The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[initforme]

Ok th n you tell the health insurance companies to cut their rates way over half. And cover everything necessary no questions asked. Also increase wages for workers so not only the wealthy can afford to be alive

 

[PoliticalChic]

So you are against social security and medicare? Imagine america without them. Total chaos. Most people who have worked their whole life wouldn't be able to suevive

I favor the Constitution.

You don't.

That's why you wrote this:

now I have not a patriotic bone in my body

Now....On To The Future!

“It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.” Yogi Berra Yet one can make a calculated conclusion by judging the past. 1. First....the context. "Near the end of the third and final presidential debate, moderator Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump for clarification on one...

www.usmessageboard.com

. Of course I will admit I don't have a patriotic bone in my body eventhough i was born in america

The pledge

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ok th n you tell the health insurance companies to cut their rates way over half. And cover everything necessary no questions asked. Also increase wages for workers so not only the wealthy can afford to be alive

Pay for your own.

Get off your knees and stop begging for others to shoulder your responsibilities.

 

[Care4all]

So you are against an illegal serving in the military, and against trans gender from serving because they get benefits after serving? Perhaps trans can serve faithfully? Our military is stronger than all others in the world combined. Today's young generations have such a devotion to work and nation.

Our military is fast deteriorating because they are not training for war. They are training for filthy wokeness shit.

They are also purging the military of Patriots that have always been the backbone and replacing them with stupid yes men, queers, unqualified minorities and women.

Our military may have the best hardware but it is becoming ineffective and is the joke of the world. For instance, the Navy is spending more time training on CRT than they are on qualifying watch officers nowadays. Stupid minorities and women are being promoting for affirmative action reasons rather than qualifications.

The Democrats screw up everything they touch. Now they are working hard to screw up the once great US military.

Anybody that voted for this Joe Dufus piece of shit and then ignored the fact he stole the election is a an idiot.

what a load of number two!!!!

 

[initforme]

Uhhh...I paid in now I'm collecting. That's the way it works.

 

[Flash]

So you are against an illegal serving in the military, and against trans gender from serving because they get benefits after serving? Perhaps trans can serve faithfully? Our military is stronger than all others in the world combined. Today's young generations have such a devotion to work and nation.

Our military is fast deteriorating because they are not training for war. They are training for filthy wokeness shit.

They are also purging the military of Patriots that have always been the backbone and replacing them with stupid yes men, queers, unqualified minorities and women.

Our military may have the best hardware but it is becoming ineffective and is the joke of the world. For instance, the Navy is spending more time training on CRT than they are on qualifying watch officers nowadays. Stupid minorities and women are being promoting for affirmative action reasons rather than qualifications.

The Democrats screw up everything they touch. Now they are working hard to screw up the once great US military.

Anybody that voted for this Joe Dufus piece of shit and then ignored the fact he stole the election is a an idiot.

what a load of number two!!!!

No it is not!


'Every officer is up to speed on diversity training. Not so much ship handling': Scathing official report finds US Navy is not fit for war because of risk averse, politically correct, control-freak top brass

Navy 'is in disarray and focusing more on diversity than warfighting'

A scathing new report commissioned by members of Congress has claimed that the Navy's surface warfare forces have systemic training and leadership issues, including a focus on diversity that overshadows basic readiness skills.
The report prepared by Marine Lt. Gen. Robert Schmidle and Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, both retired, came in response to recent Naval disasters, including the burning of the USS Bonhomme Richard in San Diego, two collisions involving Navy ships in the Pacific and the surrender of two small craft to Iran. The authors conducted hour-long interviews with 77 current and retired Navy officers, offering them anonymity to identify issues they wouldn't feel comfortable raising in the chain of command.

The report found that a staggering 94 percent of the subjects believed the recent Naval disasters were 'part of a broader problem in Navy culture or leadership.'

'I guarantee you every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I'm sorry that I can't say the same of their ship handling training,' said one recently retired senior enlisted leader.

The report focused on issued within the Navy's surface warfare forces, as opposed to submarine and aviation, and suggested that issues in the surface fleet could be unique due to better funding and training for submarine and aviation units.

One of the key issues raised by the officers interviewed for the report was a concern that Navy leaders spend more time focusing on diversity training than on developing warfighting capacity and key operational skills.
'Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we'll survive a fight with the Chinese navy,' lamented one lieutenant currently on active duty.

'It's criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we'll all bleed the same color,' she added.

One recent destroyer captain said: 'where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are. And we've got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month, or sexual assault prevention, or you name it. We don't even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.'

'While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking prevention, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost,' the report's authors wrote.

'The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents,' the report added.

 

[Care4all]

So you are against an illegal serving in the military, and against trans gender from serving because they get benefits after serving? Perhaps trans can serve faithfully? Our military is stronger than all others in the world combined. Today's young generations have such a devotion to work and nation.

Our military is fast deteriorating because they are not training for war. They are training for filthy wokeness shit.

They are also purging the military of Patriots that have always been the backbone and replacing them with stupid yes men, queers, unqualified minorities and women.

Our military may have the best hardware but it is becoming ineffective and is the joke of the world. For instance, the Navy is spending more time training on CRT than they are on qualifying watch officers nowadays. Stupid minorities and women are being promoting for affirmative action reasons rather than qualifications.

The Democrats screw up everything they touch. Now they are working hard to screw up the once great US military.

Anybody that voted for this Joe Dufus piece of shit and then ignored the fact he stole the election is a an idiot.

what a load of number two!!!!

No it is not!


'Every officer is up to speed on diversity training. Not so much ship handling': Scathing official report finds US Navy is not fit for war because of risk averse, politically correct, control-freak top brass

Navy 'is in disarray and focusing more on diversity than warfighting'

A scathing new report commissioned by members of Congress has claimed that the Navy's surface warfare forces have systemic training and leadership issues, including a focus on diversity that overshadows basic readiness skills.
The report prepared by Marine Lt. Gen. Robert Schmidle and Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, both retired, came in response to recent Naval disasters, including the burning of the USS Bonhomme Richard in San Diego, two collisions involving Navy ships in the Pacific and the surrender of two small craft to Iran. The authors conducted hour-long interviews with 77 current and retired Navy officers, offering them anonymity to identify issues they wouldn't feel comfortable raising in the chain of command.

The report found that a staggering 94 percent of the subjects believed the recent Naval disasters were 'part of a broader problem in Navy culture or leadership.'

'I guarantee you every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I'm sorry that I can't say the same of their ship handling training,' said one recently retired senior enlisted leader.

The report focused on issued within the Navy's surface warfare forces, as opposed to submarine and aviation, and suggested that issues in the surface fleet could be unique due to better funding and training for submarine and aviation units.

One of the key issues raised by the officers interviewed for the report was a concern that Navy leaders spend more time focusing on diversity training than on developing warfighting capacity and key operational skills.
'Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we'll survive a fight with the Chinese navy,' lamented one lieutenant currently on active duty.

'It's criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we'll all bleed the same color,' she added.

One recent destroyer captain said: 'where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are. And we've got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month, or sexual assault prevention, or you name it. We don't even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.'

'While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking prevention, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost,' the report's authors wrote.

'The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents,' the report added.

they actually got to the real reason later in the article....

 

[Oddball]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

The real fun will happen with the recancass....How many thousands of votes are going to be linked to empty lots, vacant buildings, commercial and gubmint addresses, and private mail drop boxes claimed to be "suites"?

 

[Flash]

So you are against an illegal serving in the military, and against trans gender from serving because they get benefits after serving? Perhaps trans can serve faithfully? Our military is stronger than all others in the world combined. Today's young generations have such a devotion to work and nation.

Our military is fast deteriorating because they are not training for war. They are training for filthy wokeness shit.

They are also purging the military of Patriots that have always been the backbone and replacing them with stupid yes men, queers, unqualified minorities and women.

Our military may have the best hardware but it is becoming ineffective and is the joke of the world. For instance, the Navy is spending more time training on CRT than they are on qualifying watch officers nowadays. Stupid minorities and women are being promoting for affirmative action reasons rather than qualifications.

The Democrats screw up everything they touch. Now they are working hard to screw up the once great US military.

Anybody that voted for this Joe Dufus piece of shit and then ignored the fact he stole the election is a an idiot.

what a load of number two!!!!

No it is not!


'Every officer is up to speed on diversity training. Not so much ship handling': Scathing official report finds US Navy is not fit for war because of risk averse, politically correct, control-freak top brass

Navy 'is in disarray and focusing more on diversity than warfighting'

A scathing new report commissioned by members of Congress has claimed that the Navy's surface warfare forces have systemic training and leadership issues, including a focus on diversity that overshadows basic readiness skills.
The report prepared by Marine Lt. Gen. Robert Schmidle and Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, both retired, came in response to recent Naval disasters, including the burning of the USS Bonhomme Richard in San Diego, two collisions involving Navy ships in the Pacific and the surrender of two small craft to Iran. The authors conducted hour-long interviews with 77 current and retired Navy officers, offering them anonymity to identify issues they wouldn't feel comfortable raising in the chain of command.

The report found that a staggering 94 percent of the subjects believed the recent Naval disasters were 'part of a broader problem in Navy culture or leadership.'

'I guarantee you every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I'm sorry that I can't say the same of their ship handling training,' said one recently retired senior enlisted leader.

The report focused on issued within the Navy's surface warfare forces, as opposed to submarine and aviation, and suggested that issues in the surface fleet could be unique due to better funding and training for submarine and aviation units.

One of the key issues raised by the officers interviewed for the report was a concern that Navy leaders spend more time focusing on diversity training than on developing warfighting capacity and key operational skills.
'Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we'll survive a fight with the Chinese navy,' lamented one lieutenant currently on active duty.

'It's criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we'll all bleed the same color,' she added.

One recent destroyer captain said: 'where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are. And we've got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month, or sexual assault prevention, or you name it. We don't even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.'

'While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking prevention, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost,' the report's authors wrote.

'The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents,' the report added.

they actually got to the real reason later in the article....

Yea, stupid woke bullshit that doesn't have a damn thing to do with preparing and training for war, which is what the military should be doing.

The purpose of the military is to kill the enemy not be a stupid social justice organization.

 

[Faun]

Another vote was stolen conspiracy thread.

Wow. Shocking. We haven’t had one of these in at least an hour.

Why so worried?

Why are you so desperate?

 

[PoliticalChic]

​

Wow.....Liberal paper reports:​

"Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount​

Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results.


The discovery of identical ballots provides evidence to back up allegations of problems in the presidential election, but on a relatively small scale that had no bearing on the final certified count. A group of voters seeking to prove the election was fraudulent say double-counting is just the beginning of what they hope to find."

Search for election fraud in Georgia finds 200 ballots scanned twice

Nearly 200 absentee ballots were scanned twice during Fulton County's initial count of the 2020 presidential election, according to digital ballot images. A recount in early December resulted in Republican Donald Trump regaining 121 absentee votes in Fulton, but Democrat Joe Biden won Georgia by...

www.ajc.com

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven that would change or alter the election!

It's pretty much their admission that they stole the election from the man who actually won it, and gave it to the bought and paid for servant of Communist China.


But they might have this much in their argument: not widespread......but targeted voter fraud- in the swing states.

 

[Faun]

​

Wow.....Liberal paper reports:​

"Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount​

Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results.


The discovery of identical ballots provides evidence to back up allegations of problems in the presidential election, but on a relatively small scale that had no bearing on the final certified count. A group of voters seeking to prove the election was fraudulent say double-counting is just the beginning of what they hope to find."

Search for election fraud in Georgia finds 200 ballots scanned twice

Nearly 200 absentee ballots were scanned twice during Fulton County's initial count of the 2020 presidential election, according to digital ballot images. A recount in early December resulted in Republican Donald Trump regaining 121 absentee votes in Fulton, but Democrat Joe Biden won Georgia by...

www.ajc.com

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven that would change or alter the election!

It's pretty much their admission that they stole the election from the man who actually won it, and gave it to the bought and paid for servant of Communist China.


But they might have this much in their argument: not widespread......but targeted voter fraud- in the swing states.

A couple of hundred ballots is not widespread fraud.

Try harder.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"BREAKING: VoterGA Releases Explosive New Report: Fulton County Georgia Recount Included 60% Error Reporting Rate — THOUSANDS of Fraudulent Biden Votes​

VoterGA also found THOUSANDS of fraudulent Biden ballots.

BREAKING: VoterGA Releases Explosive New Report: Fulton County Georgia Recount Included 60% Error Reporting Rate -- THOUSANDS of Fraudulent Biden Votes

On Monday night Garland Favorito, the founder of the election integrity group VoterGA, announced he will hold a press conference on Tuesday morning. VoterGA will review highlights of its amended ballot inspection complaint and provide proof that election fraud occurred in the November 2020...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[woodwork201]

Well. I voted Republican in 2016. I didn’t vote for either steaming pile of shit disguised as a candidate in 2020. I’d like to see the Republicans competitive in 2022 and 2024. Unfortunately that isn’t going to happen with embracing of full on crazy. It becomes a self fulfilling fantasy.

You voted for Biden. There were two choices in the 2020 election: Biden and Trump.

If you didn't vote for Trump you voted for Biden.

If you checked Jorgensen, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden.

If you checked Hawkins, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden

If you stayed home, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden.

You need to lose the Anti-Biden picture in your signature; you're a Biden voter.

 

[Faun]

Well. I voted Republican in 2016. I didn’t vote for either steaming pile of shit disguised as a candidate in 2020. I’d like to see the Republicans competitive in 2022 and 2024. Unfortunately that isn’t going to happen with embracing of full on crazy. It becomes a self fulfilling fantasy.

You voted for Biden. There were two choices in the 2020 election: Biden and Trump.

If you didn't vote for Trump you voted for Biden.

If you checked Jorgensen, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden.

If you checked Hawkins, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden

If you stayed home, you didn't vote for Trump so you voted for Biden.

You need to lose the Anti-Biden picture in your signature; you're a Biden voter.

You realize the opposite is also true, right?

There were two choices in the 2020 election: Biden and Trump.

If you didn't vote for Biden you voted for Trump.

If you checked Jorgensen, you didn't vote for Biden so you voted for Trump.

If you checked Hawkins, you didn't vote for Biden so you voted for Trump

If you stayed home, you didn't vote for Biden so you voted for Trump.​

... so what's your point?

 

[initforme]

Faun wins that one...

 

[initforme]

I didn't vote so I didn't vote for either. I didn't have a good choice to vote for

 

[Faun]

I didn't vote so I didn't vote for either. I didn't have a good choice to vote for

The 2020 presidential election offered America the worst possible candidates to vote for since at least 1976.

 

[initforme]

Nobody can argue that one faun.

 

[Flash]

So you are against social security and medicare? Imagine america without them. Total chaos. Most people who have worked their whole life wouldn't be able to suevive

I am against Social Security and Medicare. I can pay for my own retirement and my own medical care. If you can't then you are one sorry asshole. You pay your bills and I'll pay mine and we don't need the filthy ass government to be involved.