The NPV may be closer than you think

[jacksonlamb]

No once the state decides popular vote is the method for election, they can't then negate that vote because other states didn't vote the same way.

Of course, they can.

 

[struth]

Now you're projecting, Q-NUT.

Trump's disapproval rating hits record high, new poll shows​

View attachment 1252940
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › may › trump...




2 days ago — Disapproval rose to 62%, the worst of his two terms in office, amid economic issues since launching his war against Iran.

Still higher then Harris and Xiden....not to mention the Dem party

Face it, you are simply projecting cause you are hated.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No once the state decides popular vote is the method for election, they can't then negate that vote because other states didn't vote the same way.

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

 

[struth]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Actually you would be negating the votes of the people of your state, if the majority voted for the canidate that didn't win the national popular vote.

 

[martybegan]

tl;dr

Enact it and the USSC will strike it down so fast it'll make your head spin.

Unconstitutional denial of a State's requirement to provide a Republican form of government, and an end run around the Constitution itself.

 

[martybegan]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Except if it goes against the blue States they will immediately try to revoke the law before the votes are certified.

If you want the President to be directly elected, amend the Constitution, stop trying to use end runs.

 

[Oddball]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Actually, this is the entire point of the NPV.

All the electoral votes of the rural states get negated, and subsequently their voters disenfranchised, by those of the heavily urbanized states.

This is exactly the centralization of electoral power to the cities that the EC was designed to obviate.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Still higher then Harris and Xiden....not to mention the Dem party

Face it, you are simply projecting cause you are hated.

Does not matter. It rubs on a weak GOP this fall, makes it stink, really.

 

[struth]

Does not matter. It rubs on a weak GOP this fall, makes it stink, really.

You don’t think it matters that the Dems have a lower approval?

 

[jacksonlamb]

You don’t think it matters that the Dems have a lower approval?

Not right at the moment. If you accept that, then you accept Trump is under 1:2, and you accept that the American public is pissed "affordability," gas, and groceries. None of which is coming down yet. It all goes the other way.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Look dumbass if the vote total in a state is for a person and the State then changes who they send electors for to another person that negates the voters in that state. And that is unconstitutional. A state that allows a vote must honor that vote.

 

[Rogue AI]

Don't need one. Anchor baby exclusion from citizenship does.

You do need one, nothing in the Constitution allows for the aggregate vote of the many states' elections to interfere with what is already laid out in the Constitution. You loons really aren't very bright.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Actually you would be negating the votes of the people of your state, if the majority voted for the canidate that didn't win the national popular vote.

It negates no more than the current winner take all states.

Unless you want to be consistent and claim that winner take all negates the votes of the people because C in winner take all the get 100% of the EC votes with 59%+1 vote.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Look dumbass if the vote total in a state is for a person and the State then changes who they send electors for to another person that negates the voters in that state. And that is unconstitutional. A state that allows a vote must honor that vote.

Winner take all also negates votes.

Your point?

WW

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Winner take all also negates votes.

Your point?

WW

No it doesnt the majority is what you are talking about and winner take all is by majority. You are grasping at straws to justify illegal action.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Except if it goes against the blue States they will immediately try to revoke the law before the votes are certified.

If you want the President to be directly elected, amend the Constitution, stop trying to use end runs.

I don’t support winner take all. See post 24.

For this reason. Watch what you ask for, you might get it and not like the results.

WW

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I don’t support winner take all. See post 24.

For this reason. Watch what you ask for, you might get it and not like the results.

WW

then work in your state to change the law and support an amendment this wont fly.

 

[WorldWatcher]

You don’t think it matters that the Dems have a lower approval?

Approval are pretty close.

DEMs are actually favored for b the house.

See RCP generic ballot.

WW

2026 Generic Congressional Vote | RealClearPolling

2026 Generic Congressional Vote | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

 

[struth]

It negates no more than the current winner take all states.

Unless you want to be consistent and claim that winner take all negates the votes of the people because C in winner take all the get 100% of the EC votes with 59%+1 vote.

WW

Winner take all starts give the Electors to the nominee with the most votes in that state

So, let’s say A gets a majority of the votes in VA…he gets all her Electors

If B wins in the national popular vote, the Dems have said the majority of Va citizens votes don’t matter

And ignores the will of Virginians

 

[struth]

Approval are pretty close.

DEMs are actually favored for b the house.

See RCP generic ballot.

WW

2026 Generic Congressional Vote | RealClearPolling

2026 Generic Congressional Vote | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

That poll was conducted when illegal maps were in place.