The Optics Of Trying To Remove Trump From Office

[postman]

And since they thought there was fraud, I can understand it.

The DOJ didn't think there was fraud, the AG didn't think there was fraud.

Only Trump thought there was fraud.

 

[The Duke]

https://distrokid.com/hyperfollow/realprincedoll/too-big-to-rig-get-up-harry-feat-president-trump--harry-oats

 

[martybegan]

Maybe you don't remember how many in the Trump administration resigned after January 6th

Good fucking riddance to them.

 

[martybegan]

States run elections.
The only role of the federal government is through congress to set the time and place, and other rules

But they have to run Federal Elections based on the Federal Constitution and applicable federal law.

Then the DOJ have no right to enforce federal election laws on the States by your logic.

 

[martybegan]

But they were refusing to perform an ILLEGAL act.

And you wanted them to resign, because they wanted to follow the law and the constitution.

What illegal act?

No, they wanted to follow their own opinions and ideas, and the President is the elected official that sets the agenda for the executive branch.

 

[martybegan]

Hey, all Harvey Weinstein did was "ASK"

Another piss poor comparison. And most of Weinstein's former associates are all Dems.

 

[The Duke]

Can you steal an election by engaging in free speech?

No, but you can help do it by denying free speech, and that was done in 2020.

Hunter laptop suppression, banning of anyone who mentioned it on social media..

Zuckerberg paying for voting facilities lock, stock, and barrel.

 

[martybegan]

The DOJ didn't think there was fraud, the AG didn't think there was fraud.

Only Trump thought there was fraud.

Plenty of others thought there could be fraud, they were just too chickenshit to admit to the possibility.

The system to them is more important than the accuracy of the vote.

 

[Marener]

No, but you can help do it by denying free speech, and that was done in 2020.

Hunter laptop suppression, banning of anyone who mentioned it on social media..

Zuckerberg paying for voting facilities lock, stock, and barrel.

Social media companies own their platforms. You dont have any right to post on there.

You want free speech? Go speak on your own site.

 

[The Duke]

The DOJ didn't think there was fraud, the AG didn't think there was fraud.

Only Trump thought there was fraud.

No.
They knew it and enabled it. We knew it, too.
UK Boi. Your land is overrun by Muslims enabled by your government.
We kicked your kind the fuck up out of here centuries ago.
We are not the same.

 

[Marener]

Plenty of others thought there could be fraud, they were just too chickenshit to admit to the possibility.

The system to them is more important than the accuracy of the vote.

Since when do you care about the accuracy of the vote?

Your side wanted to chuck out votes because they “could be” fraudulent.

 

[martybegan]

Since when do you care about the accuracy of the vote?

Your side wanted to chuck out votes because they “could be” fraudulent.

What I want are secure elections. Same day in person voting except for exceptional circumstances, 24 hour voting period, National Holiday each year.

 

[Marener]

What I want are secure elections. Same day in person voting except for exceptional circumstances, 24 hour voting period, National Holiday each year.

Goody for you. Has nothing to do with the topic of changing the results of the election after we voted based on what you think might have happened.

 

[Marener]

What I want are secure elections. Same day in person voting except for exceptional circumstances, 24 hour voting period, National Holiday each year.

No election is secure as along as you are willing to tolerate people like Trump changing the result because they wanted to win.

If you want a secure election, Trump needs to face consequences.

 

[martybegan]

Goody for you. Has nothing to do with the topic of changing the results of the election after we voted based on what you think might have happened.

And ignoring any fraud or even the potential fraud because you got the result you wanted is better how?

 

[Marener]

And ignoring any fraud or even the potential fraud because you got the result you wanted is better how?

We didn’t see the evidence of fraud so we aren’t ignoring shit.

As for “potential fraud”, you lunatics saw “potential fraud” everywhere because you’re brainwashed to believe in it. Any legitimate concerns were investigated and unsurprisingly not found to be credible.

That’s what we’ve been telling you morons for years now but you won’t listen because you don’t want to accept the truth.

You can’t take away people’s votes because you believe in something that you can’t prove. It doesn’t work that way.

 

[martybegan]

We didn’t see the evidence of fraud so we aren’t ignoring shit.

As for “potential fraud”, you lunatics saw “potential fraud” everywhere because you’re brainwashed to believe in it. Any legitimate concerns were investigated and unsurprisingly not found to be credible.

That’s what we’ve been telling you morons for years now but you won’t listen because you don’t want to accept the truth.

You can’t take away people’s votes because you believe in something that you can’t prove. It doesn’t work that way.

Oh, you are ignoring plenty.

By ignoring fraud and the potential for fraud, as well as making things easier for fraud, Dems take away the votes of legitimate voters.

 

[DStar777]

Trump withheld funds to force a foreign power to help him dig up dirt against his political opponent.

Ukrainian President Denies President Trump Pressured Him

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky denied that the Trump had pressured him to investigate 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden's son for corruption.

time.com

.. and please don't say "fake news". Time isn't some right wing rag.

 

[Marener]

Oh, you are ignoring plenty.

By ignoring fraud and the potential for fraud, as well as making things easier for fraud, Dems take away the votes of legitimate voters.

No, you just have no idea what you're talking about. Some of the complaints of fraud were just hilariously stupid.

One election observer saw that a lot of overseas ballots were going for Biden and said that was fraud because the military supports Trump. I mean, c'mon, that's the level if dumb assery you dipshits were going on about.

You complain that we could have potentially taken away votes of legitimate voters based on potential fraud, and your response is to DEFINITELY take away the votes of legitimate voters by politicians wiping out the votes entirely.

You realize how stupid that sounds to normal people, don't you?

You want to protect the election from fraud, and I want to protect it from politicians.

 

[martybegan]

No, you just have no idea what you're talking about. Some of the complaints of fraud were just hilariously stupid.

One election observer saw that a lot of overseas ballots were going for Biden and said that was fraud because the military supports Trump. I mean, c'mon, that's the level if dumb assery you dipshits were going on about.

You complain that we could have potentially taken away votes of legitimate voters based on potential fraud, and your response is to DEFINITELY take away the votes of legitimate voters by politicians wiping out the votes entirely.

You realize how stupid that sounds to normal people, don't you?

You want to protect the election from fraud, and I want to protect it from politicians.

And you know how hacky partisan you sound not caring about it?