The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

RE: The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth
※→ P F Tinmore, JoelT1, et al,

This is a good argument. And is part of the Permanent Status of Negotiations (Oslo Accords).

post: 18330526 said:
From your link:

The West Bank and the Gaza Strip were never parts of Jordan, and Jordan's attempt to annex the West Bank was not generally recognized and has now been abandoned. The two parcels of land are parts of the Mandate that have not yet been allocated to Jordan, to Israel, or to any other state, and are a legitimate subject for discussion.​

Now, RoccoR has consistently stated the West Bank was Sovereign Jordan territory. Of course I have always disagreed with that premise.

Here is where Rostow and I disagree. He states that the land was part of the Mandate. That is not true. One of the tenets of the Mandate was the non annexation of former Turkish territory. The land was directly ceded to the respective successor states.

He also speaks of land not allocated. For one, who has the authority to allocate land. Plus, the land was already ceded to Palestine.
(COMMENT)

First, "Palestine, itself, was not a successor state. Palestine was the short title for the "territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine;" as stated in the Palestine Order in Council 1922 (Part I - Preliminaries, Paragraph 1: Title).

Sovereignty does not have to be recognized; but it must be maintain as the supreme authority that claims sovereignty. Recognition is not a prerequisite. [Precedence: Convention on Rights and Duties of States (Montevideo Convention) Article 3: The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.]

Whether or not the intent of the Mandate was to restrict the Arab Palestinian Right to self-determination is moot. The Mandate terminated on 15 May 1948. The Annexation Action by Jordan took place 2 years later in April 1950. The applicability of the Mandate had expired.

The Precedence even becomes more applicable and stronger when coupled with the fact that the Annexation of the West Bank (Unification of the Two Banks) was approved by the "Jordanian parliament in which the Palestinian Arabs of the West Bank were equally represented." (Precedence: UN Charter - Chapter I, Article 1(2) "Based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.)

The Annexation by Jordan was generally considered a unilateral action → made effective by actual possession and legitimized by general recognition. It is sometimes interpreted that Article 47, Fourth Geneva Convention, prohibits any annexation by the Occupying Power of any part of the territory under occupation is arguable.

The want and need by Israel of Political Legitimacy and International Law (considered separate and distinct) relative to its action within East Jerusalem (annexed) and the West Bank is becoming less and less important. The Arab Palestinians have been obstructionists to the establishment of Peace since the unsuccessful attempt by the Arab League, the Holy War Army and the Arab Liberation Army to claim Israeli Independent territory; more than a half century ago has been replayed twice again with failed results. It is the Arab Palestinian opinion, by action and deed, that any territory overrun by Israeli Forces while in pursuit of the aggressor Arab Palestinians, should be return to Arab Palestinian Control so that may reconstitute forces and arsenals for yet another bid against Israel. The Arab Palestinians, like nearly every other nation that opens a conflict and defeated, should be exempt from War Reparations and Restitution for the cost of the conflict.

Pro-Arab Palestinians and the Arab Palestinians themselves, need international assistance so to avoid the customary practice of including payments or exchanges, in any treaty negotiation, intended to cover damage or injury inflicted during a war; as well as the custody of any Arab Palestinian wanted in connection with terrorism.

Most Respectfully,
R
Sovereignty does not have to be recognized; but it must be maintain as the supreme authority that claims sovereignty. Recognition is not a prerequisite. [Precedence: Convention on Rights and Duties of States (Montevideo Convention) Article 3: The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.]
States exist as a person under law even if it lacks the power to exercise its rights. A state does not go out of existence because it is under military occupation.

ARTICLE 4

States are juridically equal, enjoy the same rights, and have equal capacity in their exercise. The rights of each one do not depend upon the power which it possesses to assure its exercise, but upon the simple fact of its existence as a person under international law.​

Palestine, originally a Roman name imposed on ancient Israel, later Britain’s name for the British Mandate, ceased to exist in 1948 with Israeli statehood

There is no state of palestine nor has one ever existed.
RE: The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Treaty of Lausanne identifies that geography as:

ARTICLE 3.

From the Mediterranean to the frontier of Persia, the frontier of Turkey is laid down as follows:

(I ) With Syria:

The frontier described in Article 8 of the Franco-Turkish Agreement of the 20th October, 1921.
In the time before the Politicizing the name "Palestine," the undefined territory was encapsulated in the typical description of Syria.

First, "Palestine, itself, was not a successor state. Palestine was the short title for the "territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine;" as stated in the Palestine Order in Council 1922 (Part I - Preliminaries, Paragraph 1: Title).
You are still talking about occupied territory. The rules changed when Palestine became a successor state after the Treaty of Lausanne.
(COMMENT)

The Treaty of Lausanne did not create any country. And even if it did, the inhabitants of the former Enemy Occupied Territory Administration were NOT parties to the agreement. In fact, none of the other countries created out of the Mandate had the capacity to enforce any portion of the Treaty of the Agreement.

Israel is a successor state as of May 1948, by self-determination, in cooperation with the UN Palestine Commission and having completed the Steps Preparatory to Independence. Jordan was a successor nation as of 1946. In the case of Jordan, once part of the territory over which the Mandate for Palestine applied, was by treaty, made Independent.

Article 1, Treaty between Great Britain and Jordan 1946
His Majesty The King recognises Trans-Jordan as a fully independent State and His Highness The Amir as the sovereign thereof.​

(REASON)

A cornerstones of In the Arab Palestinian Argument is that:

• The inhabitants of the region, later to become known as the Arab Palestinians, has some right to sovereignty over the territory; and they invoke the “right to self-determination” → including their demand for autonomy — or, in some cases, secession — and believe --- by default --- they have the right to resorted to violence to pursue their aims to disestablish the State of Israel.​

The democratic government and societies like Israel – with the freedom of expression and religion → is very different to that of its neighbors and presents a threat to the more or less autocratic secular and theocratic Arab governments in the Middle East which are still tribally and culturally constituted and in religious between various sects.

Most Respectfully,
R

So-called “palestinians” are merely Jordanian Arabs abandoned after the ‘67 War Not coincidentally, the “palestinian” flag is a modified flag of Jordan

Arabs have 22 countries Ample opportunity for self-determination
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.
Wowowee! You know they're getting desperate when they start with the "biggest prison on earth" crapola.

Here are some images of this so called "prison"...just look at all that SUFFERING! Ha ha ha!

al-mashtal-007.jpg

Shoppers-at-Dubai-International-Airport.jpg


F150506ATT015-e1432653492567.jpg


2010-07-18-gazamall1.jpg

10567707.jpg


july-30-2011-gaza-city-gaza-strip-palestinians-shop-for-food-ahead-cdwt58.jpg


gaza-city-gaza-strip-palestinian-territory-30th-mar-2016-palestinians-ftywhx.jpg
your first photo is of dubai international airport your 2nd photo is Tel Aviv
INOLVIDABLE TEL AVIV

First photo is Al-Mashtal Hotel Gaza.. Iyad Kuhail Might need Facebook access to see the pages for it. 2nd photo IS Dubai...

Over-fed In Gaza LOL


That was before the siege. They haven't had any customers since.


That vid was posted 2010.. Club is STILL active. Don't spew stuff that is not true. Check their FaceBook page.

Roots The Club
 
right click on the photo and copy the url http:// arabiangazette.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Shoppers-at-Dubai-International-Airport.jpg

Don't spew stuff that is not true.
 
right click on the photo and copy the url http:// arabiangazette.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Shoppers-at-Dubai-International-Airport.jpg

Don't spew stuff that is not true.
"Would you like our luxury room equipped with suicide vest and rocket launcher?"

I can't see any more of this suffering!

 
Last edited:
right click on the photo and copy the url http:// arabiangazette.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Shoppers-at-Dubai-International-Airport.jpg

Don't spew stuff that is not true.
Would you like our luxury room equipped with suicide vest and rocket launcher?" I can't see any more of this suffering!



Now to be fair --- all that luxury is bought with UN money.. For folks to visit and write reports and document the suffering. While they are eating expensive seafood and using the pool/gym... Could take DECADES to "write enough reports". And probably by the Hamas leadership in between summary street executions..
 
Sponge Bob Fanger Pants has now found employment in the greatest prison on earth!

This is a side business, right, Fanger Pants? You aren't giving up your Hamas toilet cleaning duties, now are you?

Just look at all the suffering! Horrific!

 
Sponge Bob Fanger Pants has now found employment in the greatest prison on earth!

This is a side business, right, Fanger Pants? You aren't giving up your Hamas toilet cleaning duties, now are you?

Just look at all the suffering! Horrific!



OY.... Krusty Krab is NOT Halal.. How did this happen?

I'm telling you, they don't even have places like that for kids here in the US!
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.


I find that quite unbelievable. The total land mass occupied by U.S. colleges and universities must exceed that of the the West Bank and the Gaza strip.
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.

here's the deal Fanger. The fact that Israel won't grant citizenship to Palestinians is not really an issue. We could PROMOTE it to an issue with a plebiscite asking every Pali if they WANT TO become a citizen of Israel.

But you and I know what the results of that polling would show. OR -- maybe I'd just fall over shocked.
If even 10% wanted citizenship and pledged to abide by Israeli governance and law -- I'd support efforts for Israel to assimilate them. But most of this complaint is based on the VERY wrong premise that CITIZENSHIP and Israeli rights is what these folks want.

I think you need to be more in sync with the folks you think you're "helping"...
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.

here's the deal Fanger. The fact that Israel won't grant citizenship to Palestinians is not really an issue. We could PROMOTE it to an issue with a plebiscite asking every Pali if they WANT TO become a citizen of Israel.

But you and I know what the results of that polling would show. OR -- maybe I'd just fall over shocked.
If even 10% wanted citizenship and pledged to abide by Israeli governance and law -- I'd support efforts for Israel to assimilate them. But most of this complaint is based on the VERY wrong premise that CITIZENSHIP and Israeli rights is what these folks want.

I think you need to be more in sync with the folks you think you're "helping"...


Arabs themselves don’t want “palestinian” trash Abd Al-Bari Atwan: The Arab Leaders Are Praying That Israel Will Get Rid of the Palestinians Once and for All
 
Wowowee! You know they're getting desperate when they start with the "biggest prison on earth" crapola.

Here are some images of this so called "prison"...just look at all that SUFFERING! Ha ha ha!

al-mashtal-007.jpg

Shoppers-at-Dubai-International-Airport.jpg


F150506ATT015-e1432653492567.jpg


2010-07-18-gazamall1.jpg

10567707.jpg


july-30-2011-gaza-city-gaza-strip-palestinians-shop-for-food-ahead-cdwt58.jpg


gaza-city-gaza-strip-palestinian-territory-30th-mar-2016-palestinians-ftywhx.jpg
your first photo is of dubai international airport your 2nd photo is Tel Aviv
INOLVIDABLE TEL AVIV

First photo is Al-Mashtal Hotel Gaza.. Iyad Kuhail Might need Facebook access to see the pages for it. 2nd photo IS Dubai...

Over-fed In Gaza LOL


That was before the siege. They haven't had any customers since.


That vid was posted 2010.. Club is STILL active. Don't spew stuff that is not true. Check their FaceBook page.

Roots The Club

I know it was an older video because it had Abbas and Haniyeh at the same table. (pre coup 2007)

There are many photos and videos on Facebook. It is all local events. you won't see any tourists which should be their major income.
 
your first photo is of dubai international airport your 2nd photo is Tel Aviv
INOLVIDABLE TEL AVIV

First photo is Al-Mashtal Hotel Gaza.. Iyad Kuhail Might need Facebook access to see the pages for it. 2nd photo IS Dubai...

Over-fed In Gaza LOL


That was before the siege. They haven't had any customers since.


That vid was posted 2010.. Club is STILL active. Don't spew stuff that is not true. Check their FaceBook page.

Roots The Club

I know it was an older video because it had Abbas and Haniyeh at the same table. (pre coup 2007)

There are many photos and videos on Facebook. It is all local events. you won't see any tourists which should be their major income.


Give it up.. You were speculating. Read the reviews on TripAdvisor..
 
First photo is Al-Mashtal Hotel Gaza.. Iyad Kuhail Might need Facebook access to see the pages for it. 2nd photo IS Dubai...

Over-fed In Gaza LOL


That was before the siege. They haven't had any customers since.


That vid was posted 2010.. Club is STILL active. Don't spew stuff that is not true. Check their FaceBook page.

Roots The Club

I know it was an older video because it had Abbas and Haniyeh at the same table. (pre coup 2007)

There are many photos and videos on Facebook. It is all local events. you won't see any tourists which should be their major income.


Give it up.. You were speculating. Read the reviews on TripAdvisor..

I was just looking at the photos and videos. They were virtually all locals.
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.

here's the deal Fanger. The fact that Israel won't grant citizenship to Palestinians is not really an issue. We could PROMOTE it to an issue with a plebiscite asking every Pali if they WANT TO become a citizen of Israel.

But you and I know what the results of that polling would show. OR -- maybe I'd just fall over shocked.
If even 10% wanted citizenship and pledged to abide by Israeli governance and law -- I'd support efforts for Israel to assimilate them. But most of this complaint is based on the VERY wrong premise that CITIZENSHIP and Israeli rights is what these folks want.

I think you need to be more in sync with the folks you think you're "helping"...
Interesting point. Israel points to Resolution 181 to pretend to have legitimacy. What Israel ignores, however, is that Resolution 181 states that all Palestinians who normally live in the territory that becomes the Jewish state will become citizens of that state. This follows the rule of nationality and citizenship of state succession under international law.

This means that about 40% of the people in the West Bank, about 75% of the people in Gaza, and all of the Palestinians living elsewhere are legally Israeli citizens.
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.

here's the deal Fanger. The fact that Israel won't grant citizenship to Palestinians is not really an issue. We could PROMOTE it to an issue with a plebiscite asking every Pali if they WANT TO become a citizen of Israel.

But you and I know what the results of that polling would show. OR -- maybe I'd just fall over shocked.
If even 10% wanted citizenship and pledged to abide by Israeli governance and law -- I'd support efforts for Israel to assimilate them. But most of this complaint is based on the VERY wrong premise that CITIZENSHIP and Israeli rights is what these folks want.

I think you need to be more in sync with the folks you think you're "helping"...
Interesting point. Israel points to Resolution 181 to pretend to have legitimacy. What Israel ignores, however, is that Resolution 181 states that all Palestinians who normally live in the territory that becomes the Jewish state will become citizens of that state. This follows the rule of nationality and citizenship of state succession under international law.

This means that about 40% of the people in the West Bank, about 75% of the people in Gaza, and all of the Palestinians living elsewhere are legally Israeli citizens.

Your rambling “legal opinions” are a hoot.
 
Not only open air, but at times, and nowadays in Gaza, a maximum-security prison. Recently, the Israeli government officially celebrated the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Already in 1967, Judea and Samaria, namely the West Bank, were liberated areas, not territories to be held in custody for the return of a peace agreement, in the eyes of all the Zionist parties, while Gaza was seen as an enclave that had to be always guarded either from within or without.

Thus in 1967, the Israeli government then -- and all the successive governments since -- regarded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as territories that had always be under either direct or indirect Israeli rule. The second decision was that the people who live in these territories will not be granted Israeli citizenship, nor were they allowed to have their own sovereignty or independence. They were also not driven out, as were the Palestinians in 1948. So, they were intentionally defined as people without citizen rights and at the mercy of first military rule, and then civil administration that did not only violate their civic rights, but also their human rights. The only system I know where people are deprived of these basic rights is the prison system. These people were incarcerated in this mega-prison for no other crime than being Palestinians. They were allowed some benefits, such as working in Israel and a limited measure of autonomy if they consented to such life -- this is the open prison model, and they were collectively punished when they resisted, and this is the maximum-security prison.

The Occupied Territories Are the Biggest Prison on Earth

Any war that could have been prevented by active and intensive diplomacy is a war of choice.

here's the deal Fanger. The fact that Israel won't grant citizenship to Palestinians is not really an issue. We could PROMOTE it to an issue with a plebiscite asking every Pali if they WANT TO become a citizen of Israel.

But you and I know what the results of that polling would show. OR -- maybe I'd just fall over shocked.
If even 10% wanted citizenship and pledged to abide by Israeli governance and law -- I'd support efforts for Israel to assimilate them. But most of this complaint is based on the VERY wrong premise that CITIZENSHIP and Israeli rights is what these folks want.

I think you need to be more in sync with the folks you think you're "helping"...
Interesting point. Israel points to Resolution 181 to pretend to have legitimacy. What Israel ignores, however, is that Resolution 181 states that all Palestinians who normally live in the territory that becomes the Jewish state will become citizens of that state. This follows the rule of nationality and citizenship of state succession under international law.

This means that about 40% of the people in the West Bank, about 75% of the people in Gaza, and all of the Palestinians living elsewhere are legally Israeli citizens.

Your rambling “legal opinions” are a hoot.
Not my opinion.

Look it up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top