The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[Gdjjr]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

What a carload of crap.

Much ado about nothing.

The courts (most of them Republican appointees) have heard all this rubbish time-and-again and you have been laughed out of court over it.

The election is over.

Your Orange Baboon-God has lost.

Go home.

Drink wine.

Cry.

Pass out.

Sleep.

Then wake up, and begin figuring-out how to do better next time.

Hint for 2024: "Right message, wrong messenger" .

We understand that you believe election fraud is "nothing." That's why you are a Dim.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Soup Nazi is just a plain old Nazi.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Soup Nazi is just a plain old Nazi.

Now you are doublling down on llies.

Just as you cannot cite one instance of me saying anything remotely nazi like you cannot cite any evidence of your claim that the election was stolen

Those are FACTS now go suck on them

 

[Gdjjr]

I read more than you do and your claim is false

No, it's actually been posted more than once in more than one thread-

but, just for your tender eyes

“Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77.”– PA Judge Patricia McCullough

On election eve Monday, Nov 3 a California judge ruled that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) overstepped his authority when he issued an executive order amending state election law and thus required mail-in ballots to be sent to every registered voter amid the COVID-19 pan-panic.

In her ruling, Sutter County Superior Court Judge, Sarah Heckman, said that Newsom’s order was “an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power.”

In March, Newsom, like many officials in other states, declared a state of emergency in CA due to the alleged spreading of COVID-19. Three months later, in June, Newsom issued a blanket executive order to send mail-in ballots to all registered California voters. Overall, Newsom issued more than fifty orders that changed a number of state laws under the auspices of the California Emergency Services Act (CESA). That law gives the governor the authority to issue orders and rules while suspending certain laws during a declared state of emergency.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

if there is silence it is because people have spent weeks asking for evidence of massive fraud and no evidence has been produced

Of course it has, liar.
Lots of it.......that's why your sort is so worried.


"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

None has and do not call people a liar when the term applies to you

No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud. You cited supposed IRREGULARITIES. WHich is evidence of NOTHING

You're a liar.


Inserting the phrase 'large scale' proves it.

If you hurry, you might be able to change your avi to "BigFatLiar" before anyone else snatches it up.

You are ther liar not me and you are a moral coward.

The fact si you have not produced evidence of large scale fraud. Small time fraud at the local level happens in every election. In this case it HAS to be large scale to swing the elction

Neither you nor anyone else has ever produced A FUCKING SHRED of evidence of any significant fraud

That is fact you cannot refute.
Suck it up and deal with it junior

A lesson for you, you liar.

The term 'large scale fraud' is your admission that fraud resulted in Biden's lead.

It is a meaningless term as we have agreed that there was fraud, one that can be expanded in any direction as you sense you are losing.

Let's cut to the chase, and prove you just as irrational and ignorant as I suggest:



The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I read more than you do and your claim is false

No, it's actually been posted more than once in more than one thread-

but, just for your tender eyes

“Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77.”– PA Judge Patricia McCullough

On election eve Monday, Nov 3 a California judge ruled that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) overstepped his authority when he issued an executive order amending state election law and thus required mail-in ballots to be sent to every registered voter amid the COVID-19 pan-panic.

In her ruling, Sutter County Superior Court Judge, Sarah Heckman, said that Newsom’s order was “an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power.”

In March, Newsom, like many officials in other states, declared a state of emergency in CA due to the alleged spreading of COVID-19. Three months later, in June, Newsom issued a blanket executive order to send mail-in ballots to all registered California voters. Overall, Newsom issued more than fifty orders that changed a number of state laws under the auspices of the California Emergency Services Act (CESA). That law gives the governor the authority to issue orders and rules while suspending certain laws during a declared state of emergency.

APPEARS to have a viable claim.

Which means it is not proven.

A governor has no legislative power. A governor is head of the EXECUTIVE branch

MAssive failure for you and your claim is proven false

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.

Nah......the scam has been exposed and you have egg on your face, sucker.


But don't wipe it off......it's an improvement.

PC, RedState? Really?
The US judicial systems (including Trump appointees) are waiting for evidence. Thus all of the lawsuits getting tossed.
Did the facts get in your way, again? Try again cultist.

When you can't deny the facts, low-lives like you carp about the source.

That after every one of your media sources hid the Hunter Biden Laptop scandal.

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm

Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One…

nypost.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

I need to prove you a liar yet again????


No prob.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature


https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH





https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit



https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.

Nah......the scam has been exposed and you have egg on your face, sucker.


But don't wipe it off......it's an improvement.

1-37 in lawsuits right now. Judges (some of them Trump appointees) tossing every lawsuit for lack of evidence.
I'm sorry, I haven't needed to wipe any egg off my face. Tired of losing yet?...or would you like a wet towel?..you know, to wipe the egg off your face.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.

Watch this:




An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature


https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH





https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit



https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.

No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

How about you just from 'Soup' from your avi.....?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.

No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.

Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any

Difficult to prove you lying?

Hardly.


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

 

[Gdjjr]

APPEARS to have a viable claim.

Which means it is not proven.

A governor has no legislative power. A governor is head of the EXECUTIVE branch

You're pretty ignorant I'll give you that- a viable claim will take it to court, where it will or will not be ruled on favorably, if that fails it will go the next court in the food chain, winding up at the SC

 

[Soupnazi630]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.

No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

How about you just from 'Soup' from your avi.....?

How about you cite some of this evidence which you claim exists but NO ONE has ever revealed?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

Redstate.com??? A rabid, right wing conspiracy site???

• Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and a few failed fact checks.

RedState - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

When you can't deny the facts, low-lives like you carp about the source.

That after every one of your media sources hid the Hunter Biden Laptop scandal.

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One…

nypost.com

 

[Care4all]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

Nope....where Biden did good, was with increasing democratic votes, in most all republican known counties.... He may have lost the county overall, but he picked up more votes in the county, than Hillary in 2016.... is what was shown on tv during election counts....

And duh, of course Trump was ahead on election night, it's how he told his voters to vote...

While the democrats encouraged absentee ballot voting, which in most of the battle ground states, did not begin counting, until all of the election day voting, was counted.

Of COURSE the counting of absentee ballots would show heavily, towards Biden....once they began counting them.

Most if your other crud, has been debunked, disproved.

 

[Soupnazi630]

APPEARS to have a viable claim.

Which means it is not proven.

A governor has no legislative power. A governor is head of the EXECUTIVE branch

You're pretty ignorant I'll give you that- a viable claim will take it to court, where it will or will not be ruled on favorably, if that fails it will go the next court in the food chain, winding up at the SC

WHat part of APPEARS do you not get?

It does not make it viable it only appears to be which means a closer look is warranted.

You cannot cite any evidence of massive fraud

You are as absolutely stupid on this issue as you are on your dumb fucking conspiracy theories where I proved you wrong

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.

No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.

Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any

Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?

"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.

 

[bripat9643]

I read more than you do and your claim is false

No, it's actually been posted more than once in more than one thread-

but, just for your tender eyes

“Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77.”– PA Judge Patricia McCullough

On election eve Monday, Nov 3 a California judge ruled that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) overstepped his authority when he issued an executive order amending state election law and thus required mail-in ballots to be sent to every registered voter amid the COVID-19 pan-panic.

In her ruling, Sutter County Superior Court Judge, Sarah Heckman, said that Newsom’s order was “an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power.”

In March, Newsom, like many officials in other states, declared a state of emergency in CA due to the alleged spreading of COVID-19. Three months later, in June, Newsom issued a blanket executive order to send mail-in ballots to all registered California voters. Overall, Newsom issued more than fifty orders that changed a number of state laws under the auspices of the California Emergency Services Act (CESA). That law gives the governor the authority to issue orders and rules while suspending certain laws during a declared state of emergency.

APPEARS to have a viable claim.

Which means it is not proven.

A governor has no legislative power. A governor is head of the EXECUTIVE branch

MAssive failure for you and your claim is proven false

All these mail-in voter schemes are unconstitutional since they weren't approved by the legislature.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed.

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.

Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth

Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.

No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.

Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any

Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?

"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.

You are the liar here as are all the other itios claiming there is evidence.

You have yet to cite any evidence and you cannot cite any

 

[PoliticalChic]

No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud

Don't read a lot, do you? Ca and Pa have had judges tell them they violated their state constitutions- that, dear one, is "large scale fraud"- especially when they knowingly perpetrated their fraud-

I read more than you do and your claim is false

Wow.....yet another 'is not, isssssss nooottttttt!!!" response from a lying Leftist.