The Quandary Christians Put Gays In

[Skylar]

I know. The lezbo in Oregon said it happened to her when the Christian baker refused her request. Must have been an isolated case, huh.

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

True story

It is...for gays. Straight sex would be "abnormal" for gays.

Are you opposed to cunnilingus?

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

Don't procreate, the species dies.

And yet people in no danger of starving continue to eat. And folks who can't have kids still have sex.

There's clearly more than a lone purpose in either activity.

 

[Pop23]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

True story

It is...for gays. Straight sex would be "abnormal" for gays.

Are you opposed to cunnilingus?

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science.

Most homosapiens are. But clearly not all.

All are, some can't handle their obsessive compulsive behavior.

 

[Flash Farley]

S

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature.

Actually, you're just uneducated. You do realize that your claim "Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature" is actually impossible, right? If what you are saying were true, it would be impossible for homosexuality to exist. Even if we were to regard homosexuality as nothing more than a choice, the fact would still remain that the ability to receive sexual pleasure from activity with a member of the same gender proves that the individuals so engaged are, at the very least, inherently bisexual.

I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Observing human anatomy I can see that all humans have a head, which encases a brain capable of higher thinking and reasoning skills. The fact that the anatomy exists for something to be possible, does not mean that employing that possibility is the "natural" state of the species. Your stupidity is the perfect example.

The vagina and penis are anatomically aligned to fit together. The asshole isn't. It has one function, expel waste. .

You must be a virgin. I got a pro tip for you: Not all penises and vaginas fit together. There are many rectums that fit with a penis much better than the associated vagina.

In any event, maybe you should spend a little more time enjoying your own sex life, and less time jealously obsessing at how other people enjoy their own.

So basically you're argument is "I'm smart and you're stupid!" Yes, I've heard that argument from your side often.

 

[Pop23]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

True story

It is...for gays. Straight sex would be "abnormal" for gays.

Are you opposed to cunnilingus?

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

Don't procreate, the species dies.

And yet people in no danger of starving continue to eat. And folks who can't have kids still have sex.

There's clearly more than a lone purpose in either activity.

Those that keep eating when not needed are obese.

Get it

 

[Skylar]

It is...for gays. Straight sex would be "abnormal" for gays.

Are you opposed to cunnilingus?

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

Don't procreate, the species dies.

And yet people in no danger of starving continue to eat. And folks who can't have kids still have sex.

There's clearly more than a lone purpose in either activity.

Those that keep eating when not needed are obese.

Get it

Demonstrating my point.

 

[Pop23]

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

Don't procreate, the species dies.

And yet people in no danger of starving continue to eat. And folks who can't have kids still have sex.

There's clearly more than a lone purpose in either activity.

Those that keep eating when not needed are obese.

Get it

Demonstrating my point.

Indeed, obsessive compulsive behavior.

 

[Skylar]

It is...for gays. Straight sex would be "abnormal" for gays.

Are you opposed to cunnilingus?

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science.

Most homosapiens are. But clearly not all.

All are, some can't handle their obsessive compulsive behavior.

Eating for pleasure isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want a cheese burger. And having sex because its feels good isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want to get laid.

See how that works?

Both eating and sex can have a variety of purposes.

 

[Seawytch]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

You, on the other hand, will probably spank it out to this, but still double down on your bullshit.

I wonder, does Wytch find that exciting?

If so, why should she be allowed in a female gym locker and not men?

Paradox

Oh Pops...you ******* rookie. I've been dealing about you bigots whining about showers since God was an Admiral.

Gay Military Signal 070410Steinman

 

[Seawytch]

So basically you're argument is "I'm smart and you're stupid!" Yes, I've heard that argument from your side often.

Actually he gave you a detailed and sound logical argument. Your not understanding proves your own point about yourself.

 

[SwimExpert]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

You, on the other hand, will probably spank it out to this, but still double down on your bullshit.

I wonder, does Wytch find that exciting?

If so, why should she be allowed in a female gym locker and not men?

Paradox

I'm sure that as a lesbian woman, she finds it about as exciting as you find this...

In other words...nothing particularly "exciting" at all, sexually speaking, unless you're a sexually repressed lunatic who is ready to cream at the mere thought of two people being within 20 feet of each other.

But hey, isn't that a beautiful picture? The expression of unbridled love, the sensation of wanting to hold onto someone, to never be without them, to have your very existence so enlivened by someone that it defines you....it really is a beautiful, wonderful thing. So beautiful, in fact, that your petty objections and asinine insecurities that two boys holding hands might give you a chubby is about as significant as a teardrop in the ocean. Get over yourself. If two gay people love each other, let them get married. Instead of spending your time whining about it, go get yourself some damn therapy. I hear there's an Obamacare for that.

 

[Flash Farley]

So basically you're argument is "I'm smart and you're stupid!" Yes, I've heard that argument from your side often.

Actually he gave you a detailed and sound logical argument. Your not understanding proves your own point about yourself.

Read his first sentence.

 

[SwimExpert]

So basically you're argument is "I'm smart and you're stupid!"

No, that wasn't my argument at all. But I'm glad you were able to reach that conclusion all on your own.

 

[Pop23]

Nope. A man and woman giving pleasure is normal. Same sex isn't. Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. I can prove that by simply observing male and female anatomy.

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science.

Most homosapiens are. But clearly not all.

All are, some can't handle their obsessive compulsive behavior.

Eating for pleasure isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want a cheese burger. And having sex because its feels good isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want to get laid.

See how that works?

Both eating and sex can have a variety of purposes.

Both can be. But those that make lifestyles out of either are obsessive compulsive by definition

 

[SwimExpert]

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

So, you want to ban these?

Don't procreate, the species dies.

So, you want to ban these?

 

[Pop23]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

You, on the other hand, will probably spank it out to this, but still double down on your bullshit.

I wonder, does Wytch find that exciting?

If so, why should she be allowed in a female gym locker and not men?

Paradox

I'm sure that as a lesbian woman, she finds it about as exciting as you find this...

In other words...nothing particularly "exciting" at all, sexually speaking, unless you're a sexually repressed lunatic who is ready to cream at the mere thought of two people being within 20 feet of each other.

But hey, isn't that a beautiful picture? The expression of unbridled love, the sensation of wanting to hold onto someone, to never be without them, to have your very existence so enlivened by someone that it defines you....it really is a beautiful, wonderful thing. So beautiful, in fact, that your petty objections and asinine insecurities that two boys holding hands might give you a chubby is about as significant as a teardrop in the ocean. Get over yourself. If two gay people love each other, let them get married. Instead of spending your time whining about it, go get yourself some damn therapy. I hear there's an Obamacare for that.

You made my point idiot.

SeaWytch would find the females attractive but can enter a gym/shower with my wife. I find females attractive, but if I enter with seawytch's wife, I go to prison??????

Equality? Public accomodations?

Bull shit

 

[Skylar]

Procreation isn't the only purpose in sex, anymore than sustenance is the only purpose in eating. Getting and receiving pleasure is perfectly natural.

Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science.

Most homosapiens are. But clearly not all.

All are, some can't handle their obsessive compulsive behavior.

Eating for pleasure isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want a cheese burger. And having sex because its feels good isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want to get laid.

See how that works?

Both eating and sex can have a variety of purposes.

Both can be. But those that make lifestyles out of either are obsessive compulsive by definition

Eating for enjoyment isn't 'obsessive compulsive by definition'. Or is having sex because you want to get laid and it feels good.

What else have you got?

 

[Pop23]

Hey dimwit.

Don't eat, you starve

So, you want to ban these?

Don't procreate, the species dies.

So, you want to ban these?

^^^^such a troll^^^^

Can you find any reasoning that your post makes any sense at all?

 

[Skylar]

Don't blame Wytch for not being able to keep up, hell she actually thinks gay sex is normal.

You, on the other hand, will probably spank it out to this, but still double down on your bullshit.

I wonder, does Wytch find that exciting?

If so, why should she be allowed in a female gym locker and not men?

Paradox

I'm sure that as a lesbian woman, she finds it about as exciting as you find this...

In other words...nothing particularly "exciting" at all, sexually speaking, unless you're a sexually repressed lunatic who is ready to cream at the mere thought of two people being within 20 feet of each other.

But hey, isn't that a beautiful picture? The expression of unbridled love, the sensation of wanting to hold onto someone, to never be without them, to have your very existence so enlivened by someone that it defines you....it really is a beautiful, wonderful thing. So beautiful, in fact, that your petty objections and asinine insecurities that two boys holding hands might give you a chubby is about as significant as a teardrop in the ocean. Get over yourself. If two gay people love each other, let them get married. Instead of spending your time whining about it, go get yourself some damn therapy. I hear there's an Obamacare for that.

You made my point idiot.

SeaWytch would find the females attractive but can enter a gym/shower with my wife. I find females attractive, but if I enter with seawytch's wife, I go to prison??????

Equality? Public accomodations?

Bull shit

Attraction isn't the basis of bathrooms. Gender is. You're using a false basis of argument.

 

[Syriusly]

You haven't argued merit at all. You have presented no more cogent argument than:

"Gay marriage is legal so therefore sibling marriage and polygamous marriage must be made legal also."

That is the extent of your argument.

Why not? Five lawyers just redefined marriage. Why stop with same sex marriage?

Flash, you are amazingly ignorant. Even for a bigot like you.

Or maybe you are knowingly lying?

Homosexuals have been legally marrying in the United States for over 10 years, starting first in Massachusetts, when the Massachusetts State Supreme Court said that banning same gender couples from marrying violated the Massachusetts Constitution.

In addition some 2 dozen State and Federal judges came to the same conclusion. As did the Judges for 3 Appellate courts.

And voters in 3 states said that marriage included same gender couples.
And the legislatures in 7 or 8 States passed legislation legalizing the marriage including same gender couples.

5 Supreme Court Justices- the highest judges in the United States- redefined nothing. They were behind the opinion of the American public, behind the states that had recognized the marriage of same gender couples and were in agreement with the dozens of judges who had previously found that Americans who happen to be gay have the same constitutional right to marriage as my wife and I have.

So tell me, what makes gays more acceptable than polygamy or incest?
.

What makes gays (gays being people) more acceptable than polygamy(which is an association) or incest(which is is an illegal sex act)?

What makes you even compare people with an association with an illegal sex act?

How are two straight males, wanting shared insurance benefits an illegal sex act? And since when is three an association and 2 not?

Pretzel much?

Good question- that is what I asked you.

What makes gays (gays being people) more acceptable than polygamy(which is an association) or incest(which is is an illegal sex act)?

What makes you even compare people with an association with an illegal sex act?

 

[Pop23]

Homo sapiens are heterosexual by nature. That's science.

Most homosapiens are. But clearly not all.

All are, some can't handle their obsessive compulsive behavior.

Eating for pleasure isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want a cheese burger. And having sex because its feels good isn't 'obsessive compulsive'. Sometimes you just want to get laid.

See how that works?

Both eating and sex can have a variety of purposes.

Both can be. But those that make lifestyles out of either are obsessive compulsive by definition

Eating for enjoyment isn't 'obsessive compulsive by definition'. Or is having sex because you want to get laid and it feels good.

What else have you got?

When your life revolves around either, they are.