First 'Mini Big Bang' | Fox News

LMAO... again... "come close to" only counts in horseshoes and hand-grenades. Not Science.

Hawking says there wasn't a "Big Bang" and I tend to agree with him because it would include a Singularity which is a mathematical impossibility due to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

 

[ChrisL]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

Sorry, but they have actually come close to be to reproduce this chemical reaction. And look! It's a Fox News link.

Scientists Create World's First 'Mini Big Bang' | Fox News

LMAO... again... "come close to" only counts in horseshoes and hand-grenades. Not Science.

Hawking says there wasn't a "Big Bang" and I tend to agree with him because it would include a Singularity which is a mathematical impossibility due to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

You can't be this brainwashed, can you? Yikes. It's pretty scary to think that, in this day and age, there are people like you out there who don't believe in the theory of evolution. How old are you? What year did you graduate from high school?

 

[ChrisL]

You think it's more "plausible" that the earth was created by some mythical being? Seriously?

 

[sealybobo]

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

No. You believe because we can't reproduce it in the lab that that proves macro evolution is wrong. You're wrong. Even if macro isn't true, you don't have a better theory. Macro is the theory that makes the most sense. Explaining it to you over and over would be an exercise in futility

It made the most sense that the Earth was flat.... It made the most sense that the universe revolved around the Earth... It made the most sense that the universe was comprised mostly of atoms... What makes the most sense is not always what is true. That's where Science comes in.... it doesn't care what makes the most sense, it's about questioning these things, testing and evaluating evidence.

You simply can't declare me wrong because that's your opinion. That's what closed-minded bigots do. Closed-minded bigots who believe their opinions are always right regardless of whether they can back their opinions up with evidence, have no business in Science. Your mindset is precisely what Science was invented to defeat.

That's not what I'm doing. You're flipping ignorant biblical beliefs that had no basis in fact science or evidence and trying to compare them with a scientific fact. Fact

You're trying to compare a scientific fact called macro evolution with

Questioning testing and evaluating evidence is how they came up with macro evolution.

Im not about to start learning about it so I can tell you why you're stupid. Educate yourself. I listed the four fields of study. Good luck

 

[Boss]

Even if I believed in your God I would assume it planted one seed that turned into all life. Yes that is mind boggling but your spirit put adult humans here makes absolute zero sense. But it's proof how gullible igorant and brainwashed humans are. We will believe anything

Yes... some of us believe things that are totally not backed up by science yet we claim them to be.

The ONLY difference between your "faith-based belief" and mine is that you dishonestly try to masquerade your beliefs as science when they're not. At least I honestly admit that mine is a faith-based belief.

And I didn't ever say that a spirit put adult humans here. I don't know what happened. You don't know either but you dance around here claiming you do... then admitting you don't really know... then back to claiming you do know. You appeal to popularity and ridicule and think that this suffices as scientific evidence.

 

[sealybobo]

Th

...but he certainly believes the probability a God poofed adult creatures into existence is an equally probable outcome as evolution...

And you believe that some random chemical reaction happened to turn inorganic matter into organic matter and *poof* spawn trillions and trillions of interdependent life forms... despite the fact that with all the modern technology and labs at your disposal, have never been able to reproduce such a chemical reaction.

No. You believe because we can't reproduce it in the lab that that proves macro evolution is wrong. You're wrong. Even if macro isn't true, you don't have a better theory. Macro is the theory that makes the most sense. Explaining it to you over and over would be an exercise in futility

It made the most sense that the Earth was flat.... It made the most sense that the universe revolved around the Earth... It made the most sense that the universe was comprised mostly of atoms... What makes the most sense is not always what is true. That's where Science comes in.... it doesn't care what makes the most sense, it's about questioning these things, testing and evaluating evidence.

You simply can't declare me wrong because that's your opinion. That's what closed-minded bigots do. Closed-minded bigots who believe their opinions are always right regardless of whether they can back their opinions up with evidence, have no business in Science. Your mindset is precisely what Science was invented to defeat.

ThoThose things made sense when people were no smarter than you. Once the Enlightenment Period began and people started using the scientific method.

I believe you know the truth but choose to be willfully ignorant. I think you could possibly be this stupid or stubborn

 

[sealybobo]

Even if I believed in your God I would assume it planted one seed that turned into all life. Yes that is mind boggling but your spirit put adult humans here makes absolute zero sense. But it's proof how gullible igorant and brainwashed humans are. We will believe anything

Yes... some of us believe things that are totally not backed up by science yet we claim them to be.

The ONLY difference between your "faith-based belief" and mine is that you dishonestly try to masquerade your beliefs as science when they're not. At least I honestly admit that mine is a faith-based belief.

And I didn't ever say that a spirit put adult humans here. I don't know what happened. You don't know either but you dance around here claiming you do... then admitting you don't really know... then back to claiming you do know. You appeal to popularity and ridicule and think that this suffices as scientific evidence.

You're just pretending to be stupid.

 

[Boss]

You think it's more "plausible" that the earth was created by some mythical being? Seriously?

Again, Chris... I have said this repeatedly throughout the thread... It doesn't matter if I have a better theory. Science is not a pissing contest where I have to come up with a better theory than yours. It is entirely up to YOU to prove your theories... it doesn't matter if I have a theory or if I can prove mine.

I don't believe in "mythical beings" ...I believe in spiritual nature. There is no "being" involved, mythical or otherwise. And let me clarify that... It's not just that I blindly have faith in my belief, I am aware of spiritual nature and it proves itself to me daily. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that it's there. You see... I'm not big on blind faith. I generally have to see some evidence before I believe it. That's why I reject the theories of macro-evolution and abiogenesis... I have not seen the evidence to support it. That's not me saying it's not true or the theories aren't valid... I just don't believe them until I see evidence.

 

[ChrisL]

Even if I believed in your God I would assume it planted one seed that turned into all life. Yes that is mind boggling but your spirit put adult humans here makes absolute zero sense. But it's proof how gullible igorant and brainwashed humans are. We will believe anything

Yes... some of us believe things that are totally not backed up by science yet we claim them to be.

The ONLY difference between your "faith-based belief" and mine is that you dishonestly try to masquerade your beliefs as science when they're not. At least I honestly admit that mine is a faith-based belief.

And I didn't ever say that a spirit put adult humans here. I don't know what happened. You don't know either but you dance around here claiming you do... then admitting you don't really know... then back to claiming you do know. You appeal to popularity and ridicule and think that this suffices as scientific evidence.

It is science. Lol. You think we are just making stuff up here? I learned the Theory of Evolution in science class when I was in middle school for goodness sake!