The ongoing 9/11 cover-up.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The renowned truther response....... no wonder you never grow up.

All without a shred of debate seen in the thread..... :laugh:
2004 called and wants it's troll talking point back.
yawn

Now on page 2, still no defense for your article or a detailed response to my debunking articles.

It is clear you have nothing to offer for your thread.

Your taunting me through the PM is very juvenile of you. :rolleyes:

Cheers
 
Steel Sulfidation | World Trade Center Building 7
In a New York Times article published in February 2002, James Glanz and Eric Lipton wrote:

“Perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation involves extremely thin bits of steel collected...from 7 World Trade Center.... The steel apparently melted away, but no fire in any of the buildings was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright.... A preliminary analysis at Worcester Polytechnic Institute [WPI]...suggests that sulfur released during the fires—no one knows from where—may have combined with atoms in the steel to form compounds that melt at lower temperatures.”

Read More


Foreknowledge | World Trade Center Building 7
About an hour after the destruction of WTC 1 at 10:28 AM, the authorities at the World Trade Center began anticipating the collapse of WTC 7 with a high degree of confidence and precision. Their anticipation was so strong that the media widely reported on WTC 7’s imminent collapse, with some news outlets even reporting the collapse before it occurred.

Read More


The Official Theory | World Trade Center Building 7
The seven-year quest to produce an official technical explanation for the destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 represents an unparalleled case study in “expectation bias."

NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, which serves as the national guide for fire and explosion investigations in the United States, defines “expectation bias” as follows:

Read More
 

You are throwing out articles, but can't address anything in particular.....

You told me you have me on ignore 1 1/2 hours ago...... :rolleyes:
Disinformation trolls don't get the last word on my threads
c un t mouth.
 
Now on page 2, still no defense for your article or a detailed response to my debunking articles.
None of your articles debunk anything. Liar.
I've seen them years ago.
I've been spanking putzes like you since 2005.

Bla bla bla, that is all you have, not debating anything is the best you can do. You are looking more and more childish in your replies.

You are now running from one article to the next..... that is what a believer does.

Cheers.
 
This has long been addressed, but amazingly some people just can't accept hard evidence:

Popular Mechanics
An article packed with lies.

I haven't said one mean word to you, yet I get all this in return. You have a problem that is all yours.......
Go away then.

Not this shit again!

:cuckoo:
Dude you talk a lot of shit. Maybe you should learn some manners? Pussy. Your conspiracy theories are a joke.
Its more plausible than the voter fraud bullshit your believe in.
 
It's good to keep it fresh in people's minds
that there was never a criminal investigation performed following the destruction of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11, and there are still many unanswered questions.

We are the citizen journalists and investigators who will always pursue truth and justice, despite being labelled 'conspiracy theorists'.

View attachment 448585
We must applaud Mr. Richard Gage and his colleagues, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, for their tenacity in seeking to answer lingering questions concerning the total destruction of the World Trade Center complex, in particular Buildings 1, 2, and 7.

Is this another thread where you block spam 911 conspiracy shit you don't understand and then flee when we start to shred your silly little conspiracy with better evidence and better reasoning?
 
It's good to keep it fresh in people's minds
that there was never a criminal investigation performed following the destruction of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11, and there are still many unanswered questions.

We are the citizen journalists and investigators who will always pursue truth and justice, despite being labelled 'conspiracy theorists'.

View attachment 448585
We must applaud Mr. Richard Gage and his colleagues, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, for their tenacity in seeking to answer lingering questions concerning the total destruction of the World Trade Center complex, in particular Buildings 1, 2, and 7.

You're a good Democrat.
 
It's good to keep it fresh in people's minds
that there was never a criminal investigation performed following the destruction of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11, and there are still many unanswered questions.

We are the citizen journalists and investigators who will always pursue truth and justice, despite being labelled 'conspiracy theorists'.

View attachment 448585
We must applaud Mr. Richard Gage and his colleagues, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, for their tenacity in seeking to answer lingering questions concerning the total destruction of the World Trade Center complex, in particular Buildings 1, 2, and 7.

You're a good Democrat.

Oh, Angelo is a tried and true Trumpie. And shocker, a Stealer to boot.
 
Steel Sulfidation | World Trade Center Building 7
In a New York Times article published in February 2002, James Glanz and Eric Lipton wrote:

“Perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation involves extremely thin bits of steel collected...from 7 World Trade Center.... The steel apparently melted away, but no fire in any of the buildings was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright.... A preliminary analysis at Worcester Polytechnic Institute [WPI]...suggests that sulfur released during the fires—no one knows from where—may have combined with atoms in the steel to form compounds that melt at lower temperatures.”

Read More


Foreknowledge | World Trade Center Building 7
About an hour after the destruction of WTC 1 at 10:28 AM, the authorities at the World Trade Center began anticipating the collapse of WTC 7 with a high degree of confidence and precision. Their anticipation was so strong that the media widely reported on WTC 7’s imminent collapse, with some news outlets even reporting the collapse before it occurred.

Read More


The Official Theory | World Trade Center Building 7
The seven-year quest to produce an official technical explanation for the destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 represents an unparalleled case study in “expectation bias."

NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, which serves as the national guide for fire and explosion investigations in the United States, defines “expectation bias” as follows:

Read More

Yeah, the FDNY had put transits on the building and measured its leaning, watching it burn after taking a massive hit from the collapse of the towers earlier in the day. The FDNY watched WTC 7 slowly structurally fail, bulge, and lean.

They anticipated its collapse by HOURS, pulling their fire fighting effort and evacuating the area as the fires burned uncontrolled inside.

So you'd have to fold the FDNY into your silly little conspiracy. Good luck with that.
 
never a criminal investigation
into the controlled demolition of all three towers.......

all the steel columns cut up & quickly sent to China for recycling

What 'controlled demolition'?

Remember, the WTC 1 and 2 fell exactly opposite of controlled demolition, collapsing top to bottom. There was no residue of explosives ever found. There was no girder cut in a manner consistent with controlled demolition. There wasn't one charge, one inch of blasting wire, one detonator, nothing ever found.....this despite the WTC plaza inspected by the Port Authority bomb squad....with bomb sniffing dogs only 6 DAYS before the attacks. And it would have taken YEARS to wire the WTC 1 and 2 for controlled demolition.

The collapse initiated where the planes hit. Meaning that the 'bombs' would have been hit by a plane and set on fire. There's no system of explosive demolition that withstand either.

Your truther conspiracy is simply a terrible explanation of events.
 
Yeah, the FDNY had put transits on the building and measured its leaning, watching it burn after taking a massive hit from the collapse of the towers earlier in the day. The FDNY watched WTC 7 slowly structurally fail, bulge, and lean.

They anticipated its collapse by HOURS, pulling their fire fighting effort and evacuating the area as the fires burned uncontrolled inside.

So you'd have to fold the FDNY into your silly little conspiracy. Good luck with that.
Keep on lying.


Apparently it's your job.
 
Yeah, the FDNY had put transits on the building and measured its leaning, watching it burn after taking a massive hit from the collapse of the towers earlier in the day. The FDNY watched WTC 7 slowly structurally fail, bulge, and lean.

They anticipated its collapse by HOURS, pulling their fire fighting effort and evacuating the area as the fires burned uncontrolled inside.

So you'd have to fold the FDNY into your silly little conspiracy. Good luck with that.
Keep on lying.



Again, Angelo.....the folks that evacuated around WTC 7 due to its imminent collapse was the FDNY.

You have to fold the New York City Fire Fighters into your little conspiracy.

Good luck with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top