The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[bripat9643]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

 

[Billy000]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

 

[bripat9643]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

Name one that you don't consider to be "right wing."

 

[Billy000]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

Name one that you don't consider to be "right wing."

The Associated Press is pretty objective I would say.

 

[bripat9643]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

Name one that you don't consider to be "right wing."

The Associated Press is pretty objective I would say.

ROFL! You mean the company that doctored photos of Palestinians who supposedly died from Israeli bombs? The ones who had an office in the same building as Hamas?

progs are so gullible.

 

[Billy000]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

Name one that you don't consider to be "right wing."

The Associated Press is pretty objective I would say.

ROFL! You mean the company that doctored photos of Palestinians who supposedly died from Israeli bombs? The ones who had an office in the same building as Hamas?

progs are so gullible.

Well that sounds like some serious bullshit you just pulled out of your ass.

 

[bripat9643]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, turd.

As I said before, many sources of news have a history of criticizing both democrats and republicans. You know there are. You’re just pretending otherwise.

Name one that you don't consider to be "right wing."

The Associated Press is pretty objective I would say.

ROFL! You mean the company that doctored photos of Palestinians who supposedly died from Israeli bombs? The ones who had an office in the same building as Hamas?

progs are so gullible.

Well that sounds like some serious bullshit you just pulled out of your ass.

No, I've submitted dozens of posts on both subjects.

 

[Faun]

I am pleasantly surprised that the truth does seem to be emerging. New Evidence Indicates Enough Illegal Votes In Georgia To Tip 2020

Uh, no, there is no such evidence to prove that salacious headline.

You don’t know what salacious means, do you?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

"Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit​

View attachment 511126
Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario.

The state senate is on course to do an Arizona-style forensic audit of the election. State Senator Doug Mastriano announced this week that it was almost certainly going to happen. Today, the Secretary of State issued orders for county election boards to not cooperate.

Clearly, someone’s terrified."

Terrified Joe Biden Heading to Pennsylvania to Try to Stop Election Audit - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Is Pennsylvania the key to exposing the stolen 2020 presidential election? Judging by the unhinged responses and massive gaslighting coming from Democrats and mainstream media, this seems like an extremely likely scenario. The state...

thelibertydaily.com

Are you incapable of posting sources that aren’t rightwing garbage blogs?

So any source that doesn't support your biases is "garbage?" You have pretty much admitted that you are immune to facts.

I don’t expect you to read or watch MSNBC or The Huffington Post. It’s a simple matter to not indulge in rightwing garbage blogs with no credibility. There are plenty of objective sources you could try instead like Vox, WaPo, or Business Insider.

MSNBC, Huff Post, etc., are just amplifications of the left wing Pravda we already get through W Post, NYT, AP, Google, etc.
If you fail to vet those sources you are a Pravda dupe.

Lol the AP. That’s a left wing source to you huh? That is so ridiculous.

Okay tell me this. What’s an example of an unbiased news source?

There are none, thanks to new Pravda and democrats.

 

[Dadoalex]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

And the beat goes on
The beat goes on
Trumpist whines bout losing once again
La de da de de go and whine some more

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

And the beat goes on
The beat goes on
Trumpist whines bout losing once again
La de da de de go and whine some more

No, you dunce.


America lost to the stolen election.

Adults vote for policies, not persons.

This is what you voted for:

• 1. Reversed Trump move of disengaging with the World Health Org, based on their covering up China’s culpability in spreading the Wuhan Red Death, the numerous mistaken orders about the virus, the fact that their leadership is by a Communist who is paid by Red China

2. Rejoin Paris climate agreement- even as the United State is far more efficient in reducing Greenhouse gases than the nations who are major pollutants, and the accord is nothing more than a re-distribution of our wealth plan. "ClimateDepot Fndr: Paris Accord Is About Wealth Redistribution, Not Climate" ClimateDepot Fndr: Paris Accord Is About Wealth Redistribution, Not Climate The Paris Climate accord's premise is wealth distribution and it would not even have much of an impact on Earth's climate, ClimateDepot.com founder Marc Morano said.During an interview with Newsmax TV's Steve Malzberg, Morano discussed the climate change agreement that... www.newsmax.com

• 3. Revoke permit for Keystone XL pipeline, pause energy leasing in ANWR, obviating Trump’s success in making America energy independent, effectively rewarding our enemies, Russian and Iran.

And....

4.Biden EO: Launch an initiative to advance racial equity, end "1776 Commission" The 1776 Commission was an advisory committee established in September 2020 by then–U.S. President Donald Trump to support what he called "patriotic education". Wikipedia

• 5.Preserve/fortify DACA, which helps "Dreamers" Part of the plan to get millions of illegal alien votes for the Democrat Party
• 
  
• “Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats And Illegal Immigration
  
  … a leaked document from the Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund shows what most of us have always known, but what Democrats like to pretend isn’t their reality.
  
  Namely, the memo, in great detail, maps out how Democrats are relying on illegal immigration to prop up their political future.
  
  “The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo,…” Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats and Illegal Immigration
• 
  
• 
  
• 6. Reverse travel ban targeting primarily Muslim countries
• What a swell idea!!!
• It must be aimed at keeping Americans safe!
• 
  
• When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. During the Obama regime there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

Wanna see where Muslim Americans stand?

• For reference, during the 2020 stolen election, “…less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.” A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator U

And these:

7.Biden EO: Stop construction of border wall that was designed to support American sovereignty.





The Declaration of Independence refers to sovereignty in its first sentence: “…necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station…” thus assuming that nations, like individuals, have rights. Having an inviolate border, and determining who may cross it, is the reason for said wall.







8.Combat discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity………make sure fake girls completely destroy women’s sports.



"Whether to allow biological men into women's sports may be the silliest debate of our time. Fairness falls so completely to one side; outcomes are obvious and predetermined.
Allyson Felix, a contender for the title of fastest female sprinter in the world, who holds more Olympic medals than even Usain Bolt. Her lifetime best for the 400-meter is 49.26 seconds. Based on 2018 data, nearly 300 high school boys in the U.S. alone could beat it. "

The transgender threat to women's sports | Opinion





The only other option comes with too steep a price. To force young women to compete with male-bodied athletes will bring about the collapse of women's sports.

Newsweek.comnewsweek.com





9.Revoke certain executive orders concerning federal regulation



This is the target, Trump’s removing of regulatory ‘red tape.’ "Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal

Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....
....hence poor men come to Washington to do good, and leave as millionaires, having made good.
Trump is a threat to the sort of bribery that make Biden rich.



It is the major reason Trump’s economy was so successful but restricted the opportunity for politicians to demand bribes for writing ‘helpful’ regulations. So Biden, the textbook example for bribery, must eliminate the Trump policy.





And these:





10. Another Biden Executive Order: Repeal ban on transgender people serving openly in U.S. military



This makes America responsible for life-long treatment of these individuals….and all they have to do is sign up for the armed forces.
Do you know you don’t have to be an American citizen to sign up?







11. Reopen Obamacare marketplaces, lower recent barriers to joining Medicaid



Wanna defend this failure?



"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool



"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges



"Health-care exchange sign-ups fall far short of forecasts"
Enrollment in the insurance exchanges for President Obama’s signature health-care law is at less than half the initial forecast, pushing several major insurance companies to stop offering health plans in certain markets because of significant financial losses."
Health-care exchange sign-ups fall far short of forecasts





12. Lift certain restrictions on abortion funding



“Biden will be fulfilling a campaign promise in the memorandum, rescinding the so-called Mexico City Policy, a ban on US government funding for foreign nonprofits that perform or promote abortions.” Biden to sign memorandum reversing Trump abortion access restrictions | NewsChannel 3-12



“…Biden’s payback to abortion providers for campaign donations. “It is also a slap in the face to the majority of Americans who do not want their tax dollars sent to abortion businesses, and especially not to abortion promoters overseas,” she added.” Biden to Lift Some Curbs on Abortion Funding, Reopen ACA Enrollment

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

At 9am election night with Trump comfortably ahead, I poured another Bloody Mary. 6 states or so left.

By 11pm I felt like I was transported to an episode of the Twilight Zone. Everything seemed wrong. Things weren't adding up. By midnight a foul stench like a libturds pussy began .

I knew this was a set up. Total set up.

The same feeling I had when the FBI inspired riots were happening

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

And the beat goes on
The beat goes on
Trumpist whines bout losing once again
La de da de de go and whine some more

No, you dunce.


America lost to the stolen election.

Adults vote for policies, not persons.

This is what you voted for:

• 1. Reversed Trump move of disengaging with the World Health Org, based on their covering up China’s culpability in spreading the Wuhan Red Death, the numerous mistaken orders about the virus, the fact that their leadership is by a Communist who is paid by Red China

2. Rejoin Paris climate agreement- even as the United State is far more efficient in reducing Greenhouse gases than the nations who are major pollutants, and the accord is nothing more than a re-distribution of our wealth plan. "ClimateDepot Fndr: Paris Accord Is About Wealth Redistribution, Not Climate" ClimateDepot Fndr: Paris Accord Is About Wealth Redistribution, Not Climate The Paris Climate accord's premise is wealth distribution and it would not even have much of an impact on Earth's climate, ClimateDepot.com founder Marc Morano said.During an interview with Newsmax TV's Steve Malzberg, Morano discussed the climate change agreement that... www.newsmax.com

• 3. Revoke permit for Keystone XL pipeline, pause energy leasing in ANWR, obviating Trump’s success in making America energy independent, effectively rewarding our enemies, Russian and Iran.

And....

4.Biden EO: Launch an initiative to advance racial equity, end "1776 Commission" The 1776 Commission was an advisory committee established in September 2020 by then–U.S. President Donald Trump to support what he called "patriotic education". Wikipedia

• 5.Preserve/fortify DACA, which helps "Dreamers" Part of the plan to get millions of illegal alien votes for the Democrat Party
• 
  
• “Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats And Illegal Immigration
  
  … a leaked document from the Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund shows what most of us have always known, but what Democrats like to pretend isn’t their reality.
  
  Namely, the memo, in great detail, maps out how Democrats are relying on illegal immigration to prop up their political future.
  
  “The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo,…” Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats and Illegal Immigration
• 
  
• 
  
• 6. Reverse travel ban targeting primarily Muslim countries
• What a swell idea!!!
• It must be aimed at keeping Americans safe!
• 
  
• When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. During the Obama regime there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

Wanna see where Muslim Americans stand?

• For reference, during the 2020 stolen election, “…less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.” A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator U

And these:

7.Biden EO: Stop construction of border wall that was designed to support American sovereignty.





The Declaration of Independence refers to sovereignty in its first sentence: “…necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station…” thus assuming that nations, like individuals, have rights. Having an inviolate border, and determining who may cross it, is the reason for said wall.







8.Combat discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity………make sure fake girls completely destroy women’s sports.



"Whether to allow biological men into women's sports may be the silliest debate of our time. Fairness falls so completely to one side; outcomes are obvious and predetermined.
Allyson Felix, a contender for the title of fastest female sprinter in the world, who holds more Olympic medals than even Usain Bolt. Her lifetime best for the 400-meter is 49.26 seconds. Based on 2018 data, nearly 300 high school boys in the U.S. alone could beat it. "

The transgender threat to women's sports | Opinion





The only other option comes with too steep a price. To force young women to compete with male-bodied athletes will bring about the collapse of women's sports.

Newsweek.comnewsweek.com





9.Revoke certain executive orders concerning federal regulation



This is the target, Trump’s removing of regulatory ‘red tape.’ "Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal

Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....
....hence poor men come to Washington to do good, and leave as millionaires, having made good.
Trump is a threat to the sort of bribery that make Biden rich.



It is the major reason Trump’s economy was so successful but restricted the opportunity for politicians to demand bribes for writing ‘helpful’ regulations. So Biden, the textbook example for bribery, must eliminate the Trump policy.





And these:





10. Another Biden Executive Order: Repeal ban on transgender people serving openly in U.S. military



This makes America responsible for life-long treatment of these individuals….and all they have to do is sign up for the armed forces.
Do you know you don’t have to be an American citizen to sign up?







11. Reopen Obamacare marketplaces, lower recent barriers to joining Medicaid



Wanna defend this failure?



"The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo"
The Federal Government's $146 Billion Obamacare Boo-Boo -- The Motley Fool



"...the exchanges are on the brink of collapse. Major insurers are quitting, premiums are skyrocketing, enrollment is below expectations, and the administration is taking increasingly desperate measures to paper over the problems. By this time next year, the exchanges could be out of business."
Read more at: More Duct Tape Won’t Save Obamacare’s Collapsing Exchanges



"Health-care exchange sign-ups fall far short of forecasts"
Enrollment in the insurance exchanges for President Obama’s signature health-care law is at less than half the initial forecast, pushing several major insurance companies to stop offering health plans in certain markets because of significant financial losses."
Health-care exchange sign-ups fall far short of forecasts





12. Lift certain restrictions on abortion funding



“Biden will be fulfilling a campaign promise in the memorandum, rescinding the so-called Mexico City Policy, a ban on US government funding for foreign nonprofits that perform or promote abortions.” Biden to sign memorandum reversing Trump abortion access restrictions | NewsChannel 3-12



“…Biden’s payback to abortion providers for campaign donations. “It is also a slap in the face to the majority of Americans who do not want their tax dollars sent to abortion businesses, and especially not to abortion promoters overseas,” she added.” Biden to Lift Some Curbs on Abortion Funding, Reopen ACA Enrollment

LOL.Great thread. I see the circle jerking crew is all over this....lolol

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

At 9am election night with Trump comfortably ahead, I poured another Bloody Mary. 6 states or so left.

By 11pm I felt like I was transported to an episode of the Twilight Zone. Everything seemed wrong. Things weren't adding up. By midnight a foul stench like a libturds pussy began .

I knew this was a set up. Total set up.

The same feeling I had when the FBI inspired riots were happening

We appear to have reached our 'sell-by' date. More than once I have written that we are basking in the afterglow of a once great nation.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

At 9am election night with Trump comfortably ahead, I poured another Bloody Mary. 6 states or so left.

By 11pm I felt like I was transported to an episode of the Twilight Zone. Everything seemed wrong. Things weren't adding up. By midnight a foul stench like a libturds pussy began .

I knew this was a set up. Total set up.

The same feeling I had when the FBI inspired riots were happening

We appear to have reached our 'sell-by' date. More than once I have written that we are basking in the afterglow of a once great nation.

I believe Providence elected Biden to expose what these absolute monsters are. How many Biden voters must be horrified with an alien invasion, and not from space either

Once all this AOC inspired nonsense is removed, we'll be greater than ever.

Think of it like a festering boil about to pop. So swollen and painful. Then it bursts and all the puss has to drain before healing. We're now in the about to burst phase now.

Liberals and boils are genetically linked

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

At 9am election night with Trump comfortably ahead, I poured another Bloody Mary. 6 states or so left.

By 11pm I felt like I was transported to an episode of the Twilight Zone. Everything seemed wrong. Things weren't adding up. By midnight a foul stench like a libturds pussy began .

I knew this was a set up. Total set up.

The same feeling I had when the FBI inspired riots were happening

We appear to have reached our 'sell-by' date. More than once I have written that we are basking in the afterglow of a once great nation.

I believe Providence elected Biden to expose what these absolute monsters are. How many Biden voters must be horrified with an alien invasion, and not from space either

Once all this AOC inspired nonsense is removed, we'll be greater than ever.

Think of it like a festering boil about to pop. So swollen and painful. Then it bursts and all the puss has to drain before healing. We're now in the about to burst phase now.

Liberals and boils are genetically linked

"I believe Providence elected Biden to expose what these absolute monsters are. "

I believe I can hear the Pontius Pilate tap water running.

The Left has worked assiduously to destroy Western Civilization.

 

[Dadoalex]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

And the beat goes on
The beat goes on
Trumpist whines bout losing once again
La de da de de go and whine some more

No, you dunce...

Here. Let me help you make sense of that.

Try to get those fantasies out of your mind.
Trump lost.
Trump lost BIGLY
Trump's loss was YUUUUUGE!

There, I hope that clarified things for you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

And the beat goes on
The beat goes on
Trumpist whines bout losing once again
La de da de de go and whine some more

No, you dunce...

Here. Let me help you make sense of that.

Try to get those fantasies out of your mind.
Trump lost.
Trump lost BIGLY
Trump's loss was YUUUUUGE!

There, I hope that clarified things for you.

What policies of Trump's did you vote against?

What policies of Biden's did you vote for?



Your inability to answer simple questions like that proves it was a stolen election.


Sooo….the fifth grade was your Senior Year???

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"ARIZONA AUDIT: Discrepancies Found – Ballot Totals Do Not Match –"​

ARIZONA AUDIT: Discrepancies Found - Ballot Totals Do Not Match - More Results Expected WITHIN 48 HOURS | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

New findings are expected from the Arizona audit in the next 48 hours per One America News Network.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

More non-existent evidence?????