The NPV may be closer than you think

[jacksonlamb]

No once the state decides popular vote is the method for election, they can't then negate that vote because other states didn't vote the same way.

Of course, they can.

 

[struth]

Now you're projecting, Q-NUT.

Trump's disapproval rating hits record high, new poll shows​

View attachment 1252940
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › may › trump...




2 days ago — Disapproval rose to 62%, the worst of his two terms in office, amid economic issues since launching his war against Iran.

Still higher then Harris and Xiden....not to mention the Dem party

Face it, you are simply projecting cause you are hated.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No once the state decides popular vote is the method for election, they can't then negate that vote because other states didn't vote the same way.

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

 

[struth]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Actually you would be negating the votes of the people of your state, if the majority voted for the canidate that didn't win the national popular vote.

 

[martybegan]

tl;dr

Enact it and the USSC will strike it down so fast it'll make your head spin.

Unconstitutional denial of a State's requirement to provide a Republican form of government, and an end run around the Constitution itself.

 

[martybegan]

No body is talking about negating any vote after an election.

The NOV is the legislative method for upcoming elections.

Nothing after the fact.


WW

Except if it goes against the blue States they will immediately try to revoke the law before the votes are certified.

If you want the President to be directly elected, amend the Constitution, stop trying to use end runs.