"Race, Evolution, and Behavior," by Professor J. Philippe Rushton

[JoeB131]

Jews belong in Israel. I am glad we have helped them.

If they belonged in Palestine, they wouldn't have had to come from Europe.

Just because they can't get along with their fellow Europeans, doesn't mean the Palestinians have to suffer.

If America is so keen on a Jewish State, we should give them one of ours.

 

[Hector12]

If they belonged in Palestine, they wouldn't have had to come from Europe.

Just because they can't get along with their fellow Europeans, doesn't mean the Palestinians have to suffer.

If America is so keen on a Jewish State, we should give them one of ours.

The Israelis are people like us The Palestinians are not. The only Palestinians I care about are the Christian Palestinians. The rest should have been deported long ago.

 

[JoeB131]

The Israelis are people like us The Palestinians are not. The only Palestinians I care about are the Christian Palestinians. The rest should have been deported long ago.

Naw, the Zionists need to be deported back to Israel.

Somehow, I doubt you signed up in the military to fight whatever war the Zionist Lobby dreamed up.

 

[Hector12]

Naw, the Zionists need to be deported back to Israel.

Somehow, I doubt you signed up in the military to fight whatever war the Zionist Lobby dreamed up.

I would have loved to fight in the Six Day War of 1967.

Ashkenazi Jews are the most superior race in existence. They deserve the best we can offer them.

 

[JoeB131]

I would have loved to fight in the Six Day War of 1967.

Ashkenazi Jews are the most superior race in existence. They deserve the best we can offer them.

But the point is, YOU DIDN'T.

I didn't fight in the Gulf War (instigated by Jews), but my unit was damned close to being deployed.

 

[Hector12]

But the point is, YOU DIDN'T.

I didn't fight in the Gulf War (instigated by Jews), but my unit was damned close to being deployed.

The Gulf War was instigated by Saddam when he ordered the conquest of Kuwait. Israel had nothing to do with it.

 

[JoeB131]

The Gulf War was instigated by Saddam when he ordered the conquest of Kuwait. Israel had nothing to do with it.

You are missing a few pieces.

Saddam had an audience with April Glaspie, the US Ambassador to Iraq, and told him he intended to invade Kuwait. Glaspie replied.

"We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America."


In short, we didn't care. It wasn't our problem. Just like it wasn't our problem when Saddam invaded Iran. Fuck, we actively supported him when he did that.


Then Mr. Jew in Washington rubbed his little grubby hands together and said, "This is our chance to get America to take out Saddam for us!!!"

Americans died, others came back with chronic diseases, for a war that REALLY WASN'T OUR PROBLEM.

 

[Hector12]

You are missing a few pieces.

Saddam had an audience with April Glaspie, the US Ambassador to Iraq, and told him he intended to invade Kuwait. Glaspie replied.

"We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America."


In short, we didn't care. It wasn't our problem. Just like it wasn't our problem when Saddam invaded Iran. Fuck, we actively supported him when he did that.


Then Mr. Jew in Washington rubbed his little grubby hands together and said, "This is our chance to get America to take out Saddam for us!!!"

Americans died, others came back with chronic diseases, for a war that REALLY WASN'T OUR PROBLEM.

President Bush changed his mind about fighting Kuwait. I am glad he did. I did not care about Kuwait. The Saudis also pressured Bush about defending Kuwait. Their fear and mine was that if Saddam got away with the conquest of Kuwait, he would conquer Saudi Arabia.

My scenario was that Saddam would conquer Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, raise the world price of petroleum, spread the wealth around to poor Arabs, and raise an army to destroy Israel.

So for me, the war was very definitely about assuring the safety and well being of Israel. I thought Iraq under the rule of Saddam was a threat to Israel. I wanted Iraq to be beaten into the sand, Iraq was beaten into the sand. I was delighted.

The War in Iraq was a splendid war. It was short. With minimal casualties and in a short time we achieved total victory. For most Americans it was as delightful as Israel's victory in the Six Day War. I love to watch Israel win wars. I love to watch Jews succeed and prosper.

 

[JoeB131]

President Bush changed his mind about fighting Kuwait. I am glad he did. I did not care about Kuwait. The Saudis also pressured Bush about defending Kuwait. Their fear and mine was that if Saddam got away with the conquest of Kuwait, he would conquer Saudi Arabia.

My scenario was that Saddam would conquer Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, raise the world price of petroleum, spread the wealth around to poor Arabs, and raise an army to destroy Israel.

So for me, the war was very definitely about assuring the safety and well being of Israel. I thought Iraq under the rule of Saddam was a threat to Israel. I wanted Iraq to be beaten into the sand, Iraq was beaten into the sand. I was delighted.

The War in Iraq was a splendid war. It was short. With minimal casualties and in a short time we achieved total victory. For most Americans it was as delightful as Israel's victory in the Six Day War. I love to watch Israel win wars. I love to watch Jews succeed and prosper.

Again, if the Jews weren't over there needlessly antagonizing the Arabs, we wouldn't have a say in it.

Sure, Bush changed his mind, after AIPAC engaged in another round of "Let's you and him fight'.

It's not like your chickenshit ass would sign up and fight a war.

 

[Hector12]

Again, if the Jews weren't over there needlessly antagonizing the Arabs, we wouldn't have a say in it.

Sure, Bush changed his mind, after AIPAC engaged in another round of "Let's you and him fight'.

It's not like your chickenshit ass would sign up and fight a war.

The Jews are not "needlessly antagonizing the Arabs." They want to be left alone.

 

[JoeB131]

The Jews are not "needlessly antagonizing the Arabs." They want to be left alone.

Then they should have stayed in Europe.

 

[Hector12]

Then they should have stayed in Europe.

Jews have the right to live anywhere they want to live. I am glad that so many Jews have decided to live in the United States, and that the United States has always supported and defended Israel. We need more Jews to fill cognitively demanding positions at the top of our economy. Unfortunately, there are not enough Jews to go around. We in the United States already have far more than our fair share of Jews.

 

[JoeB131]

Jews have the right to live anywhere they want to live. I am glad that so many Jews have decided to live in the United States, and that the United States has always supported and defended Israel. We need more Jews to fill cognitively demanding positions at the top of our economy. Unfortunately, there are not enough Jews to go around. We in the United States already have far more than our fair share of Jews.

I'd be perfectly willing to part with some, but I can't think of another country I dislike enough to wish them on.

The only reason they ended up here is every other country they've lived in they've worn out their welcome.

They should probably work on that.

 

[Hector12]

I'd be perfectly willing to part with some, but I can't think of another country I dislike enough to wish them on.

The only reason they ended up here is every other country they've lived in they've worn out their welcome.

They should probably work on that.

Jews came here to escape persecution based on religious bigotry, and resentment of their high average intelligence.

By no commonly accepted criteria do Jews tend to be less moral than white Gentiles.

 

[JoeB131]

Jews came here to escape persecution based on religious bigotry, and resentment of their high average intelligence.

By no commonly accepted criteria do Jews tend to be less moral than white Gentiles.

Well, um, no.

Christians (and I'm not really one) have a Golden Rule. Jews, not so much, they're just looking for the gold.

Never trust a people who think they are God's special retards.

 

[Hector12]

I have never heard oor read a Jew claiming that Jews are God's chosen people. Charles Murray has said it.

Well, um, no.

Christians (and I'm not really one) have a Golden Rule. Jews, not so much, they're just looking for the gold.

Never trust a people who think they are God's special retards.

I have never heard or read a Jew say that Jews are God's Chosen People. Charles Murray has,

Jewish Genius

Jews are extravagantly overrepresented in every field of intellectual accomplishment. Why?

www.commentary.org

So has Byron M. Roth.

The Chosen People - American Renaissance

Why are Jews so successful?

www.amren.com

I think they are too.

 

[JoeB131]

I have never heard oor read a Jew claiming that Jews are God's chosen people. Charles Murray has said it.

I have never heard or read a Jew say that Jews are God's Chosen People. Charles Murray has,

Jewish Genius

Jews are extravagantly overrepresented in every field of intellectual accomplishment. Why?

www.commentary.org

So has Byron M. Roth.

The Chosen People - American Renaissance

Why are Jews so successful?

www.amren.com

I think they are too.

I don't care about your pseudo-science crap. Next, you'll be promoting Phrenology.

 

[Hector12]

I don't care about your pseudo-science crap. Next, you'll be promoting Phrenology.

View attachment 1043580

There is nothing pseudo abut Charle Murray and Professor J. Philippe Rushton.

 

[JoeB131]

There is nothing pseudo abut Charle Murray and Professor J. Philippe Rushton.

Really? Where are the peer reviewed papers validating their work?

Oh, wait. There aren't any? In fact, the universities they worked for have condemned their research as shoddy and have disassociated themselves from them?

 

[Hector12]

Really? Where are the peer reviewed papers validating their work?

Oh, wait. There aren't any? In fact, the universities they worked for have condemned their research as shoddy and have disassociated themselves from them?

Name a single book, published for the general public, that has been peer reviewed. The Mismeasure of Man, by Stephen Jay Gould is often considered to be a refutation of The Bell Curve. Has it been peer reviewed?

Professor Richard Herrnstein kept his teaching position at Harvard until he died of lung cancer. Efforts were made to get him fired. Fortunately, they failed.

It is one thing to say that research for a book is shoddy. It is something quite different to explain how and where it is shoddy.

For example, Gould claimed that a nineteenth century scientist, Samuel George Morton, was inaccurate when he used lead shot to measure brain size on skulls of people of various races. On the basis of his measurements Morton claimed that different races had different average brain sizes. Contemporary scientists have repeated Morton's measurements using lead shot and skulls. They have proved that Morton's measurements, rather than Gould's, were accurate.

This is the way the scientific method works. It works with repeated experiments using the same measurements. More modern methods of measuring brain sizes, even the sizes of living people, have verified that the different races do have different average brain sizes, even when the sizes of their bodies are kept constant.

Other studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between brain size and intelligence.