The Nordic model is widely regarded as a benchmark.

For the Nordic countries it’s a great deal. Better healthcare, free college, retirement...


Try to get a free refill of or free water in those countries...



Nope not buying your argument.



.
You are more interested in a free refill than healthcare or education? That is funny.


Uhm because they are not free? A free refill is free, I can sit at McDonald's all day long getting free WiFi and free cokes can I do that there?


.
You pay for it in your taxes. Healthcare is better and costs less than here. The Nordic model seems to work very well.
Their healthcare isn't better. The survival rate for cancer is much better here than in Europe.
They don't go broke when they get sick.
 
A number of comparative studies of economic and social performance have ranked the Nordics high. A common finding of cross-country comparisons is that the Nordics succeed better than other countries in combining economic efficiency and growth with a peaceful labour market, a fair distribution of income and social cohesion. The model is pointed to as a source of inspiration for other people in their search for a better social and economic system. On the other hand, many observers around the world are amazed that “the bumble-bee can fly” – that the Nordic economies can prosper and grow in spite of the presumably weak economic incentives associated with high tax wedges, a generous social security system and an egalitarian distribution of income. Critics have been looking for inner contradictions in the model and they have questioned its sustainability. Some argue that the economic performance of the Nordic countries is simply a result of exceptional and temporary advantages, bound to disappear over time. This report deals with the Nordic model, the reasons why it has worked in the past, and the challenges it is being subjected to in the future. Present economic and social trends, including globalization and demographic change, pose significant challenges to the model as we know it. The model will remain viable and successful only if the challenges and the need for reform are understood – and if action is taken. THE NORDIC MODEL Embracing globalization and sharing risks Torben M. Andersen, Bengt Holmström, Seppo Honkapohja, Sixten Korkman, Hans Tson Söderström, Juhana Vartiainen



https://economics.mit.edu/files/5726

Mod Edit: Supplying a link to the textual material that may be subject to copyright. Contact moderation if it's not correct. BILLSANDS New members may and should post links for copyright after they reach their qualifying post limit.

So a system based on free market economics works. What a surprise. If the Nordic countries are on the same level of economic freedom as the US, with higher tax rates and a lower standard of living...I think all the evidence we need is right there, right in front of our eyes. Why don’t we look to a country that’s scores top 3 in absolutely every single category one can think of for as long as we have measured such things for inspiration? That seems logical right? That country being Switzerland: economic freedom top 3, standard of living top 3, overall citizen happiness top 3, healthcare top 3, education top 3, safety, top 3, name a category, the Swiss are up there. They’re obviously doing something right. Why is it we want to lower our standard of living, when we have a clear cut example of what actually works, and has worked for a long ass time, and is actually what we’re partially based offf of?

Why is it Bernie can point to Nordic countries, who operate on free market economics, and then trash the free markets and propose policies that even the Nordic countries push away with a 10 foot pole because they’d cost triple the amount of money that’s actually circulating the globe within a decade. The Nordic countries are NOT democratic socialist countries. They have social progams larger is scale than our social programs, they are also just as economically free as we are, if not freeer. No where near what Bernie calls for.

What’s wrong with looking to the Swiss for inspiration, on what’s proven to work? They’ve been doing it for 500 years. Something is going right for them there.

Where do we find some Nazi gold to steal?

....right, because 500 million of rumored gold from 80 years ago explains why the Swiss have been in such good shape for like the past 300 years. They just handed it out to all their citizens and made a super duper pinkie promise not too tell anyone else. We know where that gold went, it went to Argentina. There’s whole cities over there where they all speak German, they look pristine German towns before WWII, have shrines to their nazi grandparents. It’s bizarre but they’re real, almost like someone enlarged a snow globe of Frankfurt Germany circa 1936, and dropped it right on the side of a secluded South American mountain range, and filled it with a bunch of third Reich remnants. There’s like 15 or 20 of these towns, yea that sort of thing doesn’t happen without a lot of “capital”.

Swiss Acknowledge Profiting From Nazi Gold

And what is it the Swiss do you would mimic?
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



I'll pass.......
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



I'll pass.......


Look at California, Illinois and cities like Detroit....yeah kick that shit to the curb
 
A number of comparative studies of economic and social performance have ranked the Nordics high. A common finding of cross-country comparisons is that the Nordics succeed better than other countries in combining economic efficiency and growth with a peaceful labour market, a fair distribution of income and social cohesion. The model is pointed to as a source of inspiration for other people in their search for a better social and economic system. On the other hand, many observers around the world are amazed that “the bumble-bee can fly” – that the Nordic economies can prosper and grow in spite of the presumably weak economic incentives associated with high tax wedges, a generous social security system and an egalitarian distribution of income. Critics have been looking for inner contradictions in the model and they have questioned its sustainability. Some argue that the economic performance of the Nordic countries is simply a result of exceptional and temporary advantages, bound to disappear over time. This report deals with the Nordic model, the reasons why it has worked in the past, and the challenges it is being subjected to in the future. Present economic and social trends, including globalization and demographic change, pose significant challenges to the model as we know it. The model will remain viable and successful only if the challenges and the need for reform are understood – and if action is taken. THE NORDIC MODEL Embracing globalization and sharing risks Torben M. Andersen, Bengt Holmström, Seppo Honkapohja, Sixten Korkman, Hans Tson Söderström, Juhana Vartiainen



https://economics.mit.edu/files/5726

Mod Edit: Supplying a link to the textual material that may be subject to copyright. Contact moderation if it's not correct. BILLSANDS New members may and should post links for copyright after they reach their qualifying post limit.

So a system based on free market economics works. What a surprise. If the Nordic countries are on the same level of economic freedom as the US, with higher tax rates and a lower standard of living...I think all the evidence we need is right there, right in front of our eyes. Why don’t we look to a country that’s scores top 3 in absolutely every single category one can think of for as long as we have measured such things for inspiration? That seems logical right? That country being Switzerland: economic freedom top 3, standard of living top 3, overall citizen happiness top 3, healthcare top 3, education top 3, safety, top 3, name a category, the Swiss are up there. They’re obviously doing something right. Why is it we want to lower our standard of living, when we have a clear cut example of what actually works, and has worked for a long ass time, and is actually what we’re partially based offf of?

Why is it Bernie can point to Nordic countries, who operate on free market economics, and then trash the free markets and propose policies that even the Nordic countries push away with a 10 foot pole because they’d cost triple the amount of money that’s actually circulating the globe within a decade. The Nordic countries are NOT democratic socialist countries. They have social progams larger is scale than our social programs, they are also just as economically free as we are, if not freeer. No where near what Bernie calls for.

What’s wrong with looking to the Swiss for inspiration, on what’s proven to work? They’ve been doing it for 500 years. Something is going right for them there.

Where do we find some Nazi gold to steal?

....right, because 500 million of rumored gold from 80 years ago explains why the Swiss have been in such good shape for like the past 300 years. They just handed it out to all their citizens and made a super duper pinkie promise not too tell anyone else. We know where that gold went, it went to Argentina. There’s whole cities over there where they all speak German, they look pristine German towns before WWII, have shrines to their nazi grandparents. It’s bizarre but they’re real, almost like someone enlarged a snow globe of Frankfurt Germany circa 1936, and dropped it right on the side of a secluded South American mountain range, and filled it with a bunch of third Reich remnants. There’s like 15 or 20 of these towns, yea that sort of thing doesn’t happen without a lot of “capital”.

Swiss Acknowledge Profiting From Nazi Gold

And what is it the Swiss do you would mimic?

So the Swiss bank, a neutral country with banking policies that everyone knows about, did what all banks do, and made money off of capital they’ve received. They only made 20 million from the nazi bullion, and they received 500 million to start out with. And again, you’re implying that the banks shared that 20 million in profits with their citizens and government? Well if that’s the case, it just proves my point that they’re doing something right over there. They were so efficient with that 20 million, that they used it to propel them to the top 3 in every category. That’s just incredible. For any other modern 1st world country, 20 million is a water molecule in a bucket. Might be enough to fund a few school districts...maybe enough to fund the tiniest department they have in government. But it sounds like if you give the Swiss 40, 50, maybe even 60 million, they could make heaven on earth with that money.
 
No thanks.
get used to the idea.. welcome to the revolution
John F. Kennedy > Quotes > Quotable Quote

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

[Remarks on the first anniversary of the Alliance for Progress, 13 March 1962]”


― John F. Kennedy

We may sink into socialism/communism. I seriously doubt it though. The world is at the precipice of war. The planet is being perturbed. We're about to witness epic changes.

The Russians already have the GOP in their pocket so, stealth has come into play.
How exactly is the Republican party in the pocket of the Russian's.
 
A number of comparative studies of economic and social performance have ranked the Nordics high. A common finding of cross-country comparisons is that the Nordics succeed better than other countries in combining economic efficiency and growth with a peaceful labour market, a fair distribution of income and social cohesion. The model is pointed to as a source of inspiration for other people in their search for a better social and economic system. On the other hand, many observers around the world are amazed that “the bumble-bee can fly” – that the Nordic economies can prosper and grow in spite of the presumably weak economic incentives associated with high tax wedges, a generous social security system and an egalitarian distribution of income. Critics have been looking for inner contradictions in the model and they have questioned its sustainability. Some argue that the economic performance of the Nordic countries is simply a result of exceptional and temporary advantages, bound to disappear over time. This report deals with the Nordic model, the reasons why it has worked in the past, and the challenges it is being subjected to in the future. Present economic and social trends, including globalization and demographic change, pose significant challenges to the model as we know it. The model will remain viable and successful only if the challenges and the need for reform are understood – and if action is taken. THE NORDIC MODEL Embracing globalization and sharing risks Torben M. Andersen, Bengt Holmström, Seppo Honkapohja, Sixten Korkman, Hans Tson Söderström, Juhana Vartiainen



https://economics.mit.edu/files/5726

Mod Edit: Supplying a link to the textual material that may be subject to copyright. Contact moderation if it's not correct. BILLSANDS New members may and should post links for copyright after they reach their qualifying post limit.

So a system based on free market economics works. What a surprise. If the Nordic countries are on the same level of economic freedom as the US, with higher tax rates and a lower standard of living...I think all the evidence we need is right there, right in front of our eyes. Why don’t we look to a country that’s scores top 3 in absolutely every single category one can think of for as long as we have measured such things for inspiration? That seems logical right? That country being Switzerland: economic freedom top 3, standard of living top 3, overall citizen happiness top 3, healthcare top 3, education top 3, safety, top 3, name a category, the Swiss are up there. They’re obviously doing something right. Why is it we want to lower our standard of living, when we have a clear cut example of what actually works, and has worked for a long ass time, and is actually what we’re partially based offf of?

Why is it Bernie can point to Nordic countries, who operate on free market economics, and then trash the free markets and propose policies that even the Nordic countries push away with a 10 foot pole because they’d cost triple the amount of money that’s actually circulating the globe within a decade. The Nordic countries are NOT democratic socialist countries. They have social progams larger is scale than our social programs, they are also just as economically free as we are, if not freeer. No where near what Bernie calls for.

What’s wrong with looking to the Swiss for inspiration, on what’s proven to work? They’ve been doing it for 500 years. Something is going right for them there.

Where do we find some Nazi gold to steal?

....right, because 500 million of rumored gold from 80 years ago explains why the Swiss have been in such good shape for like the past 300 years. They just handed it out to all their citizens and made a super duper pinkie promise not too tell anyone else. We know where that gold went, it went to Argentina. There’s whole cities over there where they all speak German, they look pristine German towns before WWII, have shrines to their nazi grandparents. It’s bizarre but they’re real, almost like someone enlarged a snow globe of Frankfurt Germany circa 1936, and dropped it right on the side of a secluded South American mountain range, and filled it with a bunch of third Reich remnants. There’s like 15 or 20 of these towns, yea that sort of thing doesn’t happen without a lot of “capital”.

Swiss Acknowledge Profiting From Nazi Gold

And what is it the Swiss do you would mimic?

So the Swiss bank, a neutral country with banking policies that everyone knows about, did what all banks do, and made money off of capital they’ve received. They only made 20 million from the nazi bullion, and they received 500 million to start out with. And again, you’re implying that the banks shared that 20 million in profits with their citizens and government? Well if that’s the case, it just proves my point that they’re doing something right over there. They were so efficient with that 20 million, that they used it to propel them to the top 3 in every category. That’s just incredible. For any other modern 1st world country, 20 million is a water molecule in a bucket. Might be enough to fund a few school districts...maybe enough to fund the tiniest department they have in government. But it sounds like if you give the Swiss 40, 50, maybe even 60 million, they could make heaven on earth with that money.

That's how much they have admitted to so for. I thought it was all in Argentina?

Again, what are they doing we should mimic? Think we should all become bankers?
 
I have no desire to hand over 60% of what I make to the government.
For the Nordic countries it’s a great deal. Better healthcare, free college, retirement...


Try to get a free refill of or free water in those countries...



Nope not buying your argument.



.
You are more interested in a free refill than healthcare or education? That is funny.


Uhm because they are not free? A free refill is free, I can sit at McDonald's all day long getting free WiFi and free cokes can I do that there?


.
You pay for it in your taxes. Healthcare is better and costs less than here. The Nordic model seems to work very well.


How is health care better then the best hospitals in the world here? I never heard of them living years longer then we do


.
 
Capitalism allows anyone to become wealthy and powerful.

Socialism only allows the powerful to become wealthy.
Exactly... The hope is by the radicals today, is that they will find favor with those in power because they may have put them there, and they feel as if they will use those powerful to get what they want by way of force against us. You see in the socialist system or communist systems, no one has the independence needed outside of the club in order to challenge the club if the club begins standing up for things that are bad for this country on whole. The break down of wealth and power in the hands of Patriots has been an on going thing by these Demon-crats with their wealth redistribution schemes, regulation schemes, climate change bullcrap and etc. Meanwhile they are working to replace one culture (The American culture), with a multi-cultural society that is anti-American in many ways by what we see today.

Right now this country is under a series of multiple attacks by these groups, and it needs to be looked at as a threat to the fabric of this country in a serious way.
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



Oh Jeebus. Another one. Did your handlers instruct you to post this propaganda?

Facts:
- Nordic countries are highly homogenous, consisting of people whose cultures developed under incredibly harsh environmental and scarcity conditions.
- They developed highly cooperative tribal groups to survive.
- This cooperation predates anything resembling Liberal Socialism.
- They are capitalists, with some of the profits diverted to welfare programs.
- Norway is a special case given their profits from North Sea Oil.

To take these specialized cases as examples that Socialism is the way to go in bonkers. Applying "Liberal" to Socialism doesn't make it any less Authoritarian and anti-Human.



if you are against authoritarianism why do you support conservatives and evangelicals.?



Do you still beat your dog?

If you are truly interested in learning about the effects of Real Authoritarians, read up at this link:

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



And you couldn't post this in your other thread about the same topic because...? You enjoy spamming message boards?
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles


The American definition of "liberal" is now....

a complete idiot who hates truth, debate, America, and anything that interferes with the idiot getting a larger government check....
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



Oh Jeebus. Another one. Did your handlers instruct you to post this propaganda?

Facts:
- Nordic countries are highly homogenous, consisting of people whose cultures developed under incredibly harsh environmental and scarcity conditions.
- They developed highly cooperative tribal groups to survive.
- This cooperation predates anything resembling Liberal Socialism.
- They are capitalists, with some of the profits diverted to welfare programs.
- Norway is a special case given their profits from North Sea Oil.

To take these specialized cases as examples that Socialism is the way to go in bonkers. Applying "Liberal" to Socialism doesn't make it any less Authoritarian and anti-Human.



if you are against authoritarianism why do you support conservatives and evangelicals.?



Do you still beat your dog?

If you are truly interested in learning about the effects of Real Authoritarians, read up at this link:

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER

We gotta make sure that we won't be the ones led off to the slaughter, and that time is now. Vote conservatives, vote.
 
No thanks.

the EVILs of SOCIALISM......
bob is a conservative
he makes 75k a year
and he only pays 10k in taxes because he is married with 3 children and gets BIG TAX BREAKS!
bob LOVES football!
bob can afford season tickets for his family to their favorite team because bob gets BIG TAX BREAKS for his family.
so bob takes his family on socialist built roads to the stadium...
the brand new stadium....
built with TAX PAYERS DOLLARS!.....
the SOCIALIST stadium!
and even better....Bob didn't pay for the stadium at all because of his BIG TAX BREAKS!
So bob gets to drive on roads built with the taxes of other people to stadiums built with the taxes of other people to see his favorite team play because he has season tickets which he can afford because he gets BIG TAX BREAKS for being married with 3 kids....
Apparently, being conservative, bob HATES the idea of HIS taxes being used for OTHER people (even though he doesn't pay much) but he LIKES the idea of paying LOW taxes while OTHER PEOPLE pay MUCH MORE for HIS BENEFIT!....
is bob a hypocritical arsehole?

Steve is a gay liberal democrat.
He makes 75k a year.
but he isn't allowed to marry or have kids (bob won't let him).....
so Steve pays 30k in taxes and gets NO TAX BREAKS!
Steve doesn't like football...
so it doesn't bother him that he can't afford to buy season tickets for himself.
and he never thinks about the fact that HE is paying EXTRA TAXES while Bob is paying MUCH LESS!

and THAT explains the EVILS of SOCIALISM.
you are welcome
donations accepted.
 
No thanks.

the EVILs of SOCIALISM......
bob is a conservative
he makes 75k a year
and he only pays 10k in taxes because he is married with 3 children and gets BIG TAX BREAKS!
bob LOVES football!
bob can afford season tickets for his family to their favorite team because bob gets BIG TAX BREAKS for his family.
so bob takes his family on socialist built roads to the stadium...
the brand new stadium....
built with TAX PAYERS DOLLARS!.....
the SOCIALIST stadium!
and even better....Bob didn't pay for the stadium at all because of his BIG TAX BREAKS!
So bob gets to drive on roads built with the taxes of other people to stadiums built with the taxes of other people to see his favorite team play because he has season tickets which he can afford because he gets BIG TAX BREAKS for being married with 3 kids....
Apparently, being conservative, bob HATES the idea of HIS taxes being used for OTHER people (even though he doesn't pay much) but he LIKES the idea of paying LOW taxes while OTHER PEOPLE pay MUCH MORE for HIS BENEFIT!....
is bob a hypocritical arsehole?

Steve is a gay liberal democrat.
He makes 75k a year.
but he isn't allowed to marry or have kids (bob won't let him).....
so Steve pays 30k in taxes and gets NO TAX BREAKS!
Steve doesn't like football...
so it doesn't bother him that he can't afford to buy season tickets for himself.
and he never thinks about the fact that HE is paying EXTRA TAXES while Bob is paying MUCH LESS!

and THAT explains the EVILS of SOCIALISM.
you are welcome
donations accepted.


So sad.

You don't understand anything about the real world, do you Slick?
 
Try to get a free refill of or free water in those countries...



Nope not buying your argument.



.
You are more interested in a free refill than healthcare or education? That is funny.


Uhm because they are not free? A free refill is free, I can sit at McDonald's all day long getting free WiFi and free cokes can I do that there?


.
You pay for it in your taxes. Healthcare is better and costs less than here. The Nordic model seems to work very well.
Their healthcare isn't better. The survival rate for cancer is much better here than in Europe.
They don't go broke when they get sick.

Neither do people here who have insurance.
 
No thanks.

the EVILs of SOCIALISM......
bob is a conservative
he makes 75k a year
and he only pays 10k in taxes because he is married with 3 children and gets BIG TAX BREAKS!
bob LOVES football!
bob can afford season tickets for his family to their favorite team because bob gets BIG TAX BREAKS for his family.
so bob takes his family on socialist built roads to the stadium...
the brand new stadium....
built with TAX PAYERS DOLLARS!.....
the SOCIALIST stadium!
and even better....Bob didn't pay for the stadium at all because of his BIG TAX BREAKS!
So bob gets to drive on roads built with the taxes of other people to stadiums built with the taxes of other people to see his favorite team play because he has season tickets which he can afford because he gets BIG TAX BREAKS for being married with 3 kids....
Apparently, being conservative, bob HATES the idea of HIS taxes being used for OTHER people (even though he doesn't pay much) but he LIKES the idea of paying LOW taxes while OTHER PEOPLE pay MUCH MORE for HIS BENEFIT!....
is bob a hypocritical arsehole?

Steve is a gay liberal democrat.
He makes 75k a year.
but he isn't allowed to marry or have kids (bob won't let him).....
so Steve pays 30k in taxes and gets NO TAX BREAKS!
Steve doesn't like football...
so it doesn't bother him that he can't afford to buy season tickets for himself.
and he never thinks about the fact that HE is paying EXTRA TAXES while Bob is paying MUCH LESS!

and THAT explains the EVILS of SOCIALISM.
you are welcome
donations accepted.


So sad.

You don't understand anything about the real world, do you Slick?


If you can't see that I posted the REAL WORLD then your brain is more defective than I realized and there is no hope for you.....sad....pathetic.....

are you unaware of the fact that workers with families get tax breaks?

are you incapable of understanding that a person with NO FAMILY pays MORE in taxes?

If you hate socialism then why do want tax breaks for families?

THAT IS SOCIALISM!

single people paying more while people with families pay less.....SOCIALISM!

It would seem to me that anyone who opposed all forms of socialism would NOT want tax breaks for....families....or..anything.....

Have you enjoyed driving on the roads we all graciously paid to have built for you?
 
No thanks.

the EVILs of SOCIALISM......
bob is a conservative
he makes 75k a year
and he only pays 10k in taxes because he is married with 3 children and gets BIG TAX BREAKS!
bob LOVES football!
bob can afford season tickets for his family to their favorite team because bob gets BIG TAX BREAKS for his family.
so bob takes his family on socialist built roads to the stadium...
the brand new stadium....
built with TAX PAYERS DOLLARS!.....
the SOCIALIST stadium!
and even better....Bob didn't pay for the stadium at all because of his BIG TAX BREAKS!
So bob gets to drive on roads built with the taxes of other people to stadiums built with the taxes of other people to see his favorite team play because he has season tickets which he can afford because he gets BIG TAX BREAKS for being married with 3 kids....
Apparently, being conservative, bob HATES the idea of HIS taxes being used for OTHER people (even though he doesn't pay much) but he LIKES the idea of paying LOW taxes while OTHER PEOPLE pay MUCH MORE for HIS BENEFIT!....
is bob a hypocritical arsehole?

Steve is a gay liberal democrat.
He makes 75k a year.
but he isn't allowed to marry or have kids (bob won't let him).....
so Steve pays 30k in taxes and gets NO TAX BREAKS!
Steve doesn't like football...
so it doesn't bother him that he can't afford to buy season tickets for himself.
and he never thinks about the fact that HE is paying EXTRA TAXES while Bob is paying MUCH LESS!

and THAT explains the EVILS of SOCIALISM.
you are welcome
donations accepted.


So sad.

You don't understand anything about the real world, do you Slick?


If you can't see that I posted the REAL WORLD then your brain is more defective than I realized and there is no hope for you.....sad....pathetic.....

are you unaware of the fact that workers with families get tax breaks?

are you incapable of understanding that a person with NO FAMILY pays MORE in taxes?

If you hate socialism then why do want tax breaks for families?

THAT IS SOCIALISM!

single people paying more while people with families pay less.....SOCIALISM!

It would seem to me that anyone who opposed all forms of socialism would NOT want tax breaks for....families....or..anything.....

Have you enjoyed driving on the roads we all graciously paid to have built for you?


People keeping the money they earn is Not Socialism.

Your lose.
 
Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that incorporates liberal principles. Liberal socialismdoes not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism, but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods.



Oh Jeebus. Another one. Did your handlers instruct you to post this propaganda?

Facts:
- Nordic countries are highly homogenous, consisting of people whose cultures developed under incredibly harsh environmental and scarcity conditions.
- They developed highly cooperative tribal groups to survive.
- This cooperation predates anything resembling Liberal Socialism.
- They are capitalists, with some of the profits diverted to welfare programs.
- Norway is a special case given their profits from North Sea Oil.

To take these specialized cases as examples that Socialism is the way to go in bonkers. Applying "Liberal" to Socialism doesn't make it any less Authoritarian and anti-Human.



if you are against authoritarianism why do you support conservatives and evangelicals.?



Do you still beat your dog?

If you are truly interested in learning about the effects of Real Authoritarians, read up at this link:

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER



trump endorsed roy moore.
roy moore believes HIS religion should be the source of law in the USA.
roy moore believe that gays and atheists have NO RIGHTS in CHRISTIAN USA!
in fact, he wants to criminalize them and have them rounded up......and (to save on tax dollars).......executed for the crime of being gay or atheist.....

would you call THAT authoritarian?
 

Forum List

Back
Top