- Dec 29, 2008
- 19,703
- 4,746
- 280
No, they wouldn't. Some may think there should be a Paleestinian state, but all know there isn't one now.The absolute majority of the world would disagree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, they wouldn't. Some may think there should be a Paleestinian state, but all know there isn't one now.The absolute majority of the world would disagree.
There isn't any synagogue there.And yet ... the holiest synagogue in the world has restrictions on freedom of worship for only one religion. But we are the "troublemakers".
There will.No, they wouldn't. Some may think there should be a Paleestinian state, but all know there isn't one now.
Don't be ridiculous. It is the holiest place for the Jewish people.There isn't any synagogue there.
It's an absurd notion dreamed up by European diplomats who paid no attention to the facts on the ground. There is no rational scenario which would lead to the conclusion a Palestinian state would be viable.There will.
A mosque is located there now. End of story.Don't be ridiculous. It is the holiest place for the Jewish people.
Agree, too much depends on the US. Basically, it is up to them whether a Palestinian state to be there or not. But the stance in the US is changing and there is little to reverse that.It's an absurd notion dreamed up by European diplomats who paid no attention to the facts on the ground. There is no rational scenario which would lead to the conclusion a Palestinian state would be viable.
End of story? Interesting take.A mosque is located there now. End of story.
Nonsense, a Palestinian state in the territories is not viable because the Palestinians are committed to the destruction of Israel.Agree, too much depends on the US. Basically, it is up to them whether a Palestinian state to be there or not. But the stance in the US is changing and there is little to reverse that.
But what should I say? Before, you talked about a synagogue, then switched to 'the holiest place'. You know, if people base their demands on thousands years' old 'traditions' ignoring the present day's reality, then what can I say? Okay, try that. Good luck. But don't be surprised when other people aren't too eager in supporting you in this endeavor.End of story? Interesting take.
The time will show. There is no point in debating about some possibilities being based on some personal preferences.Nonsense, a Palestinian state in the territories is not viable because the Palestinians are committed to the destruction of Israel.
Facts are facts and it has nothing to do with personal preferences. The idea of a Palestinian state in the territories is a European fairy tale the Palestinians never bought into, and there is no rational basis for believing that will change in the foreseeable future.The time will show. There is no point in debating about some possibilities being based on some personal preferences.
Facts? What these facts are:Facts are facts and it has nothing to do with personal preferences. The idea of a Palestinian state in the territories is a European fairy tale the Palestinians never bought into, and there is no rational basis for believing that will change in the foreseeable future.
The only pertinent fact is that the Palestinians are committed to the destruction of Israel and are not willing to accept only a state in the territories. That means that no matter what anyone else thinks, a Palestinian state is simply not viable.Facts? What these facts are:
1. The Palestinians have already become a separate nation. At least in political terms.
2. The whole of the so called Global South, with quite a few exceptions, supports the right of this nation to exist. To say nothing about Muslim states.
3. The stance in the US is changing. Though, granted, I can't say how fundamental this change can be, if it ever will.
Yes, they were told that for 70 years. Maybe if some Arab countries change the narratives, the people's mindset will be changing also.The only pertinent fact is that the Palestinians are committed to the destruction of Israel and are not willing to accept only a state in the territories. That means that no matter what anyone else thinks, a Palestinian state is simply not viable.
One fights fire with fire.More because they've lowered themselves to Muzzie standards
Add not being much of an ally on top of that
~S~
Was that the defense @ Nuremburg Kondor?One fights fire with fire.
What was the Allied defense over Berlin and Hamburg and Dresden and Tokyo and Hiroshima and Nagasaki?Was that the defense @ Nuremburg Kondor?
~S~
No, the Palestinians have been telling the world for 70 years that they are not interested in a state just in the territories, but you are just not listening to them.Yes, they were told that for 70 years. Maybe if some Arab countries change the narratives, the people's mindset will be changing also.