- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,097
- 24,171
- 2,180
You are ignorant of the facts of history.It took two nuclear explosions to convince the emperor that surrender was the only optionProven by the fact that they DID surrender?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are ignorant of the facts of history.It took two nuclear explosions to convince the emperor that surrender was the only optionProven by the fact that they DID surrender?
Blacks weren’t allowed in MLB until 1947 and it wasn’t easy. To me, the 40s is ancient historyWhy are we discussing morality of the 1940s? Seems crazy.Without the atomic bomb an invasion would be necessary and even more japanese would have diedFurther, the 'it would have saved millions' canard started out far less in #'s, grew due to historic revisionists who supported Truman , as opposed to all his generals
Speculation to hide behind.
The 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
You are speculating that the war would have ended any other way than it didWhat speculation do you imagine you see?
War is a dirty brutal businessThe 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
When there are people from that time still around, it isn't ancient history. It certainly isn't an era lost to the misty shroud of time such that morality was unknown to people of that forgotten epoch.Blacks weren’t allowed in MLB until 1947 and it wasn’t easy. To me, the 40s is ancient historyWhy are we discussing morality of the 1940s? Seems crazy.Without the atomic bomb an invasion would be necessary and even more japanese would have diedFurther, the 'it would have saved millions' canard started out far less in #'s, grew due to historic revisionists who supported Truman , as opposed to all his generals
Speculation to hide behind.
The 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
No, I am recognizing that there were other possibilities. I am not drawing conclusions like you, illogically, are.You are speculating that the war would have ended any other way than it didWhat speculation do you imagine you see?
War is a dirty brutal businessThe 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
the japanese are lucky that we dropped the bomb instead of invading
Very few are still around. It’s ancient history.When there are people from that time still around, it isn't ancient history. It certainly isn't an era lost to the misty shroud of time such that morality was unknown to people of that forgotten epoch.Blacks weren’t allowed in MLB until 1947 and it wasn’t easy. To me, the 40s is ancient historyWhy are we discussing morality of the 1940s? Seems crazy.Without the atomic bomb an invasion would be necessary and even more japanese would have diedFurther, the 'it would have saved millions' canard started out far less in #'s, grew due to historic revisionists who supported Truman , as opposed to all his generals
Speculation to hide behind.
The 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
If you want to get technical about it, that is nowhere near "ancient history."Very few are still around. It’s ancient history.When there are people from that time still around, it isn't ancient history. It certainly isn't an era lost to the misty shroud of time such that morality was unknown to people of that forgotten epoch.Blacks weren’t allowed in MLB until 1947 and it wasn’t easy. To me, the 40s is ancient historyWhy are we discussing morality of the 1940s? Seems crazy.Without the atomic bomb an invasion would be necessary and even more japanese would have diedFurther, the 'it would have saved millions' canard started out far less in #'s, grew due to historic revisionists who supported Truman , as opposed to all his generals
Speculation to hide behind.
The 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
Hyperbole by me but you know what I mean. The world is a much different place now. We should learn from it but not overly criticize it.If you want to get technical about it, that is nowhere near "ancient history."Very few are still around. It’s ancient history.When there are people from that time still around, it isn't ancient history. It certainly isn't an era lost to the misty shroud of time such that morality was unknown to people of that forgotten epoch.Blacks weren’t allowed in MLB until 1947 and it wasn’t easy. To me, the 40s is ancient historyWhy are we discussing morality of the 1940s? Seems crazy.Without the atomic bomb an invasion would be necessary and even more japanese would have diedFurther, the 'it would have saved millions' canard started out far less in #'s, grew due to historic revisionists who supported Truman , as opposed to all his generals
Speculation to hide behind.
The 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
... The world is a much different place now. ...
We just have a lot more knowledge and easier communication skills.... The world is a much different place now. ...
How so, relative to the topic at hand?
We just have a lot more knowledge and easier communication skills.... The world is a much different place now. ...
How so, relative to the topic at hand?
There likely would not have been a war with Japan. Holocaust would have likely not happened either.We just have a lot more knowledge and easier communication skills.... The world is a much different place now. ...
How so, relative to the topic at hand?
If they had our knowledge and communication skills and technology, how do you think that would have affected decisions related to the war?
Do you still think Japan did not Invade the US? You still haven't answered that question.War is a dirty brutal businessThe 1940s was not so long ago. People still understood morality in the 1940s.
the japanese are lucky that we dropped the bomb instead of invading
Do you still think the attack on the US military base at Pearl Harbor was an "invasion"? You never did address that claim of yours.
There likely would not have been a war with Japan. Holocaust would have likely not happened either.We just have a lot more knowledge and easier communication skills.... The world is a much different place now. ...
How so, relative to the topic at hand?
If they had our knowledge and communication skills and technology, how do you think that would have affected decisions related to the war?
Isnt this your headline?No, I am recognizing that there were other possibilities. I am not drawing conclusions like you, illogically, are.
I never called the bombing of Pearl Harbor an invasionDo you still think the attack on the US military base at Pearl Harbor was an "invasion"? You never did address that claim of yours.