Steinlight
VIP Member
- Jan 30, 2014
- 4,508
- 289
- 85
JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Franklyn made similar observations as you. So your telling me that blacks are barred from "centuries of mental damage" that is somehow magically passed from their parents to their kids? I would call that a self imposed barrier. You cannot blame white people for a self imposed barrier. You cannot blame racism for a self imposed barrier. Although, I will agree with you that the difference of success between Africans and African Americans is culture. African Americans have a culture that promotes victimhood, and African culture promotes education and advancement once they find a place secure enough to where such things are possible. As opposed to todays Africa, even the 1960's South would have been a better option, and thus, It could be a matter od perception and experience. Nevertheless, Africans do better than African Americans under the exact same system, the exact same economy, the exact same government, and the exact same circumstances. If "mental damage from past discrimination" is what's holding African Americans back then it is a self imposed barrier and they have no one to blame but themselves.
There is nothing magical about it. Its not brain surgery. I beat my kid, chance are he will beat his and the cycle will continue until someone breaks it. In addition racism is passed from one generation to the next as well so whites are also infected by the virus. I teach my child white people are inferior chances are they will grow up and teach theirs the same thing. I would think you were educated enough to understand that concept? What is your take on Patty Hearst? Was she innocent due to being brainwashed or was she knowingly participating in illegal activities?
Now an African coming over to the US may experience the same exact racism but he will be in a much better position to circumvent it due to knowing his history and not having the years of dealing with the institutionalized racism in the country. There is a reason the US locks up a larger percentage of its Black people than South Africa did at the height of apartheid. There is a reason Nixon stated to his right hand man the way to control Black people was to come up with a system without appearing to do so. There is a reason Reagan announced the war on drugs before the crack epidemic hit. There is a reason the CIA looked the other way while those drugs were brought into this country. Looking at history the white power structure has always set up systems to control Black people. Why would I think they are not still doing the same thing?
I get what you're saying. Blacks chose to smoke crack and the CIA should be punished because you say they allowed crack to enter into the united States. So instead of the crack smoker you blame the CIA. Got it!
Once again you demonstrate that black dysfunction is completely self imposed. thank you.
JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
I never said Africa was in good shape, but some African countries are.JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
I agree, I believe aid should be given to American friendly regimes in Africa to promote political and economic stability. I was just clarifying.I never said Africa was in good shape, but some African countries are.JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
OK... end foreign aid and watch the communists take up the slack. Besides, foreign aid is the least the west can do after the colonial and subsequent IMF's rape of Africa.
JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
Yes it should end. All white nations need to stay out of Africa. The problem is that they wont because Africa is resource rich and too tempting for the white racist power structure to leave alone. There is a reason the aid comes in the form of loans with payday loan interest rates. You need to understand the way the world banks do business to understand those loans give them leverage in Africa. Ask yourself why was gaddafi killed? Answer. He was working ot create an African bank based on real money not fiat money. aid to African nations will not cease until the African nations realize this. My guess is that there will be a negative propaganda campaign shortly before European invasion if they start turning down aid.
I never said Africa was in good shape, but some African countries are.JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
OK... end foreign aid and watch the communists take up the slack. Besides, foreign aid is the least the west can do after the colonial and subsequent IMF's rape of Africa.
JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
Yes it should end. All white nations need to stay out of Africa. The problem is that they wont because Africa is resource rich and too tempting for the white racist power structure to leave alone. There is a reason the aid comes in the form of loans with payday loan interest rates. You need to understand the way the world banks do business to understand those loans give them leverage in Africa. Ask yourself why was gaddafi killed? Answer. He was working ot create an African bank based on real money not fiat money. aid to African nations will not cease until the African nations realize this. My guess is that there will be a negative propaganda campaign shortly before European invasion if they start turning down aid.
Hey guy, guess what, no race owns any land. I take it if Whites have to leave, Jews have to leave as well eh? In a globalized free market economy, anyone has the right to do business where they wish. Stop being an envious loser and get over it.
I don't think you understand the definition of fiat money or "real money". As for Gadaffi, he was thrown out by the Libyan people with the aid of the west because he was a corrupt ruler that suppressed political opposition and resided over a struggling economy(not to mention, he had aided terrorist groups who had in the past killed westerners).
Western intervention prevented a long stretched out conflict and ensured a moderate transitional government.
If races don't exist, than why are you whining about Whites and Jews doing business in Africa? Racist piece of shit. Make up your mind. You know what, if you hate westerners(and now Chinese as well), doing business in Africa, how about you go over to Africa, start your own business, and see how far you get by being a racist asshole and discriminating against everyone who is non-African. The answer is you won't get far.Yes it should end. All white nations need to stay out of Africa. The problem is that they wont because Africa is resource rich and too tempting for the white racist power structure to leave alone. There is a reason the aid comes in the form of loans with payday loan interest rates. You need to understand the way the world banks do business to understand those loans give them leverage in Africa. Ask yourself why was gaddafi killed? Answer. He was working ot create an African bank based on real money not fiat money. aid to African nations will not cease until the African nations realize this. My guess is that there will be a negative propaganda campaign shortly before European invasion if they start turning down aid.
Hey guy, guess what, no race owns any land. I take it if Whites have to leave, Jews have to leave as well eh? In a globalized free market economy, anyone has the right to do business where they wish. Stop being an envious loser and get over it.
I don't think you understand the definition of fiat money or "real money". As for Gadaffi, he was thrown out by the Libyan people with the aid of the west because he was a corrupt ruler that suppressed political opposition and resided over a struggling economy(not to mention, he had aided terrorist groups who had in the past killed westerners).
Western intervention prevented a long stretched out conflict and ensured a moderate transitional government.
You are right no race owns land since there is only one race. It all belongs to the people that inhabit that land. No everyone does not have a right to do business where they want to unless the people that live there give them permission to. Go back to Europe and stop being envious of African wealth.
You seem to have a hard time thinking about most things. Fiat money is money by decree. Real money is money backed up by a resource. What about that confused you? Gaddafi got the propaganda treatment I spoke of. He has been around a long time and it was only when he begin threatening the world banking structure they went after him and killed him. Western intervention has caused instability not prevented it. You need to visit Africa as it is obvious you have never set foot on the continent.
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:I agree, I believe aid should be given to American friendly regimes in Africa to promote political and economic stability. I was just clarifying.I never said Africa was in good shape, but some African countries are.JQPublic, if Africa is in good shape, than foreign aid from the West should end, yes?
OK... end foreign aid and watch the communists take up the slack. Besides, foreign aid is the least the west can do after the colonial and subsequent IMF's rape of Africa.
But the West the should pay back Africa for what? Raising the living standard?
It's funny you talk about the the "rape" by the IMF, and then bring up the success of Botswana, one of the most successful IMF projects of the 20th Century. Get your stories straight guy.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2005/famm/pdf/radele.pdf
Finance & Development, September 2005 - Aid and Growth
.The IMF and World Bank are largely controlled and owned by the development nations such as USA, Germany, UK, Japan, amongst others. The US for example controls 17 to 18% of the voting right at the IMF. When an 85% majority is required for a decision, the US effectively has veto power at the IMF. In addition, the World Bank is 51% funded by the US treasury.
Under a plane devised mechanism the World Bank and the IMF loan money in return for the structural adjustment of their economies. This means that economic direction of each country would be planned, monitored, and controlled in Washington. For instance, the World Bank assistance for helping a poor country involves, country by country investigations with a meeting of begging-Finance Ministers who are handed a restructuring agreement pre-drafted for voluntary signature
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:I agree, I believe aid should be given to American friendly regimes in Africa to promote political and economic stability. I was just clarifying.I never said Africa was in good shape, but some African countries are.
OK... end foreign aid and watch the communists take up the slack. Besides, foreign aid is the least the west can do after the colonial and subsequent IMF's rape of Africa.
But the West the should pay back Africa for what? Raising the living standard?
It's funny you talk about the the "rape" by the IMF, and then bring up the success of Botswana, one of the most successful IMF projects of the 20th Century. Get your stories straight guy.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2005/famm/pdf/radele.pdf
Finance & Development, September 2005 - Aid and Growth
.The IMF and World Bank are largely controlled and owned by the development nations such as USA, Germany, UK, Japan, amongst others. The US for example controls 17 to 18% of the voting right at the IMF. When an 85% majority is required for a decision, the US effectively has veto power at the IMF. In addition, the World Bank is 51% funded by the US treasury.
Under a plane devised mechanism the World Bank and the IMF loan money in return for the structural adjustment of their economies. This means that economic direction of each country would be planned, monitored, and controlled in Washington. For instance, the World Bank assistance for helping a poor country involves, country by country investigations with a meeting of begging-Finance Ministers who are handed a restructuring agreement pre-drafted for voluntary signature
The IMF and World Bank Are Major Causes of Poverty in Africa | Global Envision
See subsequent posts outlining debilitating effects IMF policy and procedures have on developing nations! TO BE CONTINUED
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:I agree, I believe aid should be given to American friendly regimes in Africa to promote political and economic stability. I was just clarifying.
But the West the should pay back Africa for what? Raising the living standard?
It's funny you talk about the the "rape" by the IMF, and then bring up the success of Botswana, one of the most successful IMF projects of the 20th Century. Get your stories straight guy.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2005/famm/pdf/radele.pdf
Finance & Development, September 2005 - Aid and Growth
.The IMF and World Bank are largely controlled and owned by the development nations such as USA, Germany, UK, Japan, amongst others. The US for example controls 17 to 18% of the voting right at the IMF. When an 85% majority is required for a decision, the US effectively has veto power at the IMF. In addition, the World Bank is 51% funded by the US treasury.
Under a plane devised mechanism the World Bank and the IMF loan money in return for the structural adjustment of their economies. This means that economic direction of each country would be planned, monitored, and controlled in Washington. For instance, the World Bank assistance for helping a poor country involves, country by country investigations with a meeting of begging-Finance Ministers who are handed a restructuring agreement pre-drafted for voluntary signature
The IMF and World Bank Are Major Causes of Poverty in Africa | Global Envision
See subsequent posts outlining debilitating effects IMF policy and procedures have on developing nations! TO BE CONTINUED
Yes, the IMF, an evil conspiracy that made Botswana the most successful African country.
I guess you won't use them as an example of African success anymore, huh?
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:I agree, I believe aid should be given to American friendly regimes in Africa to promote political and economic stability. I was just clarifying.
But the West the should pay back Africa for what? Raising the living standard?
It's funny you talk about the the "rape" by the IMF, and then bring up the success of Botswana, one of the most successful IMF projects of the 20th Century. Get your stories straight guy.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2005/famm/pdf/radele.pdf
Finance & Development, September 2005 - Aid and Growth
.The IMF and World Bank are largely controlled and owned by the development nations such as USA, Germany, UK, Japan, amongst others. The US for example controls 17 to 18% of the voting right at the IMF. When an 85% majority is required for a decision, the US effectively has veto power at the IMF. In addition, the World Bank is 51% funded by the US treasury.
Under a plane devised mechanism the World Bank and the IMF loan money in return for the structural adjustment of their economies. This means that economic direction of each country would be planned, monitored, and controlled in Washington. For instance, the World Bank assistance for helping a poor country involves, country by country investigations with a meeting of begging-Finance Ministers who are handed a restructuring agreement pre-drafted for voluntary signature
The IMF and World Bank Are Major Causes of Poverty in Africa | Global Envision
See subsequent posts outlining debilitating effects IMF policy and procedures have on developing nations! TO BE CONTINUED
Yes, the IMF, an evil conspiracy that made Botswana the most successful African country.
I guess you won't use them as an example of African success anymore, huh?
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:
.
The IMF and World Bank Are Major Causes of Poverty in Africa | Global Envision
See subsequent posts outlining debilitating effects IMF policy and procedures have on developing nations! TO BE CONTINUED
Yes, the IMF, an evil conspiracy that made Botswana the most successful African country.
I guess you won't use them as an example of African success anymore, huh?
Well, nooo, Botswana is NOT the most successful African country; Equatorial Guinea fits that billing followed by Seychelles. Your link is rather old. A lot can change in a decade. Besides The IMF and WB are NOT benevolent agencies. Perhaps you should check the source of the report in your link to see if it originates from the IMF or the Word Bank.
Another thing, the GDP per capita does not reflect the individual citizen's standard of living. The GDP is a hypothetical whereas all income produced from the sale of goods and services is equally distributed to every citizen.. The people of Botswana could be mired in poverty but on paper, the IMF makes everything seem rosy!
First I will clarify who iis really running the IMF and World Bank:
.
The IMF and World Bank Are Major Causes of Poverty in Africa | Global Envision
See subsequent posts outlining debilitating effects IMF policy and procedures have on developing nations! TO BE CONTINUED
Yes, the IMF, an evil conspiracy that made Botswana the most successful African country.
I guess you won't use them as an example of African success anymore, huh?
When confronted with something that makes you uncomfortable the easiest way out of it is to declare it a conspiracy and nervously laugh. Your response is an epic failure.
Yes, the IMF, an evil conspiracy that made Botswana the most successful African country.
I guess you won't use them as an example of African success anymore, huh?
When confronted with something that makes you uncomfortable the easiest way out of it is to declare it a conspiracy and nervously laugh. Your response is an epic failure.
You started your black nationalist business in Africa yet? How's that working out?
When confronted with something that makes you uncomfortable the easiest way out of it is to declare it a conspiracy and nervously laugh. Your response is an epic failure.
You started your black nationalist business in Africa yet? How's that working out?
Did you start your gentile business in Europe yet?
You started your black nationalist business in Africa yet? How's that working out?
Did you start your gentile business in Europe yet?
I am not a gentile. And I support global commerce with all peoples on all continents. I guess you can call me globalist capitalist. You want no global commerce, you want business between Africans only in Africa. The thing that makes you closest to is a national socialist. I hate nazis and racists, so why don't you piss off and go to a Nation of Islam meeting or something, or better yet, leave this country.
I am Jewish not gentile. Nation of Islam racists like you are just as much my enemy as th KKK. You are nothing but a black Nazi."Africa" us not a single economic entity. Individuals on the continent have the right to do business with whom they wish, and not to be restricted by your racist standards. Move to Zimbabwe, that black racist state is right up your alley.